Good day and welcome to the RTX Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Desiree and I will be your operator for today. This conference is being recorded for replay purposes. On the call today are Chris Calio, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Neil Mitchill, Chief Financial Officer; and Nathan Ware, Vice President of Investor Relations. This call is being webcast live on the Internet and there is a presentation available for download on RTX's website at www.rtx.com. Please note, except where otherwise noted, the company will speak to results from continuing operations, excluding acquisition accounting adjustments and net nonrecurring and/or significant items often referred to by management as other significant items. The company also reminds listeners that the earnings and cash flow expectations and any other forward-looking statements provided in this call are subject to risks and uncertainties. RTX SEC filings, including its Forms 8-K, 10-Q, and 10-K, provide details on important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. With that, I will turn the call over to Mr. Calio.

Thank you and good morning, everyone. We delivered a very strong quarter of results in Q3, which reflects our intense focus on execution, the broad utilization of our core operating system, and the durable demand for our products. On the top line, sales were up 13% organically year-over-year with double-digit growth in each of commercial OE, commercial aftermarket, and defense. Adjusted segment operating profit was up 19% year-over-year with growth and margin expansion across all 3 segments. And free cash flow was robust at $4 billion in the quarter, keeping us on track for the full year. Underpinning these results is the continued strength in the global demand for our products and services. In commercial aerospace, passenger air travel has remained resilient with global RPKs on track for approximately 5% growth this year. We continue to see positive OE production trends, which drove a significant increase in production at Collins in the quarter, as well as at Pratt, which saw a 6% growth in large commercial engine deliveries. Commercial aftermarket also remains strong, supported by our large and growing installed base, including over $100 billion of out-of-warranty content at Collins and heavier shop visit content across our MRO activities. Aircraft retirements have remained low with only 1.5% of the V2500 fleet retired so far this year. And Pratt Canada, with nearly 70,000 engines in service, has seen over 15% growth year-to-date in commercial aftermarket. On the defense side, we continue to be exceptionally well-positioned to meet the growing needs of our U.S. and international customers, in particular, with respect to munitions and integrated air and missile defense, both core capabilities of our company. On the orders front, our book-to-bill in the quarter was 1.63, resulting in a backlog of $251 billion, up 13% year-over-year. The activity in the quarter included $37 billion of new awards, with $23 billion of defense and $14 billion of commercial orders. On the commercial side, through Q3, our book-to-bill this year was 1.71 and our backlog has grown 18% since the end of 2024, showing the exceptional demand for our products and technologies at both Collins and Pratt. At Raytheon, we booked over $8 billion of orders for munitions, including approximately $2.5 billion for GEM-T to support multiple international customers and $2.1 billion for AMRAAM, the largest order in the 30-year history of that program. Raytheon was also awarded a significant counter-drone contract for Coyote production from the U.S. Army. Coyote has proven to be extremely effective in the field, and we've recently developed a lower-cost, non-kinetic Coyote payload to combat drone swarms. And Pratt was awarded over $3 billion to support the F135 engine, including the Lot 18 production contract. So overall, our end markets and operational performance remained strong as we enter the fourth quarter. Based on this, we're raising our full year outlook for adjusted sales and EPS and maintaining our free cash flow outlook of $7 billion to $7.5 billion. Neil will take you through the details in a few minutes. But before that, let me provide an update on our strategic priorities on Slide 4. Starting with executing on our commitments. Our focus on driving performance improvements through our core operating system has continued to generate productivity across RTX. Through Q3, we have delivered 10% organic sales growth this year while keeping headcount flat across the organization. This has been a key enabler in driving 6 consecutive quarters of year-over-year adjusted segment margin expansion. With respect to the GTF fleet management plan, our financial and technical outlook remains on track. PW1100 MRO output was up 9% in the quarter and is up 21% year-to-date. We continue to work with our supply chain partners to increase the flow of critical value stream material to ramp MRO output. In Q3, we saw another quarter of solid progress with growth in isothermal forgings up 16% and structural castings up 29% year-over-year. Exiting the third quarter, this material flow has supported a record high number of PW1100 Gate 3 starts, which is where we reassemble engines during a shop visit, putting Pratt in a position to deliver about 30% MRO output growth for the year. And across the company, we continue to focus on increasing critical manufacturing capacity to support growth, including investing over $600 million this year in expansion projects. For example, Raytheon is on track to invest $300 million in capacity expansion to deliver the growing backlog. This includes the Redstone missile integration facility in Huntsville, Alabama, which will increase site capacity by 50% and support the growing demand for our naval programs, including the standard missile franchise. Shifting to innovating for future growth. Pratt Canada was selected by the EU's Clean Aviation program to design and integrate a hybrid electric propulsion demonstrator for regional aircraft. This system integrates a 250-kilowatt electric motor and advanced propeller technology from Collins and is expected to improve fuel efficiency by approximately 20%. Additionally, Collins is nearing final certification of its next-generation braking system for the A321XLR aircraft. The design incorporates proprietary carbon technology and is expected to extend brake life and drive improved profitability in our maintenance support portfolio. And Raytheon recently demonstrated 2 significant effector technology achievements. The AMRAAM team successfully completed the longest-ever air-to-air shot from a fifth-generation fighter. And the StormBreaker team, in just 50 days, designed, developed, and tested a new ground launch demonstrator version of this air-launched effector, which will expand the capabilities and future applications for this product. And finally, we remain focused on leveraging the breadth and scale of RTX. As we've highlighted before, we continue to develop and deploy our data analytics and AI tools to improve productivity and the speed and quality of decision-making in our business. We're strategically using these tools to support the highest impact opportunities across the company, including increasing munitions and OE production rates, growing GTF MRO output, and improving sales and inventory planning and management. For example, the Raytheon AMRAAM team has deployed multiple proprietary digital AI tools to proactively identify production bottlenecks and reduce rework, which has contributed to output more than doubling year-to-date through Q3 on the program. These examples highlight the progress that we continue to make across our strategic priorities, and I'm pleased with the results they are yielding throughout the company. With that, let me turn it over to Neil to take you through the third quarter results and our updated outlook for the full year.

All right, Chris. Thanks. I'm on Slide 5. In the third quarter, adjusted sales of $22.5 billion were up 12% on an adjusted basis and 13% organically. As Chris mentioned, this was a very strong result in the quarter with commercial aftermarket up 18% and commercial OE and defense, both up 10%. Adjusted segment operating profit of $2.8 billion was up 19%, and we saw 70 basis points of consolidated segment margin expansion with contributions from all 3 segments. Adjusted earnings per share of $1.70 was up 17% from the prior year, driven primarily by segment operating profit growth. In addition, the quarter also benefited from several tax items, including legal entity reorganizations, which impacted EPS by approximately $0.12. These items more than offset a $0.04 headwind from the recently enacted tax legislation. On a GAAP basis, EPS from continuing operations was $1.41 and included $0.29 of acquisition accounting adjustments. Free cash flow was very strong at $4 billion, driven by working capital improvement, including strong collections and some advance payments tied to contract awards in the quarter that were accelerated from Q4. Cash flow for the quarter also included approximately $275 million for powder metal-related compensation and $220 million of tariff-related impacts. With respect to capital allocation, we returned over $900 million to shareholders through dividends in the quarter. And with our focus on further strengthening our balance sheet, we paid down $2.9 billion of debt in the quarter. And finally, during the quarter, we completed the sale of the actuation business. And earlier this month, we also completed the sale of Collins' Simmonds Precision Products business for $765 million. Okay. Turning to Slide 6. Let me provide a few details on our updated outlook for the full year. As you've seen with our third quarter results, execution and momentum across all 3 segments continue to be strong. Given this operating performance, along with the strength of our end markets, we are updating our outlook for the full year. On the top line, we are raising our full year adjusted sales outlook to a range of $86.5 billion to $87 billion, up from our prior range of $84.75 billion to $85.5 billion. This now translates to between 8% and 9% organic sales growth for the year, up from our prior range of 6% to 7%. By channel, at the RTX level and adjusting for divestitures, we now expect commercial aftermarket sales to grow mid-teens year-over-year, up from our prior outlook of low teens, primarily driven by heavier shop visit content that we saw in Q3 at Pratt. On the commercial OE side, we expect sales to grow around 10% for the year, up from our prior outlook of high single digits year-over-year. And on defense, we continue to expect sales to grow mid-single digits. On the bottom line, given the performance across all 3 segments, we are increasing adjusted earnings per share by $0.30 on the low end of our range and $0.25 on the high end. At the midpoint, the increase is primarily driven by approximately $0.20 of improved segment operating profit, with the rest coming from a few below-the-line items. And within this updated outlook, there is no change to the net tariff headwind we discussed on our last earnings call. All in, we now see adjusted EPS at a new range of between $6.10 and $6.20 for the full year, up from our prior range of $5.80 to $5.95. Specific to Q4, we expect another quarter of strong operational performance at the segment level, with segment profit up around 10% year-over-year, excluding the impact of tariffs and recent divestitures at Collins. Below the line, the Q3 $0.12 tax benefit I mentioned will not repeat, and we expect a higher effective tax rate in the fourth quarter. On free cash flow, we are on track to achieve our outlook of between $7 billion and $7.5 billion for the year. The primary drivers of our fourth quarter free cash flow will be the same as we saw in the third quarter, segment operating profit growth, and working capital improvement. And as we look beyond this year, we feel good about the momentum we're seeing across our business, including our growing backlog and end market strength that continues to position us well for continued top line growth, margin expansion, and solid free cash flow conversion. And like we do every year, we'll be back on our fourth quarter earnings call in January with our detailed outlook for 2026. So with that, let me hand it over to Nathan to take you through the segment results for the third quarter.

All right. Thanks, Neil. Starting with Collins on Slide 7. Sales were $7.6 billion in the quarter, up 8% on an adjusted basis and 11% organically, driven by strength across all 3 channels. Adjusting for divestitures by channel, commercial OE sales were up 16% versus the prior year, driven primarily by higher volume on narrowbody platforms. Recall, last year included the impact of the Boeing work stoppage in the quarter. Commercial aftermarket sales were up 13%, driven by a 17% increase in mods and upgrades, a 13% increase in parts and repair, and a 10% increase in provisioning. Defense sales were up 6% versus the prior year, driven by higher volume across multiple programs and platforms, including the Survivable Airborne Operations Center program. Adjusted operating profit of $1.2 billion was up $98 million versus the prior year as drop-through on higher commercial aftermarket, defense, and commercial OE volume, along with lower R&D expense was partially offset by unfavorable commercial OE mix and the impact of higher tariffs across the business. Turning to Collins' full year outlook. We continue to expect sales to grow mid-single digits year-over-year on an adjusted basis and high single digits organically. And we now expect operating profit growth between $325 million and $375 million versus 2024, up from our prior expectation of between $275 million and $350 million, driven by drop-through on higher commercial aftermarket volume. Keep in mind, this updated profit range includes an approximately $60 million year-over-year headwind associated with the business divestitures completed this year.

Shifting to Pratt & Whitney on Slide 8. Sales of $8.4 billion were up 16% on both an adjusted and organic basis, driven by strength across all channels. Commercial OE sales were up 5%, driven by increased volume in large commercial engines and favorable mix in Pratt Canada. Commercial aftermarket sales were up 23%, driven by higher volume in both large commercial engines and Pratt Canada. In military engines, sales were up 15% in the quarter, driven primarily by the F135 program, including higher volume associated with the Lot 18 contract award. Adjusted operating profit of $751 million was up $154 million versus the prior year, driven by drop-through on higher commercial aftermarket and military volume. This growth more than offset increased large commercial OE deliveries, higher SG&A expense, and the impact of higher tariffs across the business. Turning to Pratt's full year outlook. We now expect sales to grow low to mid-teens on an adjusted and organic basis, an increase from our prior range of up low double digits, driven by strength in commercial aftermarket and favorable commercial OE mix. And we now expect operating profit growth between $350 million and $400 million versus 2024, up from our prior expectation of between $200 million and $275 million, driven by drop-through on higher commercial aftermarket volume and favorable commercial OE mix.

Now turning to Raytheon on Slide 9. Sales of $7 billion in the quarter were up 10% on both an adjusted and organic basis, driven by higher volume on land and air defense systems, including international Patriot and higher volume on naval programs, including multiple classified programs, SM-6 and the Evolved SeaSparrow Missile. Adjusted operating profit of $859 million was up $198 million versus the prior year, driven by favorable program mix, including international Patriot, improved net productivity, and higher volume. Net productivity improved $57 million year-over-year. Recall, Q3 of last year included an unfavorable impact of $53 million related to a classified program. Bookings in the quarter were $15.9 billion, resulting in a book-to-bill of 2.27 and a record backlog of $72 billion. International backlog represented 44% of Raytheon's total at the end of the quarter and was up 18% on a dollar basis year-over-year. Other key awards in the quarter included $1.5 billion for LTAMDS production and over $500 million for Stinger production. These awards will support both domestic and international customers. And on a rolling 12-month basis, Raytheon's book-to-bill is 1.43. Turning to Raytheon's full year outlook. We continue to expect sales to grow low single digits year-over-year on an adjusted basis and mid-single digits organically. And we now expect operating profit growth between $400 million and $450 million versus 2024, up from our prior expectation of between $225 million and $300 million, driven by the favorable international program mix we saw during the third quarter.

Okay. Thanks, Nathan. We have great momentum across RTX. We delivered strong top and bottom line growth this quarter and our end markets remain robust as seen by our recent customer wins and 1.63 book-to-bill in the quarter. Our backlog now stands at $251 billion and we remain focused on our strategic priorities across the company, giving us confidence in our ability to deliver strong growth in sales, earnings, and free cash flow well beyond this year. With that, let's open it up for questions.

The first question will come from Rob Stallard with Vertical Research.

This is probably for Neil. You've raised the aerospace OEM guidance for the year, so I was wondering if you could provide more details on that. Also, Chris, how confident are you in delivering those new LEAP engines to Airbus in relation to their full-year target?

Thanks, Rob. Let me start on the guidance and then I'll hand it over to Chris. Again, really strong quarter here in the third quarter. And what we've done with our outlook is we've dropped through that goodness for the full year. Also taking up the top line, if I kind of focus that around the midpoint at the top line at the RTX level, we'll see about $1.6 billion increase. Commercial aftermarket is a large portion of that. Commercial OE is about $200 million there. I'd say that $50 million of that is coming from Collins. The rest of it is Pratt & Whitney. And what we're seeing there is continued delivery strength on the Collins side, particularly as we get into the last quarter of the year here on increased rates on 737 and 787. And on the Pratt side, I'd attribute that to the engine mix. On the aftermarket side, a lot of that sits at Pratt & Whitney, about $1.1 billion of the $1.6 billion that we're talking about on the increase sits inside of Pratt & Whitney with the majority of that in the aftermarket. We had a really strong third quarter. As you heard Chris talk about, the increase in MRO output is driving GTF aftermarket. We're also seeing strong V2500 mix and heavy shop visits there. So again, letting that drop through for the full year and you'll see that both on the top and the bottom line. And then finally, there's a couple of hundred million dollars at Raytheon on the defense side. We've got 10 consecutive quarters here of material receipt growth and we're continuing to get ready for the delivery of that large backlog and a backlog we expect to continue to grow. So those are the big moving pieces on the top line. Of course, dropping through on the bottom line, you see the profit there. We've had some favorability on below-the-line items as well and we're letting that kind of come through as we stare at just 90 days to go.

Rob, I'll take over regarding your second question about deliveries. Overall, we feel quite positive about our performance this year and how we've supported the production increases for all the aircraft manufacturers. We will keep collaborating closely with Airbus to ensure they have what they need as the year progresses, while also managing the allocation of materials as we've mentioned earlier, since we must continue to support the fleet. This will remain a primary focus. I want to highlight that we are over 50% ahead of our production levels from 2019. We have consistently ramped up production strongly and will keep working closely with our airframe customers to ensure they have everything necessary to meet their delivery targets by the end of the year.

Neil, maybe just a clarification first and then maybe, Chris, a question on Raytheon segment. On the clarification, the 30% output for the full year, I just want to make sure that's 30% output for GTF and so a pretty steep 4Q MRO output improvement you're looking for there. And then, Chris, on the Raytheon outlook, could you just comment on the limitations to growth? It's clearly not a demand situation here that you're poor on and would expect that the Raytheon segment's revenue would start to accelerate pretty meaningfully. Obviously, we saw some of that here in the third quarter but didn't raise in the full year. And so maybe what are the limitations there?

Yes. Thanks, Myles. Maybe your question on the GTF MRO output, I'll start there. And you're right, through the year-to-date, up about 20%. We need to get to that 30% level. MRO output, as I've said, pretty consistently, is the key to continuing to push down our AOG levels. And I think we're in a pretty good position to be able to hit that 30% for the full year. And there are several factors that kind of put us in that position. I mean, first, we exited September with the record number of gate restarts, as I said previously, that's the reassembly and then the testing process. So feel good about how we've come out of the gate here, no pun intended. Material flow in the critical value streams was pretty strong. Isothermal forgings were up 16% year-over-year, as I mentioned, structural castings 29% year-over-year. Another piece here is our repair network, demonstrated some strong increase here in Q3, 30% year-over-year. That helps lessen the demand for new parts, which should again help the flow in Gate 2. We've continued to see progress with productivity in our shops. Again, exited Q3 and September with about 80% of our MRO completions on the GTF averaging 110-day turnaround time in the shop and that's on heavier work scopes. Those are the things that I think put us in a position to drive here in the fourth quarter on MRO output, ultimately to support the fleet. On your questions on Raytheon, and I'll invite Neil to come in as well if he wants to talk about some of the puts and takes in the quarter. But overall, the headline story here is just continued exceptionally strong demand, right? The book-to-bill in the quarter at 2.27, $16 billion of new orders. The demand is there and we're continuing to invest in capacity to ensure that, that demand can be met. You heard us talk about the $300 million this year. If you just think about since 2020, just at Raytheon alone, it's been about $1 billion on capacity expansions and automation. And then I'll tell you, for us, it's looking at the supply chain and making sure that it continues to be healthy. We're seeing our 10th consecutive quarter of material receipts growth, which is great. We've got to continue to see that accelerate upwards across all of our critical value streams, whether that be microelectronics, rocket motors, and the like. So while performance has stabilized and been good, we need to continue to see that accelerate '26 and beyond because the demand is there.

Chris, I'll just add to that a little bit. Myles, you alluded to it. The third quarter is seeing a very substantial 10% organic growth at Raytheon. If you look under the covers there, just a couple of kind of anecdotes. Our naval power business is in line with that level of growth but our land and air defense systems business is significantly higher than that. So that growth that you're talking about, we're seeing come through in that side of the business, in particular, as it relates to Patriot and GEM-T output. So the business is very diverse, as you know. And when you look at it at the Raytheon level, I still think we're going to see very strong aggregate organic growth going forward. But certainly, within the areas of munitions and air and defense systems, we're seeing growth that's well above what we're reporting at the Raytheon level.

In Raytheon, it has not only been about the top line or backlog; there has also been impressive performance regarding margins, with ongoing margin expansion. How should we approach this as growth accelerates, especially with a higher international mix? Could you elaborate on your perspective regarding Raytheon's margins in the long term?

Yes. Peter, you're absolutely right. When we talk about the backlog at Raytheon, which is substantial, huge orders in the quarter and if you think about the international portion of that backlog, it now sits at about 44%. And our top 3 programs in that backlog are international. So that certainly provides a tailwind. I would also tell you, the team continues to focus heavily on our core operating system and driving productivity and efficiency in our shops to take cost down and to drive productivity. I can give you a number of examples this year where Phil and the team have used our core operating principles to drive increased production and to drive down cost. And if you just think about some of our top programs, we're going to have significant increases in production this year. Just think AMRAAM, you think GEM-T, Coyote, significant production ramps, again, enabled by more efficiency in our shops, which, again, drives down cost and provides some margin tailwind.

Peter, I'll add that during the third quarter, really pleased to see positive productivity on top of significant year-over-year productivity. Obviously, we had a one-time item last year. But year-to-date, it's about $75 million or so of productivity improvement. That's on top of $160 million last year. So the business is getting back to its formula of driving efficiencies and driving productivity. And clearly, the growing backlog creates more opportunities for us to do that. So now those are significant items here in the quarter. The mix was heavily international focused, particularly on the Patriot deliveries but we'll see that change a little bit in the fourth quarter. But long term, as Chris said, the mix of the backlog supports an expanding margin, and we're happy to see the productivity continuing to develop in the business.

The only thing I would add to that, Peter, just to build on Neil's comment, is it's not only the mix of international and domestic; it's the mix in terms of the products that you're seeing in there. In terms of the $16 billion in orders this particular quarter, $8 billion in effectors. Those are things directly in the core capabilities of Raytheon, where we've got mature processes, and where we've been able to historically yield productivity. So another piece of good news on that front.

Neil, looks like Pratt commercial OE revenue was up 5% on 6% higher shipments. So was the GTF spare engine ratio down year-over-year this quarter? Or are these spare engines just being heavily discounted for the customers that are impacted by the powder metal issue? I'm just trying to understand.

Yes, thank you for the question. I wouldn't say that our spare engines are being heavily discounted. As you know and as Chris mentioned earlier, we're balancing the output of installs, spares, and material to the MRO network. We're continuing this approach in the third quarter. I don't see any significant change in the mix between original equipment and spares that we observed during the quarter. As we've discussed previously, we anticipate this trend will persist. There's considerable demand for all of these engines, whether they are going to Airbus, directly to airline customers, or as material going into the MRO network. So nothing particularly unusual in the quarter. Looking ahead to the fourth quarter, we expect a continued increase in original equipment. Year-over-year, there will be some headwinds from a higher negative engine margin in the fourth quarter, but still anticipate a reasonable balance of spares and the typical fourth quarter aftermarket performance from Pratt.

Maybe touching base on the Boeing 737 MAX and 787. Can you level set us regarding the run rate you're currently producing and how we should think about incremental margins on these programs as volumes continue to ramp up? And ultimately, how does that expectation relate to your overall Collins margin expectations?

Thank you, Kristine. I'm really pleased to see the approval for a higher production rate on the 737. Currently, we are aligned with Boeing on their rates and their future goals for Collins. Historically, Collins has operated at higher rates, so we have the capacity to support this volume increase. We're confident that as production rates climb, we will be well-prepared to assist Boeing in their efforts. Of course, the ongoing stability of the supply chain will be crucial. We've been very open about our supply chain status and our needs, which has been beneficial. I believe we're in a strong position to continue supporting Boeing as they progress.

If I may elaborate, at the start of the year, we established our outlook based on certain assumptions and we were on track with that. There was some inventory in the channel, but now, with over three-quarters of the year completed, most of that is resolved. We are well-aligned with Boeing's delivery schedule. The increased production of the 787 on the Collins side presents some margin challenges, but as Chris mentioned, production rates are returning to the levels we prepared for. This will lead to better absorption, contributing to ongoing margin expansion in the Collins business related to original equipment. Additionally, with more new aircraft entering service, provisioning and aftermarket opportunities will accompany that. Overall, I believe we are on the right path. We'll provide a more detailed outlook in January, but we anticipate growth in the Collins segment.

Was wondering if you could just update us on your expectations through '26 on the GTF compensation payments. Has there been any change to the timing of when we get down to a much lower level of AOGs and the like? And is the provision still adequate?

Thanks, Gautam. I'll take that one. Today, we sit here and the financial outlook remains consistent with the outlook that we've had for now a couple of years. The team continues to be disciplined with our compensation payments to our customers. I'd say we're right on track with where we expected to be this year. We have some more to go, a little bit heavier fourth quarter payments. That was all planned and contemplated in our outlook. We said between $1.1 billion and $1.3 billion for the year. And so the residual falls into next year. I'd say right now, no change to that outlook. It seems on track.

Can you speak a little bit to the margins in Collins? It seems like the incremental margins might have been a little bit weaker than what we were thinking. Is that tariff-related? Or how should we think about that?

Yes, it's definitely related to tariffs. During the quarter, Collins experienced approximately $90 million in headwinds from year-over-year tariffs, the same amount that Pratt saw for the quarter. If you set that aside, the team is effectively working to reduce that figure as we progress. Several mitigations have been identified, but tariffs are the main factor impacting the margins. Moving forward, we are actively supporting our products and their qualification for USMCA treatment or bonds as we re-export materials outside of the U.S. There is also an opportunity to continue alleviating these headwinds through pricing strategies. This situation was evident in the third quarter, and we anticipate seeing similar impacts in the fourth quarter for both Collins and Pratt.

Maybe I could revisit Pratt to discuss the factors affecting both the top line and bottom line. Regarding commercial operations, you increased the revenue guidance for commercial OE by $150 million at Pratt, citing a positive mix. Can we consider whether this is primarily due to the GTF advantage, resulting in higher revenues per engine and a favorable spares mix? Additionally, how does this impact the bottom line given the negative engine margin challenges? Is the estimate still in the range of $150 million to $200 million for '25? Furthermore, how should we view the increased MRO output as we approach the fourth quarter and into '26?

Sure. Let me take that, Sheila. As I said earlier on the call here, the Pratt uptick in the revenue outlook is about $1.1 billion at the midpoint of our guidance. About $150 million of that is on the OE side. And I would say it has nothing to do with the GTF advantage at this point. It's really just finalization of the year, the mix of spare engines versus install engines and the volumes that we see there. So that's what's driving the top line there, frankly. We're also seeing about $100 million on the defense side of Pratt & Whitney, and we are happy to get the Lot 18 production contract executed in the third quarter. That drove most of the growth that Pratt saw on the military side in the third quarter. And so as we play that forward, the material receipts coming in, we expect a little bit of upside there. The rest sits in the aftermarket. And if you think about the third quarter and the fourth quarter MRO output that we just talked about, that comes with revenue. So there's a heavy mix of that towards the GTF. Obviously, that comes with some profit but not the same kind of profits that we see on the V2500. That said, on the V2500, I talked about 800 shop visits for the full year. I'd say we are right on track. It's been pretty linear throughout the first 3 quarters of the year. So we expect another quarter of about the same level of volume on the V2500. Those shop visits are getting a little bit heavier. And so that's what you're seeing in the top line. And of course, that's dropping to the bottom line. As it relates to full year negative engine margin, no change to the outlook from the beginning of the year, still within that $150 million to $200 million year-over-year headwind. I expect it's going to land somewhere in the middle of that at the end of the year.

Wanted to ask just a quick clarification and question. Just following up on Sheila's question, at Pratt and GTF, given negative engine margin outlook is still the same, are we still thinking about 14% growth in GTF deliveries for the year and which implies a very, very strong Q4? And then as a question, I guess, as we think about where the company is going to exit this year, balance sheet should be getting into better shape. How do you think about capital deployment as we go forward and maybe balancing the ability to start returning some cash along with maybe some of the investment requirements that might be ahead, especially on the defense side?

Thank you for the question. Regarding GTF engines, at the beginning of the year, I mentioned growth similar to last year, though I didn't specify a number. Now, it looks like we're heading towards a growth rate in the high single digits, around 8% to 10%. You can calculate what that means for the fourth quarter. On the topic of capital return, we've been pleased with our debt paydown this year. As you're aware, we conducted a buyback a few years ago and reduced some debt, which we've been repaying over the last couple of years. We plan to continue this into next year and return to our previous debt levels before that transaction. We're prioritizing dividends, as we always have, and expect them to grow alongside earnings in the coming years. Additionally, we're committed to making the necessary investments in the business, particularly in research and development and capital expenditures. We anticipate capital expenditures this year to be between $2.5 billion and $2.7 billion, along with similar levels of company-funded R&D, and I expect this trend to continue moving forward. Chris?

Yes, I'd like to highlight something Neil mentioned, which is spot on. As the need for defense investment may keep growing, we've historically managed to do that alongside our capital allocation strategy. Our average investment is about $1.5 billion a year in defense, capacity, automation, and R&D. We continue to invest where the business cases are sound. For us, it's really about having a conversation with the government regarding long-term demand signals. We can build a business case for investing when we have visibility into long-term demand. When we see and feel confident about it, we invest. Ultimately, regarding our capital deployment strategy, we can pursue both initiatives simultaneously.

Chris, you mentioned V2500 retirements have been low, and that's a trend we've seen coming out of COVID. We're kind of at a point where ASKs, at least domestic ASKs, are growing below the pre-COVID trend. Next year, Boeing and Airbus will probably deliver 1,300 narrowbodies, and we'll have potentially hundreds of GTF-powered aircraft returning to service. So when you think about V2500 shop visit visibility into next year, are you requiring customers to put down deposits to reserve shop visits just to make them a little bit more sticky?

Yes. Thanks for the question, Scott. So look and Neil said this upfront, the demand for the V2500 continues to be strong and that's separate and apart from what you just mentioned. And that's because, frankly, what's the dynamic of what's going on in the fleet, obviously. So people need to continue to use their Vs but it's also the characteristics of that fleet. It's still a relatively young fleet. Average age is 15 years. 15% haven't seen a first shop visit, 40% haven't seen a second shop visit. So there is just natural significant aftermarket runway ahead on that program. Customers love the application. And so we feel good about the demand on this going forward, frankly, above where we thought it would be 1 year, 2 years ago, continues to have runway.

On Raytheon, you talked some about margins before. This quarter, you got over that 12% level that I know you've been looking at for some time. And when you talk about the opportunities here, higher volumes, more international, more mature fixed price work, are you kind of where you want to be already? Or can we see more upside from here on margins as you go forward over the next few years because it does set up well?

Yes, Doug, we're very pleased with Raytheon's position. Demand is the key point. The international portion of our backlog has grown to 44%, which is an increase from last year. We feel confident about the mix and the potential benefits it can provide. I want to emphasize that the $50 billion in munitions replenishment and Golden Dome for America are not currently reflected in our backlog, so they could add to it. However, we need to maintain supply chain health to achieve these levels. The defense supply chain is highly interconnected, so any increase in production across various programs requires careful coordination with suppliers and the introduction of new suppliers to meet the demand. The critical factor for converting this situation into positive results will be our ability to maintain a healthy supply chain to support higher delivery rates. This has been a focal point for us.

Can you discuss the 13% increase in the Collins aftermarket, particularly focusing on the components involved and your observations regarding retrofits? Additionally, for both Collins and Pratt, are you seeing similar pricing levels for spare parts this year compared to last year, or is there any noticeable resistance from customers on catalog pricing this year?

Yes, thanks, Ken. I’ll touch briefly on Collins and then Neil can provide more details. Collins has experienced double-digit organic growth across all three of its aftermarket channels: parts and repair, provisioning, as well as modifications and upgrades. We feel very positive about the robust performance we're witnessing in the Collins aftermarket. With over $100 billion in its out-of-warranty installed base, it is in a very strong position for aftermarket growth. Regarding pricing for both Pratt and Collins, considering the current tariff situation and market demand, both have taken an appropriately aggressive approach to pricing this year. Looking ahead to next year, we will need to monitor the tariff developments. Nonetheless, we plan to maintain our aggressive stance on catalog pricing due to the significant value we provide and the existing demand in the market.

And to add some color on the quarter's aftermarket performance, I think what was notable was the parts and repair. We're seeing 13% organic growth there. And that's indicative of aircraft that are flying that need sort of the break/fix type of aftermarket that Collins has, which comes with very good margins. So I think that was encouraging to see, on the mods and upgrades up 17% organic. If you look a little bit into that, you're going to see that the interiors business was up significantly during the quarter. Top line growth really, really strong. Still working through some older contracts there. But I would tell you on the top line, delivering that backlog, positioned for continued growth as well as expanding margins on the interiors business, which is one of the items that will fuel next year's margin expansion for Collins.

I guess I wanted to ask about 2026 free cash flow conversion. I think you made some recent comments, and there's a little bit of market confusion or investor confusion around that. And then if you could bridge some of the major moving pieces as we go into 2026. And then why reiterate the 2025 free cash guide while raising everything else?

Thanks. Let me start with 2025. We set out the year with a goal of $7 billion to $7.5 billion of free cash flow. And as we sit here today, we're very comfortable with that for the full year. There have been some moving pieces. I'll remind you, back in the second quarter, we had some tariff headwind that we onboarded, about $600 million. We offset that with lower cash taxes for the year. So that's sort of neutralized. And as you kind of roll forward to where we sit today, obviously, we're getting stronger operating profit. And we're seeing a little bit of growth in the inventory, I'd say less reduction in the inventory. We were pleased to see inventory come down a couple of hundred million dollars sequentially from Q2 to Q3; things are moving in the right direction. And I think we'll see another few hundred million dollars of inventory reduction as we exit the year. But there's been some stocking there to prepare for this continued growth. And we're making sure that we balance our sales and inventory and ops planning using the CORE operating system to do that. But that was one of the things that sort of offset a little bit here in the fourth quarter. That said, really strong collections in the third quarter. We had catch-up from the Pratt & Whitney work stoppage in the second quarter that helped bolster the results. We also had some advances that the Raytheon business in particular, as well as the execution of the Lot 18 contract at Pratt brought some cash into the third quarter; things that were planned in the fourth quarter. So as we sit here and you look at the implied fourth quarter, very achievable, positioning us, I think, for a nice start to '26 as well. I'm not going to get into the specifics of '26 but if you look at '25 and you think about the $7.25 billion at the midpoint, you also think about the level of powder metal compensation embedded in that, you can see that our baseline free cash flow is in the $8 billion, $8.5 billion range. And so next year, as we look forward, obviously, we expect powder metal payments to come down. Working capital still remains an opportunity for us. We have very heavy levels, but we have very heavy growth plans ahead of us. So we'll be balancing that as we move forward. I'll be back in January to provide a more detailed walk on that front.

Yes. Maybe just to add to it, Gavin. I think long term, we think the 90% to 100% of free cash flow is where this business is positioned to sit. And if you just step back, you've got some momentum around that with some of the fundamental attributes in this business, a $251 billion backlog in place to drive growth. Commercial OE production is ramping. Air traffic has been resilient. And of course, we've got large installed base with Collins and Pratt, which have long aftermarket tails. And of course, we've talked a lot today about the growth in defense spending. So put all those things together and that's where we get to that longer-term 90% to 100% conversion.

With that, there are no more analysts in the queue. So I will now turn the call back over to Nathan Ware.

All right. Thank you, Desiree. That concludes today's call. As always, the Investor Relations team will be available for follow-up questions. So thank you all for joining us and have a good day.

This now concludes today's conference. You may now disconnect.