Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for being here. Welcome to the UMB Financial Conference Call. I now turn the call over to our host Kay Gregory from Investor Relations. Please proceed.

Good morning, and thank you for joining us on our call with such short notice. Earlier this morning, we announced our agreement to acquire Heartland Financial USA, or HTLF, a $19.4 billion asset bank headquartered in Denver. Both companies also released first quarter 2024 results, and these materials can be found on our respective Investor Relations website. You will note that we have posted two presentations to our website, our typical quarterly review and an overview of the announced transaction. We will provide some brief comments about UMB's first quarter results, then we'll spend most of the call discussing the announcement. On the call today is Mariner Kemper, Chairman and CEO of UMB Financial and Ram Shankar, CFO. Following our comments, we'll open the call for questions. Jim Rine, CEO of UMB Bank; and Tom Terry, Chief Credit Officer; will be available for the question-and-answer session. Before we begin, let me remind you that today's presentation contains forward-looking statements, including the discussion of future financial and operating results, benefits, synergies, gains and costs that the company expects to realize from this transaction as well as other opportunities management foresee. Forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. These risks are included in our SEC filings and are summarized on Slide 2 of our presentation. Actual results may differ from those set forth in forward-looking statements, which speak only as of today. We undertake no obligation to update them, except to the extent required by securities laws. Reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures have been included in the press release and the accompanying presentation. Pro forma financial information presented is based on March 31, 2024, results for both companies. Presentation materials are available online at investorrelations.umb.com. Now I'll turn the call over to Mariner Kemper.

Thank you, Kay, and good morning, everyone. On the heels of a great quarter, I'm very excited to share details about this transaction, which accelerates UMB's growth strategy, further diversifying and derisking our business model. The addition of this high-quality franchise is a great fit from a strategic, financial, and cultural perspective. I'll ask Ram to share some quick thoughts about the quarter, and then we'll get right into the details of the transaction.

Thanks, Mariner. We had a great start to 2024 reporting GAAP earnings of $110.3 million or $2.25 per share. Operating EPS of $2.47 per share represented an increase of 7.7% compared to the fourth quarter of 2023. We reported balance sheet growth that included a 4.2% annualized increase in average loan balances, led by construction drives of previously drilled lines, along with C&I. Credit quality in our loan portfolio remains excellent with nonperforming loans of 8 basis points of total loans. Net charge-offs were 5 basis points of average loans for the quarter and charge-offs have averaged just 4 basis points over the past seven quarters. Provision of $10 million included about $7 million related to the previously disclosed co-branded credit card portfolio acquisition. The 10.4% increase in average deposits was driven largely by our institutional businesses, specifically investor solutions with increased sweep activity at Corporate Trust, where balances fluctuate related to customer bond distributions and dividends. DDA balances were 30% of average deposits for the first quarter. Looking ahead, second quarter DDAs are typically lower as clients make tax payments and cover seasonally high payroll expenses related to the reset of FICA payroll factor. The 3.9% increase in net interest income reflected continued loan growth and higher levels of liquidity in addition to $1.4 million from amortization of a municipal bond hedge gain. Net interest margin increased 2 basis points to 2.48% in the quarter, outpacing the expectations I shared in January. Positives include loan repricing and mix as well as the impact of the bond hedge gain. Looking into the second quarter, we expect some modest pressure on net interest margin and net interest income driven by an expected pipeline of higher-cost institutional client deposits, lower liquidity levels, coupled with the seasonal contraction in DDA balances typically associated with tax payments. Slide 18 of our first quarter deck covers the highlights and drivers for the first quarter. Fee income increased $19 million from the fourth quarter to $159 million and benefited from an 18% increase in bank card fees, driven both by strong purchase volumes and lower rewards as well as a $3 million increase in trust and securities processing income from our private wealth and institutional banking businesses that include Corporate Trust, Custody, and Fund Services. Card purchase volumes increased 12% from a year ago to a record $4.6 billion, driving the interchange income I noted earlier. First quarter fees also included about $15 million of benefit that does not occur in the typical course of business, as shown in our deck. Operating expenses, excluding the $53 million and the $13 million FDIC assessments incurred in the fourth and first quarters, increased 2.3% sequentially and reflected typical seasonal increases in payroll taxes, health insurance, and 401(k) expenses. Additional metrics about our first quarter results are included in our earnings release and slide deck, and we'll be happy to answer any follow-up questions during the Q&A portion of the call.

Thanks, Ram. Our great first quarter results set up well for this transaction, and I'm looking forward to continuing the momentum throughout the rest of 2024 and beyond, bolstered by the acquisition we're here to discuss today. UMB is an asset-generating machine consistently outpacing peer loan growth. We have a strong history of asset quality and a strong history of growing our fee business to support our total revenue. Events in the past year have served to remind us of the importance of diverse granular deposits. While we have a well-developed diverse business model, one area where we are underpenetrated is our consumer banking franchise. We have continued to look for the right transaction that will meet that need. We screened for banks with a strong underlevered deposit base and a core retail component and quality credit metrics, all in the right markets. Our search for the right fit has been elusive, but we found the right unicorn in Heartland, a bank that understands the key part of the value of a franchise within its deposits. As we did our diligence, we realized that their strong deposit franchise was undervalued by the market at large. We saw this as an opportunity, as we believe that banks with low-cost granular deposit bases will garner a greater premium moving forward. The combination of UMB and Heartland creates a nearly $65 billion asset bank. We'll accelerate UMB's organic growth strategy and create significant value. And importantly, it is a great cultural fit. Our banking cultures are similar in tone with similar approaches to business and focus on our associates and communities. The thesis for this transaction is laid out on Slide 3. UMB will add significant scale in several markets, expanding density in some of our existing regions, including Denver, Kansas City, and Phoenix, as well as gaining entry into attractive new geographies, including Iowa, West Texas, New Mexico, Wisconsin, Illinois, Minnesota, and California. We will combine two franchises with similar values, a conservative credit culture, and complementary businesses. UMB's strong commercial banking capabilities will expand into new markets and Heartland's successful consumer and small business efforts will bring further density and diversity to our business model. In fact, we will nearly double our retail presence. Bruce and his leadership team have done a great job in recent years and done the heavy lifting, laying out the groundwork. This includes successfully handling the consolidation of their multiple charters and the strategy and vision they laid out in their 3.0 initiative. Through the combination with us, we believe we can put our engine in their chassis to accelerate this transformation, extract value, and grow and bring those benefits to Heartland's customers sooner and more efficiently. While the combination results in day one TBV dilution driven entirely by interest rate marks, it positions us well and enhances ROATCE by approximately 800 basis points with an implied earn-back of just 3.1 years. We'll gain meaningful scale in both retail banking with the addition of $6 billion in consumer deposits, providing the raw material to sustain our growth. And in private wealth, Heartland adds an additional $4.9 billion in assets under management and administration, increasing our totals by approximately 31%. The pro forma loan-to-deposit ratio of 67% preserves our conservative profile while positioning us for future growth. Finally, the pricing and financial metrics are compelling, with EPS accretion of 31%, including rate marks and strengthening our return and performance metrics. As is typical with such analysis, the accretion math is based on consensus estimates. As demonstrated by both of our first quarter results, we hope to generate more shareholder value by continuing to execute. The pricing multiples are attractive at 9.7x 2025 consensus EPS at 6.7x, but fully phased-in synergies, representing a price to tangible book value of 1.53x. This is an all-stock transaction; details are on Slide 5.

The exchange ratio is fixed, with 0.55 UMBF shares for every HCLF share. This equates to a transaction value of approximately $2 billion. Concurrently, we announced this morning the pricing of a very successful underwritten public offering of $210 million or 2.8 million common shares. We also have a forward agreement on this offering, which has an up to 18-month term. The offering includes participation from high-quality institutional investors, including some of our top shareholders. We expect the transaction with Heartland to close in the first quarter of 2025, subject to regulatory and shareholder approvals. We have been keeping our prudential regulators and other agencies engaged throughout our due diligence process, and because of the feedback we've received, we're excited to move forward. On Slide 6, we're projecting top quartile profitability and capital generation, with key expectations shown on the right-hand side. We anticipate strong core earnings power with approximately $700 million in net income and fully phased-in cost saves based on 2025 estimates. Additionally, with a loan deposit ratio of 67%, we have about $10 billion of excess deposit capacity versus peer medians to fund our growth.

Slide 8 is a snapshot of Heartland's footprint and bank divisions located in attractive and fast-growing markets. We see the benefit of our combined scale in the chart on Slide 9. We will have a 13-state footprint with a top 10 market share in 5 of those states. On Slide 10 and 11, we've included a look at Heartland's granular deposit base and commercially focused loan portfolio, followed by details on commercial real estate. The investor real estate CRE is well diversified by property type and geography. The average loan size is just under $2 million and had no nonaccruals at the end of the first quarter. Details of the office portfolio is on the right-hand side of Slide 12. Again, well diversified with an average loan to value of 57%, in line with ours. Moving to Slide 14. We have a long-term look at asset quality. If you follow us, you know asset quality is a topic I like to talk about. UMB has a track record and metrics I'm extremely proud of, and Heartland has a similar approach to managing credit. On Slide 15, we've shown the two companies side by side, highlighting our capabilities on each. The combination of UMB's products and services and Heartland's deposits, lending verticals, and customer base provides meaningful cross-sell opportunities. Heartland's strong retail and small business capabilities will have revenue synergies to UMB's platform, and our commercial capabilities and access to key municipalities in newly acquired geographies could open doors for corporate trust and other institutional businesses. We will work hard for you to unlock value in this combined franchise. For example, in their 3.0 strategy, HCLF has laid out their vision to increase their fee income to 25%. With our more sophisticated treasury management products and commercial card stream, we can penetrate deeper into their existing client base and new prospects in their markets. This will accelerate fee income to mimic our profile and drive higher quality earnings. Similarly, since the American economy is driven more than 75% by small businesses, we are looking forward to leveraging their small business capabilities to our existing markets. Finally, we've provided a look at the diligence process that got us to this point on Slide 16. As you can see, well over 200 of our associates, along with multiple outside experts have given hundreds of hours reviewing data on multiple lines of business processes, operational support functions, and the risks involved in all areas. Every line of business reviewed their own area, met with counterparties at Heartland, and documented their findings for a comprehensive review. At the end of the day, our work gives us confidence in the metrics and assumptions throughout the transaction.

Thanks, Mariner, and good morning, everyone. The transaction assumptions are on Slide 17. The earnings projections we've included are based on consensus estimates for 2025, growing at a 5% rate thereafter. We see upside to both sets of projections but wanted to be conservative for our presentation. We put together a thorough bottom-up analysis and expect cost saves of 27.5% of Heartland's noninterest expense, 40% of which is to be recognized in 2025, assuming a first-quarter close. And as Mariner noted, we've identified numerous revenue synergies that we're excited about but are not included in our metrics, providing additional potential for upside. Onetime charges were similarly put together with the bottom-up analysis with inputs from all business lines across the bank and are $215 million in total. Purchase accounting marks are important to get right and we use a prominent third-party firm to assist in our calculations. Our transaction model assumes a conservative credit mark of 1.3% on Heartland's loans and a core deposit intangible of 3.4% of deposits amortized over 10 years using the sum of the years' digit method. The credit mark based on internal reviews and independent third-party analysis is roughly 28% higher than Heartland's current ACL of $124 million. The interest rate marks assumed on the loan portfolio are expected to amortize over 5 years in total on a straight-line basis and are estimated to be approximately $550 million at close. For the securities portfolio, we expect to sell approximately $2.5 billion of Heartland's bonds that don't match our investment profile simultaneously with the closing of the transaction and reinvest those proceeds into agency mortgage-backed securities and/or U.S. treasuries. Inclusive of the rate marks on loans, retailing securities, and other debt instruments, we expect approximately $660 million of after-tax income to flow through earnings over time. Interest rate marks clearly have a large role on the merger map and financial metrics at close. The core impact of the acquisition is very attractive. If you strip out the rate marks and CDI, the deal is roughly 15% EPS accretive. Tangible book value dilution in this case would be approximately 6% and unpack would go to just under 2 years. Turning to Slide 18, the combined franchise will generate meaningful capital at close, including the equity offering. We expect CET1 to be 10.1%. Combined earnings plus cost savings is nearly $700 million per year, and net of presumed dividend that equates to 115 basis points for the year of CET1 before accounting for any balance sheet growth. Additionally, the previously mentioned $660 million in rate marks over the next few years will add another 135 basis points of CET1. Based on these factors, we expect to return to our first quarter 2024 CET1 ratio of 11.1% in less than 18 months after close.

Our first question comes from Timur Braziler of Wells Fargo.

Can you maybe go through some details on how the deal came about? Was this a negotiated transaction between the two parties? Or was this something that was more of an auction process?

Yes. Timur. This is Mariner. You've known the company for some time and built a long-term relationship with our CEO, Bruce. You'll be able to read the details in further detail in the proxy when it comes out.

Okay. And then Mariner, UMB has had quite good success, particularly on a relative basis, maybe to a more challenged group of being able to maintain a high growth rate. I know this deal is accretive from an earnings standpoint, but just looking at a growth rate standpoint, is this dilutive to kind of stand-alone UMB type growth? Or do you think that once everything is layered in, that growth rate as a combined company is going to be unchanged or even faster?

Yes. I mean our expectation, as you know, the modeling that you have and is used in these decks as a consensus. We certainly expect and hope that we can accelerate growth through layering our engine on top of their chassis and all the revenue synergies. So that is our desired expectation.

Okay. What about from a balance sheet standpoint, does it dilute the opportunities for balance sheet growth, maybe on a percentage standpoint as a combined company? Or is the expectation that balance sheet growth is going to accelerate as well?

Well, I think we're really thinking about this from a standpoint of raw material, providing funding for growth from that perspective. That's kind of how we're thinking about it. And also layering in another 100-plus distribution points to continue to build our strong profile as a deposit generator ourselves. So on a combined basis, we expect that we can leverage the combined entity to continue the already great profile we have as being a strong funding provider to back up our excellent asset generating machine that we already are.

Okay. And then just last one for me. Maybe can you provide a composition of the cost savings, kind of where are those coming from? And with the greater focus on the retail component of that franchise, I'm assuming maybe it doesn't come quite as much from the branch network. Any kind of detail you can provide on where those cost savings are going to materialize would be great.

Yes, Timur, this is Ram. And it's the usual stuff. Unlike other deals, there's not a lot of branch overlap in the combined franchises, even in the three common markets of Kansas City, Denver, and Phoenix. So not a lot of those opportunities, maybe a handful of branches. But otherwise, it's the standard people, process, technology contracts that are part of our bottoms-up analysis when we came up with the cost saves.

Your next question comes from the line of Chris McGratty of KBW.

Great. Ram, Mariner, the balance sheet has got plenty of capacity post-closing. I think you talked about a 67% LD ratio. I'm interested in maybe how does this deal affect your thoughts on that over time? And also, how will the rate profile change if it does with the deal?

I'll take the first part and let Ram follow up on the rate mark. Regarding the change in the profile, nothing really changes in the way we operate. That's one of the advantages of this deal, as we believe it allows us to continue being the company we are. As I've mentioned several times, and you’ve seen in our results over the years, we have been able to generate double the asset growth of our peer group consistently for nearly 20 years during my tenure as CEO. This is raw material for us; it enables us to leverage their assets at some level, but it also provides us with distribution and outlets to continue our operations, generating the raw material needed to keep everything running smoothly. I'll let Ram follow up on the rate mark.

Yes, on the combined balance sheet, Chris, we expect it to be modestly asset sensitive. They have a very similar profile on the loan side, with about 63% of their loans being variable compared to our 65%. Additionally, as Mariner mentioned, they benefit from a very attractive low-cost, low-beta funding base, primarily retail, which effectively doubles our retail presence. Therefore, we are modestly asset sensitive on a combined balance sheet basis.

Okay. Great. I have a couple of housekeeping questions, Ram. Will the forward settlement shares be available immediately at close? Also, if I'm interpreting Slide 17 correctly, is the CECL day 2 approximately $80 million?

The second question, yes, 50% of the $160 million. So yes, the non-PCD, PCD mix is about 50-50. And then, I'm sorry, remind me of your first question.

The forward settlement logistics.

Yes, so the price is fixed as of yesterday, $75. We raised 2.8 million shares at $210 million. So we have the option with the forward provider to pick that out anytime between now and 18 months. So it's an 18-month contract. But as you rightly surmised, we would probably do it closer to the actual closing of the transaction. There is no impact or change in price. It's just a cash settlement based on when we decide to pull that optionality.

Okay. But so saving of the shares coming in at close. That's the easiest way to do it.

Yes, I would model it that way. It's just our way of deferring dilution and taking capital just in time.

It avoids the draft before the close.

The next question comes from the line of Jared Shaw of Barclays.

Looking at the expenses, do you feel that as you approach a larger size at $67 billion, will there be other investments needed to offset some of those expense savings to manage the larger balance sheet?

Jared, it's Mariner. Basically, for all on the line that basically translates into what the regulators call heightened standards. So that's the $50 billion threshold. What I would tell you is that we were well on our way. It's sitting at $45 billion. And so we had hired a year ago, PWC for a gap analysis that came back clean. We know what we need to do. We're well prepared, all pretty well along the way to do that anyway, even independent of doing this transaction. So very comfortable with where we stand from that standpoint. There will be some investment we need to make along the way, but it's identified and easy to do. Regulators have been supportive of the process that we've been going through, and we're very comfortable and excited about crossing that $50 billion threshold.

And then I think as we did the bottoms-up analysis, Jared, that was part of our consideration, and is included in our analysis as well.

We have a lot of great people at Heartland to support us as we reach that threshold.

Okay. Great. So that growth rate reflects the investment and is likely to remain steady.

Yes, for sure. Yes.

Okay. You mentioned returning to a CET1 of 11% in 18 months. Should we view that as your target for CET1, or has that figure been influenced by your plans to engage in a deal like this? I’m trying to align the forward settlement contract with the buyback and the period after the deal closes.

Yes, we don't provide guidance on that. That's our current position, and we feel comfortable with it. Generally speaking, we expect a slightly higher level of capital in today's operating environment. While we might be slightly below or above that level from quarter to quarter, it doesn't significantly impact our direction. We're certainly comfortable within that range and believe it's wise to maintain a somewhat higher level of capital in the industry right now.

Yes. Okay. Finally, I have a somewhat mundane earnings question rather than a thrilling deal-related inquiry. When we examine the DDA trends, the last two quarters have been strong, and you mentioned seasonality. It's been some time since we've observed what I would consider a typical second quarter seasonality. What potential impact could we see from that? Additionally, aside from the seasonality aspect, do you believe that DDAs have reached their lowest point and that we are now entering a normal growth phase?

Our guidance for margin for the next quarter was a handful of basis points downward pressure just from a mix shift. So, we've talked for long about a healthy institutional deposit pipeline. So, we're expecting those to come sometime in the second quarter coupled with what might happen with seasonality on the DDA side. So that's baked into our margin guidance that we said of about a few basis points. Whether it's part of now DDA, I mean, we're at 30%. The rest of the deposits, the interest-bearing deposit base, as you saw this quarter, is growing pretty rapidly. So just as a result of that math, we might see DDA as a percentage come down, but the hope is our DDAs are somewhere between $9.5 billion and $10 billion.

Yes, we don't expect too much more rotation, if you take the seasonality out. So likely at the bottom on rotation based on the interest rate environment. And I think Ram was just saying, with the growth of everything else on a percentage basis, it may come down slightly.

The next question comes from the line of Terry McEvoy of Stephens Inc.

I was wondering if you could just talk about the due diligence on HTLF's franchise people infrastructure. They've gone through a lot of the last couple of years in terms of kind of an upset shareholder base, collapsing the charters, etc. So what type of disruption do you expect? How do you minimize that disruption particularly on the consumer banking side, which you've talked about the value there a few times on the call.

Yes. Thanks for that question. Yes. Obviously, you're referring to some public disclosures around some issues the Board had a couple of years ago; it's well behind them. As I said, we've gotten to know this company over time and we're very comfortable that they've settled those issues and they're behind them. As far as the due diligence process and the charter class, exciting. We see all that, really, what they've been going through the last couple of years as a great opportunity. They've been, as I would describe, plowing the field and planting the seeds, and we basically get to harvest. So they have done a lot of heavy lifting, and that's great for us, lapsing the charter, centralizing activities. So they've done a lot of really great work to really kind of mimic the kind of company we are and allow us really to harvest all that awesome work.

And then just as a follow-up, what are your thoughts on maintaining and growing that food and ag business lending portfolio, which is, I think, about $1 billion today? Is that a business you'd like to continue to grow?

Yes. We absolutely love that. It's one of the things we really like about the transaction. We're actually the 24th largest agricultural lender in the country ourselves. They picked up Rabo's team and Rabo has a really great reputation in the business. So they have a great team of people in California, and the average size is pretty small, and the diligence was great on that book, and we're really excited to leverage their team and our team combined and just keep rocking and rolling with our ag business unit.

The next question comes from the line of David Long of Raymond James.

Congratulations on the deal announced this morning. My first question is about the expense synergies. With the numbers you provided, are you assuming any revenue synergies at this point?

No, we're not in the model that we presented, but that's the opportunity. And as Mariner said, the harvest that we can do on the great work done already by the HTLF team. So that's not included. We haven't quantified it or disclosed it. But certainly, there's a lot of opportunities that we see as part of our diligence process.

Yes. Of course. Okay. Great. And then the securities restructuring, the $2.5 billion was the accretion from that, that I assume is included in your earnings per share outlook as well?

No, not on the disposed securities. Those are soon to be gone on day one. So there's any accretion related to that is just part of the marks, and it's not part of the EPS accretion that we've presented, the 800 basis points sort of the 31%.

I want to emphasize that this move serves as a way to reduce risk for the transaction. Our organization avoids credit risk in our investment portfolio, and in their investment portfolio, they were assuming some credit risk, so we are eliminating that in the combined entity.

Got it. And as you've mentioned, Bruce and his team handled a significant amount of the charter consolidation. With HTLF3.0, they implemented further expense rationalization initiatives. When you examine the figure, the 27.5% cost reduction from the current levels indicates they were making progress on their own. You noted that a lot of the heavy lifting has been completed. If I were to say that 27.5% appears conservative, what would your response be?

You are correct. What you see in our presentation is conservative, and what they are considering is not factored into our numbers. Therefore, any actions taken before the close and any joint efforts we undertake after the close regarding rationalization are not included in our assumptions.

Okay. And then just the last thing, deal closing in the first quarter of 25%, that's the expectation. What about the systems conversion? Any thoughts on timing of that?

Yes, we're currently planning, and this is all very fluid. We don't have a lot of control over what happens in the regulatory process. But if it closes when we expect it to, our current plan is to convert in early October on a three-day weekend in 2025.

As there are no additional questions waiting at this time, I'd like to hand the conference back over to the UMB management team for closing remarks.

Okay. Thank you all for your questions. As you can tell, we're super excited about this opportunity. We've gotten to know Heartland and their amazing team for a handful of years now, and we're coming together. We're super excited to bring these two great companies together and unlock serious value for all of you, our shareholders. And we're highly confident in our ability to really unlock and deliver that value. So I appreciate everybody's interest in getting on, and we'll be talking again soon.

Thanks, Mariner. And as always, you can follow up with any questions with Investor Relations at (816) 860-7106. Thanks for your time today.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.