Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the fourth quarter results teleconference for travelers. We ask that you hold all questions until the completion of formal remarks, at which time you will be given instructions for the question and answer session. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded on January 21st, 2026. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Ms. Abby Goldstein, Senior Vice President of Investor Relations.

Ms. Goldstein, you may begin. Thank you. Good morning and welcome to Travelers discussion of our fourth quarter 2025 results. We released our press release, financial supplement, and webcast presentation earlier this morning. All of these materials can be found on our website at Travelers.com under the Investors section. Speaking today will be Alan Schnitzer, Chairman and CEO, Dan Frye, CFO, and our three-segment president, Greg Tuzlowski of Business Insurance, Jeff Klink of Bond and Specialty Insurance, and Michael Klein of Personal Insurance. They will discuss the financial results of our business and the current market environment. They will refer to the webcast presentation as they go through prepared remarks and then we will take your questions. Before I turn the call over to Alan, I'd like to draw your attention to to the explanatory note included at the end of the webcast presentation. Our presentation today includes forward-looking statements. The company cautions investors that any forward-looking statement involves risks and uncertainties and is not a guarantee of future performance. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors. These factors are described under forward-looking statements in our earnings press release and in our most recent 10Q and 10K filed with the SEC. We do not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements. Also in our remarks or responses to questions, we may mention some non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations are included in our recent earnings press release, financial supplement, and other materials available in the investor section on our website. And now I'd like to turn the call over to Alan Schnitzer.

Thank you, Abby. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today for excellent fourth quarter and full-year results, a strong and broad-based performance across both underwriting and investments. For both periods, the bottom-line results were driven by very strong underlying underwriting income. Particularly given the written margins remain attractive, this is a durable dynamic. For the quarter, we earn core income of $2.5 billion, or $11.13 per diluted share, generating core return on equity of 29.6%. Underwriting income of $2.2 billion pre-tax increased 21% compared to the prior year quarter, benefiting from higher underlying underwriting income, higher favorable prior year reserve development, and a lower level of catastrophe losses. The underlying result was driven by strong net earned premiums and excellent margins. The underlying combined ratio improved nearly two points to 82.2 percent. Underwriting results were strong in all three segments. Our high-quality investment portfolio also continued to perform well, generating after-tax net investment income of $867 million for the quarter, up 10 percent, driven by strong and fixed income portfolio. Our terrific underwriting and investment results, together with our strong balance sheet, enabled us to return $1.9 billion of capital to shareholders during the quarter, including $1.7 billion of share repurchases. At the same time, we continue to make significant strategic investments in our business. Even after this deployment of capital, adjusted book value per share was up 14% compared to a year ago. Turning to the top line, through disciplined marketplace execution across all three segments, We grew net written premiums to $10.9 billion in the quarter. In business insurance, we grew net written premiums to $5.5 billion. Excluding the property line, we grew domestic net written premiums in the segment by 4%. As I shared last quarter, the declining property premium is a large account dynamic. We'll continue to be disciplined in terms of risk selection, pricing, and terms of conditions . Renewal premium change in auto, CMP, and umbrella remained in the double digits. Excluding the property line, renewal premium change came in strong at just over 8%, including workers' comp, which continues to be low single digits positive. Given the attractive returns, we were pleased that retention in the segment remained strong at 85%. In bond and specialty insurance, we grew net written premiums to $1.1 billion with excellent retention of 87% and positive renewal premium change in our high-quality management liability business. In the insurity business, we grew net written premiums from a very strong level in the prior year quarter. In personal insurance, net written premiums of $4.2 billion reflected a continued strong renewal premium change in homeowners and higher new business in auto. You'll hear more shortly from Greg, Jeff, and Michael about our segment results. Before I turn the call over to Dan, I'd like to take a step back and talk about what's driving this performance and what's ahead. About 10 years ago, we embarked on an innovation strategy designed to position our business to grow at industry-leading returns with low volatility. As you can see on slide 18 of our webcast presentation, over the past decade, we've grown our top line at a compound annual rate of 7% while improving our underlying profitability by almost eight points. Notwithstanding a significant increase in our technology spending, that improvement in underlying profitability includes a three-point or 10% improvement in our expense ratio. As a consequence of all that, compared to 10 years ago, our underlying underwriting income is more than four times what it had been, our cash flow from operations has more than doubled, and our investment portfolio has grown by 50% to more than $100 billion. Say on slide 19, over that same period, core return on equity has averaged more than 1,000 basis points over the 10-year treasury at industry low volatility, and we've grown earnings per share on average by 12%. The execution of our strategy has been exceptional. We think about that chapter as Innovation 1.0. Our success with Innovation 1.0 is the result of having done three difficult things very well, identifying the initiatives that really matter and passing on the merely good ideas that don't, executing effectively, and capturing the value of what we built. In a decade we developed the competitive advantage of an innovation skill set. Now we're bringing all that hard-won know-how to Innovation 2.0 at Travelers, powered by AI and not too far off quantum computing. The PNC industry is well positioned to benefit from AI across the entire value chain. This generation of AI can understand and execute on the complex stakeholder interactions, well-defined processes, data-intensive workflows, and massive amounts of unstructured data that characterize our industry. It gains compound over many, many interactions. In that context, Travelers is particularly well positioned. As an industry leader, we bring differentiating domain expertise. Because AI amplifies existing strengths, leaders in the domain are best positioned to use it to drive improvement. In addition, we have decades of high-quality data from millions of transactions and interactions and the scale to invest at significant levels as AI and technology continue to segment the market. We have thousands of engineers, data scientists, and analysts building AI and other sophisticated technology solutions. Dozens of scale generative AI tools are already in production. Millions of transactions are now automated. Within 20,000 of our colleagues use AI tools on a regular basis. An agentic AI isn't a future aspiration. It's embedded in our business operations today. Last week, we in Anthropic announced a partnership to empower 10,000 of our engineers, data scientists, analysts, and product owners with personalized, context-aware, and integrated AI assistance. This initiative will enhance and accelerate the development of software analytics and predictive models in extensive testing we achieved significantly improved engineering output and meaningful productivity gain we expect that this will result in faster and more cost effective delivery of new capabilities across travelers everything from product development the new business prospecting to underwriting speed and quality the agent and customer service and fitting our business our customers and our distribution. In our claim organization, more than half of all claims are now eligible for straight-through processing, with customers adopting straight-through processing about two-thirds of the time. Another 15% of all claims are processed with advanced digital tools. All of those percentages are growing. To accommodate customers who still prefer to call in to report a claim, just last week we launched a natural language generative AI voice agent that takes first notice of loss by phone early customer adoption is exceeding our expectation the results are tangible in our claim organization investments we've made including an automation straight through processing and analytics refine indemnity payouts and drive operational efficiencies it's worth pointing out that the efficiency gains in our claim organization come through loss adjustment expense, benefiting the loss ratio. As just one example, our claim call center population is down by a third, and this year we'll be consolidating four claim call centers down to two. And of course we're deploying AI broadly across the business. Other use cases enhance underwriting decision quality and efficiency and improve the experience for customers, agents, brokers, and employees. You'll hear some examples from Greg, Jeff, and Michael information, which means the benefits, more effective underwriting, improved operating leverage, and profitable growth will continue to build. To sum it up, our results this year and over time reflect the power of our earnings engine fueled by the discipline execution of our strategy. For the full year, core income was up 26% to $6.3 billion, or $27.59 per diluted share, share, generating core return on equity of 19.4%. And during the year, we grew adjusted book value per share by 14% after returning $4.2 billion of excess capital to shareholders and investing more than a billion and a half dollars in cutting-edge AI and other technology initiatives. Our operational and financial success in the face of another year of elevated catastrophe losses for the industry supports our ability to be there for our customers. In 2025, we handled a million and a half claims, that's about one every 20 seconds, and paid out more than $23 billion in claim pay. We also met our objective of closing 90% of claims arising out of catastrophes within 30 days. In 2026 and in future years, we'll be there to help our customers and communities recover and to enable individuals and businesses to thrive. Looking ahead, we're also very well positioned to continue generating substantial shareholder value. The durability of our strong underlying business performance provides a powerful foundation for continued strong bottom line results, leading returns, and operating from this position of strength, we remain highly confident in the outlook for travelers in 2026 and beyond. And with that,

I'm pleased to turn the call over to Dan. Core income for the fourth quarter was $2.5 billion in core return on equity was 29.6%, as we once again delivered excellent financial results on a consolidated basis and in all three segments, on both an underlying and as-reported basis. And net investment income was once again higher than a year ago. The strong fourth quarter finish brings full-year core income to $6.3 billion, and full-year core ROE to 19.4. But we generated higher levels of written and earned premiums compared to a year ago while delivering excellent combined ratios on both the reported and underlying basis. At 82.2%, the underlying combined ratio marked its fifth consecutive quarter below 85. The combination of higher premiums and the improved underlying combined ratio led to a 15% increase in after-tax underlying underwriting income. That brings the full year after-tax underlying underwriting results to $5.5 billion, up 23% from the prior year. The growth in underlying underwriting income in recent years is worth an extra minute of commentary. In 2022, we reported a very strong $2.1 billion after-tax. Disciplined execution of our strategy. We grew that figure to $3.2 billion in 2023, then to $4.5 billion in 2024, and now to $5.5 billion for 2025. Those earnings are what drive strong cashflow from operations, which, after averaging about $4 billion for the 10 years from 2011 through through 2020, surpassed $9 billion in 2024, and reached $10.6 billion in 2025. Expense ratio for the fourth quarter was 28.4%, bringing the full year expense ratio to 28.5% as expected. Continue to expect the expense ratio for 2026 to be right around 28.5%. Catastrophe losses in the quarter were $95 million pre-tax. The prior year reserve development, we had total net favorable development of $321 million pre-tax in the quarter, with all three segments contributing. In business insurance, net favorable PYD of $205 million was driven by favorability in workers' comp. In bond and specialty, net favorable PYD of $30 million was driven by better-than-expected results in fidelity and surety. Personal insurance had $86 million of net favorable PYD. Investment income of $867 million increased by 10% from the prior year quarter. Fixed maturity NII was again the driver of the increase, reflecting both the benefit of higher invested assets and higher average yields. Driven by the strong cash flows I referenced earlier, During 2025, we grew our investment portfolio by approximately $7.5 billion to $106 billion. December 31st, new money rates were about 70 basis points above the yield embedded in the portfolio. And for 2026, including earnings from short-term securities, we expect approximately $3.3 billion after tax, beginning with about $800 million in the first quarter and growing to about $870 million in the fourth quarter. As with underwriting income, the growth in investment income over the past several years has been significant. Our 2026 outlook represents nearly twice as much fixed income NII as we delivered in 2021, just five years ago. Page 22 of the webcast presentation provides information about our January 1st catastrophe reinsurance renewal, and we're very pleased with the changes for 2026. The CAAT XOL Treaty continues to provide coverage for both single CAAT events and the aggregation of losses from multiple CAAT events. Concurrents loss deductible is unchanged at $100 million, and for 2026, we dropped the attachment point to $3 billion, compared to the $4 billion attachment point we had in 2025. We believe an all-perils CAAT aggregate is the most efficient way to protect the balance And the combination of our industry outperformance, refined reinsurance structures, and more favorable reinsurance pricing have allowed us to meaningfully improve our coverage with only a modest increase to our total ceded premium cost. Also renewed the enhanced casualty reinsurance program first introduced for 2025. We were once again able to purchase working layer coverage on a roughly margin neutral basis. Page 23 of the webcast presentation, we have again provided both a summary of the seasonality of our CAT losses over the prior decade and a view of our CAT plan by quarter for 2026. As you can see, the 2026 CAT plan in terms of combined ratio points is higher than both the five- and ten-year averages. As a reminder for your modeling in terms of seasonality, as you can see from the data, the second quarter has historically been our largest CAT quarter. Also of interest for 2026, we continue to value our relationship with Fidelis and are very pleased to have once again renewed our 20% quota share with them. The renewal includes the same loss ratio cap we've had in place since the quota share began in 2023 during the quarter, and as a result, our net unrealized investment loss decreased from $2 billion after tax at September 30th to $1.5 billion after tax at December 31st. Adjusted book value per share, which excludes net unrealized investment gains and losses, was $158.01 at year end, up 14% from a year ago. Turning to capital management, we returned $1.9 billion of capital to our shareholders this quarter, comprising share repurchases of $1.65 billion and dividends of $244 million. In our prepared remarks last quarter, we indicated that we expected to execute roughly $1.6 billion of share repurchases in the first quarter of 2026, including the use of about $700 million from the sale of our Canadian operations, which did close as planned on January 2nd. Even with the increased level of share repurchases we just executed in Q4, given the strong finish to the 2025 year, we now expect repurchases of around 1.8 billion dollars in actual amount and timing of repurchases will depend on a number of factors including cat events and other quarterly earnings impacts as well as other factors we disclose like to make one other comment on capital management to help with your models given the growth we've generated over the past several years and the outlook for continued growth we're now more likely to issue debt every year assuming we're comfortable with market conditions our recent history has been issued debt every other year. Annual debt issuance allows us to maintain a more consistent debt-to-capital ratio. Recapping our results for 2025, we're very pleased to have delivered net and core income of $6.3 billion, a core return on equity of 19.4%. We ended the year with our all-time high in adjusted book value per share and with our largest investment portfolio ever, very well positioned for 2026 and beyond. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Greg for discussion.

We've had another terrific year in terms of financial results, execution in the marketplace, and progress in our strategic initiatives. Segment income for the quarter was nearly $1.3 billion and up more than $100 million from the prior year quarter. Improvement from the prior year was driven by higher net investment income, higher favorable prior year reserve development and lower catastrophes. The all-in combined ratio of 84.4% was a great result and about a point better than the prior year quarter. We're once again particularly pleased with our exceptional underlying combined ratio of 87%. The underlying loss ratio was the second best quarterly result ever, trailing only last year's fourth quarter record. Expense ratio remained excellent at 29.3%. To the top line, net written premiums reached an all-time fourth quarter high of more than $5.5 billion. We grew our leading select and middle market businesses by 4% and 3% respectively. These two markets make up almost three quarters of our net written premiums for business insurance in the quarter. We saw a decline in national property premiums, reflecting our disciplined execution in terms of risk selection, pricing, and terms and conditions. Excluding the property line, domestic net written premiums were up 4%. As always, our focus is on writing business that meets our risk profile and underwriting standards and where we can get an appropriate price with terms that reflect the exposure's peril. The segment, pricing remained attractive with renewal premium change of just over 6%. Excluding the property line, RPC was strong at 8%. Renewal premium change was positive in all lines, including property and double digits in CMP, Umbrella, and Auto. Retention remained excellent at 85%. A new business of $675 million was up 6% from the prior quarter. We're pleased with these production results in our field's execution of our proven segmentation strategy. Across the book, pricing and retention results this quarter reflect excellent execution, aligning price, terms, and conditions with environmental trends for each line. As for the individual businesses, no premium change and renewal rate change both remain strong for the quarter and about flat with third quarter levels. Retention was up two points from the fourth quarter of last year as we continue to wind down our CMP risk return optimization efforts. Lastly, new business was up 6% from the fourth quarter of last year to a healthy 139 million dollars. In our core middle market business, renewal premium change remained attractive at 6.6%. Price increases remain broad-based as we we achieved higher prices on about three-quarters of our middle market accounts. And at the same time, the granular execution was excellent, with meaningful spread from our best-performing accounts to our lower-performing accounts. To a large degree, the sequential decline in RPC was impacted by the property line, where RPC remains positive, healthy, and reflective of attractive returns. We're pleased that middle market retention remained exceptional at 87%, and new business of $395 million was up 11% to an all-time fourth-quarter high. As we close out 2025, let me provide a little color on full-year results before turning the call over to Jeff. We're very pleased to report segment income of nearly $3.7 billion, an underlying combined ratio of 88% and top line of $22.7 billion. This was the third year in a row where we delivered an underlying combined ratio of less than 90%. As for production, renewal premium change and retention both remained historically high, while new business premiums approaching $3 billion reached an all-time best. These sustained exceptional results are a direct reflection of our strong value proposition, as well as the successful execution of our thoughtful and deliberate strategies. Beyond our execution excellence, we're pleased with the contributions we're getting from our ongoing strategic initiatives. The decision support tools we're putting in the hands of our underwriters at the point of sale, including models that derive risk characteristics, refine technical pricing, and summarize historical model loss experience results in better risk selection, pricing, and terms and conditions. In addition, we're encouraged by the impact we're seeing from our product and user experience initiatives, including how well they've been received in the market. Our new BOP product is now fully rolled out, and our new auto product is live in 46 states. Both products contain industry-leading segmentation, which contributes to profitable growth. We also continue to enhance the insights around our submissions based on quality and appetite that allow our underwriters to focus on those new business opportunities that we most want to add to the portfolio. We're pleased with our progress with Gen.AI. We're building and executing a robust portfolio of Gen.AI initiatives that will enable enhanced risk assessment and selection, ultimately improving loss experience, as well as drive gains in productivity and efficiency, and improve our industry-leading experience for our agents and brokers. As just one example, we've recently rolled out Gen AI agents to efficiently mine both internal and external data sources to better understand and synthesize the risk characteristics and ensure appropriate business classification. This capability both accelerates the underwriting process and results in improved risk classification and segmented pricing. To sum up, we feel terrific about our performance and financial results in 2025. We're excited about what we're investing in for the future, and we have the best people in the business. And they're not only executing with excellence in the market today, but they're also helping to shape the transformation of our industry. In short, we're well-positioned for continued profitable growth. With that, I'll turn the call over to Jeff. Thank you, Greg, and good morning, everyone.

Bond and specialty ended the year with another strong quarter on both the top and bottom lines. In the fourth quarter, we generated segment income of $236 million at an excellent combined ratio of 83%. The strong underlying combined ratio of 85.7% was a little more than a point better than the prior year quarter. Turning to the top line, we grew net written premiums by 4% in the quarter to $1.1 billion. For a high-quality domestic management liability business, renewal premium change was 2.8%, while retention remained strong at 87%. We're very pleased with the progress we've achieved to improve pricing through our purposeful and segmented initiatives while continuing to deliver strong retention. As we expected, new business was lower than the fourth quarter of 2024. As a reminder, this is the final quarter of year-over-year new business impact from our Corvus acquisition. With most Corvus production now reported turning to our market-leading surety business, net written premiums increased from the very strong prior year quarter, reflecting strong demand for our products and unparalleled value-added services. We're pleased to have once again delivered strong results in bond and specialty this quarter. Reflecting on the full year, we're also very pleased with the performance of our business in 2025. In our management liability business, we successfully navigated ongoing soft market conditions and were among the first carriers to drive higher pricing to improve product returns where needed. Despite market headwinds, we drove profitable account and premium growth by leveraging our investments in advanced analytics, including the automated delivery of next-generation, sophisticated pricing models. Our AI investments to automate submission intake for new business reduced our time to ingest submissions from hours to just minutes, and we recently extended automation capabilities to renewal workflows. We've also made important investments in sales effectiveness and enhancements to our product offerings. In capitalizing on our Corvus acquisition, we've successfully extended cyber risk services to customers across our portfolio. This includes always-on threat monitoring with same-day alerts, continuous dark web surveillance policyholder dashboard, and personalized security consultations from our in-house cyber experts. As we've expected, these capabilities are helping our customers to more effectively manage cyber risks and are mitigating our exposure to evolving cyber vulnerabilities. In our surety business, we drove solid growth by capitalizing on our industry-leading expertise and premier-valuated service offerings. We've entered into new and expanded distribution arrangements, domestically and internationally, that position us for continued growth. We've more closely aligned and integrated our outstanding Canadian surety operation, which contributes to our position as the leading surety in North America. And in our commercial surety flow business, we've leveraged AI to enhance distribution, submission, and fulfillment experiences, improving efficiency of these investments and initiatives, and the terrific execution by our outstanding team drove another strong year of profitable growth in bond and specialty, and we're excited about the opportunities that lie ahead. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Michael.

Federal insurance generated segment income of more than a billion dollars in the quarter in a combined ratio of 74%. Both results reflect the strong underlying fundamentals of our business. We generated over $2 billion of segment income in a combined ratio of 89.5%. These results improved compared to the prior year, notwithstanding significant losses from the California wildfires, reflecting the strength of our diversified book of business and our disciplined approach to selecting, pricing, and managing risk. Net written premiums in the fourth quarter were comparable to the prior year, reflecting strong renewal premium change in homeowners and other, and higher auto new business premiums. The full year net written premium increased 2% to a record $17.4 billion. In auto, the fourth quarter combined ratio was 89.4%, reflecting a strong underlying combined ratio and favorable net prior year. The underlying combined ratio of 92.2% improved just over four points compared to the prior year quarter, driven by continued favorable frequency across coverages with sustained moderation and severity, partially offset by the impact of continued moderation in earned pricing. This quarter's underlying combined ratio included a three-point benefit related to the re-estimation of prior quarters in the current year. year. The full-year auto combined ratio of 85.7% represents improvement of over 9 points compared to the prior year, as we experience favorability in both frequency and severity. In homeowners and other, the fourth quarter combined ratio of 60.3% improved by 7.5 points compared to the prior year quarter, primarily as a result of improvement in the underlying combined ratio and lower catastrophe losses. The underlying combined ratio of 59.9% improved by 5.5 points compared to the prior year quarter, reflecting the impact of our actions to achieve target returns. The year-over-year favorability was primarily related to the benefit of property earned pricing as well as favorability in non-catastrophe weather and non-weather losses. Stepping back, the 2025 full-year property combined ratio of 93% was a notable improvement compared to the prior year. This reflects our actions to manage exposures in high-catastrophe risk geographies, along with favorable non-catastrophe weather losses. Turning to production, our results reflect continued disciplined execution to position our diversified portfolio to deliver long-term profitables. In domestic auto, retention of 82% increased slightly from recent quarters. Renewal premium change of 2.2% continued to moderate as expected and will continue to do so in 2026, reflecting our sustained profitability and our focus on generating growth. Auto new business premium was up year over year as new business momentum continued in states less impacted by our property actions. More than other, retention of 84% remained relatively consistent with recent quarters. Renewal premium change remained strong at 16.7% as we concluded our efforts to align replacement costs with insured values. We continue to expect RPC to drop into the single digits beginning in early 2026, reflecting improved profitability and values that have now largely aligned with replacement. Quarterly new business premium and policies in force declined compared to the prior year. These production results reflected deliberate choices we've made to improve profitability and manage volatility in property. Over the past few years, we've executed a granular strategy to reposition our portfolio to optimize our risk-return profile. The results have been meaningful. We reduced property policies in force by 10%, with most of that decrease coming from high-catch geographies, reflecting disciplined risk selection and concentrated actions to manage volatility and reduce local market aggregations of experience. While these actions impacted auto policies in force, the impact was muted as we grew auto in many of the markets less affected by our property actions, demonstrating our ability to sustain a competitive position where portfolio economics remain favorable. Overall, the net impact of our actions is shifting the portfolio back toward a better balance between auto and property. Looking ahead to 2026, as we wind down many of our actions in property, we're focused on maintaining this progress by deploying property capacity in supportive writing package business. The strength of our 2025 results reflects years of disciplined execution and strategic investment. Since year-end 2020, net written premiums grew $6 billion to $17.4 billion, while we generated an average combined ratio of 98%. Over that same period, our domestic auto book grew both in terms of PIF and premium, and in our homeowner's portfolio, our actions to address profitability, geographic distribution, and terms and conditions have meaningfully improved risk-adjusted returns. In addition, we continue to invest in and deploy strategic capabilities. As just one example, we're leveraging artificial intelligence to make our renewal underwriting process more effective and efficient. It's a proprietary AI-enabled predictive model that scores every account in the property portfolio. Based on this score, accounts with the highest probable risk of loss are presented to underwriters for review. From there, our renewal underwriting platform leverages Generative AI to consolidate data into summaries of relevant, actionable information for our underwriters to evaluate, with early results showing more than a 30% reduction in average handle time. The net result is that our underwriters focus their efforts on decisions most likely to improve profitability and do so more efficiently. To sum up, thanks to the continued, diligent efforts of our team and with support from our distribution partners, personal insurance continues to deliver on a long track record of profitably growing our business over time. Now I'll turn the call back over to Abby.

Thanks, Michael, and we are ready to open up for Q&A. Thank you.

We will now begin the question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad to raise your hand and join the queue. And if you'd like to withdraw that question, again, press star 1. We also ask that you limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. For any additional questions, please re-cue. And your first question comes from Gregory Peters with Raymond Jane. Please go ahead.

Good morning, everyone. And as you said in your comments, you did have a great year, so congratulations. Thanks, Greg. I wanted to thank you for the commentary around the technology. You know, I've been asking you about this off and on, like others have, for a couple of years now. In Dan's guidance for the expense ratio, I think he said it's going to be flat in 26, 28.5 versus what it was in 25, versus the same in 24. So I guess what I'm trying to reconcile is, you know, the emphasis on growing the strategic investments, you're harvesting efficiencies with these technology investments, just wondering when the structural shift in the expense ratio might materialize. And maybe, you know, I was looking at the, you know, the responsible artificial intelligence framework section of your website. Maybe you could talk about some of the regulatory and other considerations that might delay some of the expected benefits from their technology's done great thanks for

the question I appreciate it in terms of of the expense maybe we give you a sort of a year outlook of where we'd like it to be and that's that's not something that happens to us that's something we manage and we talk a lot about trying to optimize operating leverage so you know in other words we want the gains from the efficiencies that we're generating and that just gives us a lot of flexibility in the way we run the business we can let it fall to the bottom line, if we want, through lower expense ratio. We can continue to invest it in other capabilities. Just gives us the flexibility to manage the business. And as I shared in my remarks, the extent that some of these productivity and efficiency benefits are in the claim organization, you know, those come through loss adjustment expense in the loss ratio. Again, we've got the flexibility there to think about that as an operating leverage component, but just in terms of where those benefits are or where they might arise in the future. In terms of the regulatory environment, from our perspective, it's constructive. We try to make sure that we're using the technology in ways that are thoughtful and careful. And frankly, we as a company and we through our trade association are on a regular basis working with policymakers to make sure that we're achieving, you know, smart public policy and regulations as it comes to the development and implementation of technology?

I guess, and thanks for the answer, I guess related on the regulatory front, you know, there are increased example, or more examples of regulators becoming more focused on the profitability of the insurance business and particularly the purse lines business. And I'm just curious if you have a view on any regulatory pushback you might be getting on the profit levels in your business and if you think there's anything, you know, bigger issues at play that's going to spread throughout the country as it relates to that.

Yeah, you know, Greg, we certainly understand the affordability issue and think it's an important one for all of us to be focused on and we are focused on it. Let me just put the profitability of our personal insurance business into some perspective. We had a good year in 25. We had a good year in 2024, but the two years prior to that, our combined ratio was over 100. And if you look at the last five years, you know, it was 98, I think. So, you know, that would be below our target returns. And so this really is a business that you need to look at and manage over a period of time. And I think when you think about personal insurance results over a period of time, I mean, certainly in our case, you wouldn't say that we're over-earning. So we, you know, we are trying to get the right price on the risk and earn a fair return for helping customers manage their risk.

Your next question comes from the line of Ryan Tunis with Cantor Fitzgerald. Please go ahead.

Alan, in your prepared remarks, I think you mentioned that in business insurance, annual premium change, ex-property, was a little over 8%. I think that number was 9% last quarter. I'm just curious how much of that one-point deceleration is attributable to rate versus exposure?

Yeah, we're looking for the exact breakout, Ryan.

It's a little bit of both. Yeah, I mean, Ryan, if you look at the middle market webcast, you can see exposure was down. you can do the math between rate and RPC. It's not perfect math. So to Alan's point, a little bit of an exposure and a little bit of rate. And then I guess just on the property side,

clearly was a bit of a challenging year in the large account space just from a trading standpoint. Just curious how you guys are thinking about overall rate adequacy of national property

headed into 2026. Yeah, right, it's a challenging year. I mean, you know, the pricing dynamic is what the pricing dynamic is, but to a very large degree, that's reflective of the profitability of that business. I mean, you know, that business has been achieving, you know, rate gains over a very long period of time, and it's gotten to a point where the, you know, profitability was strong. So we don't really look at a macro level and look at it and say it was challenging or inappropriate. It's, you know, it's not – you can certainly find examples of accounts and we'll scratch our head and say, gee, we're surprised that got priced that way, or – and obviously more than price, we're surprised sometimes at the terms and conditions that we see given away in the marketplace that we're not willing to do. But, you know, sort of writ large, we look at it and we say not so crazy when you think about where the returns are.

Your next question comes from the line of David Motemadum with Evercore. Please go ahead.

Hey, thanks. Good morning. Dan, just had a follow-up just on the capital return. So hear you loud and clear on the $1.8 billion that's expected in the first quarter. But just given what sounds like a change in terms of just how you guys are managing the debt load and what looks like, you know, a billion dollars of excess at the holding company now before the Canada proceeds and pretty healthy statutory capital levels, any sort of thought in terms of how we can think about the buybacks throughout the rest of this year, outside of 1Q into 27, just given the current growth environment?

Hey, David, so I'd say not really. I mean, we can't really sit here, you know, at the very beginning of the year and give much guidance on what we think buybacks are gonna look like in, you know, the second, third, and fourth quarters of this year. The strategy, and we made these comments, you know, last quarter when we alerted you to the fact that we did expect higher levels of buybacks in at least Q4 and Q1, because we had, as you recognize, reached a point where we're probably carrying a little more capital on the balance sheet than we needed to. But no change in the overall capital management strategy, and the rest of the year is going to be impacted by all the usual things that would impact buybacks. What do cat losses look like? What does overall profitability look like? How do we feel about the growth environment? And we're going to responsibly manage the capital. We're not looking to hoard capital. We're looking to hold the right amount, and when we have excess, it's not ours, and we're going to give it back to the shareholders.

The only thing I'm going to add to that, David, is our first objective for every dollar capital that we generate is to invest it back into the business.

That makes sense. And then this is my follow-up, just looking at slide 23 and the 7.8 percent expectation for catastrophe losses in 2026. if I just sort of do rough math on the 2025 premium levels, that implies, you know, a little bit above, I think, $3.4 or $3.5 billion, which is above, you know, where you guys have the retention at your XOL, your aggregate XOL. So could you help me understand a little better the moving pieces there? And then just relatedly, just the cost of that, how much of a drag that might be on BI premium growth in 2026.

Sure, David, thanks for the question. So I guess I'll start with the second part of it and say, you know, we don't expect it to be much of a drag. In my prepared remarks, we talked about, you know, improvements in pricing in the reinsurance environment and a couple other things we're doing around the edges that, you know, we don't think the year-over-year impact of seeded premium is going to be that big a deal. Really importantly, though, what you were getting to in terms of cat load on a percentage point basis and what that might translate into dollars, the thing you've got to remember when you think about the attachment point of the treaty is the first $100 million of every event is ours. So you can't just say if we thought we were going to have $3.x billion of cat losses next quarter, anything over three goes to the treaty, first $100 million of every event is ours. We've said with this treaty, historically, this is really we're buying tail protection for the balance sheet. That's still true. Clearly, with a $3 billion retention compared to a $4 billion retention, we're a lot closer in on the tail of possibly being able to hit that book. But if you look, for example, at if we had that treaty in 2025, we would not have attached that treaty.

Your next question comes from the line of Mike Zaremsky with BMO. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. My question is around all the great color you gave on technology initiatives. Would you be able to share what you maybe roughly expect your organic headcount growth or shrinkage to be on a percentage basis this year versus maybe last year or so?

Yeah, Mike, we gave you an example of a narrow view of that in our claim organization in our call centers. We're not going to get into projecting headcount beyond that. But what I would say is premium per employee is up, thanks to some productivity and efficiency initiatives, and we expect premium per employee to continue to go up.

Got it. That's helpful. Switching gears from my follow-up to commercial lines, I think we can tease it out based on the comments and the prepared remarks. So maybe you can just tell us, in casualty commercial, maybe non-workers comp, what was the change in pricing kind of sequentially, or what's the trend line looking there? Thanks.

Yeah, Mike, good morning. And, you know, that would predominantly be the GL line and the umbrella. And in my prepared comments I shared with you, the umbrella had double digit in terms of renewal premium change. What I didn't include was GL. GL think has been running in the mid-single digits in terms of renewal premium change. Those would be the two components outside of the comp.

Your next question comes from the line of Katie Sakis with Autonomous Research. Please go ahead.

Yeah. Thank you. Good morning, Alan. You mentioned in your prepared remarks that the strength seen in underlying underwriting this quarter is a durable dynamic. I guess with pricing momentum seeming to continue to slow down here, can you map out for us what's driving your confidence that those underlying results hold in in 2026? Yeah. Good morning, Katie. So,

Dan shared and I shared the trajectory of underlying underwriting income in our prepared marks, and you can see it in the slides in the webcast, we are a larger and more profitable company today than we have been historically, and thanks to investments that we've made in products, services, experience, capabilities, and so on, we are very confident in our ability to continue writing premium at substantial levels, and we're very happy with the business that we're putting on the book. So when you combine those premium levels with, you know, reasonably strong profitability, you get high levels of underlying underwriting income and if you look at the you know trajectory yet you get a sense of what it's done over the last several years and we're confident it'll continue to be a strong foundation for

strong results you know in the years to come and as a follow-up I think last year in the fourth quarter the business insurance underlying loss results included some additional IDNR for casualty lines I guess with the net favorable reserve development results this year that probably seems to be holding in fairly well. But could you give us any additional color there and let us know if there was any similar additions to IBNR this quarter?

Hey Katie, it's Dan. So you know we did say as you recall from from last year that we were including in the accident year loss pick for 2024 you know what that we called sort of a load for uncertainty related to the casualty lines. I'm pretty sure we said we were doing that again in 2025, and we did do that again in 2025. And just to get the question out of the way as we head into 2026, our planned loss ratio for 2026 once again includes an uncertainty provision in the casualty space. I would say the casualty loss is generally performed And about as we expected, not really better than we had expected, you know, the business insurance workers' comp favorability has really been driven by workers' comp. But long tail line still in the casualty space, a little bit of uncertainty. So we're going to stay prudent and stick with that load again in 26.

Next question comes from the line of Mayor Shields with KBW. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks so much and good morning. I think this applies for Dan. I know you talk about not having much of an overall margin impact from lowering the catastrophe reinsurance attachment point. Should there be any impact on a seasonal basis? In other words, is there any pressure on first quarter combined ratio components?

I don't think so, Mayor, again, because when we look at, you know, our reinsurance program in the aggregate in terms of, you know, what we're going to pay out for seeded premium given the pricing dynamic in the reinsurance space and again some other changes we made around the margins in a reinsurance program we don't think it's

going to happen. Okay perfect thanks and just a question for Michael when you look forward to 2026 and beyond are you comfortable growing the more capstone state policy counts in line with the overall book or are we still

constraining growth? Yeah thanks Meyer I think you know my point in my prepared remarks about deploying property capacity to support package growth but maintaining the progress that we've made implies that certainly at most we would grow grown states in line with the rest of the portfolio but we do still have some spots where we'll be constrained so I'd expect in aggregate the property PIP growth will continue to trail auto as it has been but both the growth trajectories of both lines should improve. Your next question comes from the

line of Alex Scott with Barclays. Please go ahead. Hi, thanks for taking the

question. First one is on just capital deployment, maybe a little bit of a follow-up off the question earlier. How are you viewing prospects for today relative to organic growth at this point? I mean the profitability seems attractive but you know the growth obviously a bit lower so I'm just trying to gauge if you're again a growth isn't quite as attractive to you it could

could have been a be the way that you go. Alice I'm going to give you the same answer I've given right for 10 years I'm sorry for I'm not going to be the satisfying answer you're looking for but but the answer or that question for us is we're always looking for M&A opportunities and you know we've got the capital and we've got the expertise to diligence the deals and find the deals and execute the deals and and we are we are always looking for attractive inorganic opportunities and but but I would have answered that question the same way at any point in the last decade understood I guess second one for you on

tariffs and just you know all of a sudden seems like maybe a wider range of outcomes again. How does that affect, you know, the way that you go about pricing, maybe across all your businesses, but I'd be particularly interested in personal auto. You know, a couple

of quarters ago, when we first started talking about tariffs, we shared our view that we thought that the impact was going to be relatively mild for us. And if you go back and look at the transcripts, and we shared a fair amount of commentary about how we got there. And at the In time, you know, for lines that are potentially impacted, we did provide a little bit in the loss pick for that. What we've seen so far hasn't even been the relatively modest amount that we expected. Now, as the world changes and as the tariffs are out there longer, certainly that dynamic could change, but we feel like the provisions that we've made in the loss picks for potentially impacted lines are there to cover it.

Your next question comes from the line of Brian Meredith with UBS. Please go ahead.

Yeah, thanks. First one for Michael. I'm just curious, Michael, the personal auto insurance space is getting increasingly more competitive, some new entrants in the agency space. Maybe you can talk a little bit about those competitive dynamics and what is going to enable, you know, travelers to actually maybe recoup some of the market share you've lost over the last couple of years in personal auto, you know, given the competitive dynamics in that market?

Yeah, thanks, Brian. I would start with, you know, the marketplace is always competitive. And certainly, you know, I think a lot of the news that you see is around competition in the IA space. The first thing I'd say about that is I think it's a great validation of our strategy to be largely an independent agent carrier for personal lines. and the value of choice and advice in this type of a marketplace. The second thing I would say is we've competed successfully in the independent agent channel for years. We remain confident in our ability to compete successfully in that channel, and I think it really comes down to, you know, a handful of competitive advantages in the space. Certainly the strength and durability of our relationships with independent agents, our investments in digitization and ease of doing business. And then lastly, and again, I've been talking about this for the last several of quarters, the value of our package value proposition for both agents and customers and our ability to deliver balance sheet protection for consumers is another key advantage that we have in that space. And again, we're confident in our ability to compete going forward.

Yeah, Brian and Stan, I'll just add one more comment in there on the auto space in particular. So, you know, last couple of years, we've seen policy count down, you know, but if you looked at the business now compared to what it was, say, five years ago, we're up one of only a very small number of carriers that's actually got to hire now than we did five years ago. And our view always, again, on growth is you think about growth over time, right? We're not really looking to influence a growth number in the next quarter or even necessarily the next year. What's the right balance of returns? And are you sure that you're great?

That's helpful. And then, Alan, just curious, I'll always welcome your thoughts on the tort environment and casualty trend and what you see here, you know, going forward. Anything positive that's developing here that maybe, you know, curves that kind of lost trend on tort inflation?

Yeah, Brian, I mean, it continues to be a very challenging environment, and I wish I could say that, you know, we saw improvement. It continues to be a pretty challenging environment. What may be a little bit of a bright light is we do see more states reacting to a difficult tort environment, and certainly the impact of tort costs is impacting affordability for businesses and consumers, and I think we're seeing that in some states and positive. The other thing we are seeing more of is disclosure requirements when it comes to third-party litigation financing, and that's also a very good thing. So we are, you know, continue to put our shoulder into it and there's more work to do.

Thank you. That's all the time that we have for questions. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Ms. Abby Goldstein for closing comments.

Thanks, everyone, for joining. I know we left several analysts in the queue, but as always, please feel free to follow up with Investor Relations. Thanks, everyone, and have a good day.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation, and you may now disconnect.