Good morning. The Roper Technologies conference call will now begin. Today's call is being recorded. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the store key followed by zero on your touchstone telephone. I would now like to turn the call over to Zach Moxie, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and thank you all for joining us as we discuss the third quarter 2025 financial results for Roper Technologies. Joining me on the call this morning are Neil Hunt, President and Chief Executive Officer, Jason Conley, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Brandon Cross, Vice President and Principal Accounting Officer, and Shannon O'Callaghan, Senior Vice President of Finance. Earlier this morning, we issued a press release announcing our financial results. The press release also includes replay information for today's call. We have prepared slides to accompany today's call, which are available through the webcast and are also available on our website. Now, if you please turn to page two. We begin with our safe harbor statement. During the course of today's call, we will make forward-looking statements which are subject to risks and uncertainties as described on this page in our press release and in our SEC filings. You should listen to today's call in the context of that information. And now if you please turn to page three. Today we will discuss our results primarily on an adjusted, non-GAAP, and continuing operations basis. For the third quarter, the difference between our GAAP results and adjusted results consists of the following items. Amortization of acquisition-related and tangible assets, transaction-related expenses associated with completed acquisitions, and lastly, financial impacts associated with our minority investment at IndiCorps. Reconciliations can be found in our press release and in the appendix of this presentation on our website. And now, if you please turn to page four, I'll hand the call over to Neil. After our prepared remarks, we will take questions from our telephone participants. Neil?

Thank you, Zach, and thanks to everyone for joining us and excited to be with you this morning. As we turn to page four, you'll see the topics we plan to cover today. We'll start with our third quarter highlights and financial results. Next, Next, we'll review our segment performance, this recent set of all-time acquisitions. Then I'll get into our guidance details, and of course, four key takeaways for today's call. We had a strong third quarter. Total revenue grew 14%. Organic revenue grew 6%. Software bookings grew in the high singles area, and we continued to deliver impressive free cash flow, with free cash flow growing 17%, and of note, free cash flow margins posted at 32% for the TTM period. Really impressive financial results. Second, we're super encouraged by the progress and momentum we're seeing across all of our businesses as it relates to our internal operations, and more on this in a moment. We're announcing today our first share repurchase authorization, $3 billion in total. And lastly, we continue to execute on our M&A strategy of acquiring faster growth platforms and bolt-on or tuck-in acquisitions at a high-fidelity rate. In the quarter, we deployed $1.3 billion, $800 million for subsplash, which we detailed this time last quarter, and $500 million on a series of tuck-in acquisitions. Also, more on this later, but worth highlighting here, we are very encouraged by this recent capital deployment execution and the future growth potential that is being layered into our enterprise. Importantly, we remain very well positioned for the continued execution of our M&A strategy and continue to have north the $5 billion of capital deployment capacity available over the next 12 months or so. As I turn the call over to Jason, reflecting on the quarter, I'm quite bullish on most of what we're seeing. A very strong 3Q, real demonstrable AI progress, which is a long-term growth driver for us, Excellent execution of our higher growth, higher returning capital employment strategy, and the announcement of our first ever buyback authorization. This all bodes very well for the future. That said, we'd like to see some of our markets start to cooperate a bit better, namely the government contracting and trade markets, and we have some delays at Neptune. Much more on this as we walk through today's call. So with that, let me turn the caller to Jason to talk through our P&L and our balance sheet.

Thanks, Neil. Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining us today. I'm pleased to take you through our third quarter results and strong financial position. Turning to page six, Q3 and TTM results reflect a long-term financial profile of ROFR, which is to compound cash flow in the mid-teens area. We'll start with revenue, which was 14% over prior year and surpassed the $2 billion mark. Acquisitions contributed 8%, led by the final quarter of Transact before it turns organic, and Central Reach, which we acquired in April this year. Of note, these businesses are tracking very well against our acquisition expectations. We printed 6% organic growth, both for the consolidated enterprise and across each of our three segments. Our application and network software segments were in line with expectations, while TEP was a bit below given near-term timing at Neptune, which Nia will discuss further. EBITDA of $810 million was 13% over prior year, with EBITDA margin of 40.2%. Core margins expanded 10 basis points, and segment core margins expanded 30 basis points, led by our software segments. $0.14 was 11% over prior year, and $0.02 above the high end of our guidance range, despite absorbing $0.05 of dilution from Q3 acquisitions that were not reflected in previous Pre-cash flow was outstanding at $842 million, up 17% over prior year and representing 32% of revenue on a TTM basis. Our software businesses captured strong renewals, and we drove great working capital performance across the board. Broadening out a bit, TTM cash flow of over $2.4 billion is a 17% CAGR over a three-year And for those looking at per-share metrics, you'll note that our share count has compounded at about half a percent over that same time period. At Roper, we have been and will continue to be relentlessly focused on cash flow and shareholder value of creation. Now let's turn to slide 7 and discuss our very strong financial position. Our net debt to EBITDA stands at three times, which is up only modestly from Q2 at 2.9 times, despite deploying $1.3 billion towards acquisitions. This places us in a great position with over $5 billion in the next 12-month capacity for capital deployment. Regarding M&A, you can see that we've been quite active this year in acquiring high-quality growth businesses and several strategic bolt-ons. This is against the backdrop of a muted PE deal environment. The pipeline of high-quality acquisitions continues to build as access mature in PE portfolios, and a return of capital to LPs becomes paramount. Additionally, as Neil mentioned, we're pleased to announce another capital deployment lever that was previously unavailable. Our board has authorized a $3 billion share repurchase program with an open-ended time period to execute. While M&A will continue to be the majority of our capital deployment allocation, our share repurchase program will allow us to opportunistically complement our M&A program. For the last year or two, we have talked about the great business building taking place across the Roper portfolio, from strategy to talent to execution, all now greatly turbocharged by AI. Our repurchase program reflects both confidence in our strategy and our commitment to delivering long-term shareholder value. So with that, I'll turn it back over to Neil to talk about our segment performance.

Thanks, Jason. Turning to page 8, and before we get into our segment details, we want to discuss why AI is a powerful and durable growth driver for Roper. To start, AI represents a meaningful expansion of our TAM across the portfolio. We can now deliver transformational software solutions that automate labor-intensive work adjacent to our existing platforms. This creates substantial new value streams for our customers and correspondingly facilitates long-term growth for Roper and our businesses. Importantly, our businesses are uniquely positioned to win in AI. In fact, having a very high right to win in the AI world. Our software solutions are deeply embedded system of record applications with workflow-oriented, domain-specific architectures. The decades of cumulative workflow knowledge built into our platforms, combined with the proprietary vertical market data, provide the precise context needed to develop agentic AI solutions. Because of this, our businesses have an exceptionally high right to win as we deploy these capabilities across our VMS and markets. Internally, we're becoming AI native across all functions to drive productivity gains. We're excited to reinvest these gains to further accelerate our product development and go-to-market initiatives. It's important to note we've always had more great ideas than resources needed to execute, and AI has the potential to attack this challenge. Finally, we have tangible proof points, though it's still early. Adderick has claimed the technology leadership position in legal tech, accelerating their bookings growth. Central Reach now has roughly 75% of their bookings attributed to AI-enabled products, which have automated 100 million reimbursement rule evaluations, over 3.5 million learner appointments, and over a million clinical summaries being generated. Great real-world examples of the power of AI. Dell Tech has released over 40 AI features into their cloud offerings, driving increased cloud conversion activity. And DAT has industry-leading AI-ML enabled freight matching capabilities, which I'll detail shortly. These are but a few examples from across the portfolio. Very exciting times for sure. With that, let's now turn to our segment reviews starting with page 10 in our application software segment. 18% in total, and organic revenue grew by 6%. EBITDA margins were 43.4%, and core margins improved 40 basis points in the quarter. Deltech delivered solid performance in the quarter with particularly strong results in their private sector and markets. Construction, architecture, and engineering remained robust throughout. The GovCom business experienced softness in September as agencies paused activity ahead of the pending government shutdown. This timing is unfortunate. Pipeline activity and commercial momentum had been building nicely following the passage of the one big beautiful bill in July, and we're seeing increased engagement across our customer base heading into the new fiscal year. The fundamentals remain strong. The OB3 authorized significant increases in defense and infrastructure spending that will flow through to our customers once appropriations are finalized. This is simply a timing issue, not a demand issue. Finally, retention levels across the entire Dell Tech franchise remain very high. HRT continues to be incredibly strong and continues to post impressive bookings and recurring revenue growth. The booking strength is broad-based, fueled by their AI-enabled solutions, especially as it relates to AI-enabled compliant time capture and billing, and is a combination of market share gains, cloud migration, and SaaS growth. HRT continues once again to be steady and solid for us. We continue to see consistent ARR growth and strong customer retention and strength across their agency, MGA, and carrier solutions. This growth is enabled by their strong go-to-market capabilities and their long-term commitment to product strength. Their performance has been terrific. Their success is a result of several years of business building in the product stack, their go-to-market capabilities, their service delivery, really across all functions. In addition, to remind everyone, they serve power generation customers, which are adding capacity as quickly as possible to handle the AI workloads. The setup here should be quite good for a long time. Also in the quarter, we completed the acquisition of Orchard, a tuck-in acquisition for our ClinAssist business. It brings additional clinical laboratory capability to ClinAssist with particular strength, and our portfolio continues to execute very well. Central Reach was awesome again in the quarter, driving accelerating adoption of their AI tools and capturing ABA therapy capacity additions. ProCare made a great installment of progress, with new bookings continuing to be strong, posting low double-digit growth in payments with improved gross margins, though still work to do, in particular with faster implementation timeframes and shared wallet expansion, but meaningful progress for sure. Finally, Strata and Transact were steady and solid in the quarter. To the final quarter of the year, we expect to deliver mid-single-digit organic revenue growth. This outlook reflects high single-digit growth in our recurring revenue base, offset by declines in non-recurring revenue, primarily due to anticipated softness in our Dell Tech business stemming from the ongoing government shutdown. Given the uncertainty surrounding the duration and impact of the shutdown, we see potential outcomes across the full range of our MSD outlook, from the lower to the higher end. That said, our businesses in this segment continue to compete and execute exceptionally well. the primary variable remains a higher level of market uncertainty than we typically experience for a Deltex business. That's to page 11. Total revenue in our network segment grew 13% and organic revenue 6% in the quarter. Even our margins remain strong at 53.7% with core margins improving 60 basis points. As we dig into the individual businesses, we'll start with DAT. DAT was solid in the quarter and had strong RAPU improvements. DAT continues to execute exceptionally well on their core strategy of driving enhanced network value for both brokers and carriers. This side approach positions DAT to better monetize their entire network ecosystem. And more on this when we turn to the next page. Construct Connect was solid again for us in the quarter. Their growth was fueled by strong customer bookings activity and improved customer net retention. Of note, this business continues to make good progress with their emerging AI-enabled takeoff and estimating solution. It's turning the corner on growth, posting continued sequential improvements in ARR, and we expect their Q4 exit ARR to grow year-over-year in the HSD area. Really happy for the team there as they've had to work through some tough market conditions. MHA, SHP, and softwriters were very good in the quarter. Of particular note, Softwriters is executing at an exceptional level, winning a few very large pharmacy customers and making substantial progress on a high-impact AI solution, which is being beta-tested in the market currently. Congrats to Scott and his entire team for their success. The acquisition that closed on July 25th is off to a great start, delivering financial results in line with our deal model expectations. Very good market traction with their AI-driven sermon content offering, Pulpit AI, as they deepen its integration with their core engagement platform, driving strong product-led growth. Exciting stuff. As we turn to the outlook for the final core of the year, we expect to see organic revenue growth at the higher end of the mid-singles area. If we turn to page 12, we'd like to spend a few minutes describing the strategic evolution of our DAT business and why we're so excited about its future growth prospects. To start, our legacy DAT platform is the largest freight matching network across the U.S. and Canada. The scale is remarkable. Over 1.2 million loads posted and 15 million rate views every single day. DAT is the clear market leader, delivering tremendous value to both freight brokers and carriers, both of whom pay to participate in this powerful network. As strong as the legacy business is, we're even more bullish about where DAT is headed. To bring this vision to life, DAT is building capabilities across the entire freight automation workflow, from carrier vetting to broker-carrier matching to AI-driven rate negotiation, load management tracking, and finally, payment and settlement. Through deep customer partnering with the brokerage community, DAT is working to fully automate the freight matching process. DAT will generate $100 to $200 per load in savings for brokers, while giving carriers greater predictability and faster payments on their invoices. DAT Apart is this end-to-end product capability in its role as a neutral, trusted partner, a Switzerland-like player that equally serves the entire freight brokerage market. This is a truly unique position in the market. This evolution also highlights the Roper-DAT partnership at its best. We worked closely with the DA team to craft this strategy, then we executed a focused M&A program to strengthen it through three strategic tokens, Trucker Tools, Outgo, and Convoy. With the deals complete, DAT is now fully focused on delivering against this strategic opportunity. Important to note, Convoy is an unusual transaction for us as it currently is not profitable, but we expect the financial returns over the next several years to be extremely attractive. The key to success is scaling efficiently, leveraging DAT's advantage customer unit economics for both brokers and carriers to drive sustained growth and profitability. We are confident in this strategy, market position, and DAT's ability to execute. This was a bit of a deep dive, but we wanted to share with you why we're so excited about the growth opportunity that sits in front of DAT, true AI-based freight automation. On page 13, in review, our TEP segment's quarterly results grew 7%. Surcharges came in at 35.2%. Let's start with Neptune. As we said before, Neptune continues to execute really well, particularly around its ultrasonic meter strategy, and we're seeing strong traction in its data and software billing solutions. Short-term disruption. Neptune responded by implementing surcharges to offset the terrorist impact, which temporarily slowed order timing. These actions reflect the benefit of being part of Roper, doing the right long-term thing for customers and the business, even when it creates near-term headwinds. The product continues to perform well. In particular, during the quarter, Verathon saw continued strength and its single-use recurring product lines, both B-Flex and GlideScope, which remain key growth drivers. NDI also delivered an excellent quarter. As we discussed previously, NDI provides proprietary, world-class precision measurement technologies to a range of healthcare OEMs. These technologies, in turn, enable guidance-enabled solutions across multiple clinical markets, including orthopedic surgery, interventional radiology, and cardiac ablation. We saw strong execution growth across CIFCO, SMI, Antivonics, IPA, and our overall performance for this group of companies. To the fourth quarter, we expect organic growth in the low single-digit area given the very difficult prior year comp and the timing we discussed. Page 15 in reviewer Q4 and updated full-year 2025 guidance. Starting with the full-year outlook, we continue to expect total revenue to remain in the 13% area. Also, given the delays at Neptune and the temporary impact of the government shutdown, which is slowing year-end commercial activity at Deltek, we now expect organic revenue to land in the 6% area versus our previous 6% to 7% range. To our full-year depth outlook, we're tightening guidance to the high end of our prior range after adjusting for $0.10 of dilution from the $500 million of tuck-in acquisitions completed. during the quarter. Specifically, we now expect adjusted depths to be in the range of $19.90 and $19.95. We expect to see our tax rate at the lower end of our 21% to 22% area for the full year. For the fourth quarter, we're establishing adjusted depths guidance to be between $5.11 and $5.16, which includes five cents of dilution for last quarter's tuck-in deals. Now, please turn with us to page 16, and we'll open it up to your questions. The same key takeaways with which we started. First, we had a very good third quarter with exceptional free cash flow. Second, we're super excited about the pace of AI innovation and the growth potential in front of our enterprise, announcing a $3 billion authorization for a share repurchase. And finally, we remain super well positioned for further M&A activity. To our financial results, we grew total revenue 14% and organic revenue 6%, grew EBITDA 13% and delivered 17% free cash flow growth in the quarter. AI is a significant growth driver for Roper, expanding our TAMs by automating tasks and work across our vertical market offerings. With deep workflow integration, proprietary data, and vertical market-specific architectures, our businesses are well-positioned to succeed in AI, in fact, have a very high right to win, and are already seeing measurable yet early product and commercial results. DAT exemplifies this strategy in action, evolving from a traditional freight matching network to a fully automated freight marketplace powered by AI. Through this transformation, DAT is unlocking significant efficiency and economic value for brokers and carriers alike, positioning itself for improved, high-quality growth. As Jason mentioned earlier, we're excited to announce a $3 billion share purchase authorization, which will deploy opportunistically, enabling us to take advantage of dislocations in the We're super confident with our talent advantage, our strategy, and our execution capabilities, and this first-ever buyback is evidence of success. Importantly, we remain exceptionally well-positioned to execute our M&A strategy. We have north of $5 billion of available firepower over the next 12 months and a very active, large, and attractive pipeline of opportunities. Importantly, Roper continues to strengthen its position as an acquirer of choice for both target CEOs and their private equity owners. We pursue these opportunities with a consistent, unbiased, patient, and disciplined approach. Prior to turning to your questions, and if you can flip to the final slide, our strategic compounding flywheel, we'd like to remind everyone that what we do is ropeers simple. We compound cash flow over a long arc of time by executing a low-risk strategy and running our dual-threat offense. First, we have proven, powerful business model that begins with operating a portfolio of market-leading, application-specific, and vertically-oriented businesses. Once a company is part of Roper, we operate a decentralized environment so our businesses can compete and win based on customer intimacy. We coach our businesses on how to structurally improve their long-term and sustainable organic growth rates and underlying business quality. Second, we run a centralized process-driven capital employment strategy that focuses in a deliberate and disciplined manner on cultivating, curating, and acquiring the next great vertical market leading business or tuck-in acquisition to add to our cash flow compounding flywheel. Taken together, we compound our cash flow over a long arc of time in the mid-teens area, meaning we double our cash flow every five years or so. So with that, we'd like to thank you for your continued interest and support and open the call to your questions.

Thank you. We will now go to our question and answer portion of the call. We request that our callers limit their question to one main question and one follow-up. If you would like to ask a question, you may do so by pressing the star key followed by the digit one on your touchstone telephone. If you're using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press the star, then the digit two. Again, we request that callers limit their questions to one main question and one follow-up. Your first question comes from the line of George Kurosawa with Siri. Please go ahead. Hi, thanks for taking the questions. Great

to be on the call here. I wanted to first touch on kind of the high-level organic growth picture. I think you can take a step back this quarter, but I think you can certainly argue there's some one-time or short-term dynamics at play here. Maybe just if you could frame your confidence in a re-acceleration from here, particularly as we start to sharpen our pencils for 26. Thanks.

Yeah, appreciate it. Thanks for being on the call this morning. So, I think you're right. I mean, the reason that was a little rough this quarter were the two two reasons we talked about, the commercial activity at Deltek with the government shutdown and then this tariff-related impact at Neptune. As we think about 26, I mean, it's a little early for us to get super detailed about 26, but if you sort of roll sort of segment by segment, it's been pretty, in application, it's been pretty consistent trends there throughout 25. You know, Deltek and government contracting should improve next year given the passage of OB3. I think the timing of when that improves is still up in the air a little bit. We'll see that as we get through our planning and roll the next year. But there's definitely sort of improvement happening in that market, given the spending attached to OB3. In the network segment, it's been pretty consistent over the last three quarters. There was sort of a comp thing in the first quarter, so pretty consistent over the last three quarters, despite the sort of the headwinds in the freight market. We'll have to see how the freight market evolves next year. but really like the business building we're doing at DAT as I talked about as I also mentioned foundry is going to be better next year and then on TEP you know the Neptune order patterns you know likely continue normalizing the pre-COVID sort of lead lead time levels orders there have been pretty good it's just the lead and the lead times are going to continue to shorten NDI's poise for a couple strong years but we really need to get through a planning process to have more clarity on how TEP's going to play out next year. But all in all, you know, I feel pretty good about the trends at GovCon, Foundry, Century and Subsplash, Turning Organic in the second half of next year, and the general business But as usual, we go through a pretty exhaustive Q4 planning process, which we kick off in a couple weeks.

Okay, that's super helpful, caller. And then maybe just one quick follow-up here on the AI strategy. I think you disclosed 25 products last quarter. I'm curious if you have an updated number just to give us a sense for the pace of innovation and just more generally how you feel businesses are coming up the AI curve here?

Yeah, we feel very, very good. I won't rehash all the prepared comments about why we feel that way, but we're going from having a large number of products and key features. We talked about the 40 AI features in the Dell Tech core that's driving sort of the cloud migrations and SaaS, but increasingly we're seeing sort of AI skews. So we feel real good about that. Now we've got to get through the commercial activities or at least these skews across essentially every one of our software businesses now and in the first half of next year that we got to go sell them and commercialize them and then the momentum will sort of pick up from there but feel very good very high right to win a lot of uh you know compounding of knowledge about how to do all this stuff internally this is you know you can hire some talent but you got to build it so we feel real good about that um a lot of internal sharing that's going on which is a which is a Great to see a lot of momentum. So we can certainly talk more about that, but feel great about where we are on the AI front.

Thanks for taking the questions.

Appreciate it.

And the next question comes from the line of Brent Thiel with Jeffries. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Just on the buyback, I guess maybe walk through the strategy. Why not leaning harder into M&A versus I believe this is your first buyback ever. What would throw that decision?

Yeah, appreciate it. Good morning. So just so, it's $3 billion. It's open-ended timing. It's opportunistic. And in no way, shape, or form, a change in our strategy. Set this in the context of the amount of capital we have to deploy over the next three years is somewhere in the $15 to $20 billion range. So it's not a change in any way, shape, or form. The rationale for it is pretty straightforward. We just have a ton of conviction in what we're doing. and in terms of the talent we have on the team and the leader companies, the strategies, the AI execution, the general continuous improvement execution, the business building we're doing, and we think this buyback is just clear evidence and support for our conviction there. But we're going to maintain a strong bias towards M&A. You know, the compounding nature of the numerator is better than the denominator M&A front. You know, we cultivate every day. In fact, In fact, our Jan at Glazer leads our capital deployment efforts at a fantastic meeting three or four weeks ago, I think, with 18 CEOs of companies that are in the pipeline, so a marketing event, and it was met with great reviews, and we're really becoming sort of a buyer of choice, both for the CEOs of companies and also the private equity sellers. So we feel real good about the execution of our M&A strategy, and this buyback is just a small complement to the overall strategy of Roper.

Neil, I know the last couple of years we've had a couple things that maybe haven't gone the way you wanted to. The question is just how do you de-risk this out of the guy? And I think investors have looked at the portfolio and said that you get the diversification aspect. But why do we keep having kind of the setbacks if we're that diverse? So that's the question I'm getting.

Yeah, so you're right. I mean, we built this portfolio to essentially take as much cyclicality and cycle risk as you can take out of an enterprise. If you look back over a long history, you know, before we sold and divested all the industrial businesses, we'd cycle up or down, you know, five to ten points. Now we're cycling, like, a point here or there. So we've essentially beaten out, you know, ostensibly all the cycle risk you can in an enterprise. In this case, it's just frustratingly bespoke situations. You know, government contracting, normally you're in GovTech because of the stability of the enterprise, of the end market. Here it's been anything but that the last couple years. Transportation, who would have predicted like a three-year freight recession? And so it is frustrating. These things are stacking on top of each other, but they're bespoke, and we like the construct of the portfolio.

I think the cash flow generation continues to be strong and consistent with what we thought. Obviously, we've had some new deals come in that have been diluted, but we've been able to sort of push through that. Our guidance is the jessifer dilution is pretty close to where we were before. So, you know, despite some of the softness we've seen, we've been able to sort of maintain the bottom.

Thanks.

The next question comes from Brad Reback with Steeple. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks very much. Software bookings decelerated a little bit sequentially, I think from the mid-teens to the high singles. Was that predominantly Dell Tech or were there other drivers there?

Yeah, it was mainly Dell Tech. a little bit of frontline. We've talked about some of the funding from the DOE. We don't get a ton of funding down to the states, but at the margin, it does slow down a little bit in K-12. But yeah, it's Deltec frontline. Outside of that, it's very strong. So if you look at a TTM, it's also a very lumpy dynamic, right? Software bookings can be lumpy quarter to quarter. TTM is up low single digits, or sorry, low double digits. So feel good about that trend. And I would also just call out that health care has been particularly strong this quarter. Our strata business, you know, we combined strata and Centellus a couple years ago, and that's really starting to take hold in the market. So bookings are really strong there. And actually our clinicist business is doing quite well, too, in Europe and even in the U.S. with some of the bolt-ons we've done for them to get outside of the hospital, that's starting to gain traction as well. So there's some color behind the bookings this quarter.

Great. Great. And then, Neil, I think two questions ago, you talked about the rollout of the AI SKUs happening now through the first half of 26 and then needing to sell it. That all seems like we should be thinking about this more of a 27 and beyond organic driver as opposed to 26. Thanks.

I think that's a fair – we're certainly viewing it that way. I think it's a fair assumption. We'll certainly see progress in bookings throughout next year because, again, this is across, you know, 20-plus software companies and multiple products across 20 software companies. And so we'll see building momentum. But before it has a meaningful impact, I think it's 27 because of the commercial activity. It has to go along with the innovation.

Great. Thank you very much.

Yep, you bet.

The next question comes from Ken Wong with OpenHammer. Please go ahead.

Fantastic. I wanted to maybe drill in a little bit on just the organic growth. Any way for you guys to help kind of splice what you might have seen from maybe the same store sales versus maybe the net new organic that's coming on to the P&L? Hopefully that question makes sense.

We want to make sure we're framing or branching the right questions. Essentially, what's the cross-sell versus sort of net-new mix? Is that your question?

No, I guess what was coming from, let's say, the portfolio, let's say, prior to, let's say, like a ProCare transact versus the stuff that is now kind of flowing in as incremental organic. What was once inorganic coming in as organic? Does that make a little more sense?

Yeah, like what's the impact of ProCare coming into organic? A little bit of accretion from ProCare, not as much as we thought when we did the deal, but it's certainly accretive to the segment.

Okay, got it. And then on the TEP business, I think going into the quarter, I think the expectations were high single digit in the back half. I guess yet only 6% in the quarter, low single in Q4. So, was that isolated to any particular piece, or was it a little more broad-based? Is it just Neptune, or should we think about any other pieces that contributed to that slight weakness?

Yeah, it was Neptune predominantly. I mean, you had – it was an acute impact of Q3. We always had a little bit of a tougher setup in Q4, but even aside from that, it was definitely dumb. Okay, thank you very much.

The next question comes from Joshua Tilton with Wolf Research. Please go ahead.

Good morning, guys. I've been bouncing around on a few earnings this morning, so I apologize if it's already been asked. But I guess the number one question for me is just, is there anything you can give us on the guidance front specifically for organic revenue growth that could increase our confidence that you de-risked it enough? Maybe you could just walk us through a little bit further on, you know, where the de-risking is coming from, Dell Tech versus Neptune, and kind of what gives you the confidence that this is a good base to start for the rest of the year?

Yeah, I mean, I think we've, you know, we've given the outline by segment. And so I think Neil had framed at AS. We've got it at mid-single-digit growth. There could be a range there, and it really depends on Dell Tech's perpetual license activity. And a little bit, to a lesser extent, There's a couple of projects that are transact business that might hit this quarter or next quarter. So that's sort of the range there. And so I think we've given you that. You know, network's going to be, you know, sort of mid-single-digit plus. I think we've, you know, a lot of that's recurring revenue. And the only thing that can move around is truckers, right? They can come in and out of DAT on a monthly basis. So we think we've sort of got that sort of boxed. And then on, you know, low single digits for TEP, I think we've identified where the challenges are for Neptune's tariff activity. You know, NDI works on mostly, you know, backlog for the quarter. The others are a little bit less backlog, but just based on the trends and the call-downs we had with the business, we feel like that's an appropriate number for the quarter.

Really appreciate the color. And just maybe for a quick follow-up, I really appreciate all the color you guys gave on the AI positioning that you guys have and some of the examples. I guess what I'm trying to understand is it feels like every company that we talk to is trying to race to be a winner in this AI world at a pace that we've kind of never seen before. Is there a dynamic or do you feel that maybe you guys have this unique AI think tank going on inside of Roper because you have a group or a portfolio companies that are all marching towards this same AI goal? And then, you know, if that's the case, maybe could you share with us how they're sharing knowledge and best practices and what they're seeing across some of the use cases that are already being successful to kind of, you know, set up the rest of the portfolio to be just as successful in their AI endeavor?

Yeah, I appreciate that. So, you know, when you're vertical market, system of record, and you're going to evolve to, like, system of work, the portfolio construct is so similar that we're running basically the same play across the 20-plus software companies. So there's common purpose and common understanding about that. Then there is a lot of information sharing. Every three weeks there's an AI sort of showcase inside a room where we have a few hundred people sort of talking about one company or two companies that highlight what they're doing internally or externally, architecture, commercial, whatever it may be. We send a weekly email about sort of where the state of the technology is, the state of the evolution of AI to galvanize the leaders. There's telemetry we're putting into our planning process that we're looking for for both product roadmaps and internal productivity. The group executives who, as you know, coach six or seven businesses each, those businesses are together all the time on all things related to business AI being a big topic of it. And I can see us in the not-too-distant future sort of adding some resources at the corporate office, at the center that are overlaying to all of that, that are really sort of scanning the horizon for the technology, the enabling technologies are going and how to apply that technology. Because at the end of the day, this stuff is hard. I mean, it's what we're trying to do to identify tasks and work where you have to be deterministic and not probabilistic. It's hard to do. Now, it's good that it's hard because when you do something that's hard, you create this magical moment for your customer, and that's where you can sort of have this win-win relationship on value. And so we're super excited about all that. Again, have this high right to win because of all the context and data and decades of sort of accumulated knowledge about how these verticals work. And the final thing I would say is the real unlock for really anything inside our Roper is our org structure, right? Where this highly decentralized, high-trust autonomous structure taking $8 billion P&L gets put into 29 units. You have super talented leadership teams that are highly motivated intrinsically and through our financial reward system to compete in a way in the marketplace, and this is the new frontier on how to do that. Sounds like a good setup for AI

success. Thank you, guys. I appreciate the callers. Thanks. The next question comes from Terry Tillman

with Truist Securities. Please go ahead. Yeah, thanks, Neil, Jason, and Zach. Two questions. The first question is on software bookings and specifically with Dell Tech. The second one is going to be DAT. So first, in terms of software bookings, I think you said high singles and 3Q. So what are you assuming in 4Q? And the second part of that first question is, and maybe this is wildly optimistic, but assuming at some point the government shut down thesis, could you actually get those licenses in still in November or December? Or are you just assuming that doesn't happen? And then I'll have that DAT follow up. So yeah, so thanks for the

question, Terry. So I think for the fourth quarter, we'll see how it plays out. We had a very strong Q4 last year. So the comps are a little tougher, but I think, you know, it's the end of the year and obviously the pipelines look very strong across our businesses. You're right about Dell Tech. You know, we're not assuming that's going to hit this year, but we've also seen customers make very quick decisions in the last few days, especially if it's sort of, they've got an internal budget dynamic that they can utilize. So we're not assuming that at this point, but I will say, you know, just for 26, we do feel really good about what OPPB is going to mean for Dell Tech. Additionally, I mean, just Dell Tech's had, the markets haven't been cooperative just in general, you know, for the last couple of years. So, the demand is definitely there. Dell Tech's done a lot to their cloud product. They're incorporating a lot of the new AI features that are going to be cloud only. So, that should help drive some higher conversion. That's one of I think it's our biggest maintenance base at Roper. So excited about the future, just, you know, need to get past this quarter of sort of uncertainty.

Got it. And then, Neil, on slide 12, I like that slide. It shows kind of where you've delivered on the platform. I know with DAT, pricing and packaging was an important kind of growth unlock and improvement this year. But now you have this idea of one-click automation and then newer areas that seem like they've expanded the TAM around management and payments. Like, is there any way you can frame, like, how much you can garner now per successful load or transaction going forward with some of this newer technology versus, you know, the past or the present, as you laid out on that page?

Yeah, appreciate it. So the strategy at DAT, and I've called this out for a few quarters, if not longer, is we have this remarkable business that's a network between brokers and carriers, and we monetize both sides of the network on a subscription basis. and what we have is the market captured, and we have very favorable go-to-market unit economics, especially on the carrier side because the carrier, you get your authority first, then you probably subscribe to DAT second so you can understand where you're going to grab your load from. So it's a very efficient go-to-market motion on capture there, very unique go-to-market motion relative to the unit economics. So then the strategy is how do you just scaffold more value on both sides of that network? And then the ultimate value creation is the one you're talking about, which is how you sort of take the labor, the task labor, out of the matching of a brokered transaction. As we mentioned today, we broker about, you know, there's about 1.2 million loads a day on DAT. You know, there's about $100 to $200 in task labor savings for each one of those. It's automated. So you can apply whatever percentage you think is fair. I'm going to leave that open at the moment. We have a good indication internally, but some small percentage of the total loads and then some small percentage, a fair percentage of the labor task savings, and you'll get a very large sort of opportunity. Now, that's the opportunity. Now, we have to go equip it. You've got to make – we've got to integrate this capability into the TMS of every broker so it's native. You've got to onboard a large portion of the carrier base into this, which we're actively doing. So, we're super excited. the early results were sold out on the broker front, so the early results for integration is great, but there's a business we've got to go build here, and the reason that we're unique in this is that we're truly Switzerland. We're not competing with the brokers or enabling the brokers, and it's a huge value savings for both the brokers

and the carriers. Thanks. That's helpful.

The next question comes from Dean Gray with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Thank you. Good morning, everyone.

Hey, just want to get a clarification on the timing delays at Neptune. You know, our experience has been, especially recently going through COVID, is once a utility is ready to place an order, they're unlikely to switch. It's already gone through their rate case. It's all a pilot study and so forth. So have they lost any of these orders or this is strictly delay at this point?

No, no, just be super clear. This is pushed to the right. So what we've done, and I alluded to this in the prepared remarks, is that we have this tariff coming through. We at Neptune decided we concurred fully that they are going to assess a surcharge, which then you've got to go essentially recontract or renegotiate with all the open orders about how to do that, and it just puts some gum into the system. So it's a little bit easier when you're going through distribution to do that because you have a distribution partner you can sort of share some of this surcharge with. But when you're doing the direct business, that's a little bit more difficult to do it, a little bit slower. So this is 100% pushed to the right. In fact, Neptune reports, I mean, there was a little market share gain in the quarter for Neptune, but these sort of market share quarter to quarter are sort of a point here, a point there, half a point here, half a point there. But the latest report is the share has actually improved a little bit with Neptune in the quarter.

That's really helpful, and thanks for that clarification. And then a follow-up, and I'll echo how much you appreciate that spotlight on DAT. And just the idea, can you talk about the implications of making the investment in Convoy? You added that it's not profitable, but just the willingness to subsidize, make that investment So you have this end-to-end automation, but just the implications of a bolt-on that's not profitable.

Yeah, so I'll just, I'll start, I'll ask Jason to, excuse me, add a little bit of color. In our case, it was very, it was a unique situation for us. It was very much a buy versus build. This is very complicated. It sounds very easy. It is very complicated, complex algorithms to do this. They have to be absolutely deterministic. It's more ML than AI. There's a very large group of talented engineers that came with the acquisition. They're now part of the DAT sort of franchise. And so it's unique in that it's money losing at the moment, but it's like the final piece to sort of manifest the strategy of DAT. And because of what we talked about earlier, we have such high conviction of what's going to happen here.

Yeah, I would just add that, I mean, most of our strategies call for, you know, tuck-ins that are adjacent, and you sort of fold them in. It's like we just did Orchard for ClinSys. That's sort of the bread and butter that we would do for bolt-ons. This is really a technology acquisition that was, you know, it's really to create a new market. And so I would say that's very rare for us, but we think it's a great opportunity, and so we're willing to make that technology.

Thank you. You bet, Dean. Have a good day.

The next question comes from Dylan Becker with William Bear. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys. It's Faith on for Dylan. Maybe expanding on the DAT question, it seems like this end-to-end platform has been in the making for some time. So can you talk about where you see DAT growing as you continue to build out this network and the long-term potential there, and maybe even how this can drive durability despite some of the headwinds we're seeing in

rate? Yeah, so we want to, so the DAT core business is when you get the benefit of some unit growth versus just packaging and price. So that's the long-term sort of organic growth rate of the core business. When you talk about this sort of, this entire sort of tracking automated business, you know, we're talking about adding a capability that doesn't exist in the industry that is multiples of the existing TAM, and so we want to see actual momentum in there before we quote sort of what the acceleration magnitude could be to DAT, but it's exciting for sure. So I know that's a little bit of an answer you're not looking for at the moment, but we want to actually see the growth on the field before we call how much accelerated growth rate there's going to be there.

No, that's helpful. And then maybe just double-clicking on Delta, can you maybe remind us what you guys saw during past government shutdowns and the impact to the business and any potential insulation there?

Yeah, happy to do that. So just to remind everybody, Deltec is 60% GovCon, 40% non-GovCons. We're talking about the 60% of Deltec that's in GovCon. What we've seen is when you have the government shutdown, it's the pending, it's the potential of the shutdown and the actual shutdown that just pauses commercial activity. The activity is still there. The pipelines continue to build. There's still discussions because everybody knows the shutdown will end, the government will be operational again, and we have this OB-3 spending where we have to, all that will be awarded and has to be delivered. It just, in the height of the uncertainty, there's just not a lot of signing of the purchase orders or the contracts. If this were, hypothetically, if this were happening in March, we would probably not be calling down the year because there would be time left in the balance of the year for the commercial activity to sort of resolve itself. It's just we're sitting here in the last two or three months of the year and we're going to run the clock out on the year and roll in the next year.

All right, no help. Thanks, guys. The next question comes from Joe Giordano with Chiricala. Please go ahead.

Hey, guys, good morning. Good to hear from you, Joe.

Yeah, thanks. Just looking at app software, I mean, if we strip out the Deltek, GovCon stuff for a second and just think about like the acceleration of organic here, what's the catalyst for this? I mean, you look back, I mean, it's been small variants, but we're kind of like three years around 6%, give or take. So like, what do you, what in your sense is like really the catalyst to bring this into like a, you know, a high single to more of like a high single framework?

Yeah, so it certainly will help when your largest business, the largest segment of your largest business can sort of grow at its normalized growth rate. I mean, we're a couple years into sort of a slowdown with the uncertainties across all the government sort of spending. So that helps quite a bit when you look at that. You know, we've had just going through the businesses, you know, Vertifor is steady for us. a lot of AI opportunity in front of that business. Probably takes, I mean, we'll see some early green shoots of that next year, but as we said earlier, probably more than 27. Adderant has been just killing its power plan, doing a great job. Central Reach will turn organic, which will help. Frontline has been a little sluggish for the last, you know, couple quarters, couple years, couple quarters, largely because of some uncertainty around the funding coming from what's happening at the Department of Education. You've got this hangover from all the COVID spending, and it's just now that's getting more normalized, so frontline reaccelerating, which is in the offing in the next couple of years, will be super helpful to that regard. And then finally, our Clinist's business for the U.S. part of our laboratory business, Legacy SunQuest, has just lagged for all the reasons that everybody knows for eight years, and now that's turning or that's a mid-single-digit organic growth enterprise for us now, so that starts to help. So we like what's happening here in terms of the growth optionality and growth capability.

When you think about the buyback now and you think about the multiple-year stock, like what's the thought process when you're weighing, like, okay, here's a billion-dollar opportunity here or a billion dollars of deploying capital? Like it used to kind of be pretty straightforward with where the multiple-year stock was versus the multiple of what you're acquiring, and now it's flipped a little bit. So maybe talk us through how much that's informing your decisions on where to allocate at a given moment in time.

Yeah, for us, it's never been about the multiple of our stock. It's been what's in the compounding math for a cash flow acceleration, what's the best deployment of capital to optimize the long-term cash flow compounding of the enterprise. And now we just have another lever and a buyback to put into that consideration set.

Thanks, Doug.

The next question comes from Julian Mitchell with Barclays. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. Just wanted to start off with the outlook, good morning, for TEP and Neptune in particular on the top line. So you've had the backlog declining there for sort of two plus years. The revenue growth is slowing a little bit. So just wondered sort of what's the confidence that that organic growth on revenue doesn't continue slowing into next year, just given those backlog dynamics?

Well, I think we got to – so let's be clear about the backlog dynamic. This is about the buildup from the COVID period. I mean, pre-COVID, this was – you might have a couple quarters of visibility to an order backlog. It wasn't quite a book-and-ship business, but much more book-and-ship than it was when you ran up through COVID and then all the customers, you know, gave us blanket orders that were a year plus out. Now we're normal, when I spoke earlier, we're normalizing the order lead times slowly over time. So we, the backlog grew and it's bleeding down based on this order timing dynamic. Set that apart from the demand environment, the market share environment. So that's point one. Point two on the more normalizing piece at Neptune on the demand environment is, you know, we're just in a cycle now this year, probably next year, where we're just in normalized growth for that business, where the prior two or three years were accelerated growth because of the hangover from the COVID period. That's very helpful. Thank you. And then

just my second one might be around sort of with all this effort around sort of AI, just wondered what the implication for that might be on your, let's say, core R&D. Is that, could that be a bigger headwind to core margin expansion in future, and whether there's been any view to sort of looking to acquire more AI-intensive businesses within your overall capital deployment framework? Thank you.

Yeah, so actually, this is Jason. I think the, you know, it's interesting. We're getting quite a bit of productivity using some of the, you know, the frontier models out there, Cloud Code, Codex, Cursor, and so we're not really seeing that. Obviously, we're going through our planning this year, but it's creating a lot of opportunity to just do more with less. And so that's our posture is that our R&D envelope will probably stay the same, and we'll just get more out of it. And when it comes to acquisitions, look, yeah, we'll look for small tuck-ins that we can do. We just did a really small one for Adderant, and that's not necessarily buying a talent, but it's providing an AI solution that gets us faster to market. So we'll do those occasionally, I think. It's not going to be our primary way to get after AI faster, but certainly will be an option.

Great. Thank you.

You bet. Have a good day.

And this concludes our question and answer session. We will now return back to Zach Moxley for closing remarks.

Thank you, everyone, for joining us today. We look forward to speaking with you during our next earnings call.

And the conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.