Good morning. The Roper Technologies Conference Call will now begin. Today's call is being recorded. All participants will be in the listen-only mode. I would now like to turn the call over to Zack Moxcey, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and thank you all for joining us. We discussed the second quarter 2024 financial results for Roper Technologies. Joining me on the call this morning are Neil Hunn, President and Chief Executive Officer; Jason Conley, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; Brandon Cross, Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer; and Shannon Callahan, Vice President of Finance. Earlier this morning, we issued a press release announcing our financial results. The press release also includes replay information for today's call. We have prepared slides to accompany today's call, which are available through the webcast and are also available on our website. Now if you please turn to Page 2. We begin with our safe harbor statement. During the course of today's call, we will make forward-looking statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties as described on this page, in our press release and in our SEC filings. You should listen to today's call in the context of that information. And now please turn to Page 3. Today, we will discuss our results primarily on an adjusted non-GAAP and continuing operations basis. For the second quarter, the difference between our GAAP results and adjusted results consists of the following items: Amortization of acquisition-related intangible assets and financial impacts associated with minority investments. Reconciliations can be found in our press release and in the appendix of this presentation on our website. And now if you please turn to Page 4, I'll hand the call over to Neil. After our prepared remarks, we will take questions from our telephone participants. Neil?

Thank you, Zack, and thanks to everyone for joining our call. We're looking forward to sharing our second quarter results with you this morning. As we turn to Page 4, you can see the topics we'll cover today. I'll start by highlighting our second quarter performance, Jason will then go through our financial results in greater detail, review our balance sheet, including our M&A capacity, and discuss our strong cash flow performance. Then I'll walk through our segment highlights and discuss our guidance for the full year. After our closing remarks, we'll open up the call for your questions. So, let's go ahead and get started. Next slide, please. As we turn to Page 5, three key takeaways for today's call are: first, we delivered another solid quarter results; second, we're increasing the bottom end of our full year outlook; and third, we continue to be very well positioned relative to executing on our capital deployment strategy. To double-click a bit. We grew total revenue by 12%, organic revenue by 4%, and EBITDA by 13%, with EBITDA margins expanding by 20 basis points to 40.5%. Importantly, we saw good bookings momentum with organic enterprise software bookings increasing in the high single digits area during the quarter. Finally, we grew free cash flow of 24% in the quarter and 35% on a TTM basis. Also, TTM free cash flow margins came in at 32%. We are also increasing our full year 2024 guidance on the low end and maintaining our outlook for total revenue and organic revenue reflecting our continued confidence in our outlook, notwithstanding some production efficiency challenges at Neptune, which we'll discuss in a bit. And we continue to be very active in the M&A market, an environment that continues to improve and one where we have a large pipeline of highly attractive opportunities. Net-net, we continue to be quite bullish about our ability to be active on the M&A front this year. So, with that, let me turn the call over to Jason to walk through our P&L and key balance sheet metrics. Jason?

Thanks, Neil, and good morning to those joining the call. As always, thank you for your interest in Roper. If we look at Slide 6, I will provide an update on Q2, both against prior year and against a longer historical time frame. Revenue was $1.72 billion, which is 12% higher than prior year. Underpinning this was organic growth of 4% and an acquisition contribution of 8%, driven mostly by Procare and Syntellis. Organic recurring software revenue grew 6% as we cycle through the tougher comps at freight match and foundry, which we've outlined in prior calls. We see signs of stabilization in both the freight and media and entertainment markets, which Neil will discuss further. Given our leadership positions and continued innovation investments at DAT, Loadlink, and Foundry, we are confident that these businesses will capture growth upon market recovery. Also of note, organic growth in our tech segment was 5% with some production delays at Neptune. EBITDA was $695 million, which is 13% over prior year and yielded EBITDA margin of 40.5%, representing 20 basis points of expansion. Debt of $4.48 billion was above our guidance range of $4.42 to $4.46. Free cash flow was quite good at $367 million, up 24% over prior year, bringing year-to-date growth to 19%. Broadly over three years, our Q2 revenue has compounded 13% through a combination of organic growth and our consistent repeatable and disciplined M&A process. Q2 EBITDA CAGR over the same period has outpaced revenue at 14%. On a trailing 12-month basis, free cash flow compounded at 10%. Adjusting for cash tax payments related to Section 174, which went into effect in 2022, the normalized CAGR is 12% over this three-year period. Just looking at our current trailing 12-month performance against the prior TTM period, free cash flow of $2.1 billion grew 35% with free cash flow margins of 32%. We expect this to normalize in the second half and for 2024, we continue to expect free cash flow margins of 30% or more. With that, we can turn to Slide 7 to go through our financial position. With our strong Q2 cash flow, we paid down the revolver by $300 million, which brings our drawn balance down to $1.45 billion on a $3.5 billion capacity facility. Our net debt-to-EBITDA ratio now sits at 2.7x, which when coupled with future cash generation provides us with capacity to deploy $4 billion or more towards market-leading BMS businesses. On the capital deployment front, we have been quite busy over the second quarter and expect that to continue into the second half. Now, I'll turn it back over to Neil to talk through our segment detail and updated guidance.

Thanks, Jason. As we turn to Page 9, let's review our Application Software segment results. Revenue here grew by 21% in total and organic revenue grew by 5%. EBITDA margins were 43.6%. We experienced strong performance across this portfolio of businesses with organic recurring and reoccurring revenue growing in the high single-digit area. So, let's start with Deltek. Our software business serving the government contracting, architecture, engineering, and construction contractor markets. Deltek was solid in the quarter. We saw continued momentum across our private sector solutions and improved bookings activity and revenue within their GovCon business. Importantly, and as we started to highlight last quarter, Deltek's new GenAI-powered digital assistant Dela is in the process of being integrated across Deltek's core suite of software applications. We're keen to see the customer workflow efficiency benefits take route as Dela is deployed throughout the Deltek tech stack, which is exciting for sure. Turning to Aderant. Our software business focused on the needs of large law firms continues to perform incredibly well in the market and had another great quarter with continued SaaS momentum and GenAI-focused innovation. The Aderant team is consistently delivering new GenAI-powered capabilities across our platform, enabling meaningful efficiencies and creating significant value for their customers in areas like billing, receivables management, and time entry. Also, Vertafore & Frontline performed well in the quarter with strong net dollar retention and bookings growth. During the quarter, we completed our periodic strategic reviews with each of these businesses and left the reviews encouraged by the long-term opportunities in front of each. PowerPlan, our financial planning and tax software business serving heavy fixed industries was impressive yet again in the quarter and grew its ARR with strong net dollar retention and adoption of its new SaaS solution. Excited to see the progress the PowerPlan team is making. Our health care IT businesses led by Strata and data innovations were also strong in the quarter. As it relates to Strata, the combination with Syntellis continues to go very well with the vast majority of the cost synergies now in the rearview mirror. Great job by the team implementing this portion of the value creation plan. Since the completion of the transaction with Syntellis, the sales pipeline has continued to fill with substantial growth opportunities, with several of these opportunities converting to bookings during the quarter. Further to this end, with the cost synergy phase behind the team, their full attention is now focused on long-term growth-related initiatives, about which we are quite bullish and look forward to discussing in the quarters to come. As for data innovations, we saw accelerated growth in the quarter with customer decision-making returning to normal, encouraging for sure. Finally, Procare, the most recent addition to the Roper family companies, is off to a strong start. For the second half of the year, we expect to see mid-single-digit organic revenue growth trending to the upper end of this range for this segment. Please turn to Page 10. Organic revenue in our Network Software segment grew 2% in the quarter and was impacted by the fact we continue to experience pressure with our freight matching businesses and work through the impact on Foundry in the recent actors and rider strikes. Excluding our freight matching businesses and Foundry, the segment grew in the mid-singles area, which demonstrates the underlying quality of this group of market-leading businesses. EBITDA margins continue to be strong at 54.8%. Let's dig into the details and start with our freight matching businesses, DAT and Loadlink, which declined slightly as expected due to the continuing challenging freight market conditions that adversely impact both businesses. That said, the market appears stable, both on the carrier and broker side, bouncing along the bottom, if you will. Notwithstanding this, and as typical for Roper, we invest for long-term sustainable and improving levels of organic growth. In DAT's case, we're absolutely doing this, leading the industry with GenAI-enabled fraud detection and prevention tools. Also, importantly, in the quarter, we welcomed a new DAT CEO to the team, Jeff Clementz. Jeff has a long and successful career in network and software businesses, and we look forward to working with him to deliver the next chapter of DAT's growth. Now let's turn to Foundry, our post-production media and entertainment software business. Foundry continued to roll out innovative product updates and ML-powered functionality this quarter, enhancing the creative process for high-quality visual effects. Given the continued impact related to the recent industry strikes, Foundry declined in the quarter as expected. That said, the current content production pipeline is filling and Foundry's customers are beginning to ramp their capacity, which gives us confidence Foundry will return to more normalized growth next year. As mentioned, the balance of this segment grew mid-singles organically in the quarter with solid execution across this portfolio of businesses. By pipeline, our life insurance and annuities network software business has strong renewals, customer expansions, and market activity, especially in the annuities market. ConstructConnect continued its solid march of improved financial results and bookings momentum. In addition, ConstructConnect continues to lead the market with their GenAI-powered take-off and estimating solutions. Great job by Matt, Buck, and the entire ConstructConnect team. Finally, our alternate site health care businesses performed well with MHA benefiting from increased operational focus and rigor and improvement in senior care occupancy rates. SoftWriters, our LTC pharmacy software business continued their cadence of solid execution, well done. For the second half of the year, we expect the difficult freight market conditions to persist which will result in our continued low single-digit organic revenue growth outlook for this segment. Now please turn to Page 11, and let's review our TEP segment's results. Revenue here grew 5% on an organic basis and EBITDA margins remain strong at 36.2%. We'll start with Verathon. Verathon had very strong growth across all its product families and once again executed at an exceptional level in the quarter. The long-term success of Verathon is directly attributable to its leadership team building the business and all the underlying processes to enable sustainable long-term and improved organic growth. This long-term disciplined focus is truly a competitive advantage for Verathon. Neptune continues to be solid and delivered another record quarter of financial results. Demand remains strong and consistent with our expectations. Also, the Neptune team did a great job commissioning substantial ultrasonic meter capacity during the first half of this year, both of which are great relative to Neptune's long-term success. However, Neptune struggled in the quarter to achieve the manufacturing efficiency needed to deliver on the mechanical meter demand. We anticipate this to progressively be resolved through the balance of this year. Northern Digital, or NDI, declined as expected in the quarter. As a reminder, NDI is our market-leading precision measurement business. NDI partners with the world's leading medical device manufacturers to deliver innovative health care applications that require super precise navigation, such as robotic surgery and cardiac procedures to name a couple. Their long-term historical growth rate has been in the double-digit area. However, NDI is declining this quarter and this year based on customer program timing. Notwithstanding the first-half performance, NDI continues to see strong OEM order activity, and we fully expect NDI to return to their normalized organic growth rate next year. Finally, IPA Inovonics & rf IDEAS declined against a difficult prior-year comp. As a reminder, these businesses started recovering from supply chain challenges this quarter a year ago. For the balance of the year, we expect the TEP segment to grow in the mid-single to high singles range, which is slightly below our prior expectation of high singles growth due to the mechanical meter production efficiency timing at Neptune. We do expect to return to high singles growth in the fourth quarter as Neptune's efficiency improvements take hold. Please turn with us to Page 13. Now let's review our full year 2024 guidance and discuss the third quarter outlook. Based on our first-half performance, enterprise momentum, and our confidence in our outlook, we're maintaining our 12% total revenue growth and 6% organic revenue growth outlook for the full year. In addition, we're raising at the bottom end of our full year guidance to be in the range of $18.10 and $18.25. Our guidance continues to assume full year effective tax rate in the 21% to 22% range. For the third quarter, we expect adjusted debt to be between $4.50 and $4.54. Now please turn us to Page 14, and then we'll open it up for your questions. We'll conclude with the same key takeaways with which we started. First, we delivered a solid quarter of financial results. Second, we're increasing the low end of our outlook for the full year. And third, we are very well positioned relative to our capital deployment strategy. For the quarter, we delivered 12% total revenue and 4% organic revenue growth while increasing our EBITDA 13%. Importantly, free cash flow was strong, growing 24% in the quarter and 35% on a trailing 12-month basis. Free cash flow margins were 32% on a TTM basis as well. Next, we're maintaining our full year outlook for 12% total revenue and 6% organic revenue growth and increasing the bottom end of our full year guidance. We're confident in our outlook given the mission criticality of our solutions, the ongoing expansion of our recurring revenue base, and seeing HSD growth in our enterprise software bookings. Finally, we continue to maintain a strong financial position with over $4 billion capacity for capital deployment. The M&A markets are very active. We have a robust pipeline of attractive acquisition opportunities that we're excited to pursue with our unbiased and disciplined approach. We remain quite bullish about our ability to execute this partner strategy over the balance of this year and into the future. Now as we turn to your questions and if you could flip to the final slide, our strategic flywheel, we'd like to remind everyone that what we do at Roper is simple. We compound cash flow over a long arc of time by operating a portfolio of market-leading application-specific and vertically oriented businesses. Once a company is part of Roper, we operate in a decentralized environment, so our businesses can compete and win based on customer intimacy. We coach our businesses on how to structurally improve their long-term and sustained organic growth rates and underlying business quality. Finally, we run a centralized process-driven capital deployment strategy that focuses in a deliberate and disciplined manner on finding the next great business to add to our cash flow compounding flywheel. Taken together, we compound our cash flow over a long arc of time in the mid-teens area. So, with that, we'd like to thank you for your continued interest and support and open the floor for your questions. Operator, please go ahead.

Thank you. We will now go to our Q&A portion of the call. And we will now take the first question, and this comes from the line of Deane Dray from RBC Capital Markets.

Maybe we can start with the production efficiency issues at Neptune. And if I understand this correctly, so mechanical meters, it's an established platform. So, I would not expect it to be like a start-up issue on this, but maybe just share with us what the problem is, what the remedy is, and so forth?

Sure, delighted to do that. I appreciate the question. So just to highlight what we talked about on the call. So first, the demand at Neptune is consistent with our expectations. So, there's no demand issue here on either the static or the mechanical side. Second, the team did just a remarkable job standing up the static ultrasonic capacity in the first half. That business is growing north of 20% a quarter year-on-year. So, there's capacity that had to happen there. And we get to the mechanical, and I think the root cause here is just a simple fact that the team's attention was standing up the static and the ultrasound capacity, and we lost a little bit of production efficiency on the mechanical side. The countermeasures are in place. We just have to get back to prior levels of efficiency. We don't have to have a breakthrough level of efficiency here. And so, like I said, the countermeasures are in process, it's got the full attention of the team, and this should be resolved this year.

All right. That's good to hear. And then a second question, how about any issues with the CrowdStrike incident earlier this week? Any impact, any new vulnerabilities across your businesses? And anything you could share there would be helpful.

Yes. Generally, a non-event for us. Based on the information we have at this stage, at this time, we don't anticipate the event will have any general impact on us.

And the next question comes from the line of Joe Vruwink. Your line is now open.

Great. There was a fair amount of discussion over the past quarter from others in enterprise software, just around maybe deal delays customers contemplate AI and investments related to it certainly doesn't seem like that's happening at broker application software. So, I was hoping you could comment just on what the portfolio companies at Roper are hearing from customers on AI and are there either postponements or I might ask inversely, is Roper actually being brought in new ways by customers to assist with their AI strategies?

Certainly. I'll start with an initial overview and then Jason may have additional insights. First, we are aware of the broader situation affecting other companies and are closely monitoring this during our discussions with their businesses. Throughout our reviews, there has been no indication that our customers' IT spending is shifting away from us. This is an important point to highlight. We've also begun exploring the reasons behind this. One reason may be that we represent a small fraction of our customers' IT expenses, yet we play a critical role in their operations. Our clients are keen on having us enhance our product offerings with GenAI capabilities, which we are actively pursuing. We have mentioned this in our prepared remarks over the past few quarters, with several references in today’s conversation. We're very optimistic about the potential here. Moreover, we saw a notable rise in enterprise software bookings, increasing in the high single digits this quarter, indicating some positive momentum.

Yes, that's right. Joe, we talked about this a month or two ago. It's pretty consistent there. And I think, like Neil said, our enterprise bookings were strong across a number of businesses. Even Deltek was still down a little bit, so it was pretty widespread. So, no. Like Neil said, nothing on our calls indicated that this is an issue whatsoever, at least at this point.

Okay. That's great to hear. Yes. And I wanted to follow up on the high single-digit growth in enterprise bookings because that does seem like a positive change in trend. So Deltek contributed, it sounds like any other big needle movers to call out just in terms of the bookings developments?

And actually, Joe, Deltek was still down a little bit. So that's what Deltek. But Neil highlighted some strength at Strata. So, we saw, like I said, pipeline has been building and saw some good bookings at the latter part of Q2. Aderant has continued to be strong. Vertafore, Frontline, also really good quarters as well.

And the next question comes from the line of Julian Mitchell from Barclays. Please go ahead.

I was wondering if you could provide some insights regarding the Q3 EPS guidance. Typically, we see a stronger sequential increase, usually around 27 or more, in the past few years, reaching about $0.10 or $0.15 in the third quarter. Is there anything this year that is affecting that? Are there any one-time factors related to Neptune that might be impacting the sequential growth?

Thank you, Julian. I believe part of the issue is related to Neptune. We expect that the operational efficiencies will result in some of the revenue we usually see in the third quarter being pushed into the fourth quarter. Looking at last year, we anticipate AS margins will decline year-over-year in Q3. If you remember, Q3 was a peak period for us in 2023. We do expect to see stronger AS margins in Q4. This represents a slight shift in margins within the AS segment, which constitutes more than half of our revenue.

That's helpful. And then just my follow-up question would really be around the network software piece and going back to the freight market. It sounds like it's trending kind of as you thought. Maybe update us where we sit in terms of the timing of that cycle trough and what sort of slope of recovery you think we should expect there in the next kind of 12, 18 months, please?

I'll provide our best insight into the current situation. Recently, DAT experienced unusual growth consistent with the freight cycle. However, the ongoing freight recession has affected the business over the past few quarters. This quarter, we saw stable volumes with a hint of improvement. The spot market volumes are either stable or slightly better, and carrier attrition in the network has decreased more than we initially expected. Most importantly, freight rejection rates in the market are on the rise. We are currently navigating a challenging environment and will not adjust our outlook for the remainder of the year until we observe tangible improvements, though there are indications of potential positive changes.

And the next question comes from the line of Terry Tillman from True Securities. Please go ahead.

The first question, it's kind of a multi-parter. It's related to the Deltek business. And then I did have a follow-up. It's going to be on Aderant. But in terms of Deltek, on that large GovCon side, I assume that's for some of that volatility and some of the bookings weakness still going on. Is there some seasonality dynamics and just kind of strengthening of the pipeline and visibility into the second half where you think that can turn positive in terms of bookings? And the second part of this first question is on FedRAMP. If I wasn't mistaken, FedRAMP could potentially unlock some large deals?

Deltek is not a seasonal business. It is divided into two parts: approximately 60% is focused on government contracting (GovCon) and about 40% serves professional services markets like architects, engineers, and construction contractors. The professional services segment has shown solid and consistent performance, while the GovCon side, especially among the largest enterprise customers, has seen a slowdown attributed to uncertainty in government spending over the past year or more. In the second quarter, there was some encouraging activity in enterprise bookings on the GovCon side, which has not been seen in the previous two quarters. Historically, there hasn't been an election impact on this part of the business, so stability in government spending outlook is essential. The uncertainty around government spending overall has affected visibility, regardless of its specific allocations. Regarding FedRAMP, the company currently has moderate compliance, and achieving full compliance is crucial for facilitating SaaS migration within the GovCon sector, which is still in its early stages.

And I guess just a follow-up question. I've been struck by just from our own primary research, just the Aderant customer base and optimism about moving to cloud. Where are we in that upgrade cycle and moving to cloud? And is it unlocking kind of expansion sales opportunities?

Aderant is currently performing exceptionally well for several reasons, and the SaaS migration is just one of them. The company is experiencing significant market momentum and is leading in the use of generative AI tools and software. It has successfully increased its market share over the past five to seven years, moving to over 50% market share among large law firms, primarily through on-premise solutions. However, with COVID-19, large law firms have started transitioning to the cloud. We are now in the early stages of a multi-year process to shift our on-premise customers to the cloud. The product is ready, and we're just starting this migration, which may still be in its early phases.

There's a few dozen conversions that's happened over the last three or four years. So, we're still really early. It's obviously picked up in the last, call it, six quarters. But yes, still plenty of running there.

And the next question comes from Scott Davis from Melius Research. Please go ahead.

Is it fair to say, it's getting a little harder to get price year-over-year? I'm kind of thinking specifically network software, but I guess, application software as well. But I know you had some pretty big price increases the last couple of years. Has it gotten a little harder to get price in those markets?

Scott, we would actually say we've not gotten outsized price in our software businesses over the last couple of years. Price is part of the growth algorithm that we talked about. As a general matter, it's going to offset the attrition on the ARR base, and then we're going to cross-sell and upsell and add new to sort of get to the total growth of the business. There's been just maybe a little bit look a teeny tiny amount of price that's above normal on both the network and application software side. So, it wasn't a big benefit historically, and we don't have to lap that going forward. To the extent pricing were to normalize because in our case, we've been normal through the period.

Okay. That's good to hear. Last quarter, it was clear that you were very enthusiastic about the potential for M&A markets to open up. Would you say your enthusiasm for securing high-quality deals this year remains at the same level?

Absolutely. The market is showing the same sentiment we discussed last quarter. There is a significant amount of pent-up demand for opportunities. I mentioned previously that we're looking at deals that would typically span 3 to 3.5 years being compressed into a shorter timeframe. We continue to hold that view. An interesting development in the first half was that market deals were highly dependent on asset quality. High-quality assets saw trades, while those of lesser quality did not, which has forced sponsors to confront the realities of value and valuations. We believe that the combination of this, along with the pent-up demand and higher interest rates, should lead to more reasonable valuations. We are optimistic about this dynamic regarding valuations and the volume of opportunities we are observing. Additionally, Janet and her team are being much more proactive and proprietary in our efforts, which is being positively received by the sponsors we are interacting with.

And the next question comes from the line of Joe Giordano from TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Can you remind me of at Neptune, the mix between ultrasonic and mechanical? And like where that is today, where you see that going? And like is there any material margin difference between the two products today?

Yes. So, on the mix, we've been advised by Neptune for competitive reasons to sort of stay away from the specifics of the mix. Today, the market is declaratively going to static. There's a lot of benefit to static, and we believe we have a most product advantage with our static meter around being able to be accurately both high and low flow rates. Relative to the margin profile today, they're similar in terms of margin profile.

Okay. If I consider ConstructConnect and a bit of Deltek, it seems that construction starts and activity are still at a good level, but the starts are declining. It appears that even on the institutional side, things are starting to weaken, although still from good levels. What are the implications of this? Are you seeing any of these trends in those businesses?

Yes, on the Deltek side, the construction segment remains robust with strong pipeline and bookings activity. Our customer base primarily consists of small to medium-sized businesses rather than large enterprises. There is a significant untapped market, and even with some potential slowdown, these smaller contracts may seek efficiency through our software, which could alleviate some pressure. At ConstructConnect, solid execution has resulted in improved outcomes. They are strategically focusing on trade contractors and building product manufacturers. They've effectively enhanced their product strategy, R&D, and go-to-market changes, including lead generation and demo presentations. We have seen four consecutive quarters of double-digit bookings at ConstructConnect, and it’s really the consistent execution that has driven these positive results.

And the next question comes from Steve Tusa from JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

On the Neptune side, what's the kind of backlog status there? And what's your book-to-bill on that front? Just some color on the orders because accelerating into Q4 when your growth was 15% seems to imply quite a catch-up even beyond maybe just fulfilling some of these other orders? And then secondarily, you mentioned high single-digit growth in software, I believe it was bookings. Is that organic or reported? And if that's total software, shouldn't that translate to revenues more near term in the second half? It doesn't look like you're accelerating there in the second half.

On Neptune bookings, we had a very strong backlog at the beginning of the year, nearly four quarters' worth. That's been our focus this year. Orders remain robust, which addresses your question about the fourth quarter and also sets the stage for next year. Regarding enterprise bookings, we define it as all software business excluding DAT, Loadlink, and ConstructConnect, as those are more focused on small and medium-sized businesses with annual contract value revenue. The timing of bookings can affect how quickly they convert to revenue, which varies based on the type of award. Therefore, not all bookings will translate into revenue within the current year, but they do support our expectations for AS in the second half of this year and into 2025.

That's right. And just the only thing I'd add to Jason’s thought, on the software bookings is the majority, if not the vast majority of bookings are subscription or SaaS related. So, you've got the number of months left in the year, it's just hard to impact bookings in the second half or even second quarter six months left to go. So, it really is about the launch of point in AR for '25.

And yes, just to clarify, it is organic.

And the next question comes from Alexander Blanton from Clear Harbor Asset Management. Please go ahead.

I want to go back to the Neptune production issue. I really wasn't clear on the answer that you gave before. So perhaps you can make some clarifying comments. What's the nature of the production holdup or problem? And I think you said that you expected it to be resolved by the end of the third quarter so that you would do some catch-up in the fourth quarter. Could you elaborate on that?

I'll do my best. So, as you know, Neptune makes the sense that at the highest level, makes two forms of meters, a static meter and a mechanical meter. The static meter, we've had to add production capacity, which was successfully commissioned in the first half. So that's great news to the existing factory that we have in Alabama. The mechanical meter side, we have the capacity that's needed, but there was essentially a daily efficiency production rate that was below where it needed to be to meet the demand and deliver on the customer commitments. That's what's in the process of being countermeasured. Again, I mentioned before, this is just returning to levels of previous efficiency, not a breakthrough level of efficiency that would not get ever achieved. And so, the teams are fully contrasting this at the moment, and we expect it's beginning to resolve itself in the third quarter, and we hope and expect to resolve itself for the balance of the year.

My question really was what caused it to deviate from prior levels?

We think the root cause of that is you've got a factory management team that was super focused on adding the static capacity in the first half and just got distracted or lost focus on the daily efficiency or production efficiency on the mechanical side.

Thank you. This concludes our Q&A session. I will now hand the call over back to Zack Moxcey. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, everyone, for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you during our next earnings call.

Thank you. This concludes our conference call for today. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.