Good afternoon and thank you for joining the SMART Global Holdings Second Quarter Fiscal 2024 Earnings Call. My name is Kate and I will be the moderator for today's call. At this time, all lines are in a listen-only mode and will be until the question-and-answer portion of the call. I would now like to turn the call over to Suzanne Schmidt, Investor Relations for SMART Global. Suzanne, you may proceed.

Thank you, operator. Good afternoon and thank you for joining us on today's earnings conference call and webcast to discuss SGH's Second Quarter Fiscal 2024 Results. On the call today are Mark Adams, Chief Executive Officer; Jack Pacheco, Chief Operating Officer; and Ken Rizvi, Chief Financial Officer. You can find the accompanying slide presentation and press release for this call on the Investor Relations section of our website. We encourage you to go to the site throughout the quarter for the most current information on the company. I would also like to remind everyone to read the note on the use of forward-looking statements that is included in the press release and the earnings call presentation. Please note that during this conference call, the company will make projections and forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, statements about the company's growth trajectory and financial outlook. Forward-looking statements are based on current beliefs and assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, the risks and uncertainties reflected in the press release and the earnings call presentation filed today as well as in the company's most recent annual and quarterly reports. The forward-looking statements are representative only as of the date they are made and except as required by applicable law, we assume no responsibility to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. We will also discuss both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation from, as a substitute for or superior to our GAAP results. We encourage you to consider all measures when analyzing our performance. A reconciliation of the GAAP to non-GAAP measures is included in today's press release and accompanying slide presentation. And with that, let me turn the call over to Mark Adams. Mark?

Thank you, Suzanne, and thanks to all of you for joining us today for our Fiscal 2024 Second Quarter Earnings Call. We delivered solid financial results in the second quarter and continued to make great strides in our transformation into a provider of high-performance, high-availability solutions that enterprise customers need to deploy AI on-premise, at the edge and in the cloud. As one of the few players in the industry with decades-long experience in high-performance compute and specialty memory, SGH is uniquely positioned to help companies manage the complexity of AI implementation at scale. As a total solution provider, we offer our customers and partners innovative technology-agnostic hardware configurations, software that manages AI systems for maximum output and availability, and a professional services suite that enables our customers to achieve best-in-class performance and reliability. Let me summarize our operational results for the quarter. Revenues totaled $285 million in line with the midpoint of our guidance range. Although non-GAAP gross margin was at the lower end of our guidance due to a higher portion of hardware mix, we achieved non-GAAP earnings per share of $0.27, which was above the midpoint of our guidance through better operating expense controls. We exited Q2 with a strong balance sheet. Cash and short-term investments totaled $466 million. Now let me start our business line review with the Intelligent Platform Solutions group or IPS. Our IPS team offers a robust solution set of industry-leading hardware, advanced cluster management software, and best-in-class professional services. This solution portfolio enables our design, build, deploy and manage solutions framework for HPC and AI applications on-premise, at the edge and in the cloud. In Q2, IPS revenue came in at $141 million, up 19% from our prior quarter, representing 50% of total SGH revenue, thus making IPS the largest component of our overall business in Q2. Our vision is clear: partner with our customers and collaborate with them to build the future of AI. The market continues to see strong investment in the deployment of AI infrastructure solutions by hyperscalers and large-scale cloud service providers or CSPs. The first few months of 2024, however, have confirmed that AI is not just for early adopters anymore. We are seeing signs of AI adoption by larger enterprises in markets such as financial, oil and gas, defense, education and digital media as well as Tier 2 CSPs with projects ranging from proof-of-concepts to large-scale deployments. Our engagements with existing and potential AI customers have noticeably picked up in volume over the last few months, reflecting this market dynamic. In our conversations with both current and targeted new clients, they have shared the challenges they are facing in deploying AI, trying to manage the complexity that arises as they integrate advanced compute, memory, networking, storage and cooling and large-scale data center rollouts. Our customers ultimately must have high-performance compute running workloads at scale, an environment that provides for maximum uptime and overall efficiency. As a total solution provider, we are ready to meet that challenge. We offer our customers a complete solution that combines innovative hardware design, software to manage AI infrastructure for maximum output and availability, and a suite of professional services, all designed to help them achieve best-in-class performance and reliability. With our customer-first approach, we put our customers' priorities at the heart of everything we do, ensuring that each solution we deliver is tailored to their specific requirements and ready to support their success. We believe that AI inferencing at the edge will also be a critical market opportunity because it brings intelligence closer to where the information is most valuable, closer to where decisions are being made. We have expanded our capabilities at the edge with our new next-generation fault-tolerant computing platform, the Stratus ztC Endurance Server. We are seeing strong demand for this platform which enables our customers to run applications with an unplanned target downtime estimated in minutes per year. We are developing an approach to enable our customers to implement AI at the edge with a high-performance, high-availability platform. The ztC Endurance Server is another example of the investments we have made and continue to make to support the needs of our customers, whether on-premise, at the edge or in the cloud. Today, we are also announcing a new member of our management team. I am pleased to announce that Pete Manca has joined us as President of IPS. Pete brings a wealth of experience in building businesses that provide high-availability, high-performance solutions to enterprise customers. Prior to joining our team, Pete served as Senior Vice President and General Manager at Dell Technologies for five years, managing several large businesses, including Converged Solutions, OEM Solutions, and APEX, Dell's end-to-end portfolio of cloud offerings, ranging from storage to high-performance computing to AI services and solutions. Prior to Dell, Pete served as President and CEO of Egenera, a leading provider of wholesale cloud computing solutions, underscoring his broad experience and expertise. I am confident that Pete is the right leader to propel the team forward and make the most of the opportunities that are ahead. Pete will work with former IPS President, Dave Laurello, who is transitioning into an advisory role. Dave has been an invaluable partner in transforming IPS. With his guidance, IPS has become more effective and efficient across the board from go-to-market to engineering to manufacturing. He is a leader of high integrity with an execution mindset that we will miss. We wish Dave all the best. Turning now to memory, which operates under the SMART Modular brand name. We provide customers with high-performance, high-reliability memory solutions for specialty markets such as supercomputing, networking and telecom, storage, data centers, industrial and other specialty applications. For Q2, revenue came in at $83 million, or 29% of total SGH sales. As expected, sales declined slightly from Q1 levels, primarily due to continued elevated inventory levels at a number of our large customers. We continue to see signs that the memory cycle is turning upwards. However, as mentioned on our last earnings call, near-term unit demand still remains challenging at some of our traditional enterprise customers. Nevertheless, we remain confident that business will rebound as we move into the second half of our fiscal '24 and expect revenues to grow sequentially in the third quarter. AI is also reshaping the memory market landscape as the need for higher density and greater bandwidth becomes increasingly critical to system performance required to handle the most advanced compute workloads. We are expanding our product portfolio to capitalize on the convergence of compute and memory and system-level solutions by leveraging Compute Express Link or CXL memory expansion and switching technology, which allows different parts of a computer memory system to communicate faster and more efficiently. We continue to make progress on CXL product development. We have successfully completed the design of our 8 DIMM DDR5 CXL Add-In Card and anticipate sampling this innovative product to our customers later this year. This high-density solution offers 512 gigabytes of memory, making the system faster and more capable of handling the complex tasks required by large-scale AI and high-performance computing workloads. During the second quarter, we also shipped initial engineering samples of our 4 DIMM DDR5 CXL Add-In Card to a number of our enterprise customers. This product has a unique patented technology that keeps its footprint within a single-width PCIe slot. This design is exceptionally beneficial for 1U servers because it optimizes space for other PCIe devices, including accelerators and network interface cards. We expect that revenues will begin ramping from this product in early fiscal 2025. Finally, we introduced our Zefr ZDIMM Memory Modules with ultra-high reliability for demanding compute applications and our DDR5 SODIMM products continue to gain market momentum, bolstered by our exclusive I-Temp and Zefr testing offerings, which significantly enhance reliability. Taken together, these advancements exemplify our ongoing commitment to industry-leading innovation, empowering us to address our customers' needs. Now turning to Cree LED, which produces application-optimized LEDs for products in markets such as specialty lighting, video screens, outdoor, horticulture, and architectural lighting. In the second quarter of our fiscal 2024, LED Solutions revenue totaled $60 million, or 21% of total SGH sales. As anticipated, second quarter sales were lower sequentially, primarily due to seasonality. With the LED demand environment remaining relatively muted in the near term, we continue to manage our Cree LED operations prudently and are aligning our expenses with current business conditions. We are optimistic that demand trends will begin to improve and currently expect revenues to increase sequentially in the third quarter. Our R&D team has remained diligently focused on driving the technology development needed for Cree to continue leading in high-value specialty applications. During this past quarter, we launched the XLamp XP-G4 High Intensity LEDs, which are optimized for indoor directional, aftermarket auto and portable applications. We also introduced an extension to our XLamp S product line, targeting the horticultural sector with products tailored for environments like greenhouses, where precision lighting can transform crop growth and yield. As a technology and brand leader with a strong intellectual property portfolio, the Cree LED team continues to lead the charge in lighting innovation. Given our strong R&D and IP portfolio combined with our capital-light outsource model, I am confident in Cree's LED competitiveness and prospects for future success. I'll stop here and hand it over for Ken for a more detailed review of our Q2 financial performance and our guidance for next quarter. Ken?

Thanks, Mark. I will focus my remarks on our non-GAAP results, which are reconciled to GAAP in our earnings release tables and in the investor materials on our website. Now let me turn to our second quarter results. Total SGH revenues were $285 million at the midpoint of our guidance and non-GAAP gross margin came in at 31.5% at the low end of our guidance, primarily driven by a higher mix of hardware revenues. Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share was $0.27 for the second quarter, which was above the midpoint of our guidance and helped by better operating expense controls. In the second quarter, our overall services revenue totaled $49 million, down from the $55 million in the year-ago quarter. Product revenues were $235 million. Second quarter revenue by business unit was as follows: IPS at $141 million, Memory at $83 million, and LED at $60 million. This translates into a sales mix of 50% IPS, 29% Memory, and 21% LED. Non-GAAP gross margin for SGH in Q2 was 31.5%, down from 32.1% in the year-ago quarter, driven primarily by lower memory volumes that were partially offset by improved mix in IPS. Gross margin was down sequentially from 33.3% in the prior quarter, primarily due to a higher mix of hardware revenue. Non-GAAP operating expenses for the second quarter were $63.2 million, down from $64.6 million in the first quarter, primarily due to lower variable expenses and cost reduction actions. Operating expenses were also down from $68.7 million in the year-ago quarter. Non-GAAP diluted earnings per share for the second quarter of 2024 was $0.27 per share compared to $0.24 per share last quarter and $0.87 per share in the year-ago quarter. An adjusted EBITDA for the second quarter of 2024 was $33 million, or 12% of sales, compared to $34 million or 13% of sales in the last quarter, and $65 million or 17% of sales in the year-ago quarter. Turning to balance sheet highlights. For working capital, our net accounts receivable totaled $170 million, slightly lower than the $171 million last quarter. Days sales outstanding came in at 41 days, down from 44 days from last quarter, primarily due to the timing of invoicing and collections. Inventory totaled $173 million at the end of the second quarter, lower than the $208 million at the end of the prior quarter, and inventory turns were 6.8 times in the second quarter, up from 5.8 times in the prior quarter. Consistent with past practice, net accounts receivable, days sales outstanding, and inventory turnover are calculated on a gross sales and cost of goods sold basis, which were $375 million and $294 million, respectively, for the second quarter. And as a reminder, the difference between gross and net revenue is related to our logistics services, which is accounted for on an agent basis, meaning that we only recognize the net profit on logistic services as revenue. Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $466 million at the end of the second quarter, down $88 million from the $553 million in the prior quarter. In the second quarter, we paid down $50 million for the Stratus earn-out and retired approximately $37 million of our term loan facility. Second quarter cash flows used in operating activities totaled $22 million compared to $60 million provided by operating activities in the prior quarter. Second quarter cash flows used for operating activities included the $29 million payment of contingent consideration as part of a total of $50 million cash payment for the Stratus earn-out. During the second quarter, we repurchased approximately 106,000 shares of our common stock using $1.9 million. Since our initial repurchase authorization in April of 2022, we have used a total of $72.3 million to repurchase 4.1 million shares through the end of our second quarter. As of our second quarter, we have a total of $78 million available for future repurchases under our authorizations. And to remind everyone, our capital allocation strategy remains the same. First and foremost, we will continue to invest in our business as we see significant opportunities for further organic growth. Second, we will continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities in a disciplined manner, such as our most recent acquisition of Stratus. And third, the share repurchase authorizations provide us flexibility to return capital to our shareholders in an opportunistic and price-sensitive manner. And finally, we look to retire debt to keep our gross leverage at reasonable levels. We retired $37 million of our term loan in the second quarter, and subsequent to the quarter end, we retired an additional $75 million of term loan. These payments bring down the principal by $112 million since the first quarter to $425 million outstanding. For those of you tracking capital expenditures and depreciation, capital expenditures were $5.2 million in the second quarter and depreciation was $7.2 million. Turning to our third fiscal quarter 2024 guidance. We expect that revenues for the third quarter of 2024 will be approximately $300 million at the midpoint, plus or minus $25 million. Our guidance for the third quarter reflects the following. For IPS, we expect revenues to be flat to slightly up at the midpoint, with additional opportunities that may fall in the third or fourth quarter depending on the timing of deployments. For Memory, we expect revenues to grow in the high-single-digit range sequentially at the midpoint, and for LED, we currently expect revenues to be up in the high-single-digit range sequentially at the midpoint as well. Our GAAP gross margin for the third quarter is expected to be approximately 29% at the midpoint, plus or minus 1.5%. Non-GAAP gross margin for the third quarter is expected to be approximately 32% at the midpoint, plus or minus 1.5%. Our non-GAAP operating expenses for the third quarter are expected to be approximately $66 million plus or minus $2 million and slightly up from the prior quarter, primarily due to variable expenses associated with the higher expected revenue. GAAP diluted earnings per share for the third quarter is expected to be approximately a $0.07 loss plus or minus $0.15. On a non-GAAP basis, excluding share-based compensation expense, intangible asset amortization expense, debt discount and other adjustments, we expect diluted earnings per share will be approximately $0.30, plus or minus $0.15. Our GAAP diluted share count for the third quarter is expected to be approximately 52.6 million shares based on our current stock price, while our non-GAAP diluted share count is expected to be approximately 54.4 million shares. Cash capital expenditures for the third quarter are expected to be in the range of $4 million to $6 million. And as a reminder, we are utilizing a long-term projected non-GAAP tax rate of 28%, which reflects currently available information, including the sale of SMART Brazil, which was completed in the first quarter, as well as other factors and assumptions. While we expect to use this normalized non-GAAP tax rate through 2024, the long-term non-GAAP tax rate may be subject to changes for a variety of reasons, including the rapidly evolving global tax environment, significant changes in our geographic earnings mix, or changes to our strategy or business operations. Our forecast for the third quarter of 2024 is based on the current environment, which contemplates the current global macroeconomic headwinds and ongoing supply chain constraints, especially as it relates to our IPS business. This includes extended lead times for certain components that are incorporated into our overall solutions, impacting how quickly we can ramp existing and new customer projects. We continue to manage our operations in a prudent manner as we navigate a challenging environment while also investing in our long-term growth. Please refer to the non-GAAP Financial Information section and reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measure table in our earnings release for further details. Now, let me turn it over to Mark for a few remarks prior to Q&A.

Thanks, Ken. As we are still in the early innings of fully operational AI infrastructure being deployed at scale for most enterprise customers, we are seeing an accelerating need by the market for a trusted adviser to help with the challenges of deploying this new AI infrastructure. Our 25 years plus of HPC and memory expertise and deployment know-how position us to become a leader in this market by working to solve our customers' most challenging AI infrastructure needs. As our transformation continues, I want to thank our global team members for their efforts this quarter. We feel we are well-positioned for the exciting market opportunities ahead. Operator, we are now ready for Q&A.

Absolutely. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. The first question comes from the line of Quinn Bolton with Needham & Company. Quinn, your line is now open.

Hey, guys, congratulations on the nice results and outlook. I guess I want to start on the IPS business and Mark maybe just get your thoughts kind of demand across the customer base between large CSPs, Tier 2 CSPs and enterprises where you may be seeing some of the greatest demand for new deployments as you look out into the second half of calendar '24 and then I've got a couple of follow-ups.

No problem. Thank you, Quinn, for the question. When we consider our perspective on the market, it is primarily informed by our executive engagements with the three segments you mentioned. The early players in the market have been the large hyperscalers, one of which is a major customer for us. Then there are large enterprises that require infrastructure for AI to ensure their future success. Lastly, we have what we refer to as Tier 2 CSPs, which are companies that have their own infrastructure to provide services that facilitate AI implementations across various sectors. These three segments form our market view. The hyperscalers were the initial investors, but we've noticed significant growth in two areas. Large enterprises are evaluating their AI strategies, considering whether to implement solutions on-premises, in a co-location model with an outsourced data center provider, or through partnerships in joint ventures for future developments. We are witnessing high demand signals from these enterprise customers. Additionally, while hyperscalers are building according to their needs, Tier 2 CSPs are investing in infrastructure to help enterprises lacking their own data center access. It's important to emphasize that, according to anyone in the power and data center markets, there is currently a severe shortage of available data centers suitable for AI, particularly due to the power demands necessary for AI operations. This has resulted in strong demand for new data center capabilities to support large-scale AI platforms, with specific performance requirements. The existing shortfall has triggered significant activity as companies seek to enable these systems quickly. We are seeing many customers express urgent needs for space and rapid deployment timelines. Typically, enterprise customers don’t possess the same infrastructure capabilities as the major hyperscalers, nor do they fully understand the complexities tied to performance uptime, reliability, and optimization. These factors are critical. Thus, the number of engagements we've experienced, combined with our designs and proposals, is leading to clearer bookings and future delivery expectations, all trending positively.

Excellent. Second question I had you mentioned sort of AI at the edge and seemed to kind of highlight your Stratus offering. I'm wondering, are there opportunities for AI at the edge also in the traditional sort of Penguin business, where you may be setting up larger clusters to run LLMs or other AI infrastructure? So it's not necessarily just a high-reliability deployment, but you may also just say, hey, we've got to get the inferencing as close to the end user as possible. And you could see some pretty large deployments for inferencing equipment, rather than say just training, which I think some of your traditional deployments may have been more focused on.

I think that's correct. Your question really contained the answer, which is that we are currently developing solutions and investing in future integration for our solution roadmap. As you pointed out, past spending in AI was more focused on training rather than inferencing. Training will always be necessary because large language models will enable users to extract their specific needs from them. However, training will decrease as a percentage of the overall process, while inferencing will increase significantly in the future. With this increase, the availability of speed and information closer to decision-making is crucial for maintaining competitiveness. We're exploring how to not only utilize the platform but also develop and provide our customers with the highest performing, most reliable systems, particularly in environments lacking IT resources. This is a vital aspect of our strategy. We envision a future where we might design small or single cluster platforms that balance cost, reliability, and performance to serve end markets such as oil and gas, retail stores, ATMs, or healthcare offices. This reflects our outlook on AI. Clearly, AI at the edge has a promising future, but it's still in its early stages. Therefore, we are making investments today to prepare for the solutions we are developing for tomorrow.

Excellent. And then just one last quick one on the memory outlook. You called for growth to be high-single-digits. We've heard from a lot of folks in the memory industry that pricing for both DRAM and NAND is moving up pretty quickly here, especially after the earthquake in Taiwan. Wondering as you look at that high-single-digit, is that mostly ASP growth? With units still pretty muted, are you starting to see a unit recovery, but pricing benefits may come in future quarters? Just how you're thinking about units versus ASP? And I'll go back in the queue. Thank you.

Let me highlight that unlike pure-play semiconductor companies, we have made a profit through memory cycles due to our differentiated business. We tend to feel the impact of downturns more slowly on the front end, and our recovery is also gradual because of the inventory corrections that some customers are managing. We are beginning to see pricing improvements in our business overall, and there are isolated cases of demand requests. Recently, our demand has been relatively flat, which is an improvement compared to the decline we've experienced in previous quarters. In the last earnings call, I mentioned my expectation for increased demand in the Q3 and Q4 timeframe, anticipating a slower recovery. We’re starting to see that shift, although it's not reflected in the Q2 numbers. I believe we will see more demand in Q3 and that trend should continue into Q4 and early fiscal year '25.

Yeah. And Quinn, just to highlight Mark's point there in terms of the margins, and you can look at our operating margins for this business, even in Q2, which was a softer quarter here, our margins were just above 7%, and we're starting to see some expectations for growth. That's what we guided to here for Q3 sequentially, for the memory business as well.

Perfect. Thank you.

Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Kevin Cassidy with Rosenblatt Securities. Kevin, your line is now open.

Yes. Thank you for taking my question and congratulations on the quarter. Can you talk a little more about, with IPS, you said it would be flat to up depending on at least one order. And does this include services? And is this part of what the guidance for gross margin being 1.5% one way or the other? Can you just give a little more details on that?

Yeah. So thanks, Kevin. Thanks for the question. I'm going to start and let Ken jump in. As we said originally, if you go back to our Q1 earnings call, we saw a stronger second half, and that's, in fact, what we see playing out. And part of these engagements, the margin move-around is kind of muted. It could be mixed issues. It could be hardware early configurations that we then convert services to. And if you look at all of that, we're in a good place. The margins will move around, as you said. I'll let Ken kind of quantify that a little bit, but margins will move around in our business a little bit. But let's not forget, gross margins are up from 19.5% three years ago to where we are today. And if a margin moves around a point in a quarter, it's primarily because of the mix of maybe hardware deployments in a quarter and then future quarters where software might be stronger or services might be stronger. And that's just the nature of the business we're in. Very pleased with the team's execution and very confident that we'll continue to see good progress there.

Yeah. And Kevin, if you look at the margin, we provided a little bit more room here in Q4, and part of that's just around the timing of not only the hardware deployments, which we've talked about in the past, and making sure we get the appropriate customer acceptance and the like, and those can move between quarters. That's why we outlined that. But if you look at the margin for Q4 and the guidance, we have both point-in-time services and ongoing managed services. And we just wanted to have a little bit more flexibility. My assumption is most of the street will probably end up near the midpoint, but that gives us a little flex around that.

Okay. Great. Thanks for that color. And maybe, as you're saying, your engagements are increasing, can you talk more about the potential for expanding your customer base for IPS in particular?

Yes, absolutely. Kevin, as you know, this is a business we've mentioned before that has customer concentration and can be unpredictable. Over the past fiscal year, we have made substantial investments in new go-to-market resources. Honestly, I am very pleased with the progress we are making in managing major accounts and gaining executive engagement to market our capabilities to large enterprises and Tier 2 CSPs. The number of proposals we've generated continues to grow as we see more opportunities, and we're looking forward to turning those into bookings and revenue over time. Once we secure bookings, we need to align that with supply chain confirmations regarding our configurations and discuss deployment schedules. I want to emphasize that we don't view our customers in a simple buy-sell relationship. That's not our business approach. Though it’s challenging since we once focused solely on memory modules in a very transactional industry, our transformation has involved shifting from memory to AI infrastructure and HPC. However, the real change is in how we perceive our customer relationships. We see them as long-term clients and engagements rather than just transactions. We design, install, and manage systems while ensuring they perform well over time. This perspective creates a significant distinction from the transactional approach, and it reflects in our gross margins compared to larger competitors. I'm very pleased with how this process is evolving. Additionally, it has become increasingly clear that the need for our offerings is being validated each day. While there have been numerous GPU sales in the last year, customers are recognizing the complexities involved in deploying them. These complexities include designing a data center—how to manage power delivery, the layout of various components, rack designs, GPU management, and ensuring maximum uptime. We are engaged in a much more consultative, advisory sale. The executive engagements I'm referring to confirm the necessity for this kind of trusted advisor relationship, and we are well-positioned for it. HPC serves as a solid precursor to AI infrastructure. Historically, HPC helped develop large multiprocessor architectures in data centers, evolving closer to AI around 2018, 2019, and 2020. Very few companies possess over 25 years of deployment knowledge in hardware, software, and future services, and I believe we are improving in how we communicate that value to our customers.

Okay. Great. Thank you.

Thank you.

The next question comes from the line of Thomas O'Malley with Barclays. Thomas, your line is now open.

Hi. This is Scott on for Tom O'Malley. I wanted to touch on the services line. So it looks like services down ticked pretty meaningfully in the quarter. Should we think about this as sort of the new run rate level or do you expect that it ticks back up? Thank you.

Yeah. So I think as we look at Q4, I would expect the services to tick up. And as we've highlighted before, within that basket of services that we have, there are kind of point-in-time services, design, implementation, and the like. And there are managed services that we have. And so we had fewer point-in-time services here in Q3. I would expect that number to tick back up here, sorry, in Q2. I would expect that number to tick back up in Q3. And that was embedded in our guide.

Thank you. That's helpful. And then one more, if you could touch again on CXL? Could you just give us an idea of when you see the market inflecting more meaningfully there and then the types of customers that you see interested, whether that's AI or more general purpose?

Why don't I take the first part of that, and I'll let Jack talk about more the productization and the revenue. So if you talk to leading technology executives and engineering executives on the AI kind of performance curve and AI infrastructure, by far at the top of the list is latency and performance issues caused by the lack of bandwidth and availability to memory from the GPU and CPU. And there's an immense amount of capital going into investing in early-stage companies as well as some of the larger companies who are investing in solutions that help solve this bandwidth issue. Like if you look at the analogy I like to use is if you think about sharing storage in a network, you can do that today; you can't do that in memory. So eventually you'll have the capabilities. I think it's within CXL 3.0. Out in the future, you'll be able to spool memory, but that's not enough. The transport layer of memory is another issue that people are trying to tackle with optical transport layer with CXL on top of it for just maximizing the speed. High bandwidth memory is not the only solution. And there will be other solutions as it relates to how we can enhance the throughput and the latency and the overall systems performance of the compute by having more innovative hardware solutions like CXL and like optical transport integrated into such a solution. But I'll let Jack talk about kind of the market dynamics around when we see that starting to be a meaningful contributor.

Hi. As Mark mentioned, we expect to see significant shipments in CXL by the end of this calendar year. We will be providing these to standard server companies, and we are also in discussions and sampling with various AI companies that need additional memory for their AI servers. With the growth of HBM, more traditional memory is required in servers. However, as the demand for faster memory increases, the available space in DIMM slots diminishes. Therefore, to accommodate this additional memory, CXL becomes essential for integrating more memory into the server. We are identifying opportunities in both segments of the market.

That's very helpful. Thank you.

Thank you.

The next question comes from the line of Brian Chin with Stifel. Brian, your line is now open.

Hi. This is Denis on for Brian. Thanks for letting us ask a few questions. So regarding IPS, how has interest in generative AI over the last year or so changed the customer acquisition into eventually product delivery rollout process? Has it become lengthier or more complex? And then you mentioned you have these options like on-prem, co-location or co-investment. How does the customer's choice of one of these three impact either the timeframe for a rollout or kind of your business in general?

That's a great question. I believe we are still in the very early stages of AI development. While the sales of GPUs and similar products are indicators of what’s to come, large enterprises are still working on their AI strategies. Many GPU sales have gone to those building the infrastructure, rather than large enterprises which have yet to fully define how AI will transform their businesses and provide them with a competitive edge. This situation is unfolding in real time. Additionally, this is a new architectural challenge for most enterprises, excluding the major hyperscalers who have experience in this area. Even well-known companies in their respective industries are finding it difficult to determine how to design a data center or choose the right solutions. In response to your question, I see this as extending the adoption process, though larger enterprises are starting to realize the disparity between their current IT capabilities and what is needed for successful AI deployment. This gap represents an opportunity for us. While the process may take longer and require more education, it also allows us to establish stronger relationships and demonstrate the value we can offer our partners and clients in implementing AI. This is where we find confidence and optimism for the latter half of our fiscal year.

Great. Thank you. And then for my follow-up. So, we recently heard about memory price increases, both DRAM and NAND from all of the big memory suppliers. If prices were to continue to increase, how would you foresee this impacting your future gross margins?

We're not going to forecast more than we normally do in a given quarter. So Ken's kind of giving you the forecast. I will say a couple of things. I think any such benefits that you've alluded to normally will show up in our top line revenue. But as we've been clear on, on prior calls, our gross margins will trickle up or down depending on which way pricing goes. Why is that? Because when pricing moves, our value add doesn't change and our customers realize that. And so, ironically, when our revenues go down, our margins stay pretty stable, maybe even trickle up a little bit just because of the math of fixed value over a declining revenue stream. And the reverse is true. We might see an impact down a point or two or whatever as recovery happens. I don't sense that happening overnight. I don't sense that's something that's going to change the business dynamics. Because more often than not in this type of pricing recovery market, the revenue gain and gross margin dollar contribution mutes out any of the gross margin percentage impact.

Yeah. And what I'd add to that is as we see revenue start to grow, both from units and ASPs over a period of time, where we will see that at the bottom line is an improvement in operating income percent. And you can see that just in the past couple of years, this business, for the memory-specific business, was running at op incomes north of 10%, and we're below that now. So as we start to see unit demand improve as well as ASPs, that should flow to the bottom margin.

Great. Thank you.

Thank you.

And team, at this time we do not have any further questions registered in the queue. So I will turn the call back over for any final remarks.

Well, great. Thank you all for joining. Before just closing out the call, I just wanted to let you know that we have plans for an upcoming IR Day in the next few months or so and details will be coming to you soon. In the meantime, look forward to seeing you at shows and NDRs and the likes. And thanks again for joining today. Have a great week.

That concludes today's call. Thank you all for your participation. And you may now disconnect your lines.