Greetings. Welcome to the MaxLinear Fourth Quarter 2024 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Leslie Green, Investor Relations. Thank you, Leslie. You may begin.

Thank you, Elisha. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us on today's conference call to discuss MaxLinear's fourth quarter 2024 financial results. Today's call is being hosted by Dr. Kishore Seendripu, CEO, and Steve Litchfield, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Corporate Strategy Officer. After our prepared comments, we will take your questions. Our comments today include forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities laws, including statements relating to our guidance for the first quarter of 2025, including revenue, GAAP and non-GAAP gross margin, GAAP to non-GAAP operating expenses, GAAP and non-GAAP interest and other expense, and GAAP and non-GAAP diluted share count. In addition, we will make forward-looking statements relating to trends, opportunities, execution of our business plan and potential growth and uncertainties in various product and geographic markets, including, without limitation, statements concerning future financial and operating results, opportunities for revenue and market share across our target markets, new products including the timing of production and launches of such products, demand for and adoption of certain technologies and our total addressable market. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including risks outlined in our Risk Factor section of our recent SEC filings, including our Form 10-Q for the year ended December 31, 2024 which we filed today. Any forward-looking statements are made as of today and MaxLinear has no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. The fourth quarter 2024 earnings release is available in the Investor Relations section of our website at maxlinear.com. In addition, we will report certain historical financial metrics, including but not limited to gross margin, operating margin, operating expenses, and interest and other expense on both GAAP and non-GAAP basis. We encourage investors to review the detailed reconciliation of our GAAP and non-GAAP presentations and the press release available on our website. We do not provide reconciliation of non-GAAP guidance for future periods because of the inherent uncertainty associated with our ability to project certain future changes, including stock-based compensation and its related tax effects, as well as potential impairments. Non-GAAP financial measures discussed today are not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for comparable GAAP financial measures. We are providing this information because management believes it is useful to investors as it reflects how management measures our business. Lastly, this call is also being webcast and the replay will be available on our website for two weeks. And now let me turn the call over to Dr. Kishore Seendripu, CEO of MaxLinear. Kishore?

Thank you, Leslie. Good afternoon, everyone. Our Q4 results exceeded the midpoint of our guidance at $92.2 million in revenue, a non-GAAP gross margin of 59.1% along with a significant reduction in operating expenses. We continue to see meaningful improvement in our customer order rates and backlog. The solid signs of recovery combined with new product traction in strategic growth areas such as high-speed interconnect, PON, Wi-Fi and Ethernet provide us confidence that we can achieve continued growth and improvement in our financial results throughout this year. Looking at our key markets. In infrastructure, the expansion of cloud computing is driving significant growth and design activity on high-speed optical data center connectivity. We made strong progress in 2024 with design win traction and product qualifications for a 5 nanometer Keystone PAM4 product. We exceeded our revenue targets in 2024 and are positioned for exciting growth in 2025. As of this month, we have shipped approximately 1 million units total of Keystone product across multiple customers into high-volume opportunities. Our initial design wins in transceivers, active optical cables and active electrical cables are ramping as expected. We anticipate additional qualification and rollout for 800 gigabit and 1.6 terabyte data center applications throughout 2025 and into 2026. The superior power and performance advantages of Keystone continue to be the mainstay and focus for our differentiation even in our next-generation Rushmore family of 200 gigabit per lane PAM4 TIAs and DSPs for 1.6 terabit interconnections. In wireless infrastructure, our wireless 5G access O-RAN single-chip radio unit and our backhaul transceivers and modems are essential for supporting increasing mobile usage and data rates as well as new functionalities such as Edge AI. We believe we are positioned strongly for content growth and share gains this year as service provider CapEx spending improves and as our continued design wins at Tier 1 customers beginning to ramp, particularly in the second half of 2025. Also within our infrastructure revenues, our Panther III Series hardware storage accelerators are providing exciting incremental growth opportunities. At the 2024 Supercomputing Conference in November, we announced a new software-defined storage solution in partnership with Quanta to address the needs of AI, high-speed computing and other data-intensive applications. This joint solution enables rapid access to massive datasets while enhancing both performance and scalability. As we look ahead, our path to product is strongly positioned within the data center, enterprise storage applications and at the edge of the network with multiple design wins with major customers and value-added resellers across key geographies. In Ethernet connectivity, MaxLinear has one of the broadest and most competitive portfolios of 200 gigabit Ethernet switch and PHY products for the enterprise and small and medium business switch markets. Swan Creek, our single-chip integrated 8-port PHY and switch is gaining traction across multiple enterprise customers looking to upgrade their networks to 200 gigabit Ethernet rates. Our Tier 1 North American enterprise OEM customer is expected to ramp to production in 2025 and contribute to significant Ethernet revenue growth over the coming years. In addition, we are seeing widespread interest from next-generation broadband gateways and routers. Shifting to broadband and Wi-Fi connectivity, our considerable focus here on PON to expand a broadband target addressable market in addition to a strong cable data offering of DOCSIS 3.1, ultra DOCSIS and DOCSIS 4.0 solutions is bearing fruit. We have exciting design win traction for our single-chip integrated fiber PON and 10 gigabit processor gateway SoC, plus triband Wi-Fi 7 single-chip platform solution. We have a promising engagement at another Tier 1 North American carrier which we believe can become a major opportunity for us in 2025 and 2026. In conclusion, our strong product roadmap execution has begun to deliver meaningful traction and target addressable market expansion across several high-value categories, including high-speed interconnect for data center, enterprise Ethernet and storage accelerators, wireless infrastructure, multi-gigabit PON broadband access and Wi-Fi connectivity solutions. As we begin 2025, we're not only energized with the solid growth prospects in 2025, but we also feel confident of achieving sustained revenue growth in the coming years. With that, let me now turn the call over to Steve Litchfield, our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Corporate Strategy Officer.

Thank you, Kishore. Total revenue for the fourth quarter was $92.2 million, up 14% from $81.1 million in the previous quarter. Infrastructure revenue was $27 million, broadband revenue for the fourth quarter was $29 million, connectivity revenue was $20 million, and our industrial multi-market revenue was $16 million. GAAP and non-GAAP gross margins for the fourth quarter were approximately 55.6% and 59.1% of revenue. The delta between GAAP and non-GAAP gross margin in the fourth quarter was primarily driven by $3 million of acquisition-related intangible asset amortization. Fourth quarter GAAP operating expenses were $92.4 million and non-GAAP operating expenses were $61.3 million. The delta between GAAP and non-GAAP operating expenses was primarily due to stock-based compensation and performance-based equity accruals of $20.4 million, combined acquisition-related costs of $7.3 million, and restructuring costs of $3.1 million. GAAP and non-GAAP loss from operations for Q4 2024 was 45% and 7% of net revenue. GAAP and non-GAAP interest and other income during the quarter was $351,000 and $677,000 respectively. In Q4, cash flow used in operating activities was approximately $28 million. We exited Q4 of 2024 with approximately $120 million in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash. Our day sales outstanding was up in the fourth quarter to approximately 85 days. Our gross inventory was down versus the previous quarter as we continue to make improvements with inventory turns slightly less than 1. This concludes the discussion of our Q4 financial results. With that, let's turn to our guidance for Q1 of 2025. We currently expect revenue in the first quarter of 2025 to be between $85 million and $105 million. Looking at Q1 by end market, we expect broadband and infrastructure to be up, connectivity is expected to be approximately flat, and industrial multi-market is expected to be down. We expect first quarter GAAP gross margin to be approximately 54.5% to 57.5% and non-GAAP gross margin to be in the range of 57.5% to 60.5% of revenue. We expect Q1 2025 GAAP operating expenses to be in the range of $93 million to $99 million. We expect Q1 2025 non-GAAP operating expenses to be in the range of $56 million to $62 million. We expect our Q1 GAAP and non-GAAP interest and other expense each to be in the range of approximately $1 million to $2 million. We expect $2.7 million tax expense on a GAAP basis and non-GAAP tax of 0. We expect our Q1 GAAP and non-GAAP diluted share count to be approximately 85.5 million each. In closing, another quarter of improvement in customer orders and continued new product traction give us confidence that we are entering our next stage of growth in 2025. We're excited that our innovation and investment in strategic applications such as optical high-speed interconnects, wireless infrastructure storage, Ethernet, Wi-Fi, and fiber broadband access gateways are beginning to deliver tangible opportunities for near-term and long-term growth. In addition, our strong focus on operational efficiency in 2024 is positioning us for positive leverage in our business model and a return to profitability this year. With that, we'd like to open up the call for questions.

Our first question comes from the line of Tore Svanberg with Stifel.

My first question is, obviously, you're still relatively an entrant into the optical interconnect market, but you are the first one to report among your peer groups. So I was just hoping both Kishore or Steve could just talk a little bit about the events of this week, especially from Monday. How do you view this whole topic as far as potentially impacting the optical interconnect market?

Tore, we're pretty excited that we now have recorded a strong 2024. We exceeded our own internal targets and revenues. We have design wins and shipments in various quantities and stages with all the top module makers in the world with their end customers spanning across both China and the US. So that's the exciting part. With regard to what happened this week, I'm afraid that's a question that really only democratizes and really expands the real possibility for new entrants like us to really expand our share as the market grows. At the end of the day, we are a high-speed interconnect PHY transport company. So no matter what happens to the compute, the links are going to be more and they're going to be faster and speedier and we have the right technology for low power and high efficiency performance targets that these markets will require. From my point of view, processing content is one thing, but the links are a given and they're going to be really needed. And I think it really democratizes for people like us to really, really participate in what I call an expanded and cellularized market if that were to take hold.

As my follow-up, Steve, the DSOs have been all over the place this year. They came down very nicely in Q3, but now they came back up again in Q4. Obviously, still not as bad as Q1. But help us understand what's going on there and how should we think about DSOs here in 2025?

I think they were probably understated a little bit in Q3. It was really product mix and just some of the sales that we had there. So they did come up a little bit. I would argue that in this 80 to 85 range is probably where you'd likely see it the rest of the year.

That explains why I think your cash balance came down, was it, $30 million?

Cash balance did come down, but that was already reflected. We talked about that last quarter. There were some restructuring costs, but there was definitely kind of movement around the balance sheet. But certainly that was as expected in Q4.

Our next question comes from the line of Ross Seymore with Deutsche Bank.

I wanted to talk about the bookings and the backlog. It's, I think, the third quarter in a row you've seen those improve. So it's nice to see that corner being turned. Can you give it a little bit of color on where you see that happening, either by end market or geography? Perhaps even, is it company specific or is it just kind of the cycle is finally turning? Any sort of color like that on those metrics would be great.

Yes, we're definitely continuing to see really nice improvement on the booking side. Starting backlog, going into this quarter versus the previous two or three quarters, is much higher. So we're feeling much more confident. Just visibility has certainly improved. Customers are starting to kind of understand lead times and recognize that they can't get product when they ask for tomorrow. So we're seeing some nice improvements as far as visibility and forecasting. Your question, is it MaxLinear versus everyone? The broadband market has certainly been a lot worse over the last two years. I would say that is starting to normalize a bit. Kishore, in a lot of his statements, talked about the new products. And I think as we look at 2025, certainly, we've got a recovery. I think that'll be a nice tailwind. But I think what we're most excited about is these new products that are coming and these new programs that we've won. So there's certainly market share gains that we're seeing and new products that are starting to ramp.

Steve, probably this one's for you as well. Just on the restructuring efforts, not the fourth quarter impact per se, but just wanted to make sure that there's no big change in – I think you guys talked about $220 million plus or minus for the full year on the OpEx side. Just wanted to see that that's still the right trajectory and if there's any sort of lumpiness to the path on that between 1Q and 4Q.

The restructuring is certainly underway and the biggest portion of that was in Q3 and we had talked about kind of some residual that continues after that, but we definitely seeing nice improvements in OpEx spending. I don't think the expectations have changed. I do expect it to be somewhere between $220 million and $225 million for the year. And I would expect as kind of some of these final effects take place that you'll kind of see it move down throughout the year modestly; it's not a huge change there, but it'll come down a little bit throughout the year.

Our next question comes from the line of Tim Savageaux with Northland Capital Markets.

Question on the optical front, I guess. I think you've been talking throughout the year and you've increased this range to more than $30 million in revenue for the year. I wonder if you could tell us kind of where that ended up coming in. And given your volume comments, seems like you must have a pretty good January, I guess. Can we infer kind of a big step up there? I know you've guided infrastructure higher just looking at the million unit volume versus whatever your revenue may have been in 2024.

I think I'd probably echo what was said in the previous statements. I think we're really pleased we came in higher than what we had expected. We're not breaking out the exact number, but we started the year between $10 million and $30 million, and I think we probably landed shy of the $40 million number that we were stretching to, but certainly well above the high end of the range that we said originally. So we're pleased with the progress. I think as we've talked about, a lot of our wins and future production revenues are really driven by 800 gig conversion and those are just now happening this year. So it's an exciting time and looking forward to talking more about that in the coming quarters.

Or perhaps on the next question. I wanted to see if you would like to set a range for this year similar to what you – not a similar range of numbers, of course, but conceptually similar about what you think that optical business might be able to generate as you sit here in early 2025.

I don't think much has changed on this front. We've talked about kind of the $60 million to $70 million number. I think that's a very reasonable number that you can target right here. Hopefully, these new data centers roll out as expected. Some of that's out of our control, but certainly we're doing our part getting the wins and getting the qualifications completed. Then we see our customers, I guess in this case, our customers, customers roll out these programs.

Just a little while ago we saw an agreement – well, actually, Amazon's been making a couple of agreements and announcements of late, but one with Jabil. I think as a module partner of yours dating back to OFC where Amazon took a bunch of warrants in; Jabil doesn't exactly indicate a 800 gig transceiver module relationship, but it seems like it could. I wonder if you have any comment on the potential impact of that agreement on MaxLinear.

I'm not going to comment on those agreements. I will confirm, as I think many of you have seen, we did demonstrate and we've been working with those kinds for some time. But we demonstrated this at OFC last year, and they've been a good partner.

Our next question comes from the line of Quinn Bolton with Needham & Company.

A follow-up on Tori's question. Cash down to about $120 million. Guidance probably has you at a small few million, maybe mid-single digit million non-GAAP net income loss in the March quarter. Are there any major changes in working capital or any residual restructuring cash charges to hit you in the March quarter? Any sense what cash might do through the quarter?

I think as we've talked about cash, nothing's really changed on that front. We do expect inventory to continue to come down. So that's good working capital. I'm sure as revenues start to recover here and we burn down those inventories, we'll certainly have to replenish that out-quarter revenues. They certainly are going to be above where they are today. So we'll have to start building on that, and we're doing our best to manage it. Of course we've talked about cash flow break-even somewhere kind of mid-year, and it's probably Q2, Q3. Likely Q3 is where I'd probably put it today, but we feel very comfortable with that.

I guess maybe for Kishore, two questions. You talked about some design wins, a tier 1 design win, I think in the wireless infrastructure market beginning to ramp in the second half of 2025. I wasn't sure if that was for the Sierra product or if that was for the backhaul product. If you could provide any more detail there, that'd be great. Similarly, I think you mentioned now a promising engagement with an additional North American tier 1 on the PON side. I think in the past you've already talked about working with two of the largest in North America. So wondering if that is a third tier 1 in North America or maybe I misheard something.

First to answer your question of the ramp on the wireless infrastructure, the second half, there are two parts to it. They're both in our wireless backhaul transport business and also on the access side. It's for both the product lines, the one for our Sierra O-RAN product and as well as our backhaul products. Primarily, this growth is coming through content expansion of these customers on the backhaul side. And obviously, our Sierra product is unique and is a leader and it's the beginning of what would be all industry trend for merchant silicon to support both macro 5G and massive MIMO revenues in the future. So that design has a little bit of timing uncertainty. Hopefully you’re at Mobile World Congress and you'll be able to catch a lot more glimpse of these products that I'm super excited about for sure. Regarding the broadband side, a tier 1 operator, we referred to where we're in engagement. We expect that to be a major driver in 2026 but could you have a little bit of revenue in 2025? Sure. Now we talked about two major North America operators, but you must understand that we never talked about a gateway design per se in a tier one operator. We talked about there are multiple product lines within these tier 1 operators, but this would be a whole gateway design win at a tier 1 operator.

Is that PON and Wi-Fi or just the PON chip?

Yeah, it's both. When I refer to gateway these days, it has Wi-Fi, it's a full PON 10G XGS-PON gateway with a processor that supports 10 gigabit speeds plus the world's first triband single-chip Wi-Fi access point solution along with our own Ethernet quad-port 2.5 gigabit Ethernet products.

Our next question comes from the line of Suji Desilva with ROTH Capital Partners.

Just wanted to Steve, maybe double click down on the 1Q guidance. Appreciate the segment color, but I'm just trying to understand if infrastructure is likely growing and continue to ramp up here, where the offsets to that are and what would you know have you be at the low end if you have a segment like infrastructure that's ramping strong. Just trying to understand some colors, the puts and takes there.

I think excited that infrastructure is probably the biggest growth of the year and that's certainly the one that we've got a lot happening around. But we'll definitely see broadband grow as we stated in Q1 and likely the end of the year at a much higher level. The one that's been weak has been industrial and I think we're still like many of our peers kind of working through that. Demand is soft. There's a little bit of inventory out there, but I think it's really more about demand. Certainly, connectivity is starting to recover as well as we talked about along with broadband.

Maybe for Kishore. I know Tore asked about the news this week, but maybe topically also CPOs being discussed, whether it's Nvidia's in-house solution or merchant vendors like Marvell. I'm just curious you know if you could update us on your thoughts on what whether CPO's impact to your opportunity is orthogonal or whether it's an creates opportunity or whether it's something a risk. Any color there would help as people are looking for that in 800 1.6G.

CPOs have evolved in their role within the data center optical interconnect field. However, there are numerous other vendors involved, and CPOs are just part of the ongoing discussions we have. Our main focus remains as a pure DSP PAM4 TIA type vendor. This includes linear optical transceivers and the upcoming 400 gigabit per lambda silicon that supports them. We view our involvement in the data center as extending beyond just optics, which is why we refer to it as high-speed interconnects. As a silicon provider, our goal encompasses not just interconnect connections but also any high-throughput interconnects within computing or storage environments, which represent our target market. CPOs are just one aspect of this. For CPOs to succeed, you need to either have your own optics or collaborate with optics providers. I believe it will take considerable time, if ever, for CPOs to reach viability due to issues related to quality, yield, power, and footprint. Additionally, if the quality is not properly realized, it can lead to wasted potential and pricing challenges. Solutions and ideas continuously emerge in our industry, and whenever new options arise, we must explore all these paths.

Our next question comes from the line of Karl Ackerman with BNP Paribas.

This is Sam Feldman speaking for Karl Ackerman. You mentioned that your DSP business is expected to grow in 2025 due to your partnerships with hyperscalers. What gives you the assurance that it can double, especially considering Amazon has noted that the 800 gig might not expand until 2026? Does this mean the DSP growth aligns with the 800 gig timeline?

There's a large, large opportunity that is 400 gig and 800 gig really again lasts for many, many years. I think that also answers Suji's question about CPOs, honestly. So our revenues are a mix of both 400 gig and 800 gig. And as Tori pointed out, we are new entrants in this market space and the third player. So we have a large revenue share in the optical interconnect that we can go and access. There are two markets here. We have always maintained that the line side is really delayed relative to what I call the compute side, which is the AI network and they're very, very different markets. So the line side markets are indeed delayed – not delayed. I would say they've always been – sort of the 800 gig comes much later and I think they're on track on the front. And Amazon is not the only one. Right? There's Meta, there's Microsoft and everybody else. And our roadmap frankly followed the cadence of the line side markets. And we've always said that we are not a player in the Nvidia market in terms of as being what happened in the past. And so, that is the reality of it. So I think that you are sort of conflating both the markets and very different markets in terms of the timeline of how they're evolving. And same will be true for 1.6 terabyte, by the way. I would say that it'll be a long while before 1.6 terabyte or 200 gig per lambda becomes a meaningful portion of the shipment of the revenues until after 400 gig and 800 gig have really, really run their course.

Our next question comes from the line of David Williams with Benchmark Company.

Kishore, I think you mentioned this in your script earlier and I may have missed it, but just wanted to see if you could give us a little indication on the 2.5G Ethernet and PHY product, Swan Creek there. And I know you've talked about design wins there and major tier 1 enterprise OEM customers with multiple design wins. But how is that ramping and maybe just any of the color around the feedback or demand trends that you're seeing for the Swan Creek product line.

I think Swan Creek as a product goes, it's probably one of the most successful products that we have ever designed and the kind of demand for the product. It's premier. It's highly differentiated. It has outflanked anybody's offering on the 2.5 gigabit multi-port switch category. We frankly ourselves were quite surprised with the amount of traction it has. And it's pretty much designed with all the major players on routers and gateways and even on the industrial side as well. It's a very unique product. It can do multiple ports all the way from four to eight and two of those switch ports can be compounded to do a 32 port solution as well. So it's got extremely good traction. And with this tier one OEM, we're supposed to have actually ramped stronger towards the end of last year. That has not happened, but it's gotten delayed. But the ramp continues in a sense that the plans remain intact. It's their major platforms. I believe that as we head towards the rest of the year, it'll start ramping. In 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, it'll be in a pretty strong run rate position. And the overall product, really, we believe can be a $100 million per year revenue product line for Ethernet over the next two to three years. And the mix would be single PHYs and multi-port PHYs and switches in equal proportion or more tilted towards the multiple port PHY and switch.

Anything regionally that you're seeing to speak of in terms of demand trends around maybe China or even North America? How are you seeing, I guess, geographically how demand trends, anything you would point to there?

All of these designs in these markets happen in Taiwan or China and that's where most of our activities, support activities, sales activity are. So I would say that, well, the end markets are quite varied, but primarily the end markets are US and China centric, which you should expect given they're the largest markets in the world. So we're quite happy about it.

Our next question comes from the line of Alek Valero with Loop Capital Markets.

I have two quick questions. My first question is, as we go from 800G to 3.2T, do you guys see yourself as being more attractive to customers? If so, what do those dynamics look like?

Really, really speaking, you have the entrenched incumbents as one would duly give them credit for, which is both Marvell and Broadcom. They come at it very, very differently in terms of the competitive force, if you will. However, there's only one credible new entrant on the optical transceiver space by far. There's nobody even close to what we offer. And what we offer is extremely low power in the 800 gigabit solution and 400 gigabit solution for 100 gig per lane design, which is the newest generation of products that are ramping or will be ramping soon, like one of the analysts thought about the Amazon delay, for example. So the differentiation really comes from extremely low power. And we all now know whether it's an AI network or any data center, power, power, power is the key. And that's where we built our core competencies as a company. We also seen shortages on DSPs and optical module solutions in the last few years as all data centers try to upgrade to new technologies. So there is a genuine demand for a third supplier. It is where everybody wants a third supplier. And we hope to first build our position as a third supplier and then build from there. And that's been our game plan from day one. And the fact that we went from zero to $40 million last year is proof of that. It's million units, that's pretty substantial, and hopefully we can do much, much better this year and leading up to next year. And I think we are very pleased with the progress. Now, this has entailed a lot of investment on our side. I know analysts, you always have OpEx questions, but I just want to be very, very clear that this is a strategic area of interest investment, a high growth market area. And we intend to continue to invest very, very strongly in this space to expand our portfolio beyond the optical space. I think that's where our strategic thrust is right now, in the infrastructure space.

Just for a quick follow up. So with your technology in the realm of co-package optics, do you believe the advantages outweigh the disadvantages, or is it something entirely new?

I would say it may be a net positive because if our competitors are invested in optics and they try to do a fully integrated CPO, there are more optics producers in the world who are competent and really, really excellent at that. And the market capacity will require that those optics players are part of the supply ecosystem and, therefore, they need a pure play silicon vendor. And MaxLinear absolutely is a pure play silicon player in this. No cables, no optics and that sort of a thing. I think it's a net positive for us from a sort of creating a pull for what we provide. And we would be the alternative that would attach the best optics along with our DSP.

Our next question comes from Christopher Rolland with Susquehanna International Group.

I guess around optical, maybe if you had a range of optical units that we might expect in 2025, like would there be a bull case to do 2 million units or maybe even more? Or put another way, maybe market share. And maybe tying into this, Kishore, you talked about low power. How should we think about low power as you move to 4nm but competitors move to 3nm? Will you still have that advantage?

I just want to add these things that obviously competitive advantages in power and performance are incredibly important. We take that seriously and we are absolutely confident we'll come out this thing. And that's the secret sauce of our design and architectural capabilities. That's number one. And the other part is, last I checked, the latest report, that 20 million units of transceiver modules that shipped, and we have told you that 1 million units we have shipped. So I know it's not about 10% right now. I'm pretty proud of the 5% market share. That's the way I would view it. But beyond that, we don't provide color on these because there are various uncertainties on timing and that sort of a thing. But I would stand by the guidance that Steve earlier talked about, $60 million to $70 million. Yeah, you should expect that. Can we do better? I desperately want us to do much better than that. So that much I promise you.

Kishore, maybe just revisiting Tore's question and all this concern about DeepSeek this week. It had your stock off quite a bit itself, maybe not as much as others, but was still off. And I understand your comments about democratizing AI, but it seems like democratizing AI on open-source hardware is not very networking intensive. I just kind of wanted to revisit this. How these more efficient architectures might affect either inference, in your opinion, or training in your opinion, and mega clusters, for example, that seem to be very optically intensive just in terms of DSPs units, transceiver volumes for you guys. And if there was some sort of a reset in order rates, when would we know? It doesn't sound like you've seen anything over the past week in terms of a reset, but any thoughts on how this would play out or when we would know?

Well, this week is too short, number one. Number two is that, look, these dynamics are beyond my understanding. And all I know is that we make extremely good products, very low power, high performance, and that demand is huge enough even otherwise, before the AI world happened, that's when we started on this roadmap, right? There was ChatGPT before. Nobody knew there was ChatGPT and that would drive the markets. And likewise, I don't know what DeepSeek is going to do, but all I know is that even if there were no AI networks present, the market was very, very huge. So from my point of it is a fantastic market. There is no reaction from me in any direction. Stay the course. The market will be exciting for us at MaxLinear. And I really don't have thoughts about this, but I don't think we should be surprised by disruptive innovations. And that will make us more competitive. And we have a huge appetite as human beings. We just eat whatever comes how much ever cheap it is. So we'll just gobble more of it. But the TAM dollars, I don't expect it to reduce.

Our next question comes to the line of Tore Svanberg with Stifel.

I just had a follow-up, Kishore, because there's a lot of talk about your optical DSP business, but you've also announced getting into AEC, ACC, and there's obviously a discrete TIA market out there. So could you just talk a little bit about that? When we think about that $60 million, $70 million, is that predominantly optical DSP or are you also starting to see some contribution from AEC, ACC and discrete TIAs? And one of your largest competitors just announced LPO here before the end of the year. So I assume given your capabilities, you are now probably working on LPO as well, right?

Absolutely. LPO is just a derivative of what we do as a larger DSP. So I don't know why people make such a big deal about LPO. Anybody can do this who has got a DSP PAM4. That just means there are only three people, but still. Number one, on our revenues, predominantly they are 800 gig and some 400 gig and there will be some AECs. Having said that, the AEC market is still pretty small. And the market being small and one data center until now trying to deploy AECs, the verdict remains unclear. Still, the verdict remains unclear whether it's going to be a sort of across the board promulgation because there are dynamics with the copper side that are quite different. So without getting into the details, our revenues are dominated, going to be 800 gig, 400 gig and some AECs. We do have AECs that have already qualified and so therefore we expect revenues to start. How big? I am not. I don't think it's still a big enough market where that would overwhelm any of the optical revenues that we will be generating. So regarding the LPOs, I think I've answered that question. ACC is even more tiny and I think that verdict remains very questionable. AECs are questionable in terms of market size, ACCs propagation. But we have eyesight on all of these targets and we're not pulling back. We are doing everything, design-ins and so on and so forth. But I'm just making sure you understand that TIA as a revenue stream is really attached to our DSPs. And I'm not aware of anything outside of that environment in terms of our go-to-market plan.

There are no further questions at this time. I'd like to pass the floor back over to Kishore for closing remarks.

Thank you, operator. And I want to once again thank every one of you. Hey, it's Happy New Year. You all sounded muted. Just wake up. It's all exciting times moving forward, and I will wish you Happy New Year once again. This quarter, we'll be presenting a number of financial conferences and virtual events. We'll post the details on our investor relations page. Thank you very much. And Happy New Year once again to all of you.

This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.