Good morning. My name is Amy and I will be your conference operator. As a reminder, this call is being recorded. At this time, I’d like to welcome you to CoreCivic’s Third Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. Thank you. I would now like to turn the call over to Cameron Hopewell, CoreCivic’s Managing Director of Investor Relations. Mr. Hopewell, you may begin your conference.

Thank you, Amy. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for joining us. Participating on today’s call are Damon Hininger, President and Chief Executive Officer; and David Garfinkle, Chief Financial Officer. We are also joined here in the room by our Vice President of Finance, Brian Hammonds. On today’s call, we will discuss our financial results for the third quarter of 2022, developments with our government partners, and provide you with other general business updates. During today’s call, our remarks, including our answers to your questions will include forward-looking statements pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities and Litigation Reform Act. Our actual results or trends may differ materially as a result of a variety of factors, including those identified in our third quarter 2022 earnings release issued after market yesterday and in our SEC filings, including Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K reports. You are also cautioned that any forward-looking statements reflect management’s current views only and that the company undertakes no obligation to revise or update such statements in the future. On this call, we will also discuss certain non-GAAP measures. A reconciliation of the most comparable GAAP measurement is provided in our corresponding earnings release and included in the supplemental financial data on the Investors page of our website, corecivic.com. With that, it’s my pleasure to turn the call over to our President and CEO, Damon Hininger.

Thank you, Cameron. Good morning and thank you for joining us today for our third quarter 2022 earnings call. On today’s call, I will provide you with details of our third quarter financial performance, discuss with you our latest operational developments, update you on our capital allocation strategy, and discuss the latest developments with our government partners, including the recent $130 million sale of our McRae facility to the state of Georgia. I will then turn the call over to our CFO, Dave Garfinkle, who will review our third quarter financial results and full-year 2022 guidance in greater detail and will update you on our ongoing capital structure initiatives. Before I give an update on our government partners, let me briefly pan out and give a big-picture view of the past two years, but also a peek into 2023 and beyond. As you know, like the rest of the world, we have had to deal with the challenges of COVID-19 and the pandemic. Being a 24/7 operation for nearly 40 years, I am proud of the team for having strong systems, processes, and leadership in place to deal with the challenges that the pandemic brought us. It was a challenging journey, for sure, and some difficult decisions were made along the way. I am grateful for how the team navigated through this challenge, and it thankfully appears to be more easily managed going forward as the severity of COVID has diminished. Second, I would note the change in sentiment from the market in the last two years and how it could have possibly influenced our access to capital needed for growth and maintenance. The quick but proactive work to change our corporate status, expand existing and establish new major relations by our team and supported by our Board, has been impressive to have witnessed this past year. We have taken the strong balance sheet pre-COVID and made it even stronger with the leverage rate of 3.5 times at levels not seen in nearly a decade. Third, going to 2021, we have shown multiple times the essential nature of our solutions to our federal partners, notably with the United States Marshals Service and Immigration Custom Enforcement. Over the last 18 months, we have demonstrated multiple times the essential nature of our solutions to our federal partners by new, expanded, and renewed federal contracts. Fourth, and this was not unique to us for sure, but concerns with the labor market and our ability to fill vacancies that came as a result of the pandemic. I’m extremely pleased with the progress our team has made in the last six months on this front. As mentioned earlier this year, we have started leaning forward on raising our staffing levels at certain locations preparing for higher occupancy rates later this year and going into 2023 while filling vacancies at others. With those goals, we have seen a double-digit decline in our vacancy rate this year. All the while, as you have seen in our recent ESG report, our programs team is achieving tremendous outcomes with the individuals in our care, and we had a 95% retention rate over the last five years of our management contracts. So finally, before I move on, you have seen strong policy debates from this summer going into the election this fall that have significant focus on immigration and border security, along with crime and criminal justice among things like the economy and inflation. We obviously will see what next week brings from the election, but nonetheless, we have taken strong steps to be well-poised for the likely needs of our existing and possible new government partners. Now for an update on our government partners, beginning first with our federal customers, which are within the Department of Justice, comprised of the Federal Bureau of Prisons or BOP, and the United States Marshals Service. The BOP has experienced significant declines in their populations in the last decade. In response to this long-term trend, we have significantly diversified our business solutions over the years to meet the needs of other government partners. In August, we completed the sale of our 1,978-bed McRae correctional facility to the state of Georgia for $130 million. The McRae facility is our last remaining prison contract with the BOP, representing less than 2% of our total revenue. Following the expiration of our contract at McRae, we only expect to generate revenue from the BOP through the provision of residential reentry facility contracts. As a reminder, the sale of our McRae facility is notable for a number of reasons. First, the McRae facility currently has a management contract with the Federal Bureau of Prisons that is scheduled to expire on November 30, a contract that for the last few years was very clearly not going to be renewed by the BOP. The asset sale provides significant after-tax cash proceeds that allow us to more quickly execute on our share repurchase authorization and pay down debt. Third, this is once again a market opportunity resulting from correctional systems seeking to modernize our facilities, not the result of prison population growth. This transaction was a great deal for the state of Georgia as it will help them take a drastic step to modernize their system. Finally, and most importantly, this asset sale reinforces the significant underlying value of our correctional and detention real estate assets, which is not reflected in the evaluation of our publicly traded debt and equity securities. The sale price for McRae was nearly $66,000 per bed, which when used to approximate the value of our nearly 71,000 company-owned correctional beds indicates a $4.7 billion value, which is nearly triple the price the public markets have applied to our equity. While we do not expect the sale of our correctional or detention facilities to government entities to become a growing trend, we view this as an excellent opportunity to finalize our diversification away from prison contracts with the BOP, recycle capital, and create value due to the dislocation of the pricing of our public securities and our asset’s true market values. As for the United States Marshals Service, their prisoner populations have remained very consistent in recent years, so their need for capacity around the country remains unchanged and significant due to their reliance on contracted detention capacity. The Marshals were impacted by the executive order signed by President Biden issued in January 2021 that directed the Attorney General not to renew Department of Justice contracts directly with privately operated criminal detention facilities. In 2022, we have no direct contracts with the Marshals that are set for expiration, and now have only two total remaining direct contracts with the Marshals that are set to expire in later years. Both facilities provide significant capacity to the Marshals that we believe would be very challenging to replace, but we likely will not have resolution on potential contract extensions until we are closer to the existing contract’s expiration dates. We continue to work closely with the Marshals to ensure their capacities are being met in order to support their critical public safety mission. ICE is our third federal partner and operates within the Department of Homeland Security. Of any of our government partners, their operations and capacity utilization needs were and continue to be the most significantly impacted by COVID-19. Notably, ICE implemented occupancy restrictions at their facilities to improve the ability for resident populations to social distance. These occupancy restrictions remained in place during the third quarter of this year. Nationwide, ICE detainee populations remained well below the historical level since the spring of 2020, and that trend remained unchanged in the third quarter. As a result, our facility utilization levels continue to remain materially below historical averages. Current utilization levels are also well below the number of beds funded through the annual budget appropriation process. Although the agency has nonetheless experienced budget challenges because of COVID-related and other unplanned expenditures outside of their control, which impacted detention levels and actions on new contract awards. Taking this into account, at the end of September, ICE detained approximately 26,000 individuals nationwide. Their new fiscal year started on October 1, and ICE was funded at 34,000 beds under a continued resolution that funds the federal government to December 15. We obviously will be watching what their funding will be once the full-year budget is enacted in December. Today, we are experiencing increases in utilization by our federal partners, particularly ICE, across multiple facilities, where they are up nearly 26% quarter-to-date, and we expect this trend to continue. This is a result of ICE slowly beginning to relax their pandemic-related occupancy restrictions. While this trend is occurring too late in the year to have a material impact on this year’s financial results, we believe this is a notable trend following three years of utilization levels well below historical norms. We also continue to pursue opportunities to provide ICE with non-residential alternative detention or ATD programs. During the third quarter, a different provider was awarded a procurement for young adults, which was issued this January. While we were not awarded the new contract, we remain engaged with ICE as we believe additional ATD programs could be developed. We also know these case management services are similar to the type of case management services we already provide in our community segment. The elevated rates of apprehensions on the Southwest border continue to present great challenges, which are expected to increase the government’s demand for both residential detention capacity and non-residential ATDs. Should new needs arise, we believe we are well-positioned to deliver solutions to ICE. Moving now to the results of the third quarter of this year, we generated revenue of $464.2 million, which was a decline of only 1.5% compared to the prior year quarter despite the non-renewal of contracts with the United States Marshals Service at our Leavenworth Detention Center and our West Tennessee Detention Facility in 2021 and the non-renewal of a contract with Marion County, Indiana at the managed-only Marion County Jail effective January 31 of this year. Collectively, these three facilities accounted for $19.8 million or a 4.2% reduction in revenue in the third quarter of this year versus the prior year quarter. In the third quarter of this year, we generated normalized funds from operations, or FFO, of $33.9 million or $0.29 per share compared to $58.6 million or $0.48 per share in the third quarter of 2021. Now, the decline was driven by the non-renewal of the three contracts that I just mentioned, the transition of populations at our La Palma Correctional Center pursuant to a new contract with the state of Arizona, and a challenging labor market. Dave will provide more detail regarding the financial impact of these items, but I would add that while we have spent a considerable amount in incentives to recruit and retain our valuable frontline staff and on increasing staffing levels, these investments have positioned us to take advantage of increased demand from our government partners that we believe will occur once occupancy restrictions imposed by our government partners during the COVID pandemic are relaxed. As mentioned earlier, we are also poised to enter into new contracts and accept additional residential populations from our government partners that are unable to manage existing population levels because of their staffing challenges. We believe these needs could manifest as early as this quarter. In April of this year, we commenced transitioning populations at our La Palma Correctional Center in Arizona from ICE populations to Arizona State populations pursuant to a new contract we were awarded by the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation, and Reentry late last year. We expect the transfer process to be completed near the end of this year. Upon achieving normalized utilization based on the contract, we expect to generate approximately $75 million to $85 million in annualized revenue. However, because of the preparation to receive the Arizona inmates, including a reduction in the average daily population of ICE detainees at the facility whose contract expired at the end of the third quarter, facility net operating income decreased nearly $12 million during the third quarter of this year compared with the third quarter of 2021. The La Palma facility currently supports the submission of the state of Arizona by caring for approximately 1,900 inmates. We continue to actively collaborate with the Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation, and Reentry to ensure we successfully complete the transition by the end of this year. I would like to briefly discuss our updated full-year 2022 financial guidance. We are now forecasting full-year normalized FFO per share in the range of $1.28 to $1.32, and adjusted funds from operations, or AFFO, per share in the range of $1.18 to $1.22. The increase in our guidance is reflective of our third-quarter financial results being in line with our internal forecast, the expectation of completing the transition at our La Palma facility sooner than estimated in the prior quarter, and the expectation of increasing utilization by federal partners starting in the fourth quarter. Dave will provide greater details about our third-quarter financial results as well as the financial impact of the more significant assumptions included in our updated full-year financial guidance following the remainder of my comments. So finally, during the third quarter, we had multiple important milestones that continued to strengthen our balance sheet. First, as I mentioned earlier, we completed the sale of our McRae correctional facility to the state of Georgia for a sales price of $130 million, which generated a $77.5 million gain on the sale. During the third quarter, we also sold two residential reentry centers in California and a parcel of undeveloped land for an aggregate sale price of $16.3 million. The cash generated from these asset sales has helped accelerate our capital allocation strategy. During the quarter, we also repurchased an additional $3.6 million principal amount of our outstanding 4.625% senior unsecured notes, which are scheduled to mature in May of 2023 and have a remaining balance of only $166 million. Following the maturity of those notes, our next bond maturity isn’t until April of 2026. And we have less than $100 million in variable rate debt. With our debt maturity schedule in a comfortable position, significant cash on hand, and resilient positive cash flow generation, we also repaid $33.5 million principal amount of our 8.25% senior notes, reducing the outstanding balance to $641.5 million. So far this year, we have reduced our outstanding debt balances by nearly $250 million, significantly reducing our future interest expense and improving our long-term cost of borrowing. We remain committed to our targeted total leverage ratio or net debt to adjusted EBITDA range of 2.25x to 2.75x. We have made meaningful progress in reducing our overall leverage due to the strong cash flow the company generates, and we expect our leverage to continue to decline over time. During the third quarter, we continued to execute on our stock repurchase program on the $225 million stock repurchase authorization approved by our Board of Directors earlier this year. Since commencing the program in May of this year, we have repurchased 6.6 million shares of our common stock at an aggregate purchase price of $74.5 million or approximately 5% of our total outstanding shares. The remaining share repurchase authorization of $150.5 million would allow us to repurchase an additional 12% of our outstanding shares based on the recent trading price of our equity. Our capital allocation strategy has enabled us to remain flexible and in future quarters is expected to include a combination of share repurchases and debt repayments, taking into consideration factors such as the price of our securities, progress towards achieving our targeted total leverage ratio, and potential returns on other opportunities to deploy capital. We continue to believe our capital allocation strategy has been prudent for positioning the company to generate long-term value through a stable capital structure and continue to cost-effectively meet the needs of our government customers with less reliance on outside sources of capital. But before I turn it over to Dave, let me acknowledge what is being seen and reported in corporate America on a daily basis, and that is the warning signs of a recession for the U.S. economy and the impact it is having on companies and industries, both near-term and going forward. As we have seen in previous recessions, our industry has been resilient during downturns in the economy. This is largely because we are an essential government service. So, as the economy slows down and we watch the labor market coming off its unprecedented demand cycle, we are actively hiring employees for anticipated growth, and we have plenty of capacity to meet the demand of our partners. There’s no need to spend CapEx in this environment of rising interest rates. To be clear, we won’t turn a blind eye towards the current and forecasted macro trends in the economy, but history has shown that our business can be stable and growing during a recession. I will now turn the call over to Dave to provide a more detailed look at our financial results in the third quarter, to discuss in detail our updated full-year financial guidance and provide additional financial updates.

Thank you, Damon, and good morning, everyone. In the third quarter of 2022, we reported net income of $0.58 per share or $0.08 of adjusted earnings per share, $0.29 of normalized FFO per share and AFFO per share of $0.25. Adjusted and normalized per share amounts exclude a gain on the sale of real estate assets of $83.8 million, asset impairments of $3.5 million, and expenses associated with debt repayments and refinancing transactions of $0.8 million. The gain on the sale of real estate assets includes a gain of $77.5 million on the previously disclosed sale of the 1,978-bed McRae Correctional Center for a gross sales price of $130 million, which was completed on August 9. The decline in normalized FFO per share of $0.19 compared to the prior year quarter included an EBITDA decline of $11.8 million or $0.08 a share due to the earnings disruption at our 3,060-bed La Palma Correctional Center, the second largest facility in our portfolio, as we continue to transition to populations from the State of Arizona pursuant to a new management contract that commenced in April for up to 2,706 inmates. We previously had a contract with ICE at this facility, and during the prior year quarter through the beginning of this year, we cared for an average daily population of approximately 1,800 ICE detainees at the La Palma facility, which declined to zero by the end of September. Last quarter, we temporarily suspended the intake process for Arizona to ensure our pace of hiring would meet staffing needs to manage the full capacity under the new contract. After revamping and expanding our hiring efforts, we resumed intake during the third quarter, and as of last night, cared for 1,896 inmates from Arizona, and now expect the ramp to be complete by the end of next month. Our financial results have also been impacted by a challenging labor market and occupancy restrictions implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic, which largely remained in place during the third quarter for most federal facilities. While we are experiencing inflation in many expense items like utilities and food, the most impactful increases were wages and other expenses related to labor. Our investments in wage increases and other expenses related to labor were necessary to help address depressed staffing levels we experienced in 2021 and to prepare for increased occupancy levels once occupancy restrictions caused by the pandemic are removed. We have begun to see improvement in the labor market, and our same-store staffing levels increased 6.4% from the end of the third quarter of 2021 to the end of the third quarter of 2022. We have been successful in obtaining per diem increases from many of our government partners that are experiencing the same staffing challenges to cover the incremental salaries that help ensure adequate staffing levels. Notwithstanding that success, we incurred $5.6 million or $0.04 per share more in temporary incentives than in the prior year quarter to attract and retain facility staff. We also incurred substantial travel expenses in order to supplement staffing at facilities that were particularly challenged, which increased $5.3 million or $0.03 per share from the prior year quarter. As the labor market continues to improve, which will take some additional time, we expect to reduce reliance on these temporary incentives and travel expenses. Lastly, contract terminations since the end of the second quarter of last year at our West Tennessee, Leavenworth, and the managed-only Marion County Jail contributed to an EBITDA reduction of $2.7 million or $0.02 per share from the prior year. Occupancy in our safety and community facilities continues to reflect the impact of COVID-19 and decreased to 70.1% in the third quarter of 2022 from 72.1% in the prior year quarter, although the decline from the prior year was attributable to contract terminations at the West Tennessee facility on September 30, 2021, and our Leavenworth facility on December 31, 2021, and due to the transition of populations at La Palma. Occupancy increased from 69.5% in the second quarter of 2022, largely due to the transition of La Palma, where populations increased by 125 residents compared with the second quarter, driven by the intake of Arizona populations, as well as an overall increase in U.S. Marshals’ offenders in multiple facilities. Our overall ICE detainee populations remain well below historical levels as the Southwest Border has effectively remained closed to asylum seekers and adults attempting to cross the southern border without proper documentation or authority in an effort to contain the spread of COVID-19 under a policy known as Title 42. On April 1, 2022, the CDC issued a public health determination terminating Title 42 with an effective date of May 23, 2022. However, on April 25, a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order blocking the termination of Title 42, which the judge affirmed on May 20. That ruling is under appeal by the administration. Whenever Title 42 is terminated, such action may result in an increase in the number of undocumented people permitted to enter the United States claiming asylum and could result in an increase in the number of people apprehended and detained by ICE. With depressed occupancy levels, we are in a position to significantly grow earnings whenever the impact of COVID-19 restrictions subside. Turning next to the balance sheet. As of September 30, we had $185 million of cash-on-hand and an additional $233 million of borrowing capacity on our revolving credit facility, which remains undrawn, providing us with total liquidity of $418 million. During the third quarter of 2022, we purchased $3.6 million of our 4.625% senior notes in open market purchases, reducing the outstanding balance of these notes to $166.5 million. These notes mature in May 2023, which we currently expect to repay with cash on hand in early 2023. We also repaid $33.5 million of our 8.25% senior notes, reducing the outstanding balance of these notes to $641.5 million. Beyond the 4.625% senior notes, we have no maturities until the 8.25% senior notes mature in 2026. Also during the third quarter, we purchased 3.6 million shares of our common stock for $37 million under our share repurchase program. Since our Board authorized the repurchase program in May, we have repurchased over 5% of our outstanding shares, a total of 6.6 million shares at a cost of $74.5 million, and have remaining authorization for over $150 million more of our shares. Following these purchases, leverage measured by net debt to EBITDA was 3.0x using the trailing 12 months ended September 30, 2022. Even with these repurchases, during the third quarter, we repaid $109.1 million of debt, net of the change in cash. Going forward, we expect to continue to use our liquidity as well as cash flow from operations to repurchase a combination of our stock on bonds, taking into consideration a number of factors, including the amount authorized under our repurchase plan, liquidity, share price, progress toward achieving our targeted leverage of 2.25 to 2.75x and potential returns on other opportunities to deploy capital. After the repayment of our term loan B earlier this year and the paydown of our previous term loan A, we have significantly reduced our exposure to rising interest rates. Our only variable rate debt outstanding consists of a new smaller term loan A obtained in May in connection with our new bank credit facility, which comprises only 7% of our total outstanding debt. Our balance sheet is in great position not only to weather but to opportunistically take advantage of volatility in the capital markets, with no need to access the capital markets in the near term. Moving lastly to a discussion of our 2022 financial guidance. For the full year 2022, we expect to generate adjusted EPS of $0.47 to $0.50, normalized FFO per share of $1.28 to $1.32, and AFFO per share of $1.18 to $1.22. Our per share results were in line with our internal forecast for the third quarter, but we are now expecting to complete the transition at our La Palma Correctional Center sooner than estimated last quarter. We are also expecting higher federal populations and slightly lower interest expense than previously estimated. These favorable updates are partially offset by a continuation of higher levels of incentives, including travel expenses, to help address a difficult labor market. Our guidance contemplates the continuation of an inflationary environment, including particularly for food, utilities, and interest rates. As mentioned, we also expect demand for our space and services to increase in the fourth quarter, particularly at the federal level, as occupancy restrictions are expected to be relaxed beginning in the fourth quarter, even though we do not expect Title 42 to be reversed this year. Our 2022 forecast reflects a decrease in EBITDA at La Palma of approximately $20 million from pre-pandemic levels and an even larger decrease from 2021. Although we expect the facility transition to be complete near the end of next month, we do not expect the expense structure to completely normalize by the end of the year. Once the expense structure normalizes, we are confident EBITDA at La Palma will return to pre-pandemic levels, providing meaningful growth to our 2023 financial results compared with 2022. Our forecast contemplates the expiration on November 30 of our contract with the Federal Bureau of Prisons at the McRae Facility. Our full-year 2022 forecast includes EBITDA of $7.6 million for this facility that will partially offset the growth in EBITDA in 2023 from the La Palma facility. The 2022 full-year EBITDA guidance in our press release enables you to calculate our annual effective income tax rate of 25% to 26% and provides you with our estimate of total depreciation and interest expense. We expect G&A expenses for the fourth quarter to be comparable to the prior three quarters. During 2022, we expect to incur $63.5 million to $66 million of maintenance capital expenditures, in line with 2021 and unchanged from our previous guidance. We also expect to incur $19 million to $20 million for facility renovations, including $4 million to $5 million at La Palma for the new Arizona contract, almost all of which has been spent through the third quarter. We remain focused on managing our leverage target and are not forecasting any share repurchases in the fourth quarter but will remain flexible and opportunistic. I will now turn the call back to the operator, Amy, to open up the lines for questions.

Good morning, Damon and David. Thanks for taking the question.

Good morning, Joe.

Good morning, Joe.

The first one is kind of a multi-part question here, but you talked about your hiring in advance of some population increases you think are going to occur. Just wondering, A, what kind of gives you the confidence that population increases will occur? Also, you mentioned, Damon, some staffing shortages of other people, other government agencies. I was wondering if you might be able to give us a little more color on that and how you think CoreCivic can take advantage of that.

Absolutely. Thank you so much, Joe, for those questions. So for the first part of your question, give you a little more color there. So as of now, probably the best example I can give you is what I gave a little bit of color on relative to ICE in my prepared remarks. So we had assumed and now we’re starting to see play out a little bit a couple of things happening with ICE. One, they are into a new fiscal year. So they have got now kind of a full funding – a fully-funded budget relative to getting their capacity nationwide at 34,000. So as you know, in the previous year, they were funded at that level, but a lot of money was diverted out of that budget for other expenses related to COVID. So we think that probably impacted their total contracted amount nationwide. At the end of the year, they were at about 26,000. The new fiscal year is kind of a fully-funded budget that can get maybe back to a more historical level at 34,000. The second thing somewhat related is we are starting to see steps. It’s not completely universal yet. It depends on kind of conditions on the ground in certain locations, but we are starting to see a little bit of pulling back or restrictions that were put in place around COVID due to social distancing requirements within our facilities. We are starting to see that unfold, and we had some caps in certain locations for ICE that are being relaxed a little bit. So as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, with the start of the new fiscal year on October 1, our quarter-to-date increase in population is about 26%. So that’s a notable increase. Again, it won’t materially impact this year, but also will have some impact going to next year for sure. I think that answers the first part of your question. I’ll tag team with Dave here in a minute to add anything additional on that. But the second question, we have gotten a couple of calls, I received a call directly from one commissioner from the Department of Corrections here in the United States about a year ago saying that they were having a difficult time staffing the facility within their state in a rural part where they couldn’t find the labor and actually asked if we could help them with the staffing front. So we talked to them about maybe different solutions we could do with them in that state. But more recently, several states here in the United States that maybe have facilities in either rural locations or in facilities that are somewhat near metropolitan areas, have been really challenged to staff those facilities. And unlike us, where we are a nationwide employer, they are somewhat limited on where they can pull labor from that jurisdiction or from that respective state. So we have got a few states that are kind of circling right now where we could potentially provide capacity in our system because of those challenges.

Nothing to add on the confirmation other than we’ve seen, as Damon said, 25%, 26% increase in ICE populations so far this month. One month does not a trend make, but it’s certainly a good sign and makes logical sense given the turn of the fiscal year. The other thing I’d add to the populations, particularly state populations, I’d say where there could be opportunities to take additional populations because of states having challenges with their staffing levels is our ability to provide those incentives. They were expensive. I mentioned $5.6 million of incentives that we paid to our employees, higher in Q3 ‘22 over Q3 ‘21. Our government partners do not have that kind of flexibility. They have to go to the legislature to get more funds. We can be more nimble and provide those temporary incentives to staff up to levels to enable us to take on those populations.

Okay, thanks for that. And talking about those incentives, looking through the supplemental information there, looking solely at the safety segment, you see expenses as a percent of revenues for the quarter were 80.9%, up from the high 70s, call it 77%, 78% in Q1 and Q2. Is that mostly a reflection of some of these incentives you talked about and some of this hiring in advance that drove up the safety segment expenses as a percent of revenues?

Yes. It’s exactly that. We said last year, we were at unsustainably low staffing levels, doing everything we can to increase staffing levels. The prior year quarter was probably lower than it could have been, lower than it ideally would have been. There were some reasons for that. We were still deep into COVID, and some of the programs and services have been suspended temporarily that are now reinstated for the most part this year. So that contributed to it. And then, of course, the biggest impact on the margins overall is the decline in occupancy. That’s not necessarily true from last year’s quarter to this year’s quarter, but as you bring on those staffing levels back to normalized levels, you do have this dip in margins until the occupancy levels return.

Okay. And on the alternatives for detention that you spoke about, Damon, obviously electronic monitoring and ATDs have been a big driver this year for some of your competitors out there or your key competitor out there, I guess, I should say. What are you guys doing to try and garner some more of that business? What kind of investment do you need to make in that segment to hopefully capture more business there?

Yes, great question. A couple of answers there. One of which is, I mean, we have a great relationship with ICE. As you know, it’s actually our longest partner relationship-wise. We’ve had almost a 42-year relationship. So we know them really well. They know us really well. We know what their needs are, and we’ve been able to adjust our solutions nationwide depending on changing needs they have globally based on challenges on the Southwest border but also from a policy perspective. So we’ve been actively talking to them for a couple of years. Also, we participated in the most recent procurement that led to the contract that GEO has to date, and they are well aware of our capabilities, not only just because of our relationship with them over 40 years, but also, I mean, we have demonstrated an operational record with our community segment that we’ve been doing for years, not just for residential reentry, but also community programs like home confinement, case management, electronic monitoring and whatnot. So, we’ve got a whole suite of services that we can provide, but also a track record where we’ve had great outcomes and great performance. But anything you’d add to that, Dave?

Nothing at this time, and it’s an opportunity we see. It’s a growing opportunity. It’s obviously grown for our main competitor and it is an attractive business. So we are focused on it.

Okay, great. And then maybe we could just talk a little bit on the stock buyback. Maybe you can kind of give us in the third quarter a kind of a cadence there. Were you buying throughout the quarter, or was it more front-end loaded? And then you took advantage of the bond market to pay down some of the debt there? And why no forecast in the fourth quarter for additional stock buybacks?

Yes. Joe, it’s Dave. I would say our pace was probably heavier earlier in the quarter as we knew we had the $130 million of sales proceeds coming from McRae. So, that kind of impacted the timing of share repurchases early in the quarter. With respect to Q4, as I mentioned in my script, we are not forecasting any repurchases in Q4. I am not saying that, that doesn’t mean we won’t be opportunistic. And if we see opportunities, disruption in the price, something like that, we could execute on it. Our repurchase program is not really formulaic, but it is colored by our leverage. We closed the quarter due to the trailing 12 months at 3.0x. We are mindful of our target of 2.25x to 2.75x and we will be disciplined. The challenge here in the short term, as Damon mentioned previously in his script, is we have got this short-term earnings decline because of La Palma. If we continue to see those trends improving, particularly with ICE occupancy levels, we could gear that program back up and accelerate repurchases. But until we see really evidence of that and see leverage going down, I would be a little bit more conservative. The challenge we have also is that it’s a trailing 12 months for the last four quarters. So our debt does continue to go down, but the leverage is impacted more by the declines in EBITDA. So, as we get through that cycle or quarters, we see that naturally increasing and therefore leverage would naturally decrease, allowing us to ramp that share repurchase program back up.

And maybe a little color on the bond too.

Yes, so with constraints on leverage and still plenty of liquidity and a very volatile bond market, we thought it made sense to utilize our cash to pay off not just the 4% and 8% bonds. Those bonds mature in May of next year, and we expect to repay them early 2023 anyway. So, if we can get them at par or below par, why not just take them out now and avoid the interest expense that we would incur between now and when we redeem those notes. The same kind of thought process in the quarters. Yes, that’s more market-driven, though, I would say. It’s a higher rate. That is an expensive tranche of debt, $675 million at 8% in a quarter. So, while we had plenty of liquidity. And again, that governor on leverage, we think it just makes total sense to save on interest expense and chip away at that maturity because it is a chunky maturity. It’s not until 2026, but nonetheless it’s a little bit of a chunky maturity. So something will moderate going forward. I don’t know if we will continue to buy back the pace we did in the second quarter, but it’s a good use of our cash while we are constrained on the leverage side.

Great. Thanks. Thanks for the color on that. I will step aside and let someone else ask a couple of questions.

Thanks so much.

Thank you. Our first question comes from M. Marin with Zacks. Your line is open.

Thank you. So, I have a couple of questions, a different topic. So you have announced pending divestitures of some smaller facilities contracts that were either coming up or you had idle one of the facilities. How far in advance do you start conversations to renewal or extend contracts?

Yes, great question. This is Damon. And it really depends on the customer and the circumstances around the contract. So, in the case with McRae, I mean we kind of saw the signs of potentially them decreasing utilization of the private sector almost a decade ago. And so we really got in a room and looked at all of our contracts we had with the BOP, looked at the expiration dates for those respective contracts, and determined the best course of action for those facilities once those contracts did expire. Nothing changed during that period of time from the BOP’s perspective that they were going to change course or potentially renew one or multiple of those contracts. In the case of McRae, it was probably a couple of years ago that we started actively thinking through what the alternatives for McRae could be. It’s kind of an obvious point, but we thought the most likely scenario would be a solution for the State of Georgia. So we started putting various proposals to the State of Georgia and hope it ended up with a really, really good transaction for us and a great solution for the State of Georgia. So again, it depends on the circumstance. If we have got another contract coming up and the customer is clearly saying we want to renew this contract, maybe expand it or change the scope of services or programs. That may be a year or two out, where we start thinking through what that all looks like and the negotiation process for that contract. But anything you would add to that, Dave?

None other than last year, when the executive order was issued, we had our Leavenworth contract and contract with the U.S. Marshals of West Tennessee. Those conversations began immediately. They probably wouldn’t have been accepted for the executive order would have been a routine extension of those contracts with a lot of advance discussion. But because of the executive order, I think those conversations began a little bit earlier in earnest for both parties. For us, we want to try to ensure we could retain the contracts. And on the U.S. Marshals side, trying to figure out what capacity was available if they couldn’t use our facilities. So those were probably a little bit unusual because of the executive order.

Okay. Thanks. And we have also seen you come up with a solution in one facility where you sort of created a hybrid model with two distinct populations. Is that something you might be able to replicate at other venues?

Actually I didn’t follow your question there. What facility are you referring to?

So you were able to take in one population to take up some of the idle beds that you had in that facility. And I will look for it and come back in queue.

Yes, I’m following you now. Yes, it’s our Montana facility up in Shelby, Montana, it’s our crossroads facility. So, that was a win-win-win. And yes, we worked it out with Montana where they had an increased need for capacity and in an environment where we have got more programs versus being backed up in local jails. The local jails, we are happy to take the Marshals service that we are likely not able to continue to stay at our facility because of the direct contracts. So, yes, that was a great solution for all parties: Marshal Service, Montana, and CoreCivic. So that’s definitely a play in the playbook that we are always considering in those situations.

Okay. Good. And then last question is we haven’t really been talking a lot about COVID, because of COVID vaccine boosters, but is that something that’s still on your radar in terms of variation in cases within the facilities?

Absolutely. Yes. We are monitoring very closely still. Our team here within Brentwood, Tennessee, are monitoring the guidance and direction from federal, state, and local public health authorities. We are taking that into account accordingly and implementing it into our operational plan as appropriate along with feedback from our government partners. And then again, kind of an obvious point, but all jurisdictions are a little different relative to the virus levels and people that are impacted by the virus, and so we are monitoring that closely locally. So again, can’t say it’s completely in the rearview mirror, but I think we all agree that the risk has diminished. Obviously, the vaccine helped dramatically and significantly both the public sector and private sector and for our employees and our residents. So, we are grateful for that too.

Thank you.

Thank you for your questions.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Kirk Ludtke with Imperial Capital. Your line is open.

Hello, everyone. Thank you for the presentation and the question. A couple of topics.

Hi Kirk.

First, there is an election next week. I was curious. I think people probably would view Republican control of either the House or the Senate as a positive. But are there state-level elections that might impact the outlook?

Yes. A lot of good, great question. This is Damon. A lot of state-level elections that we are watching closely and depending on the outcome of those various state elections could have some impact on potentially solutions that we could provide at respective states. I guess I would say this way, though: the states where we operate today, either in state or maybe provide a solution for an out-of-state population, I feel very good saying that we just have had a 40-year track record where regardless of who is the governor or who is leadership within the legislature, as long as we continue to do a good job from a quality perspective and be cost-effective and show good outcomes in our programs, we have had great success regardless if there is change in leadership or political affiliation within those states to continue to have really strong contracts and also great relationships with respective government authorities. Anything you would add to that, Dave?

Yes. I would say, we have added into our toolbox too. So, you have seen us convert facilities that are owned and operated to facilities where we just provide the real estate. So, for political reasons or whatever the case may be, a governor prefers to employ state employees to operate a facility. We are very comfortable turning over the operations to the state government to operate. We will just become the landlord and lease the facility to the partner. So, either solution works for us. Economics can vary, it can be better, it can be worse depending on the particular economics of an individual contract. But it is a new tool in the toolbox that we have utilized in the past few years when the politics have gotten in the way of the ownership and operations of a facility.

Got it. That’s very helpful. Thank you. With respect to La Palma, Eloy, I apologize if I missed this, but how many ICE detainees were at La Palma at the end of the ICE contract?

Well, give me answer Dave. I think at the beginning of the year, right after we got the contract, we were probably about 2,000.

Yes. About 1,800.

Got it. Okay. I am just checking the occupancy level at Eloy. It looks like you have room technically for 800 detainees there, but is there an occupancy gap at Eloy?

There was, there and all over the country with ICE. So, there was an occupancy gap, and it probably kept us where we had to lease probably 500 beds, if not more, probably 600 beds, 700 beds that were vacant. And more you want to know, we can give you a little more color on how that impacts the total capacity. Most, if not all, of our ICE facilities have male and female, and then also have different levels of custody. So, if you think about maybe six or seven different variations of population facility and then you have got to overlay that with restrictions, then you have got a lot of capacity that was not able to be utilized during COVID. So, saying a different way, if that facility was just all male, one custody level, then you probably have a little higher utilization during COVID. But since we had multiple genders and multiple levels of security, then that does impact a little bit the capacity that’s unable to be used during COVID.

Got it. Okay. Thank you. With respect to the...

Sorry. One moment for our next question.

Sorry about that, Kirk.

Our next question comes from the line of Brian Violino. And your line is open.

Thanks for taking my questions.

Good morning, Brian.

Good morning. Just a quick two-parter on the expenses. I guess just in general, you have been ramping up expenses on the staffing side for a few quarters now. Could you just frame for us in terms of your expectations of where occupancy levels go, where you are in that ramp up? And then secondarily on the sort of bonus and incentive payments, how should we think about those if we were to go into a more recessionary environment, just the general sort of expense line going into next year and beyond? How should that be trending with bonuses and then also ramp up staffing, just trying to get a better idea of where that could go.

Yes. Thanks for the question, Brian. I’ll tag team with Damon on this one. I would say we are, like probably most companies, we would welcome a little bit of a recession. Obviously, we don’t want it to be a deep recession, but a recession could result in a better employment market. We would be able to reduce the amount of incentives we pay our staff. We already see things like registry nursing. The rates are coming down. Our need for hiring registry nursing has come down throughout this year. We are still paying some, but I would say as the economy continues to decline and particularly the labor market, the labor market loosens up a bit, that would be a positive for us because we would be able to reduce our expenses. On the occupancy trajectory, we are preparing our 2023 budgets right now. Not ready to put out guidance. We will do that in February as we normally do. But it seems like occupancies would trend upward from here, particularly as we get through the La Palma transition, ICE populations depending on if and when Title 42 gets reversed, that could be a positive for occupancy levels. And then, of course, the relaxation of the occupancy restrictions as we have already begun to see some—would all point towards higher occupancy levels. But the magnitude is just hard to gauge at this point. I would say we would have to get back probably to that 80% to 82% occupancy level before we see our margin percentages return to pre-pandemic levels. But we have run that exercise to see that, yes, despite the fact that we have got higher wages today, we also have higher per diems today. Unfortunately, we are not getting the total revenue from those higher per diems because the volumes are still down. But once we see those occupancy levels get to pre-pandemic levels in that 80% to 82% level, we remain confident that margins would be at the same pre-pandemic percentages.

Yes, that’s perfect. The only thing I would add to Dave’s comments is kind of going back to the general mood of the economy and likely falling into a recession. We have made great progress on lowering the vacancy rate. It’s really accelerated for the last 90 days, so pretty much the quarter. I think if we go into next year, as Dave says, and still see a little bit of a tailwind from the labor market structure, then we can taper down those incentives as appropriate. I think you would also find interesting, our HR team has shared with us that our pipeline for 2022, so this year, have exceeded the levels. These are people that have applied for jobs for CoreCivic throughout the company. Our pipeline for this year, 10 months into the year, has exceeded the levels we had in 2020 and also 2021. We are pretty close back to 2019 levels on pipeline, people applying for employment with the company. And again, a ton of credit for our HR team and the incentives that we have put in place along with our operations team. But also, I think we are starting to see a little bit of a tailwind too with the economy softening and maybe labor softening also with that.

Great. Thanks. And one more quick one, if I could. On your competitor recently won a legal case related to AB 32 in California. Just any comment on how that could impact your current operations and how you might think about operating in California going forward?

Great question. And the short answer is that, obviously, we are watching it very, very closely. We do have that one facility in California that is in Otay Mesa with ICE and Marshal Service. Obviously, that would positively impact the viability of that contract going forward. So, again, we watch that closely. Relative to behavior going forward or business opportunities or things we may do differently based on the result of that case, I would say no. Again, that was the only really notable contract that we were thinking about that potentially could be impacted by that case.

And just the Otay Mesa Detention Center, it was only at 67% occupancy during the third quarter. So, it’s nice to get an AB 32 favorable ruling there where we will be able to renew. The contract expires December 24. So, at this point, it seems like that should be a renewal without any issues at this point.

Great. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Showing no further questions at this time, this concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.