Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Ziff Davis Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. My name is Tom, and I will be the operator assisting you today. On this call will be Vivek Shah, CEO of Ziff Davis; and Bret Richter, Chief Financial Officer of Ziff Davis. I will now turn the call over to Bret Richter, Chief Financial Officer of Ziff Davis. Thank you. You may begin.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the Ziff Davis investor conference call for Q3 2025. As the operator mentioned, I am Bret Richter, Chief Financial Officer of Ziff Davis, and I'm joined by our Chief Executive Officer, Vivek Shah. A presentation is available for today's call. A copy of this presentation as well as our earnings release is available on our website www.ziffdavis.com. In addition, you can access the webcast from this site. When you launch the webcast, there is a button on the viewer on the right-hand side, which will allow you to expand the slides. After completing the formal presentation, we'll be conducting a Q&A. The operator will instruct you at that time regarding the procedures for asking questions. In addition, you can email questions to [email protected]. Before we begin our prepared remarks, allow me to read the safe harbor language. As you know, this call and the webcast will include forward-looking statements. Such statements may involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results. Some of those risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risk factors that we have disclosed in our SEC filings, including our 10-K filings, recent 10-Q filings, various proxy statements, and 8-K filings, as well as additional risks and uncertainties that we have included as part of the slideshow for the webcast. We refer you to discussions in those documents regarding safe harbor language as well as forward-looking statements. In addition, following our business outlook slides are our supplemental materials, including reconciliation statements for non-GAAP measures to their nearest GAAP equivalent. Now let me turn the call over to Vivek for his remarks.

Thank you, Bret, and good morning, everyone. In our third quarter earnings release, we announced that Ziff Davis has engaged outside advisers to help us evaluate potential opportunities to unlock value for our shareholders. I'd like to provide some additional context to this disclosure. At the end of fiscal year 2024, we significantly enhanced our segment-level reporting, going from 2 to 5 reportable segments. One of our goals with this change was to provide investors with a more comprehensive understanding of the financial characteristics of each of our divisions. And we believe that this reporting has resulted in greater insight into the performance and intrinsic value of these businesses. We've been encouraged by the reaction to this reporting change, including the engagement from public market investors and analysts, some of whom have used the enhanced disclosures to adopt a 'sum of the parts' approach to the valuation of Ziff Davis. We applaud those efforts because we believe they do reveal a meaningful discount in our current market cap relative to the intrinsic value of the company. At the same time, we have also received interest from both strategic and private equity investors in certain of our businesses, presumably doing their own analyses of our various components. In order to properly evaluate this interest, we have engaged outside advisers to assist us in assessing how certain potential transactions could unlock greater shareholder value. While no final decisions have been made to date, our focus remains on maximizing value for all shareholders. There is no assurance that this evaluation will result in any transaction, and we are very willing to continue to operate with the current business structure, which is profitable, growing, and generates strong free cash flow. It's worth noting that proactively evaluating and acting on opportunities to create value for shareholders is embedded in our company's culture and history. You'll recall that in 2021, we undertook a similar process that resulted in the spinoff of our Consensus business as an independent public company, demonstrating our willingness to take action when it serves our shareholders' interests and unlocking significant stakeholder value at that time. In that transaction, Consensus' post-spinoff enterprise value was close to $2 billion. This was a very positive outcome for shareholders and employees of both companies. If and when there are material developments related to these initiatives, we look forward to providing updates then. And we will, of course, continue to be intently focused on executing against our operating plans. Turning now to our performance in the third quarter. We grew revenues nearly 3%, marking a fifth consecutive quarter of revenue growth. While our adjusted EBITDA fell slightly year-over-year, we grew adjusted diluted EPS by 7% as we increased our share buybacks to capitalize on the current valuation disconnect in the price of Ziff Davis stock. Three of our 5 reportable segments grew revenues in Q3, including a return to growth for our Cybersecurity & Martech segment. So let me share some observations about each of our 5 segments. Tech & Shopping revenue dropped 2% in Q3 with adjusted EBITDA down 12%. This was primarily driven by the continued wind-down of our game publishing activities, which had a negative year-over-year revenue swing of $6.9 million. And as you'll recall, we previously announced that we are no longer investing in new game titles, but we have a slate of preexisting projects which will launch over the next 4 quarters. Excluding game publishing, the Tech & Shopping segment grew in both revenues and adjusted EBITDA, led by CNET, which delivered strong year-over-year growth in licensing driven by new awards, expanded video capabilities and sponsorships and the continued rollout of our Best Buy partnership that began implementation in Q3 of 2024. Gaming & Entertainment revenues were about 4% lower year-over-year, with adjusted EBITDA growth of nearly 3%. Gaming & Entertainment's revenues can be lumpy due to the timing of title releases. Year-to-date revenues are up approximately 2%, and we are on track for revenue growth in the seasonally important fourth quarter. Q3 was Humble Bundle's best quarter of the year and was the second highest revenue quarter for the business in the last 5 years. Humble Bundle subscription revenues were up 5% year-over-year. Events continue to be a large focus for IGN entertainment for audiences and advertisers alike. IGN was back at San Diego Comic-Con in July and was once again the studio partner for Gamescom, the world's biggest gaming show held in Germany every August. Health & Wellness' growth accelerated in Q3 with 13% year-over-year revenue growth and 18% year-over-year adjusted EBITDA growth, both representing high watermarks for the division in the third quarter. The growth was balanced across subscription and display and performance marketing revenue. We continue to deliver positive results with our pharma commercialization programs while supporting health-seeking consumers with our digital health and wellness solutions like our Lucid app, which saw strong subscription growth this quarter. Since we acquired Everyday Health, the division has evolved into a multifaceted solutions provider to the pharma commercialization, digital health and wellness, and provider solutions markets. Participation across these verticals is particularly strategic in a world where the line between traditional health care and consumer-driven self-care continues to blur. Our ability to deliver positive, tangible results for pharma with both patients and providers continues to place us in a strong competitive position. The Connectivity division delivered 2% year-over-year revenue growth as several deals shifted into the fourth quarter. Year-to-date, revenues at Connectivity are up 7%, and we are confident that revenue growth will accelerate in Q4, not just from timing benefits, but underlying strength in the pipeline and the introduction of new products. Continuing our efforts to leverage our platform, brand, and distribution to launch new offerings, the first new product is Speedtest Certified, which launched in September and provides a highly localized Wi-Fi certification program to target enterprise verticals under the Speedtest brand. Speedtest Certified is off to a promising start with strong global demand, including the certification of our first customer in October. The second new product, which we are planning to launch in Q4, leverages Ekahau's core capabilities and is designed for rapid network validation, diagnostics, troubleshooting, and continuous network connectivity testing. Our initial target customers are internet service provider technicians and IT organizations, from which we have already received very promising expressions of interest. Cybersecurity & Martech revenue grew 2% in Q3, consistent with our forecast that this segment would return to growth in the quarter. Growth was driven by strong performance in Cybersecurity, in particular from consumer VPN and consumer cloud backup. I highlighted the momentum in VPN on our Q2 call and it's great to see the turnaround in this business. In Martech, we completed the small but exciting acquisition of Semantic Labs, a performance-based customer acquisition platform focused on the SaaS vertical. Semantic is a great complement to the customer generation capabilities we have elsewhere in our Martech portfolio as well as in our Tech & Shopping segment. Across the company, we are leveraging AI to enhance our products and improve operational efficiency. As mentioned on the last call, we developed an AI platform to refine how we serve our advertisers. This platform creates precise audience segments, powered by billions of real-time signals from across our portfolio, translating this proprietary data into what we call moment-of-influence solutions. This quarter, we officially launched 2 commercial applications of this proprietary platform. In Health & Wellness, we launched HALO, which activates our deep first-party data to identify and target high-intent audiences, maximizing campaign ROI. It is operational, and the early client response has been strong. In Gaming & Entertainment, we introduced IMAGINE, a first-of-its-kind cognitive AI platform that combines cultural intelligence with predictive audience modeling to help brands understand, forecast, and reach entertainment consumers in real time. We're currently in private beta with select strategic partners, with a full commercial rollout planned for early 2026, aligning with IGN's 30th anniversary. We are also deploying AI to drive efficiency. In our Shopping business, for example, 80% of all user-submitted coupon codes are now processed automatically with AI, one of many workflow optimizations being implemented company-wide. On capital allocation, we are in a strong position with substantial cash to continue buying back stock at attractive levels and significant leverage capability. Even as we explore potential opportunities to unlock the intrinsic value in our businesses, which we believe is not appropriately reflected in our per share value, we are still committed to an acquisition program that generates attractive cash-on-cash returns for our shareholders. This is a consistent strategy for us. Following the Consensus spinoff in late 2021, we closed 6 M&A transactions in fiscal 2022. And with that, let me hand the call back to Bret.

Thank you, Vivek. Let's discuss our financial results. Our earnings release reflects both our GAAP and adjusted non-GAAP financial results for Q3 2025. My commentary will primarily relate to our Q3 2025 adjusted financial results and the comparison to prior periods. Please see Slide 4 for the summary of our financial results. Q3 2025 revenues were $363.7 million, as compared with revenues of $353.6 million for the prior year period, reflecting growth of nearly 3%. Q3 2025 adjusted EBITDA was $124.1 million, as compared with $124.7 million for the prior year period, reflecting a decline of less than 1%. Our overall adjusted EBITDA margin was 34.1% in Q3 2025. We reported third quarter adjusted diluted EPS of $1.76, up from $1.64 in Q3 2024, reflecting growth of more than 7%. This increase is due in part to our share repurchases, which reduced third quarter 2025 adjusted weighted average fully diluted shares by nearly 3.3 million shares or 7.5% as compared with the prior period. Importantly, year-to-date, we have delivered growth in revenues, adjusted EBITDA, and adjusted diluted EPS, as well as a significant amount of free cash flow. Slide 5 reflects performance summaries for our 2 primary sources of revenue: advertising and performance marketing and subscription and licensing. Both of these revenue sources grew year-over-year in the third quarter of 2025. Q3 2025 advertising and performance marketing grew 5.9% as compared with the prior year period, while subscription and licensing revenues grew by 2%. Q3 2025 other revenues declined by $4.3 million year-over-year, reflecting the significant decline in revenues from our games publishing business, which more than offset growth from other products and services. Slide 6 through 10 reflect the Q3 financial results of each of our reportable segments. As Vivek noted, 3 of our 5 segments grew revenue in Q3 2025. With regard to adjusted EBITDA, while there are numerous factors that impact margins in each quarter at each business, I want to highlight a few significant items that impacted Q3 2025 adjusted EBITDA at Tech & Shopping, Connectivity, and Cybersecurity & Martech. As we noted, the year-over-year performance of Tech & Shopping was negatively impacted by the performance of our games publishing business, which is in the process of being wound down. We report this revenue net of the amortization of our game publishing investments. And during the last 2 quarters, we reported negative net revenue for this business as this amortization exceeded revenue during the period. This quarter, we reported nearly $7 million less net revenue from publishing than we did during the third quarter of 2024, and this reduction flows through at a very high contribution margin to adjusted EBITDA. In the absence of this impact in Q3, Tech & Shopping would have had positive adjusted EBITDA growth for the quarter. Connectivity's Q3 2025 adjusted EBITDA margin was impacted by the timing of the contracts that Vivek highlighted in his remarks. However, it also reflects the investment we are making in Connectivity to support its anticipated growth. As Vivek mentioned, Connectivity has already launched 1 new exciting product to the market, with another product launch planned for Q4. Q3 2025 reflects our investments in product development, cloud services, and sales expenses to support these new products ahead of revenue generation from them. Overall, we are excited about the prospects of these new products as we begin to head into next year. Finally, Cybersecurity & Martech adjusted EBITDA was primarily negatively impacted by the timing of certain expenses. In Q2 2025, Cyber & Martech delivered more than 5% year-over-year adjusted EBITDA growth despite a modest decline in revenues. This quarter, despite an increase in revenues compared with the prior year period, Cyber & Martech's adjusted EBITDA declined by approximately $500,000, primarily as a result of these timing issues. Please refer to Slide 11 to review our balance sheet. As of the end of the third quarter, we had $503.4 million of cash equivalents and $119.6 million of long-term investments. We also have significant leverage capacity on both a gross and net leverage basis. As of September 30, 2025, gross leverage was 1.7x trailing 12 months adjusted EBITDA, and our net leverage was 0.7x and 0.5x, including the value of our financial investments. During the third quarter, we closed 2 small acquisitions to expand the capabilities of our Connectivity and Cybersecurity & Martech businesses. In the first 9 months of 2025, we closed a total of 7 acquisitions across our businesses, and we invested a total of $67.3 million net of cash received to support our M&A program. We anticipate we will continue to be an active and disciplined acquirer as opportunities arise to add capabilities to our businesses in an accretive manner. Since our second quarter earnings call, we've repurchased 1.5 million shares of our common stock, with certain of these repurchases occurring during the month of October. Through the end of the third quarter of 2025, we repurchased 3 million shares, deploying $109 million or close to 85% of our year-to-date free cash flow. Overall, through today's date, we've repurchased more than 3.6 million shares since the start of 2025. We have nearly 2.75 million shares remaining under our stock repurchase authorization, and we continue to believe that the current trading level of our stock does not reflect the intrinsic value of our underlying businesses. Following this earnings call, we plan to utilize a 10b5-1 Plan to continue to repurchase our shares. Turning to Slide 13. We are reaffirming our fiscal year 2025 guidance range. As noted on prior calls, this is a broad range, which we set in February of 2025. And we currently anticipate our key fiscal year 2025 financial performance metrics of revenues, adjusted EBITDA, and adjusted diluted EPS to fall within this range. As we have discussed today, the consolidated financial performance momentum that we experienced in the second quarter of 2025 did not broadly carry forward to our third quarter results. And while a number of our businesses continue to show strength, we currently anticipate fiscal year 2025 total revenues and adjusted diluted EPS to be within the lower half of our guidance range, with adjusted EBITDA expected to be closer to the lower end of our guidance range. Please note that the fourth quarter is typically our seasonally largest revenue quarter. Slide 20 includes a reconciliation of free cash flow. Q3 2025 free cash flow was $108.2 million, 35% higher than the prior year period. As of the end of Q3 2025, trailing 12 months free cash flow was $261.2 million. We believe that our ability to generate significant free cash flow is a clear indication of the intrinsic value of our businesses and highlights the disconnect we see in our share price. Overall, through the third quarter of 2025, we have delivered year-to-date growth in revenue, adjusted EBITDA, and adjusted diluted EPS, as well as significant free cash flow. Based on our current expectations, we have maintained our expectation of delivering fiscal year 2025 results within our guidance range. And we plan to continue to dedicate our investable resources to our active stock repurchase program while pursuing attractive M&A opportunities. And as Vivek noted earlier, we remain committed to identifying and pursuing all opportunities that we believe offer strong prospects to enhance shareholder value, and we have taken tangible proactive steps to pursue certain of these opportunities. Although there is no assurance that the evaluation will result in any transactions, we are excited about the potential outcomes that may result from these efforts. With that, I will now ask the operator to rejoin us to host our Q&A.

And your first question this morning is coming from Robert Coolbrith from Evercore ISI.

Congratulations on the results. Vivek, I know you have some opinions about where the valuation disconnects versus intrinsic value may be most acute. I wanted to ask if you'd be willing to share any thoughts there. And then secondly, I'd imagine you've had some inbound interest from time to time in the past. Is there something unique about this moment that makes this the right time to entertain that interest in a more significant way? Is the volume of interest where you think you could drive some competitive auction dynamics? Or have you gone some of these businesses to a place where you think an exit now makes more sense?

Thank you for your questions, Rob. I appreciate your previous analysis after our last call. To address your inquiries, I believe things shifted at the start of this year when we first segmented the company into five reportable segments, providing a clearer view of our various businesses, growth characteristics, and margins. Before this segmentation, many were unsure and trying to estimate the value. We approached this with our current and potential investors, as well as analysts, in mind. This also caught the attention of strategic partners and sponsors. From our perspective, this situation is quite different from before. We decided to engage advisers due to the high level of incoming interest. Additionally, there seems to be a significant gap between the current valuation of the company and what we perceive to be its true intrinsic value, likely broader than in the past. Regarding your question about specific divisions, we're approaching this with an open mindset, aiming to unlock as much value as possible. We believe each of our divisions should be valued at a multiple that's higher than the current Ziff Davis multiple, indicating that this value disconnect spans the entire company, not just select areas.

Your next question is coming from Cory Carpenter from JPMorgan.

I had a follow-up to the strategic review and then one on AI overviews, if I could. Just, Vivek, kind of continuing on that theme, maybe what all is on the table here? It sounds like you think there's a disconnect across all divisions, but are there any properties that maybe you think of as core or off-limits in terms of divesting? And would you consider perhaps the whole company, if that was something that you were seeing interest in? And then on AI overview, some of the other publishers called out an impact this quarter on traffic just as that ramped up a little faster than expected. Curious to hear what you've seen there.

Thank you for your questions, Cory. To begin with, nothing is off the table for us. We're approaching this with an open mind, and we don't have a specific preference. Regarding your inquiry about the whole company, we have mainly received questions about specific businesses. We believe that exploring opportunities for certain units is likely to provide more value than considering a transaction for the entire company. However, if we receive credible interest in the broader company, we have a duty to evaluate any opportunity that could create significant value for shareholders. Concerning AI overviews and traffic, I want to reiterate my previous statements about our position. The company is relatively insulated from fluctuations in search traffic. About 35% of our total revenue depends on web traffic, half of which comes from search, leading to approximately 17.5% revenue exposure. In terms of AI overviews, these currently appear in 29% of the queries that generate most of our traffic, which is actually a slight decrease. The presence of AI overviews in valuable queries remains relatively stable. Rather than focusing solely on AI overview prevalence, I am more concerned about search volatility. There have been significant algorithm changes occurring frequently, creating a lot of rank volatility, which differs from the AI overviews aspect. We're keeping an eye on that. There is considerable experimentation happening right now in the Google search experience, and we are experiencing some of those challenges.

And your next question this morning is coming from Shyam Patil from SIG.

I guess you, as you mentioned, you've prepared the market for this kind of announcement just with your segment-level disclosures as well as some of your commentary in the past. I'm just curious, what do you prefer? And then maybe kind of a separate but related, like what do you think is more likely, selling pieces of the business, selling the whole company? And then if it is just selling off certain pieces, what's your value kind of creation and unlocking kind of thesis or philosophy going forward? Would it be we buy businesses, we sell them and then we use that cash to buy back stock or do further M&A? Just how do you just think about kind of those things kind of going forward as you kind of try to figure out what the business could look like over the next 3 to 5 years?

Shyam, those are excellent questions. I’ll begin with your question regarding preference. My preference is whatever leads to the most impactful and positive result for our share price at Ziff Davis. Our shareholders have shown great patience, and we feel a strong responsibility to reward that patience. Thus, our preference depends on what will unleash the most value. It’s difficult to predict what that will be until we engage in this process and truly understand market dynamics. Many of our businesses are performing exceptionally well, and we are optimistic about the direction of that dialogue. Regarding the broader strategic question about the company, what remains consistent is our ability to identify opportunities to apply our digital transformation expertise to create value across various sectors. We have successfully done this with digital publishing, data, and software businesses, and this approach will not change. Regardless of how the company evolves, we will continue to strategically acquire assets to unlock value, usually with the intention of being long-term holders. However, the market indicates that this may not be the ideal approach right now, which is why we’re considering different options, whether that means sticking with our current model or returning to a holding strategy. I can’t provide a definitive answer at this point; we need to remain flexible and thoughtful. Additionally, we will explore all opportunities, including sales, investments, and spin-offs. There are various transactional options we will evaluate in this process.

And Vivek, I would like to add a brief thought. Our overall strategy is to effectively provide products and services to the communities we serve while generating profits, cash flow, and growth. We utilize that cash flow to maintain a healthy balance sheet and allocate capital to support our core philosophy of generating increasing cash flows. There have been instances in our journey where we shifted capital allocation from mergers and acquisitions to share buybacks. Now, we are adding another aspect to the equation by exploring additional opportunities to unlock value. Overall, I don't believe our approach has changed or set a new direction for the company; we are simply responding to our current position in the broader market.

Your next question is coming from Ross Sandler from Barclays.

Great. Vivek, I guess, a philosophical question. If we're at the peak of system-wide Google referral traffic hit for the broader open web, the broader industry, and revenue impact or revenue headwind for companies like Ziff Davis or any other publisher might be peaking right now and potentially diminishing in a year or 2, why is right now the best time to put the for-sale sign up? Has the outlook for your display growth changed dramatically at all? I'm just curious as to why right now if we're in the peak of that impact. And then, Bret, just a modeling question. I think you said we're going to land in the lower half for revenue, which I think implies like a low single-digit growth rate for advertising in the fourth quarter. Just curious what you're seeing thus far, and yes, the framing of that guide.

It's an interesting question, and it highlights the dynamics present in various businesses, not just ours. What I'm saying is that the overall narrative around AI hasn't really applied to our businesses. For instance, our Health & Wellness segment achieved nearly 13% revenue growth in the quarter and 12% year-to-date, with adjusted EBITDA rising by 18%. This segment is thriving and serves as a clear example of how our businesses compare to others in the market. I would rephrase this by stating that despite significant challenges in the industry, our businesses are performing exceptionally well. This may explain why some people have been reaching out regarding different parts of the company. Additionally, two of our segments, Connectivity and Cybersecurity & Martech, are completely unrelated to Google. Within the Cybersecurity & Martech area, we operate several different businesses. Furthermore, in Tech & Shopping, RetailMeNot has its own unique dynamics. Therefore, while some of our brands may be impacted by Google and search, that isn't necessarily the case for others. Recognizing this in the marketplace shows that our businesses are structured differently and have unique dynamics that the public market may overlook. This creates an opportunity, and I believe that's the situation we're facing.

Ross, with regards to your second question. I think it's a fair observation too, and of course, we haven't provided that figure specifically. But looking at what might be implied for advertising in the fourth quarter, I think you said low single digit. I think first, I'd call out probably the most important factor is we'll be lapping the CNET acquisition in the fourth quarter. So we'll be comparing CNET year-over-year, while up to this point for the most part it's been a contributor. And Vivek highlighted a couple of things and I highlighted, that certain of our businesses, the momentum in second quarter didn't quite carry through. And just emphasize what Vivek just said, in other businesses like Health & Wellness, it certainly did. But a little soft product launch in the marketplace as it relates to gaming and advertising, some search volatility, which impacts Tech & Shopping. I think it's a fair observation that we'd be looking for subscription growth to outpace advertising growth in the fourth quarter.

Your next question is coming from Rishi Jaluria from RBC.

I appreciate the increased transparency and agree that the stock appears undervalued. I'm interested in discussing potential M&A opportunities. Vivek, your comments about the impact of AI search indicate that your properties are handling the current landscape better than many smaller ones. I'm curious about areas where you can be more aggressive as an acquirer or consolidator, targeting smaller properties that lack scale, a robust platform, diversity, and the experience necessary to navigate the evolving search algorithms over the last decade. Given the current sentiment, which seems to be at a low point regarding AI search and media, there appears to be a chance for you to invest significantly and acquire smaller, dislocated properties. Could you share your thoughts on that and what opportunities you see in the market?

Yes. No, listen, it's a great question. And I think all the following things can be true. We can be buyers of our shares, we can anticipate transactions to unlock value for our company, and then we can deploy capital in acquisitions. Because I agree with your view, which is 2 pieces, that we have built the platforms and approach that has worked and weathered the storm. Others may not have. And isn't that a buying opportunity? So for sure, we agree with that. And I'll point out that, look, we've deployed close to $70 million for acquisitions thus far this year, and that program is not slowing down at all. But there's also no question that a big share of our capital deployment has been going to buybacks. It continues to stand out as, frankly, the best option for our capital. I mean we could buy this, what we believe is an amazing company, at almost unbelievable multiples. And so we've continued to do that. I think through just to date, it's 3.6 million shares. It's a significant part of our shares outstanding. And that's going to continue. So look, I think that we're always balancing how we deploy our shareholders' capital in the right way against the realities of the per share price experience for our shareholders, and looking to find that balance in this process and going forward.

Your next question is coming from Ygal Arounian from Citi.

Maybe the M&A question from a different angle, as you kind of go through this process, if you're more willing to think a little bit more about expanding into new verticals or areas of sort of higher growth? And then on the AI side, maybe on licensing in particular, and I know there's a lot going on there. One of your competitors talked about sort of a marketplace model where, rather than an all-you-can-eat, sort of a pay-as-you-go. And it sounds like there's more interest for the LLMs to come to the table with the Cloudflare blocking. Just wanted to get an update on how things are going there on your approach.

Thank you for the questions, Ygal. Regarding M&A, we always prefer to acquire leadership brands. For instance, CNET is a leading name in tech, IGN in gaming, RetailMeNot in shopping, and Everyday Health in health, among others. We focus on brands that hold leadership status because they can shape their business models based on demand rather than supply. Much of the media business model traditionally revolves around supply-driven strategies, particularly in programmatic advertising. Therefore, if we pursue new acquisitions, we aim for businesses that bolster our existing leadership or establish leadership in new areas. As for AI licensing, we are actively engaged in discussions and are encouraged by the growing consensus that compensating content creators is both necessary and inevitable. However, we will not enter any agreements that do not ensure a fair value exchange for our content because establishing the right financial standards is vital for a sustainable model. Additionally, we continue to block AI bots using tools like Cloudflare, and I believe the quality of sources is crucial; if the input is poor, the output will be as well. Therefore, I encourage vigilance regarding the sources of information. It's interesting to note that as trusted sources limit access, it creates potential quality issues. We have also joined Real Simple Licensing, which sets standards by incorporating machine-readable licensing terms into our robots.txt file and establishing a collective similar to ASCAP or BMI. Overall, I am optimistic about the potential for a new business model for content that is compensated by various AI systems, but it’s important to set the right precedents from the start.

Your next question is coming from Christopher Kuntarich from UBS.

Vivek, you've called out that the cash that was generated from the Consensus transaction, that was put towards 6 transactions. You were kind of talking in a previous response about going out and acquiring leadership brands. I guess in the event of a spinoff, should we be thinking about kind of the philosophical shift even further kind of on the margin towards targeting a different growth profile of business, maybe kind of expanding from leaders to emerging leaders and looking at something, again, with potentially higher growth profiles?

That's a great question and one we discuss frequently. Ultimately, our focus is on cash-on-cash returns rather than relying on multiple expansion to boost valuation. We aim to be an EPS compounder with double-digit growth, though we haven't reached that target yet. To achieve this, we emphasize pricing, earnings, and cash flow, which can be challenging for smaller, growth-oriented assets in our portfolio. These may not always meet our margin and free cash flow expectations. Therefore, we prioritize free cash flow and its yield. We'll pursue opportunities that align with our strategy, but we are not signaling a shift in our approach. We excel at identifying investment opportunities that unlock significant cash flow, and we intend to maintain that focus regardless of the direction our journey takes us.

There are no further questions in queue at this time. I would now like to hand the call back to Bret Richter for any closing remarks.

Thank you, Tom, and thank you, everybody, for joining us today. We appreciate your time and investment in the company. We look forward to speaking with you over the next couple of months and during our fourth quarter call.

Thank you. This does conclude today's conference call. You may disconnect at this time, and have a wonderful day. Thank you once again for your participation.