Good morning, and welcome to the Axon Therapeutics fourth quarter and full year 2025 earnings conference call. My name is Kevin, and I'll be your operator for today's call. At this time, all participants are in your listening-only mode. Later, there will be a question-and-answer session, and instructions will be given at that time. Please note this call is being recorded. I would now like to hand the call over to Ashley Dong, Director of Investor Relations. Ashley, please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, and thank you all for joining ACCENT's fourth quarter and full year 2025 earnings conference call. With us today are Dr. Ario Tabuto, our Chief Executive Officer, Nick Pizzi, our Chief Financial Officer, and Ari Mazel, our Chief Commercial Officer, who will begin our call with prepared remarks. Mark Jacobson, our Chief Operating Officer, and Hunter Murdoch, our General Counsel, will also be available for Q&A. Before we begin, I encourage everyone to visit the investor section of our website to find the press release and presentation for today's call. Please note that today's discussion includes forward-looking statements regarding our financial performance, commercial strategy, and operational plans, including research, development, and regulatory activities. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially. Please refer to our SEC filings, including our quarterly and annual reports, for a description of these and other risks. You are cautioned not to rely on these forward-looking statements, which are made only as of today, and the company disclaims any obligation to update such statements. And with that, I'll hand it over to Ariel.

Thank you, Ashley, and good morning, everyone. 2025 was a year of significant commercial research and development progress at Axon. Our commercial business is strong, with Avelity achieving sales of over half a billion dollars in its third full year of launch, Genozy Growth Accelerating, and Simbravo Launching, adding a third pillar of growth. Total revenue for the fourth quarter increased 65% year-over-year to $196 million, and for the full year increased 66% to $639 million. dollars. Our innovative medicines continue to meaningfully improve patient outcomes. Just our current commercialized products have the potential to achieve multi-billion dollars in annual peak sales. To support the continued momentum of our current products and future launches, we have built a technologically-enabled, scalable commercial platform. Against this backdrop, we are advancing a broad and innovative CNS pipeline, which includes five novel product candidates across nine high-impact indications. I will provide an update on our pipeline progress, starting with our SNDA formality in Alzheimer's disease agitation. We recently announced the acceptance of the SNDA filing and the receipt of priority review designation with a PDUFA action date of April 30th. If approved, Ovelity has the potential to address this prevalent and debilitating condition for which currently only one product is approved. As we approach the April 30th PDUFA date, launch readiness activities are underway, which Ari will discuss later in the call. We are encouraged by the level of interest within the treatment community and expect awareness to continue to build in the quarters ahead. Beyond the opportunity in Alzheimer's disease agitation, we are advancing our planned Phase 2-3 trial of AXS-05 and smoking cessation, with initiation anticipated in the second quarter. Moving to AXS-12 and narcolepsy, following receipt of positive FDA pre-NDE meeting minutes, We've made significant progress with our NDE package, and we expect to submit that imminently. For solar amphetol, we continue to advance this differentiated molecule across multiple new indications, including ADHD, binge eating disorder, MDD with symptoms of excessive daytime sleepiness, and shift work disorder. These new indications represent significant expansion of solar amphetol's potential to help patients and create value for stakeholders. For ADHD, we recently completed a type B meeting with the FDA, where we reached agreement on the planned phase three studies in pediatric patients. We plan to conduct two phase three trials in parallel, one in children and one in adolescents, and we are on track to initiate both in the first half of this year. For MDD, startup activities are underway for initiation this quarter for a Phase III trial of Solreanvitol in MDD patients with symptoms of excessive daytime sleepiness. With binge and eat disorder, our engaged Phase III trial of Solreanvitol in this indication is progressing, and we expect top-line results in the second half of this year. Finally, for Solreanvitol and shift work disorder, we now anticipate top-line results in 2027 based on current enrollment trends. Turning to AXS-14, we recently initiated the forward study of Phase III double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal trial of AXS-14 in patients with fibromyalgia. This new study will supplement the two completed positive Phase II and Phase III trials of AXS-14 in this indication. To complement our late-stage pipeline, we recently acquired AZD7325, a novel oral GABA-A alpha-2-3 receptor positive allosteric modulator. We plan to evaluate AXS17, the new designation for this compound, for the treatment of epilepsy based on compelling data in preclinical seizure models. Further, AXS-17 has demonstrated a favorable safety profile in over 700 patients to date. Phase two trial-enabling activities are underway, and we look forward to provide updates on this new development program in the coming months. Taking together, our growing commercial business, the potential label expansion for Velody, and the robust innovation across our pipeline uniquely position us to continue to deliver new treatment options for patients living with CNS disorders. With that, I'll hand the call over to Nick to review our financial results for the quarter.

Thank you, Ariel, and good morning, everyone. Our fourth quarter in full year 2025 performance reflects Axel's growing commercial portfolio and the continued advancement of our industry-leading CNS pipeline. Together, these collective achievements firmly position us for the year ahead. As Ariel mentioned, total product revenue was $196 million for the fourth quarter and $638.5 million for the year, up 65% and 66% year-over-year, respectively, which was driven by robust ability growth, the continued solid performance of Synose, and initial contributions from the launch of SunBravo. Avelity achieved net product sales of $155.1 million for the fourth quarter, up 68% versus the prior year. Avelity sales surpassed the half a billion dollar mark in only its third full year from launch, totaling $507.1 million, representing a 74% year-over-year increase. Cynossi posted another strong quarter with net product revenue of $36.7 million, a 40% increase compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. Cynossi revenue was $124.8 million for the full year of 2025, representing a 32% increase versus last year. Simbravo generated $4.1 million in net sales for the fourth quarter and $6.6 million for the full year following its second full quarter of launch. Together, these results underscore the continued momentum of our top-line performance and disciplined execution, which is resulting in further operating leverage in the business. Avelity and Synose gross net discounts in the fourth quarter of 2025 were in the high 40% range. Going forward, we expect Avelity and Synose gross net discounts to increase to the mid-50 range due to typical Q1 dynamics. CIMBRAVO gross net discount for the quarter was in the high 70% range, which we anticipate will remain elevated during the launch phase. Now turning to expenses, total cost of revenue was $12.3 million and $47.5 million for the fourth quarter and full year of 2025 compared to $10.5 million and $33.3 million for the comparable periods in 2024. Research and development expenses were $48.8 million for the fourth quarter and 183.3 million dollars for the full year of 2025. That's compared to 55 million and not 187.1 million for the fourth quarter and full year of 2024. The decrease in R&D spend for the year was primarily driven by the completion of clinical trials for AXS05 and Solary Empathol, which was partially offset by one-time acquisition related costs and higher costs related to AXS07. Selling, general, and administrative expenses were $169.3 million for the fourth quarter and $570.6 million for the full year of 2025. That's compared to $113.3 million and $411.4 million for the fourth quarter and full year of 2024. The 39% increase in SG&A spend for the year was primarily driven by commercialization activities for ability, including Salesforce expansion and the national launch of a direct consumer advertising campaign, along with the commercial launch of Simbravo. Net loss for the fourth quarter was $28.6 million, or 56 cents per share, compared to a net loss of $74.9 million, or $1.54 per share, for the fourth quarter of 2024. The $28.6 million net loss in the quarter includes $22.7 million in stock-based compensation expense. Net loss for the full year of 2025 was $183.2 million, or $3.68 per share, compared to a net loss of $287.2 million, or $5.99 per share, for the full year of 2024. This year's loss of $183.2 million includes $93.8 million of stock-based compensation expense. Now turning to the balance sheet, we ended the year with $323 million in cash and cash equivalents compared to $315 million at the end of 2024. Looking ahead, we continue to believe that our current cash balance is sufficient to fund anticipated operations into cash flow positivity based on our current operating plan. And with that, I'd like to now turn the call over to Ari, who will provide a commercial Thank you, Nick.

Next topic, Axome delivers strong performance in Q4 and completed 2025 with momentum for Auvelity, Simbravo, and Senozi. Our outstanding medicines continue to meaningfully improve patient outcomes. With our planned investments for 2026 and the power of our innovative digital-centric commercialization model, we have high confidence in our ability to deliver upon the vast opportunities that remain for our growing portfolio of CNS medicines. beginning with Availity. More than 225,000 prescriptions were written in the quarter, representing 42% year-over-year growth and 8% sequential growth. By comparison, the antidepressant market was flat over the same time period. Our sales team continues to drive uptake across prescriber segments, particularly in the primary care setting. Primary care clinicians represented approximately one-third of all Availity prescribers in the quarter and continue to be the fastest growing prescriber segment, further expanding the overall prescriber base alongside continued growth within psychiatry. More than 5,300 new prescribers were activated in the quarter, bringing the total number of unique prescribers to approximately 52,000 since launch. Formulary access for Oveldi also remains strong. As of January, 2026, commercial coverage increased from 75% to 78%, bringing total coverage to 86% of all lives across channels. And we expect coverage to continue to expand and evolve throughout the year. Alveldi's growth to date reflects its distinct clinical profile, fast onset of action, sustained relief from depression symptoms, and a highly favorable safety and tolerability profile, supported by execution across our innovative commercial engine, reinforcing our confidence in the significant long-term commercial opportunity for the brand. We support the growing demand at MDB, and in anticipation of the potential launch in Alzheimer's disease agitation, we recently initiated our third and largest expansion of the Audality sales force to approximately 600 sales representatives. We expect to complete this expansion in the second quarter and look forward to providing additional details of these plans in the months ahead. Turning now to Simbravo, which saw acceleration in new patient trial in Q4, resulting in more than 13,000 total prescriptions and approximately 5,300 new patients started in the quarter. Our discipline launch strategy targeting headache specialists continues to grow advocacy for Simbravo among the highest volume migraine prescribers in the U.S., And we are pleased with the feedback from HCPs on the positive impact SEMBRAVO is having on patients. The key clinical attributes leading to SEMBRAVO trial include the multi-mechanistic approach to migraine symptom relief, targeting multiple causes of migraine, rapid onset of action, and positive impact on patient functioning within two hours. We are excited about SEMBRAVO's long-term potential as a preferred acute migraine treatment. We continue to make progress with Symbravo Market Access and Coverage, with overall payer coverage at approximately 52% at the start of the year. The proportion of covered lives in the commercial and government channels is approximately 49% and 57% respectively. In addition, Axone successfully contracted with a third and final large commercial GPO for Symbravo in Q4, which now enables negotiation with all major commercial payers and PBMs. We anticipate coverage for Symbravo to expand and evolve throughout 2026. And finally, CNOZE delivered another strong quarter of performance with more than 54,000 prescriptions representing 11% year-over-year and 3% sequential growth. By comparison, the weight-promoting agent market grew 2% year-over-year and was flat versus Q3. Nearly 500 new clinicians prescribed CNOZE in the quarter, bringing the total cumulative prescriber base to approximately 15,600 since launch. Payer coverage for Zenozi remains steady at approximately 82% of lives covered across channels. Overall, the performance of our innovative marketed products in 2025 underscores the effectiveness of our commercial strategy and execution and positions us well as we enter 2026. Alvelyde, Zenozi, and Simbravo are delivering differentiated patient outcomes in the depression, excessive daytime sleepiness, and acute migraine market, and together represent a proliferating growth foundation for axon. This year, our focus remains on scaling growth across our commercial organization and expanding adoption of our important CMS medicines. I will now turn the call back to Ashley for Q&A.

Thank you, Ari. Operator, we're ready for Q&A.

Certainly. We'll now be conducting a question and answer session. If you'd like to be placed in the question queue, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. We ask you to please ask one question, then return to the queue in order to preserve time. Our first question today is coming from Leonid Temeshev from RBC Capital Markets. Your line is now live. Thanks, guys. Thanks for taking my question.

I wanted to ask on what the implications are for you from the new FDA publication on sort of the one trial policy, given the amount of trials that you're running. I guess I'm curious whether you think that means that, you know, some of the studies in binge eating and shift work disorder could potentially be approvable on a single phase three, and then similarly, why, given that policy, for example, you're running two studies in ADHD, splitting pediatric and adolescent patients.

This is Mark. Good morning. So, obviously, that's hot off the press, and the team is assessing it. So, one thing is, as always, we always vet our clinical plans with the FDA and the divisions that the programs are under. So we're going to continue to do that, and, you know, if there are changes, we'll see. You mentioned Schiff work disorder, that's an example where we already have alignment with FDA that the existing clinical package could serve as potential supportive evidence should the study that we're conducting now be positive. So, that's one example where that's the place I'll pass it to Aereo for thoughts on ADHD. But that, our plan for ADHD, that reflects recent alignment that we reached with FDA.

Yeah. To add to what Mark was saying, one thing to keep in mind is, although this is a broad guidance. Each clinical situation, each indication is specific and has to be looked at from that perspective. So for ADHD, this is a disorder which affects different patient populations, for example adults with ADHD or different from children with ADHD. So as you can imagine, this is a situation whereby you would not be able to, or the FDA would not allow you to do just one study in adults, for example. We're conducting two studies in pediatric patients with ADHD because, again, there is a sub-segmentation of pediatric patients, so you have children, so those are individuals who are less than 12 years of age and then adolescents. So typically, the FDA does require data from both subsets of patients. It is possible, for example, to study both subsets of pediatric patients in one study. We decided to split it up into two studies, which will be conducted concurrently. And that will have no impact whatsoever on our eventual filing timeline.

And today is coming from Mark Goodman from Learing Partners. Your line is now live.

Yes, I can talk about AXS-17, just the types of epilepsy, the development plan that you're thinking about moving into. And you had mentioned that the product has been around and has some history in patients. Just talk about what kind of data do we have. Thank you.

Thanks for the question. So the product has been studied in different indications. So one indication that it's been studied in in the past is the generalized anxiety disorder. And all of the safety data and safety experience comes from those studies. So, it's really nice that the product has been studied in a range of doses and also with chronic dosing. As it relates to the direction of going and looking at epilepsy, this is based on a pretty broad array of preclinical studies that have been done in epilepsy models that are predictive of clinical success. And right now, what we're doing is we're starting, we have started the work to make sure that we are phase two ready, and also we are very closely assessing all of the various different epilepsies in which the product and pre-corporal models has shown promise. So stay tuned, and over the balance of the year, we'll provide more details on which indication exactly which specific epilepsy we'll target first.

Next question is coming from Jason Gerberi from Bank of America. Your line is now live.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to just follow up on the comment just about ability payer coverage evolving over the course of the year. And one thing I just wondered about, like, as you add the ADA label sometime in April, you know, should that just mirror the MDD coverage? If not, is there a process for access build post the ADA approval? And the reason I ask, you know, I think about other CNS drugs like Kaplyta, right, when they added different indications, it was a pretty seamless coverage post the label add-on event. So I'm wondering how that looks for you guys with the Bellity and the ADA indication.

Yeah, thanks for the question, Jason. As you stated, in general, when you have a product that's on the market for a specific indication and you expand the indication, generally speaking, your existing coverage should apply to the new indication. I think what's unique about MDB and ADA is that MDB is largely a commercial business, whereas ADA is largely a Medicare business. And so although we've had really good coverage across both commercial and Medicare, we have been spending more time with the Medicare Part D plans to ensure coverage and utilization management.

Question today is coming from Andrew Sy from Jeffries, your line is now live.

Hey, good morning, thanks for the update and back to Alzheimer's agitation. How should we think about the initial launch cadence in the first year? Do you expect their launch to be stronger than what Salty saw in only Alzheimer's agitation in terms of TRX volume and sales, and then maybe as a follow up to the growth to net, specifically where do you think combined growth to net for availability could trend or shake out over time?

Thanks for the question. You know, we don't generally guide on where we expect the ultimate uptake to land, but despite this, they were actively preparing for the launch to enable commercial availability and customer engagement. And then, you know, as soon as feasible, you know, post-launch, and, you know, from our perspective, there's very limited analogs in the market, obviously, there's only- Next question today is coming from Peace Trivopolis from .

Ryan is now live.

Good morning, and thanks for taking my questions. For CENOSI, you know, you had double-digit year-over-year growth. You know, what were the drivers of that? Is growth more volume-driven, or are you seeing benefit from improved access, persistence, share gain, and is growth being driven more by narcolepsy or OSA, and are you seeing any differences in prescriber behavior between those two segments?

Yes, thanks for the question, Pete. You know, CENOSI continues to deliver steady growth in both the OSA and narcolepsy markets. As we shared before, approximately 70% of prescriptions are for EDS and OSA and 30% for EDS and narcolepsy. I think over the course of the year, we saw a really positive growth in new patient start with total active riders and total prescriptions. And part of our strategy over the past couple of years has been driving depth across existence. So we're seeing growth from Ben North Lestey and really across – Question is coming from Benjamin Burnett from Wells Fargo.

Your line is now live.

Hey, guys. This is Craig on for Ben. I appreciate the opportunity to ask a question here. I guess, could you guys provide a little bit more color on the progress of the DTC campaign?

And you all mentioned that all validity scripts continue to grow, however, the MDD market's been overall flat. So where is that growth coming from? Are you seeing adoption in earlier lines of care? Thank you.

Yeah, thank you for the question. Yeah, as you know, we launched a national TV campaign late in the year around September-October frame. And we've been pleased with the impact of that campaign. It did generate an inflection in new patient starts. And our analysis of the impact by media channel has enabled us to optimize our spend going into 2026. So, you know, we'll have more details to share on that impact, you know, as we get through the year. In terms of where the growth is coming from, you know, we're pleased with efforts to expand use in primary care while also drive and continue. So we are seeing really clear care what's the fastest growth.

This question is coming from Ram Zavaraju from HC Wayne, right?

Your line is now live. Thanks so much for taking my question. I was wondering if you could comment on what you expect ultimate reimbursement and market access to look like for Ovelity at Steady State, particularly in the context of how CENOSI percentage covered lives is around 82%. Do you expect that to be similar for Oveldi, particularly once the product is approved both across MDD and chronic agitation? Or do you expect it to go meaningfully higher? And if so, you know, what do you expect the ultimate optimal range to look like?

Yeah, thanks for the question. You know, our goal is to try to secure access for as many patients as possible across channels. And so, although we don't typically guide on what the final steady state covered lives percentage would be, I think you've seen for the past few years that we've made steady progress in terms of increasing cover lives. And our expectation is we'll continue to work to ensure access for both the MDD and ADA indications.

Question is coming from David Anselm from Pepper Sandler. Your line is now live.

Thanks. Coming back to AXS-17, and sorry if I missed any commentary here, but can you talk about how you're thinking about it beyond epilepsy? For instance, it's been about 20 years since something's been approved for generalized anxiety disorder, and given the mechanism, it would seem that could be an interesting avenue to explore. So how are you thinking about broader development of the asset? And then secondly, just in general, are you looking at other assets to bring in to further leverage your infrastructure in both neurology and psychiatry?

You know, as always, with any molecule, we look very carefully at the biology with an eye to what the possibilities are in terms of potentially affecting patients positively. So we, as you know, we recently like in license the asset, our focus right now is with regards to epilepsy. We will obviously look at other potential indications, but we wanna make sure that we stay focused with the initial indication. We think that there's a lot of promise there in that area based on all of the perclinical work that's been done by others and also by our team. So stay tuned and, you know, stay tuned and I think it's a little premature to talk about add-on indications to the primary indication.

The next question is coming from Ash Burma from UBS, your line is now live.

Oh, hi, thanks for taking your question. So on the Salesforce expansion, pretty big step up twice versus the 300 reps that you had before. Yeah, just curious like what went into that math and if you can talk about, you know, consensus SG&A for 2026 is only showing up 15% year-over-year. What would be the right range for the models? Thanks.

Yeah, thanks for the question, Ash. So, the Salesforce expansion is designed to accelerate growth in MDD while providing scale for a potential indication approval in Alzheimer's agitation later this year. So, when you think about the expansion, You know, the national hiring reps throughout the country to increase return frequency to the highest value ACPs across specialties will enable us to capitalize on the momentum that we've created in the primary care segment, and primary care is of growing importance because they are frontline treaters for both MDD and ADA. And then finally, it will allow us to engage with an expanded target universe. So larger sales force allows us to engage with a larger group of HCP targets. When you think about the specialties that will be important for both indications, primary care, psychiatry.

Thank you. Our next question today is coming from Ami Fadia from Needham & Company, your line is now live.

Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. My question is on SimBravo with the additional third commercial payer contracted in the fourth quarter. How do you see the overall coverage evolving through the course of this year and how should you see that impacting the growth to net or the rate of pull through of prescriptions as the year progresses? Thank you.

Yeah, thank you, Ami. So, as we mentioned in the call, we secured a contract with the third-large GPO. And as you'll recall, the GPO contract is really the precursor for negotiating with payers and PBMs to secure coverage. So although it doesn't guarantee coverage with the payers and PBMs, it does allow for active negotiation. And so our team is engaged with all the national payers and PPMs, and, you know, I think we're optimistic about the potential to increase the Bravo coverage. That is something that we're focused on primarily for this year.

This question is coming from Joseph Tome from TD Cowan. Your line is now live.

Thank you for taking my question. Maybe just in terms of the potential Alzheimer's agitation launch, when will you be in a position to be able to launch the therapy after the April 30th date? Will it take some time before we can see, you know, kind of the full slide launch there? And then what sort of metrics do you anticipate providing should the approval come through? Would you be able to separate kind of product revenues between MDD and Alzheimer's agitation, or how can we best monitor how that specific launch is going?

Thanks, Joseph. Yeah, we'll be ready to go within a quarter on ADA. And obviously the team right now is preparing every aspect for launch readiness. And so we're feeling really optimistic about the potential impact if approved. And then in terms of metrics, you know, So we expect to share approximate percentage of scripts coming from the ADA space as we learn more, as you know, in the typical IQVIA or Symfony data does not break out by indication. And so we haven't finalized our plans, but we'll certainly be able to share.

Our next question today is coming from Sean Lawman from Morgan Stanley. Your line is now live.

Good morning, everyone, and hope everyone's well. Thanks for taking my question. On the pipeline, ASX-12, the NDA narcolepsy, with the NDA submission plan for 12 and narcolepsy, how do you see differentiation versus existing therapies, particularly around cataplexy control and physician adoption? Thank you.

Yeah, thanks for the question. As you know, narcolepsy is a challenging disease to treat, and patients often are on polypharmacy trying to find the right combination of medications to support symptom relief. You know, I think what's very clear is that not every patient responds to every mechanism in the same way, and there's a lot of trial and error. So from our perspective, AXS-12 offers a treatment option for patients, both in terms of catapulted very optimistic and what's in the marketplace.

The next question is coming from Myles Minter from William Blair. Your line is now live.

Hey, guys, congrats on the year. Just on AXS17, just wondering how you're thinking about the therapeutic window there in epilepsy. I know that being alpha-1 sparing should be less sedative than a benzo, but I think in the hands of AstraZeneca and their phase two, they did show a little bit of sedation in that generalized anxiety disorder. So just wondering whether you're going to play around with dose to try and dial that out or whether the change in indication here is enough to make that an acceptable therapeutic window. Thanks, guys.

We are, thanks for the question. We are exploring dose, and part of that exploration involves a lot of PKPD modeling. We think that based on the preclinical data as well as the clinical data, there's a range of potential doses, and as you mentioned, depending on exactly where you fall and which therapeutic indication, you might hit certain subsets of receptors. And the goal here is to make sure that we pick a dose where we have the best risk benefit profiles. Now, the drug has not been studied previously in the clinical setting in patients with epilepsy. So there is some work there to be done and some information to be gotten from the initial trial in those patients. So stay tuned. This is what research is about. But we're very excited about the mechanism of action and the specificity of the receptor targeting.

The question is coming from Matthew Hornishhorn from Oppenheimer. Your line is now live.

Oh, hey, guys. Congrats on all the progress, and thanks for taking our question. So we were thinking about the safety data for availability in ADA and just wondering how you see the likely label language upon the update reflecting differentiation versus based on what we saw in the clinical trials, and how do you think about the biggest advantages for Avelity once both treatments are available, especially considering the safety profile in elderly patients? Really appreciate it.

Hey, Matt. Good morning. You know, thanks for the question. You know, the review is underway, and by the way, just a reminder, since this is a priority review, we're more than halfway through and we're just about two months out from PDUFA. So, it's a little early for us to comment on potential, you know, potential label. However, what we can share is we, you know, should the product be approved, we'd expect the safety profiles to be described in the label in that patient population. And we'd be pleased with that. And, you know, I think that's probably as much as we can say there. And could you remind me of the second part of your question, please, or maybe Aria, you want to feel that?

Yeah, just relative to positioning, I mean, so obviously when you look at our clinical data, you know, rapid onset of action, durability of response, low side effects and safety issues, not an antipsychotic option, and currently approved as a monotherapy MDD where there's significant comorbidity with Alzheimer's education. So we think that there's multiple elements of the clinical profile that will really help And there's a question today is coming from June Lee from Truist Securities.

Your line is now live.

Congrats on the quarter and thanks for taking the questions. This is awesome one for June, just a couple from us. So are you eligible for priority review for the AXS-12 NDE submission? And I just want to make sure I understand correctly, Nick, you're saying that the growth to net availability should actually improve after approval given the Medicare population. Thank you.

Okay, I'll take the first part of the question. Thank you for the question. Our anticipation is that ACIP-12 would be a standard review, so I'll hand it over to Nick for sure.

Yeah, and correct, based on assuming that we would see that 70% plus in the Medicare Part D channel for ADA scripts, if that's how it evolves, we would anticipate that the GTN would be more favorable as we're seeing currently in the Medicare Part D channel. from Deutsche Banker Line is now live.

Hi, thanks for taking my questions. So maybe just on the breakdown between the community and long-term care settings for ADA, could you remind us how that breaks down and how you're planning to deploy your sales force to address those two segments? And then if Bristol's COBENFI should be approved for the adjacent indication of ADP, do you think that could become a competitor in ADA, you know, such that if patients are being treated for ADP, that might also address their agitation. Thanks a lot.

Yeah, thanks for the question, David. So as a reminder, about 60% of Alzheimer's disease agitation prescriptions are in community-based settings and 40% are in long-term care facilities. So it remains to be seen how the uptake of AXS-05 will be across those settings of care, but that is sort of how the market is behaving at the moment. And then in terms of your question on Covency, we do view Alzheimer's agitation, Alzheimer's psychosis as separate and distinct indications. And so we don't expect there to be much confusion in the marketplace. And agitation symptoms are the most prominent and most burdensome for patients.

And so there's significant opportunity from Guggenheim. Your line is now live.

Hey, good morning. This is Eddie on Friat. And thanks for taking my questions. How should we think about the gross to net dynamics for ADA and how they're different from MDD? And then when looking at the ovality penetration within the PCP market segment, can you talk about how big you expect that penetration to be versus the sort of more defined neuro-psyc segment?

Hey, sorry, I answered the question already a couple of times on MDD versus ADA. We do anticipate in that ADA channel to be more positive, assuming that 70% plus would be in the Medicare Part D channel.

I'm sorry, could you repeat the second part of your question? I was just wondering if you could talk about the overall penetration within the PCP segment versus the more neuropsych-focused segment in MDD for Abelity?

Yeah, it's a good question. Obviously, primary care is the dominant specialty in terms of overall volume because they tend to be the first line treaters for MDB. That said, psychiatrists tend to have the greatest volume on a per patient basis and see the most patients overall. So we haven't specifically shared where we expect the final penetration to land in MDB. But as of today, we see about a third of our writer base is in primary care, whereas two-thirds is in psychiatry. Primary Care has been growing as we've expanded our sales team and continue to penetrate the primary care segment. But where it will sort of end.

Next question is from Greg Savanovege from ZOOHO Securities. Your line is now live.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my question and congrats on the progress in the quarter and the year. My question is around the opportunity you see with AXS-12 for narcolepsy. I know there was a question earlier on differentiation, but maybe if you could frame the opportunity vis-a-vis the potential entry of the orexin-based products. I think this has probably been asked in the past, but just wanted to see how you were thinking of the potential impact on the orexins, again, fully knowing it's a polypharmacy market, but just trying to size the market opportunity here.

Yeah, you know, as we shared before, this is a difficult to treat patient population. There's a lot of trial and error, and I think although there's a lot of enthusiasm for the erexin agonist, I think there's also recognition that not every patient is going to respond or necessarily get the same level of symptom relief across the spectrum of narcolepsy symptoms. So from our perspective, how the erexins will remain to be seen. ...of our question and answer session.

I'd like to turn the floor back over for any further closing comments.

Well, thank you, everyone, for joining us on this call. Axome is in a unique position to continue to deliver innovative medicines at the frontier of neuroscience to patients and providers. And through disciplined investment and performance across our commercial and development TNS portfolios, we expect to continue to generate significant... ...to today's teleconference and webcast.

You may just connect your line at this time and have a wonderful day.