Greetings, and welcome to the Lumen Technologies Second Quarter 2023 Earnings Call. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. Afterwards, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded Tuesday, August 1, 2023. I would now like to turn the conference over to Mike McCormack, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for joining Lumen Technologies second quarter 2023 earnings call. On the call today are Kate Johnson, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Chris Stansbury, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, I want to call your attention to our Safe Harbor statement on slide 2 of our second quarter 2023 presentation, which notes that this conference call may include forward-looking statements subject to certain risks and uncertainties. All forward-looking statements should be considered in conjunction with the cautionary statements on slide 2 and the risk factors in our SEC filings. We will be referring to certain non-GAAP financial measures reconciled to the most comparable GAAP measures, which can be found in our earnings press release. In addition, certain metrics discussed today exclude costs for special items as detailed in our earnings materials, which can be found on the Investor Relations section of the Lumen website. With that, I'll turn the call over to Kate.

Thanks, Mike. Hi, everybody. Thanks for joining us today. In a few minutes, I'm going to turn the call over to Chris as usual. But first, I just want to give you a quick overview of our transformation progress. This quarter, we added two big leaders to the Lumen executive team: Kye Prigg, an experienced telecom executive steeped in both driving large-scale network transformations and leading big teams, joined us last month as EVP of Enterprise Operations. And Ana White, an experienced CHRO with an impressive track record of culture renovation and tech companies, joined us as our Chief People Officer. These additions round out what I believe to be the most talented team in the industry, and I couldn't be more excited to see the positive impact of both of these individuals on Lumen. Now, turning to the transformation work itself. I'm going to use the framework we introduced at Investor Day on June 5. To refresh your memory, we're pursuing a three-part plan to deliver on our North Star. First, secure the base; second, drive commercial excellence; and third, innovate for growth. Each of these three parts of the plan will require hard work and they're going to take time to deliver results. But I'll share several positive early indicators, which give us confidence we're on the right path, and I'm starting with securing the base. This is about intentionally migrating customers from legacy telecom platforms to modern ones to stem churn and deliver fundamentally better customer experiences. Success here drives higher customer lifetime value to Lumen, while it will be a multi-quarter journey to yield material financial results with this new motion, our recent results are noteworthy. For example, we've been building out a scaffolding for our voice migration program over the past couple of months. We staffed up with great talent, significantly growing the dedicated team. Now, we instituted a no seller left behind enablement program, giving our representatives a winning sales playbook, AI-enabled sales targeting and digital tools to enable quick creation and delivery of customer-focused sales content. And we provide our sales managers tooling to enable deep data-driven inspection of the funnel across the lifecycle with analytics to feed learning into the process. This newly dedicated team, with their new digital tools and sales content, have only been in place fully since June 1 of this year. And in less than 60 days, we see material increases in pipe and close rates and probably more importantly, a quadrupling of the dollar value of wins from June to July. I'm happy to share that we also had two record-breaking voice migration deals in terms of dollar value. They both closed in July, and they're basically confirming our hypothesis that we're likely to see our migration efforts yield greater customer lifetime value. We're also seeing material progress in learning from our focus on migrating customers from VPN to SD-WAN and SASE. Great customers like Nissan and WE Bowers are choosing to work with Lumen because of our new customer-centric approach and our long-term orientation around customer lifetime value; it just shows that when we focus, we win. Now, I'll move on to the second part of our three-pronged strategy: driving commercial excellence which is all about consistent execution across all of our core businesses. And success here looks like growing at or greater than market rates wherever we compete. In our mass market segment, we've added approximately 250,000 fiber-enabled locations year-to-date in 2023, and we're confident that we can meet or exceed our plan of 500,000 for the year. With the fiber enablement factory delivering predictable output now, we're well positioned to nearly double our current Quantum Fiber footprint to over 7 million locations in the next four years. And as I've shared in the past a couple of times, the federal lead program could potentially represent enablement and economic upside, but it's not currently forecasted in our model.

Thank you, Kate, and good afternoon, everyone. As Kate described, our turnaround is underway, and we're very excited with what lies ahead. Our teams are energized. We're pleased with our progress on the quantum bill with fiber enablements outpacing our first quarter result and we expect further acceleration in the third quarter. This gives us confidence that we will meet or exceed our plan of 500,000 locations in 2023. Our growth product group's performance was solid this quarter and when excluding the divested businesses and foreign currency impacts, it grew year-over-year at a similar rate compared to our first quarter's performance. I'll now discuss in more detail the financial summary of our second quarter. As I did on our first-quarter earnings call, I'll reference our financial performance primarily on a sequential basis for better comparability as the year ago period included the impacts of our divested LatAm and ILEC 20 state businesses. We're again providing supplemental information of the discrete impacts in our footnotes where applicable in our earnings presentation and on a separate page in our financial trending schedule. When these impacts of the divestitures and commercial agreements are excluded from results, our year-over-year growth rates are substantially better than the GAAP reported rates. Our second quarter total revenue declined 2.1% on a sequential basis to $3.661 billion. Adjusted EBITDA was $1.229 billion in the second quarter with a 33.6% margin. Free cash flow was negative $896 million in the second quarter, including $938 million of taxes paid related to our two divestitures last year. We've now paid all of the transaction-related taxes for those divestitures. As a reminder, our 2023 free cash flow guidance excludes the impact of these taxes. Next, I'll review our detailed revenue results for the quarter. On a year-over-year basis, reported revenue was down 20.6% with the impact of the divestitures and commercial agreements, representing approximately 72% of the reported decline. Within our two key segments, business revenue declined 2% sequentially to $2.897 billion and mass markets revenue declined 2.3% sequentially to $764 million. Within our enterprise channel, which is our business segment, excluding wholesale, revenue declined 1.8% sequentially. Our exposure to legacy voice revenue continues to improve and is now less than 11% of enterprise channel revenue, and is down approximately 50 basis points sequentially. Large enterprise revenue declined 1.3% sequentially in the second quarter. Large enterprise revenue trends were similar to the first quarter year-over-year when excluding the impact of divested businesses, driven primarily by declines in harvest due to legacy voice and partially offset by stronger trends in grow due to demand for cloud, colocation and IP. Public sector revenue declined 3.7% sequentially. Excluding the impact of our divested businesses, public sector trends worsened year-over-year primarily due to lower other revenue, which includes non-recurring equipment and IT solutions. Declines in nurture and harvest products also contributed to the declines, with partial offset by accelerating growth within grow driven by IP, voice over IP and wavelengths. As a reminder, we had a contract expiration at the end of the year-ago quarter, which is impacting the year-over-year comparisons for public sector grow products by approximately $10 million. Mid-market revenue declined 1.6% sequentially. Excluding the impact of our divested businesses, there was a similar level of year-over-year decline compared to last quarter. Strength in growth products was driven primarily by broadband, IP, and UC&C and was partially offset by lower legacy voice revenue within Harvest. Wholesale revenue declined 2.4% sequentially. Excluding the impacts of our divested businesses, trends worsened year-over-year. As with public sector, the accelerated decline rate was primarily due to lower other revenue. Recall that in the second quarter of last year, we benefited by approximately $25 million related to a non-recurring IT professional services agreement, that was provided in connection with the now divested 20 state ILEC assets. Separately, we lapped the benefits from certain carrier contract discount expirations, which we previously identified in the year-ago quarter. We expect our wholesale channel will likely continue to decline over time, and it is an area we manage for cash. Now moving to our business product life cycle reporting, grow products revenue grew 0.9% sequentially. As I mentioned earlier, excluding the impact of our divested businesses, this quarter results showed a similar level of strong year-over-year growth to the first quarter of this year. While results can vary in any given quarter, we expect continued strength in these areas as we execute on our overall pivot to growth. Growth now represents approximately 39% of our business segment and carried an approximate 83% direct margin this quarter, accelerating growth by growth is a key focus of our strategy and we continue to be pleased with these early results. Moving on to nurture and harvest. We continue to expect headwinds in these categories as we take proactive steps to migrate customers to newer technologies. This improves our customers' experience and provides an uplift in the lifetime value of those customers for Lumen. And as Kate mentioned, securing the base is hard work and will take some time to be reflected in our results. Nurture products revenue declined 4% sequentially due to continued pressure in VPN and Ethernet services. Nurture represents about 30% of our business segment and carried an approximate 68% direct margin this quarter. Harvest products revenue declined 3% sequentially. Recall that Harvest is an important part of our business and generates cash to fuel our growth initiatives. Harvest represents approximately 25% of our business segment and carried an approximate 81% direct margin this quarter. The subtotal of our business product revenue, including grow, nurture, and harvest, collectively declined 1.7% sequentially and 14.8% on a year-over-year basis. The impact of the divestitures and commercial agreements accounted for approximately 68% of the reported decline. Other products revenue declined 6% sequentially. Our other product revenue tends to experience fluctuations due to the variable nature of these products. Within other, we have deemphasized low-margin equipment and changed our sales commission structure, which will continue to impact comparisons to prior periods. These changes are focusing our sales efforts on products that provide a better customer experience and stronger returns for Lumen. Moving on to mass markets. Revenue declined 2.3% sequentially. Our mass markets fiber broadband revenue grew 3.3% sequentially and represented approximately 31% of mass markets broadband revenue. Also note, our exposure to legacy voice and other services revenue continues to improve with a nearly 40 basis point reduction sequentially. During the quarter, total fiber broadband enablements were approximately 130,000, bringing the total fiber-enabled locations to approximately 3.4 million as of June 30. We are focused on penetrating our deployed fiber assets through our simplified Quantum Fiber broadband product, to maximize subscriber and ARPU growth. In the second quarter, we added 21,000 Quantum Fiber customers. This brings our total Quantum Fiber subscribers to 877,000. We expect to add subscribers at a faster rate in the second half of the year with our significant increase in Quantum marketing. Our marketing plans are ramping in conjunction with our conversion of the CenturyLink Fiber brand to Quantum Fiber later in the third quarter of this year, potentially further benefiting subscriber growth as more potential customers can benefit from our world-class quantum digital experience. Fiber ARPU increased both sequentially and on a year-over-year basis to approximately $61 in the second quarter. New customers are seeing the value and quality of Quantum Fiber with most choosing our flagship symmetrical gig, and in some cases, multi-gig service, benefiting our fiber broadband ARPU, which grew both sequentially and year-over-year. As of June 30, our penetration of legacy copper broadband was approximately 11%, highlighting the significant share-taking opportunity as we accelerate the Quantum Fiber build. Our Quantum Fiber penetration stood at approximately 26%, and as we expand our footprint, we expect penetration to fall as we increase our addressable market at a higher rate than new customers are added. Our Quantum Fiber 18-month penetration rate of the 2021 vintage was at approximately 20%. The performance of our 2021 vintage continues to track below that of 2020 at these milestones, and I expect the same will be true of our 2022 vintage. This performance was the catalyst for us to reevaluate our Quantum build enablement targets during the fourth quarter of last year, refocusing our efforts on locations that provide the best opportunity and returns for Lumen. We expect that our 2023 vintage will exhibit stronger performance given our more disciplined approach to our build. That said, our Quantum Fiber NPS score remains greater than positive 60, an indication of the quality, value, and superior service that Quantum Fiber delivers. Quantum Fiber is an all-digital prepaid product that features simplified pricing with no contracts, helping reduce call center volumes and supporting our very strong NPS scores. Now turning to adjusted EBITDA. For the second quarter of 2023, adjusted EBITDA was $1.229 billion compared to $1.811 billion in the year-ago quarter. The second quarter of last year included $398 million related to the divested businesses, and the second quarter of this year included a negative impact of $51 million from divestiture-related commercial agreements. These items represent approximately 77% of the year-over-year decline. Adjusted EBITDA benefited during the second quarter from a year-to-date adjustment related to a carrier settlement. Given legal agreements, I will not be able to comment further on this settlement. Special items impacting adjusted EBITDA this quarter totaled $102 million. Our second quarter 2023 adjusted EBITDA margin, including special items, was 33.6%. Capital expenditures for the second quarter were $796 million. In the second quarter, the company generated free cash flow of negative $896 million. As previously noted, this includes $938 million of taxes paid related to our two divestitures that closed last year. Now moving on to our financial outlook. We're reducing our estimate for stock-based compensation expenses to approximately $65 million for the full year 2023. We are reiterating all of our guidance metrics. Now before we go to Q&A, I'd like to take a moment to address recent media reports regarding lead sheet cables and telecommunication networks. We began phasing out lead sheet cables from our network infrastructure during the 1950s. And based on our initial analysis, we currently estimate that less than 5% of our approximately 700,000-mile copper network contained lead, of which we believe the majority is buried and conduit-based infrastructure. We thoughtfully manage our network to ensure the health and safety of our employees and the communities we serve. We also regularly assess our safety protocols and meet established regulatory and scientific standards related to potential lead exposure for workers. Moving forward, we're committed to working with independent experts, regulators, and our industry peers to maintain our positive track record of safety and compliance. With that, we're ready for your questions.

And our first question comes from the line of Simon Flannery with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Thank you very much. Good evening. Chris, if I could just stay on the lead issue. Have you had any discussions around remediation? And any sense of what sort of amounts that might take to do some of this for whatever aerial or underwater plant you might have?

Yes. So I guess, first of all, I think it's very early for that. Again, we spent a lot of time just determining how much lead is in the system. And the good news is, it's quite small. But beyond that, we don't really think there's any meaningful way to estimate what that would be at this point. And so we will continue to, as we said, work with regulators and outside experts as this moves forward. But again, we feel good about our network and the fact that a lot of it is conduit-based and subterranean.

Okay. Thank you. And then just one more housekeeping. On the EMEA transaction. Could you just update us on the timing? I think you've got a decision out of Europe coming up in the next few weeks here. What's your latest thinking on?

We're still on track. I mean, I would say at this point, it would be great if we could close this year. I think it's a little too early to call that. But as we said, it was going to be late this year, early next year, and we're still on track for that.

The next question comes from the line of Batya Levi with UBS. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Thank you. First, maybe on the enterprise trends, can you provide more color on what you're seeing from the macro environment? And if there's any change in the sales funnel versus bookings? And on the EBITDA side, you're tracking above your guidance so far. How should we think about some of the puts and takes in expenses and pacing of new investment in the second half? Thank you.

But I'll have the first part. And I'll let Chris handle the second piece. So the macroeconomic environment remains complex and tough. We still see slow decision-making. We're still working on training our sellers to be focused on business outcome selling, which is a new motion for them, but one that's deeply appreciated when we can connect how our network can help deliver fundamentally new business outcomes for our customers. So in all of the places that I talked about driving commercial excellence, we're seeing better motions and more progress from a selling perspective, while there's work to be done. But do you EBITDA?

Sure. So Batya, on the EBITDA, to your point, we did come in a little stronger and that relates to what I mentioned in terms of a year-to-date adjustment for that carrier negotiation. And we'll continue to get some benefits from that as we go forward. But that was contemplated in our guidance for the year. And as we've said, and we said, at Investor Day, we do have higher OpEx and investments in the back half of the year, as we're staying very aggressive and committed to our turnaround plan. So we've kept guidance where it is for a reason. And again, we'll be spending more in the back half to support those plans.

Great example is, we just got the voice migration team in place on June 1.

Yes.

And so…

So there's been a lot to tune into that.

Great. Just one more quick follow-up on the EMEA shell, can you provide an update on how we should think about the proceeds, would that mainly go towards paying down the term loan? Or would you consider splitting it across other issues?

It definitely will go to reducing leverage. And we've got a lot of flexibility under our agreements. And to how we use that. So we're evaluating that now to see what the best use is. But it's definitely going to be leverage reducing.

Okay. Thank you.

Thanks, Batya. Next question, operator?

The next question is from the line of Michael Rollins with Citi. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks, and good afternoon. Just curious, as you look at the opportunity to save customers by migrating them sooner to more strategic technology, can you give us a sizing of what that amount is in terms of the percent of revenue a quarter or year, just to get some sense on the quantum of opportunity? And then, if there's other metrics that you could share on some of the progress, broadly across the entire customer stack, that would be great. Thanks.

Yes, Mike, it's Chris. I'll take a shot at that. If you look at our harvest bucket, we said that that was about 25% of the business segment. I'd say that's the opportunity. I mean the reality is, those are products that we really no longer sell. There are very limited use cases where those legacy products are being sold. Quite frankly, we don't compensate our sales force to sell those things because we're focusing on next-gen. So I think between what's in harvest and then the VPN and Ethernet piece that's in nurture, you take those two pieces of the business, it's about - it's actually over 50% of what we sell today. That's the opportunity set as we go forward. The harvest piece, the legacy voice obviously has, I would say, more movement in it. The VPN will take place over a longer period of time, but both of those, I think, would be good products.

And I think the big change, we're always talking about, okay, what's different. We've funded a team to go after this business in a dedicated fashion. It's no longer a hobby. It's no longer an option. It's how they get paid. We've given them all the tools and the playbooks to do so, and we're starting to get some return from that.

Thanks.

Thanks, Mike. Operator, next question.

Yes, sir. The next question comes from the line of Greg Williams with TD Cowen & Company. Please proceed with your question.

Sure. Thanks for taking my question. First one is just the idea of perhaps securitizing some debt. One of your peers, Frontiers, is in the midst of raising quite a bit by securitizing stabilized fiber homes and they can raise a ton of capacity on these ones solving their capital runway. As I think about your 2020 maturities, I'm wondering is this something you could explore? Or are there covenants or limitations that would preclude that? And then just the second question is on your copper subscribers in your mass market, you lost have 93,000 copper DSL subs. Is this just migration intentional by you guys or losing gross adds or fixed wireless pressure or maybe all of the above? Just curious about the cadence from here? Thanks.

Yes. So on the first one, it's a great question. I mean, obviously, addressing our capital structure so that we can continue to support our strategy and the things that are working is paramount, and it's something we've been focused on for some time. I would say that securitization is an option. There's other options as well. I think some options are closer in, and some options are further out. But as we go forward, I think figuring out ways to capitalize what is a very intensive investment in the consumer business is something that we've got to explore and we are exploring. As it relates to the copper subs, the reality is that a lot of our Quantum builds is really in markets where we don't have a lot of copper subscription remaining. So our best guess is that this is really being driven by some pressure from fixed wireless, which is not unanticipated.

Okay. Thank you.

Thanks, Greg. Next question, please.

The next question comes from the line of Frank Louthan with Raymond James. Please proceed with your question.

Great. Thank you. Just sticking on the Quantum side. Can you give us an idea of what kind of success you're having with the SMB side with winning back some customers there? And then on ExaSwitch and the Network as a Service, can you kind of walk us through what are some of the major aspects of those products that you were doing that other carriers aren't necessarily doing or might not be able to replicate? Thanks.

Yes. So I'll take the first one and then Kate can do ExaSwitch. As it relates to SMB, it's definitely an opportunity area for us with Quantum. The product is going to play very well in that regard. I would also say though, Frank, that that's not been the primary focus as we're ramping enablement. It really has been more on the consumer side. But the team is working on SMB pricing, and it's a huge opportunity for us just given the share we've lost to cable over the years. So more to follow on that.

Okay. And NAS, we're pretty excited about the NAS platform for a couple of different reasons. The first is we know that our customers are demanding digital experiences and the notion of sort of cloudifying networking and delivering fundamentally more friction-free buying usage management support of these platforms is the way to go. I think what's different is we are committed to the long-term. What you saw yesterday was the first step in a multiyear plan to really show up in this fundamentally different way with our customers. We think it's going to help us capture more share in legacy telecom markets, but also sets us up really well for all of the adjacent markets that we see a lot of potential growth in. And if you add ExaSwitch to the storybook, it becomes a very compelling opportunity to capitalize on some of these growth areas like Gen AI and cloud.

Okay. Great. Thank you.

Thanks, Frank. Next question, please.

Our next question comes from the line of Nick Del Deo with MoffettNathanson. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Thanks for taking my questions. First, another question on NAS. Recognizing that you plan on offering a broader suite of services through that platform over time, not just what you announced yesterday, what's the use case for something like DIA build hourly? When I think about some of the other use cases that have been successfully enabled by NAS across the industry like cloud connectivity. It feels like there's maybe more of a natural variable consumption dynamic to it. So I'm curious about how you think that attribute ports to other services.

So you know how I think about this, I think about it the same way that when the world went to cloud you're going to have customers who go after optimization, and they spend a lot of time managing for cost. Originally, a lot of the naysayers in the cloud market were like, oh my gosh, this is the end of tech. And we know that, that is simply not true. We know the overall demand is going to be very, very significant for more and more bandwidth at 0 latency. And that's what NAS positions us well to do. I think, frankly, that the complexity around trying to optimize to match our demand patterns, there's just too much friction in that. And that's what we saw in cloud. And so I'm kind of using that as a model on our head. The first couple of use cases for NAS, it puts us into, I don't want to say new markets, but new places in the market where we haven't been able to show up in the past. So we're pretty excited about our ability to become ubiquitous and frictionless.

Okay. And then separately Chris you noted in your prepared remarks that you're looking to rebrand CenturyLink Fiber to Quantum Fiber later this quarter and you're ramping up your marketing spend too. Can you dimension what sort of penetration rates you have in those old CenturyLink fiber markets? Help us understand what sort of uplift you might get over time? And what's the magnitude of the marketing spend increase you're planning? How substantial is this?

Yes. So I don't want to get into specifics around kind of penetration on the CenturyLink brand, but I would tell you, and it's no secret. CenturyLink does not have the best brand in the marketplace, and the quantum experience is just fundamentally different, because of its all-digital nature. So if you think about that, there's a - we think there's a sizable opportunity there beyond just the efficiency of trying to carry two brands. It's one technology stack. It's one consumer experience. It works well for everyone. As it relates to the marketing, I don't want to give specific dollars. What I would tell you is, is that to-date, until we really got the build factory scaling. Our marketing was limited to local efforts like door hangers, right? And now as we get the build factory ramping, it gives us the ability in specific markets to scale our marketing as well, and we think that will have a nice benefit on driving subscription growth.

Okay. Thank you.

Thanks, Nick. Next question, please.

Certainly. The next question comes from the line of David Barden with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, guys. Thanks so much for taking the questions. I guess the first one, Chris, I mean, I know you're expecting this question. If you can talk a little bit about what this group of Level 3 bondholders is asking for from you guys. I think we understand on our side of the fence that, there's been a letter sent to you guys, you guys said that we're getting ready for the quarter, we can't comment. So, if now that the quarter is over, you have a comment, it will be super helpful for us to hear that. And then I guess, second, more of a business question maybe for Kate. Kate, you at the Analyst Day, talked about this a-third, a-third, a-third people buying in, people not buying in, people in the middle, having to be on over, specifically with respect to the sales force, could you talk a little bit about where we are in terms of, a scale zero to 10 full strength with the sales force that you think needs to be in place to execute on your plan to get enterprise services and others moving in the right direction? Thanks.

Sure. I'll go first, and then I'll turn it over to Chris because the second question about Salesforce is kind of a little bit easier. We're seeing exactly what we expected to see. When you institute new comp plans, new sales platforms and processes, deeper level of inspection, it's not for everybody. And as we go out to the marketplace and get tech talent that we have relationships with, that help us with those adjacent markets and the stories and narratives and value propositions that we need to be fluent in. That's the exchange that we're making. In terms of our evolution, gosh, it's still early innings, right? I mean, we've just had the strategy in place for a couple of months. We've done a really, really good job hiring in sales with - I think the number that I saw earlier today was 295 new salespeople. Getting all those people up to speed and with all the tools and enablement materials that they need, some of them coming from markets that - they need to learn some of the telecom. That's going to take a little bit of time. So, I'm excited about where we are because we're starting to see fruits of the labor. We also have low-hanging opportunities because in the past, we haven't used sales platforms, data and analytics, and AI in the way that I think modern sales forces do.

And as it relates to the debt questions and the rumors that have been swirling in the market over the last few weeks, I want to step back in addressing the question. And just to reiterate, Kate talked about the progress that we've been making against the strategy. We had really exciting news yesterday with NAS. And the reason the debt conversation is so important is we've got to get the debt structure right at our capital structure right so that we can fund what we think is a very bright future. So with that, we obviously understand the obligations of our credit instruments, and we don't believe that there's been any default under those debt agreements. We remain focused, as we said before, on addressing the upcoming maturities through 2027. And we want to do that in a manner that benefits the company and all of its stakeholders. So just without getting into specifics, I'd say that we're open to engaging with our stakeholders to achieve that. And as we previously indicated, we're going to continue to assess other options to address upcoming maturities in the overall capital structure.

Okay. Great guys. Thank you both for that. Thank you.

Thanks.

Thanks, David. Next question please.

And our next question comes from the line of Bora Lee with RBC Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Thanks for taking my questions. Just first, understanding any impact is still to be determined back on the leaping issue, is there any residual responsibility for the ILEC assets divestiture APOLLO. And then, second, you've spoken about trimming the number of SKUs starting with cleaning up perhaps some legacy variations and then moving on to more substantive reductions. Can you just update us on where you are in that process and how that's been impacting your sales process? Thanks.

Okay. Yes, I'll take the first one. The ILEC sale was a stock sale. So all assets and liabilities were sold with that. And as it relates to our network, we talked about it in my prepared remarks, less than 5% of our 700,000-mile copper network contained lead, and most of that is conduit-based and subterranean. So we don't think that this is a major issue for us, and it's something we'll continue to work on and monitor.

And regarding the simplification efforts that we have, we still have our Evergreen simplification process. We're identifying projects and programs and activities that we stop every day. The SKU simplification was a part of that. It was a major step forward in preparing for frankly, an ERP implementation that is going very well and is on target and on budget, and preparing us to be able to implement streamlined digital enterprise processes for sales, inventory, and ordering, and all of the things. So the initial reduction was the easy step. The compression beyond that sort of low-hanging fruit becomes more complex as it's tied to products that are existing in our order and billing systems that would just need more work and more time to be able to prepare to simplify further.

Good. Thank you very much.

And we have no further questions at this time. Mike, I will turn the call back to you.

Terrific. Thanks, everyone, for joining us today. Have a great night.

We would like to thank everyone for your participation and for using the Lumen conferencing service today. This does conclude the conference call, and we ask that you please disconnect your lines. Have a great day, everyone.