Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the AST SpaceMobile Fourth Quarter 2023 Business Update Call. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your host today, Scott Wisniewski, Chief Strategy Officer of AST SpaceMobile. Please go ahead.

Thank you, and good afternoon, everyone. Let me refer you to Page 2 of the presentation, which contains our safe harbor disclaimer. During today's call, we may make certain forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions, and as a result, are subject to risks and uncertainties. Many factors could cause actual events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements on this call. For more information about these risks and uncertainties, please refer to the Risk Factors section of AST SpaceMobile's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other documents filed by AST SpaceMobile with the SEC from time to time. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements, and the company specifically disclaims any obligation to update the forward-looking statements that may be discussed during this call. Also, after our initial remarks, we will be starting our Q&A section with questions submitted in advance by our shareholders. Now referring to Page 3. For those of you who may be new to our company and our mission, there are over 5 billion mobile phones in use today around the world, but many of us still experience gaps in coverage as we live, work, and travel. Additionally, there are billions of people without cellular broadband who remain unconnected to the global digital economy. These markets that we are pursuing are massive, and the problem we are solving is important and touches nearly all of us. In this backdrop, AST SpaceMobile is building the first and only global cellular broadband network in space to operate directly with everyday unmodified mobile devices, supported by our extensive IP and patent portfolio and designed for both commercial and government use. With that, I would like to introduce Chairman and CEO, Abel Avellan.

Thank you, Scott. I would like to welcome everybody to our Q4 2023 business update call. It has been an incredibly busy few months here at AST SpaceMobile, and I will walk you through updates on our key areas of focus today. First, at the start of the year, we announced strategic investments from AT&T, Google, and Vodafone, which represent a vote of confidence in our technology and business model. With this, we have the necessary funding on hand to execute near-term strategic plans for the launch of five 700 square foot Block 1 BlueBird satellites and the initial next-generation 2,400-square-foot Bluebirds, which will surpass Block 1 as the largest phased array in low Earth orbit. We’re also very excited to continue to advance this caution with additional strategic partners following the blueprint of strategic investment alongside commercial payments. Another great development on our commercialization was the new contract award we announced with the United States government through a prime contractor, which we believe will open the door for dual-use commercial and government applications of our satellites. On the regulatory front, we have received great news recently with the new FCC rules, which will provide a pathway to log over 200 megahertz of spectrum for direct-to-device to support the rollout of our technology. The FCC voted March 14 to approve the supplemental coverage from this space, which was published in February. This should facilitate AST’s SpaceMobile FCC application to provide commercial services in the U.S. This will simplify the overall application process by making the standard rules, which will cover the majority of AST SpaceMobile applications. We anticipate many regulatory entities globally will follow the new U.S. regulatory regime to regulate our services. We’re starting to see this in large countries like Brazil. Moving to manufacturing, our 185,000-square-foot Texas facilities are fully operational with production, assembly, and testing. Unfortunately, production was negatively impacted primarily by two suppliers, leading to delays in integration and testing for these five 700-square-foot Block I Bluebirds, while we have also faced initial challenges on the manufacturing of our new upgrade Microns to be used for Block I and Block II. In order to accelerate production of our next satellites and reduce dependency on outside suppliers, we acquired a license to manufacture one of the components and replace the other supplier with our own IP and design. At the same time, while rapidly stabilizing our Micron production line, this is important because these are the same Micron building blocks for our next satellite launch. With the supplier fixes, we will be able to manufacture in-house and through our third parties of our own IP approximately 95% of all satellites subsystems for our next generation Block II Bluebird satellite, securing our supply chain further. Next, I can share updates on our orbital launches to provide a near-term timeline. We expect that the five 700-foot Block I Bluebird satellite will be transported from our assembly facility to the launch site between July and August 2024. And looking ahead, we have secured an additional launch contract for the first 2400-square-foot next generation Block II Bluebird satellite with a contract launch window from December 2024 to March 2025, which will surpass Block I as the largest phase array in loaded orbits. Also, as we announced last week, our Custom ASIC entered the Tape-Out phase, which is planned to enable 120 megabits peak data rate on 40-megahertz spectrum channels. This novel custom and low-power architecture was developed to enable up to tenfold improvement in processing bandwidth on each next generation 2400-square-foot Block II Bluebird satellite. The design of our Custom ASIC with a processing bandwidth of approximately 10,000 megahertz per satellite along with the large phase array is the enabler of true space-based cellular broadband with a relatively small number of satellites. This effort represents over four years equivalent to an estimated 150 man-years of intensive work, as well as approximately $45 million of development on the ASIC alone. And lastly, in addition to the strategic discussion referred earlier, we are very excited to have received three non-binding letters of interest for non-dilutive quasi-governmental funding. As a result, we have initiated the process with these funding sources. Turning to page five, the investment from AT&T, Google, and Vodafone are of great significance for us as they are some of our largest prospective customers alongside the U.S. government. With Google in particular, the agreement to collaborate on product development will be a great benefit for our prospective MNO customers. We had agreements and understanding with more than 40 mobile network operators globally which have over 2 billion existing subscribers. AT&T and Google joined Vodafone, Rakuten, American Tower, and Bell Canada as investors. I could not be more proud to have these great organizations alongside us on the execution of our mission. And as I stated before, we continue to advance discussion with additional strategic partners following the blueprint of strategic investments alongside commercial payments. Turning to page six, a few weeks ago, we announced a new contract award with the United States government through a prime contractor. I want to take a step back on what is the opportunity here. Our large phase array antenna technology in space is able to address many potential opportunities for mission-critical capabilities in the government sector. The large aperture and high power delivered into orbit at a low cost compared with historical benchmarks fit the desired governmental model for capturing commercial networks with dual-use capabilities. And while we remain focused on a large commercial opportunity for our business, we’re excited about initiatives underway with the U.S. government as well. We have begun recording initial revenue under this contract in Q1 2024. Also, there are potential other awards including additional phases of this contract available to us in calendar year 2024. Turning to page seven, I want to take a moment to walk through why having our own ASIC is really a big deal and is critical to achieve true broadband from space. Our novel custom and low-power architecture was developed to enable up to tenfold improvement in processing bandwidth on each satellite. Satellites will be lighter, cheaper to produce, and will require less mass to orbit. The tape-out will be completed with TSMC, the world’s leading foundry following work with leaders in the semiconductor industry over the last few years. For those of you who are not familiar with the industry jargon, the tape-out means that we and our development partners have completed the design of the ASIC. After four years of work and $45 million of investment, we have now formally handed over those designs to TSMC to produce the chip for the initial set of ASICs to enable the 2,400-square-foot next-generation Block 2 Bluebirds, which we’ll be expecting to receive later this year. I am extremely proud of the team’s effort to reach this critical milestone. Our ASIC, along with our large antenna, will enable up to 120 megabits per second data rates per bin on 40-megahertz channels and 10,000 megahertz of processing bandwidth. That, combined with our large space array, is the key enabler for true broadband from space to the phone that you already have in your pocket. I will now pass it to Scott to provide a brief regulatory update.

Thank you, Abel. On page 8, I’ll take us through some of the important progress on the regulatory front. To provide a reminder for everyone, we made our first filings with the FCC back in 2020, and we’ve been in front of them regularly around direct-to-device using standard unmodified cellular phones from a very early stage. Importantly, the unanimous decision to adopt the new rules in March facilitates our FCC application to provide commercial service in the U.S. because it specifically enables over 200 megahertz of low-band frequencies for direct-to-device use. And just prior to this FCC vote, we also filed an updated application to reflect a licensing jurisdiction with the U.S. This represents a closer strategic alignment of AST SpaceMobile’s network build-out and future network operations in the United States. And internationally, Brazil announced an initial regulatory framework for direct-to-device as well. This framework enables us to test in Brazil with TIM Brazil and Claro, a subsidiary of American Mobile. And with that, I’ll hand it off to Sean for our financial update.

Thanks, Scott, and good afternoon, everyone. The AST SpaceMobile business continued to make progress this quarter with a significant fundraising in January, continued work on the regulatory front, and a substantial level of activity in our assembly, integration, and testing facility in Midland, focusing on the production of five Block 1 satellites. I would also like to point out that we have entered the tape-out phase of our custom ASIC chip. The ASIC chip will provide for increases in processing capacity that will significantly raise the inventory of gigabytes on future planned satellites we can sell through our M&O partners to end users. The ASIC design has been an almost four-year process supported by a large investment which we believe will be difficult for competing systems to develop from a standing start. As we get closer to the completion of the production of our five Block 1 satellites, I want to recognize and thank the hardworking team of engineers, technicians, and suppliers who are completing this incredible task. We believe our strategy of backward integration into the assembly, integration, and testing of satellites will enable us to build our constellation years ahead of an outsourced strategy and at a lower cost. I want to move on to reviewing our key operating metrics for the fourth quarter that are displayed on slide nine. On the first chart, we see the fourth quarter of 2023, we had non-GAAP adjusted cash operating expenses of $38.6 million versus $37.3 million in the third quarter. Non-GAAP adjusted operating expenses exclude certain non-cash operating costs including depreciation and amortization and stock-based compensation. Our fourth quarter non-GAAP adjusted operating expenses increased by $1.3 million versus the third quarter. Our research and development expenses rose by $1.5 million this quarter due to increased expenditures on engineering models and prototypes in connection with our manufacturing process. Our R&D expenses consist primarily of non-recurring development activities for which we typically engage third-party vendors and payments are based on the completion of milestones. Our engineering services expenses increased by $0.5 million and our general administration expenses decreased by $0.6 million in the fourth quarter as compared to the third quarter. Turning towards the second chart on this page, our capital expenditures for the fourth quarter were $33.9 million versus $71.7 million for the third quarter. This figure was made up of some modest launch payments, capitalized direct materials for the Block 1 satellite, additional facility and production equipment for our assembly, integration, and test facility in Midland, and the delivery of commercial-grade software from Nokia. As of the end of the fourth quarter, we have spent over 90% of the expected amounts for the five Block 1 satellites. We are still projecting to spend approximately $115 million for the five Block 1 satellites. And on the final chart on this slide, we ended the first quarter with $210.8 million in cash. We are continuing to pursue using the balance of our senior credit facility, which would add an amount of capital in the low 40s. Efforts around raising strategic capital may take precedence over the senior credit facility, and at a minimum, the deferment has reduced a bit of the negative carry we would have incurred if we had accessed the facility earlier. As we stated in our 10-K, we believe this cash, as well as our ability to raise capital through our existing facilities, is sufficient to support our expenditures for at least the next 12 months. As we have also discussed in our 10-K, our cost positions and capital plans are quite modular, and this characteristic provides us the flexibility to increase or decrease our rate of expenditures depending upon changes in our build-out plans and availability of capital. This flexibility provides us comfort that we can manage our liquidity profile dynamically, depending on our rate of raising capital. Earlier this year, we provided guidance on our expected operating expense levels. We have been supporting the development of efforts of our two critical satellite designs, Block 1 and Block 2, our ASIC chip design, and the construction of five Block 1 satellites. The completion of this Block 1 work and a significant portion of the Block 2 and ASIC design work is expected to result in a material reduction in our adjusted operating expenses and future capital expenditures. This reduction in cash expenditures will be done without a material reduction in our employment headcount, as most of these reductions are related to the completion of third-party work. Overall, our adjusted operating expenses are expected to decline from an average of $38.7 million per quarter during 2023 to an average of $30 million per quarter for 2024 as the Block 1 design is completed and the Block 2 design approaches completion. These figures will vary depending upon manufacturing activity in each period. This guidance does not include the expected costs of approximately $15 million related to the tape-out and initial production of our ASIC chips. These ASIC-related costs will be recognized as an R&D expense in subsequent quarters in 2024 as the milestones are completed. We also plan to reduce our outlook for capital expenditures as we reach the final investment for Block 1. The next three quarters we expect to spend in the aggregate approximately $50 million to $60 million in capital expenditures. Any increase beyond these levels will be in conjunction with the timing of the deployment of our Block 2 satellites, which could be either in late 2024 or the first quarter of 2025. Timing of the changes in our adjusted operating expenditures and capital expenditures, as I have just described, could be delayed or may not be realized due to a variety of factors. On a final note, I’d like to provide some additional detail on one of our additional funding strategies, which is a complement to our recent strategic round. Satellite and other infrastructure providers have historically utilized government and quasi-government institutions, which are known as export credit agencies, to source cost-effective, long-term debt funding of large projects. The key underpinning of these funding structures has been proven technology and the sale of significant capacity through long-term agreements to large credit-worthy entities. We have begun the process of approaching these funding institutions, which includes the hiring of an advisor and developing marketing materials. After preliminary discussions with a few of these agencies, we have received letters which indicate their willingness to evaluate this type of financing with us. We are in the very early stages of this process, and as we progress, I will provide updates on these potential financings. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in the pursuit of this type of financing and funding. And with that, this completes the presentation component of our earnings call, and I pass it back to Scott.

Thank you, Sean. Before we go to the queue of analyst questions, we’d like to address a few of the questions submitted ahead of the call by our investors. Operator, could you please start us off with the first question?

Q - Unidentified Analyst: Trevor from Colorado asks, where is the company on scaling up production to be able to meet the four satellites per month figures? Will that production begin immediately, or will there be a serious delay while the facilities are being built?

Thank you, Trevor, for the question. So, first of all, let me report the facilities are fully built. We have all the testing facilities for our built-in house. We do not require in any step of the build of our satellites to be taken out of our facilities. We have a 185,000-square-feet facility of manufacturing capability, and with the addition of these two suppliers that caused us problems in Block 1, we are getting to a 95% vertical integration all the way from the ASIC to all the structures and everything that is required to build and launch this spacecraft. So, we don’t anticipate any delays related to facility building or manufacturing building. Also, the other aspect is the same building block that we use for Block 1, that took its time to get stabilized and to produce at pace, will be the same parts that we will use for Block 2 and for the satellites going forward. So, of course, our focus right now is putting the Block 1s in orbit. Again, we estimate that we will be at the launch pads around July or August. We’re already working on producing on the next launch that is on a window between December and March.

Christian from Estonia asks, could you please give comments on the $100 million stock offering early this year, reasoning why it was rushed and structured the way it was launched?

Thank you for that. Taking the advice of our banks, we believe the offering structure we chose was the best route to raise additional capital to complement our strategic capital raise. At the end of the day, the transaction achieved our goal of providing a significant level of funding so that we can continue to pursue our business plan. Moving forward, we will continue to look to raise capital with strategic players in the wireless ecosystem like we did in January, and we are working to raise long-term, low-cost debt capital with export credit agencies as I described during my presentation. I’d also point out that most of the senior management team is aligned with the shareholders, as most of their compensation is made up of restricted shares and options.

So, complemented to Sean’s answer on why we needed to do that public equity deal, we needed to prioritize timing. We needed to complement the investment from AT&T, Google, and Vodafone to keep on target to our production plan and our build and our launches. At the same time, we have continued and we’re very excited about the additional strategic support that we will continue to have and also the non-dilutive funding that Sean and the team are working on to complement strategic financing with non-dilutive financing, which is why we have commenced to receive a letter of interest on that regard in addition to prepayments from MNOs and government payments.

Dennis from Chile asks, due to their larger size, do Bluebird satellites in Block 2 need a SpaceX Starship rocket to be launched?

Thank you, Dennis, for the question. No, the answer is no. As a matter of fact, we’re launching five Bluebird 1s in the next launch. And we can also launch on Falcon 9 and other providers, including the one that we’ll be using for our next launch, past the launch for Block 1. So, we have built our satellites to be completely agnostic to what launch provider is used. We obviously count on Falcon 9, Ariane 6, ISRO, the up-and-coming new launchers, future New Glenn, and other launch providers that have medium-to-large-size vehicles. So, the answer to your question is no. We do not require or we’re not counting on the Starship for our Block 2 launches.

Linden from New Zealand asks, how does Abel’s appointment as a commissioner of the ITU affect the ASTS mission?

Thanks, Linden. I mean, listen, our mission is to enable broadband globally, regardless of where people live, work, and regardless of the phone that they have in their pocket. And the Broadband Commission had a single focus in making sure that the 2.6 billion people that remain unconnected get connected. Now, I do not know any other program that had a global scope that has truly the ability to make a significant dent in the amount of people that get connected to broadband through their phones than our program. So, this is an alignment with the Broadband Commission. In the Broadband Commission, we have great participants like Carlos Slim, the owner of Telmex in Mexico. We have the chairman of the FCC. We have the chairman of Verizon. We have the chairman of many of the large wireless ecosystems, including a very vibrant and full participation of governments, regulators, and people whose core interest is making sure that the fact that connectivity is a human right gets instituted on a global basis. So we see this as something that supports our mission. It is a program where we are proud to be part of it. In the Broadband Commission, we have many new initiatives and tasks, like low-cost funds for democratizing access to knowledge and information, a universal network available to everybody on a global basis. So, we think that this is supportive. It’s part of our work of making sure that everybody, regardless of where they live or work, has access to broadband on their phone.

And with that, I’d like to thank our shareholders for submitting these questions. Operator, let’s open the call to analyst questions now.

Thank you. Our first question comes from Chris Quilty with Quilty Analytics. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks. Just a first question on the microns and bringing those in-house. When you look at the supply chain for the micron manufacturing, are there any elements of that that you view as particularly difficult or where you might have pricing issues relative to a vendor that might have had higher volumes associated with certain components in order to manufacture them?

Hi, Chris. Thank you for the question. The micron part, which is, as you know, is the building block of the satellite, is all components are either designed or manufactured with us. We basically manufacture from the solar panel all the way to all the electronics, batteries, structures, everything that goes into them. Currently, for this launch, the microns are based on FPGAs, so that’s why we’re buying those from an existing source. For the first Block 1, they will also be FPGAs. So, just as a clarification, the two suppliers that gave us an issue, we’re not naming them. They were not in the micron. They were part of the control subsystem.

Oh, perfect. Second question, with the redomiciling for regulatory purposes to the U.S., how does that impact your standing in any regulatory filings, or does it?

We don’t see that impact, none of that. I think we are finding our opportunity with the U.S. government, potential funding from the United States, and now that the FCC had a framework that we think will lead the rest of the world in how to regulate our product globally, we thought that it was the right time and the right process to actually move our satellites to a U.S. flag. So, we’re very proud of that, and we see that as being able to accelerate. We’re working very closely now with the FCC, and we are obviously very happy with the new regulatory framework that now we are starting to see replicated in large countries through the process of basically reusing a spectrum that is used on terrestrial deployments from space, which is actually the core of our technology, reusing the existing phone that is already in the pockets of everybody, using it for connecting regardless of where the people are, regardless of where the phone is on a global basis.

Very good. Thank you. I’ll circle back in the queue.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Mike Crawford with B. Riley Securities. Please proceed with your question.

Thank you. I heard that you’re putting five Block 1 Bluebirds on a Falcon 9 at the end of the summer. How many Block 2s can you fit onto the launch that you’re looking for in December to the March timeframe? And it sounds like that’s from a different launch provider, not SpaceX.

Yes, the next provider is not SpaceX. It’s a large rocket; it’s a large vehicle. We’re not disclosing yet who is the provider, but it’s a contract that is already negotiated, and the launch window is already agreed between December and March 25. We’re putting one satellite on that launch. That’s also an FPGA base, but it’s the large 2,400 square feet Block 2 type of satellite.

Okay, thank you. And then you previously disclosed intent to enable initial service in Japan in 2026. How many Block 2s need to be in service for you to be able to implement service in Japan?

Around 45 satellites to have the initial service launch between 45 and 60. We are working very hard. Now, just as a clarification, the same Block 1 micron, the same type of micron that we’re producing now, are the ones that we continue to produce for Block 2. It took more than expected to stabilize that line. It’s a new micron with a new full capability with everything vertically integrated by ourselves. But the good news is that it’s past us, and we plan to continue to do that, to get to a cadence of 72 satellites per year later as we stabilize and have enough parts to be able to do that. Obviously, the first ones are the more difficult to get up into space. They are also the ones where you implement for the first time the changes and the upgrades that you do on them.

Okay, thank you. And then a final question just relates to your new strategic partner, Google. So, I know your service works with just any phone that people already have, but are there certain things that Google could do to say Android operating system to make those phones connect even better with your network? Thank you.

Yes, I mean, you’re absolutely right. Our network, our technology is completely open. It’s for any phone, 2G, 4G, 5G, in the future 6G. So we are completely independent of the phone manufacturer or actually the generation on the phone. However, we believe and we’re super excited about the relationship with Google. Google is, as you know, the largest ecosystem provider for cellular phones with over 3.5 billion devices on a global basis. And we have agreed to collaborate in product development and implementation of features on the Google ecosystem that benefit the MNO for our customers and the end users that use SpaceMobile. So, we’re very excited about this relationship. It’s strategically significant for us and is to create value in the Android ecosystem for our customers and end users.

All right, thank you very much.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Benjamin Soff with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed with your question.

Hey guys, thanks for taking the question. My first one is just on the government contract. Is there any additional color you can provide on the type of service you’re providing and just generally how do you think about the market opportunity to work with government agencies in the U.S. and abroad? And then I have a follow-up.

Yes, I mean, we do see the government opportunity to be very, very large. I mean, obviously a technology that can deliver arrays, face arrays of this size, the power that they generate, and if you compare with the benchmark costing of that today for non-communications applications, we’re talking about several orders of magnitude higher cost that we can do despite the fact that we’re doing it. We had a 185,000-square feet facility. We’re ramping up our production as we speak. So, the government is super interested in this. We do see these opportunities not only to be on the communication side, which is an obvious application, being able to connect any 3GPP, any cellular device that government uses on a global basis or defense users use on a global basis, but also there are a multitude of applications of the same technology without any major changes to our technology to be used in the non-communications space, which we think is a very large market, a very large opportunity. And we see it also in combination with the prepayments that we expect to continue to get from MNOs, payments from governments, and the non-dilutive funding that we see that the most efficient way to take our network forward and continue to build satellites based on these agreements that we’re starting to see. So we’re very excited about the government opportunity, and we think that we’re in the very, very early innings of that, of what we can do for our government with our technology.

Great. And then my second question is on the Block 2 satellites. Obviously, there’s been a lot of moving pieces over the last couple of years, and I’m just wondering what your latest thoughts are on the timing and costs for these Block 2 satellites, and if there have been any changes recently.

Yes, we’re maintaining our guidance on costs for Block 2. As I said, the parts, the building blocks are the same. We’re building for Block 1. So the line, our assembly line, and our processes can maintain. We now control around 95% of our costs to build our satellites and also our supply chain, and that includes Block 2. So, we had Block 2, we used these microns, which are the same for Block 1 and Block 2. They rely on the same solar system, same solar panels, same battery systems, structures, and software to maintain them. So, we have that done. So, we are very excited about where we are on that, and we have taken an approach of incrementally adding features to the satellite. So with Block 2, we reuse that, but they obviously are larger. They are 2,400 square feet each, which is what makes it possible to get to 120 megabits of data rate on 10,000 megahertz of processing bandwidth, which is really the only way to provide broadband directly to regular handsets.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Christopher Schoell of UBS. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Thank you. For the Block 1 satellites, can you just update us on how you’re thinking about initial use cases and expected revenue generation as you await more continuous coverage? And then once in orbit, can you also remind us the timeline for testing and calibrating those satellites, and what are the key milestones that you need to reach to commence commercial service? Thank you.

Yes. I mean, the initial, the non-commercial usage is no constellation base. It’s basically a usage by satellite. So the revenue generation for that is incremental as we add satellites. For the MNOs, what we will be doing is immediately integrating that into the core system as we keep launching more satellites. So the days are, we disclose there is an initial payment by AT&T with the launch of Block 1. There is a pre-agreement with Vodafone to start using them in some of the core markets. And there is some revenue that we start generating initially also for non-continuous service as we build these satellites. But it is a combination of revenue for non-commercial. It is scaled on a satellite-by-satellite basis. And for commercial, it’s for non-continuous service type of applications. We start to see early revenue on that. But our plan is to rapidly ramp with the support of the government contracts, non-dilutive revenue, and prepayment revenues to continue to build into the constellation. So, we’re doing that by region. And we’re doing that prioritizing the MNOs that are investors in us and continue to support the build of the constellation.

That’s helpful. Thank you. And I appreciate your dialogue with potential MNO customers is likely ongoing. But any updates you can give on where your discussions stand? And are you seeing interest beyond the already announced set of partners that you have?

Yes, the answer is yes, absolutely. We have approximately 48 operators that we had agreements or MOUs with them. We’re using the same formula that we used initially with AT&T and Vodafone. We’ll continue to do that in a way of prepayments or advance payments, and sometimes combined with strategic investment or not. So, we had a very, very vibrant ecosystem. We already had AT&T, Vodafone, Google, Rakuten, Bell Canada, and American Tower. But we had all the 48 relationships that we are in constant dialogue. Everybody is super interested in seeing our constellation up as soon as possible. Everybody wants their regions and their customers to be prioritized. And we’re taking advantage of that relationship that’s very symbiotic between us and the operators.

Thank you. At this time, I’m showing no further questions. I would like to turn the call back over to management for closing remarks.

Thank you, operator. We’re building a space-based cellular broadband network designed for the use of the phone in your pocket today. I want to thank everybody for joining, both shareholders and analysts, for their questions. I hope everybody has a great week. Thank you.

And this concludes today’s conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you and have a good day.