Thank you for standing by. My name is Jordan and I'll be your conference operator today. At this time, I'd like to welcome everyone to the CubeSmart 4th Quarter 2025 earnings call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you'd like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number 1 on your telephone keypad. And if you'd like to withdraw your question, press star 1 again. Thank you. I'd now like to turn the call over to Josh Schutzer, Senior Vice President of Finance. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Jordan. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to QSmart's fourth quarter 2025 earnings call. Participants on today's call include Chris Maher, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Tim Martin, Chief Financial Officer. Our prepared remarks will be followed by a Q&A session. In addition to our earnings release, which was issued yesterday evening, supplemental Operating and financial data is available under the Investor Relations section of the company's website at www.cubesmart.com. The company's remarks will include certain forward-looking statements regarding earnings and strategies that involve risk, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause the actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements. The risks and factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from forward-looking statements are provided in documents the company furnishes to or files with the Securities and Exchange Commission, specifically the Form 8K we filed this morning together with our earnings release filed with the Form 8K and the risk factors section of the company's annual report on Form 10K. In addition, the company's remarks include reference to non-GAAP measures. A reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP measures can be found in the fourth quarter financial supplement posted on the company's website at www.qsmart.com. I will now turn the call over to Chris.

Good morning and thank you for joining us today. We are encouraged heading into 2026 that fundamentals have stabilized, and we are positioned to return to growth. Operating metrics have seen improvement over the last couple of quarters, and now that's beginning to flow through to financial metrics. Our more stable urban markets in the Northeast and Midwest continue to outperform, while our more transient supply-impacted markets across the Sunbelt and the West Coast are beginning to see green shoots in the form of second derivative improvement. Across all our markets, our existing customer metrics remain strong, with no change to attrition rates or credit. 2025 was a year of stabilization for demand trends. Overall demand patterns were more consistent throughout the year, and the environment has been more constructive, leading to move-in rates and the back half of the year moving positive year over year. The trend in move-in rates has been very encouraging, with year-over-year quarterly growth improving from minus 10% in the fourth quarter of 2024, improving to minus 8.3% in the first quarter of 2025, improving again to minus 4% in the second quarter of last year, continuing to improve and turning positive at plus 2.5% in the third quarter of 2025 and increasing that positive momentum at plus 2.8% in the fourth quarter of 2025. In the early part of 2026, we have seen similar trends, with the occupancy gap continuing to narrow with positive move-in rates. Specifically, the occupancy gap at the end of January of this year improved from year end, when it was down 70 basis points, to end January at 88.7%, 40 basis points below January of 2025, with rental and vacate trends consistent with our experience during 2025. With a few days left here in February, overall trends continue to be encouraging, with the occupancy gap continuing to narrow, and the quarter-to-date move-in rate trend continuing to be positive with year-over-year move-in rates growing generally in line with what we reported with fourth quarter results the improvement in operating fundamentals is beginning to show up in the financial results it will be steady gradual improvement as we typically turn over approximately five percent of our cubes in any given month we started to see that momentum play through in the fourth quarter and would expect that gradual improvement to continue through 2026. Demand does vary across markets and sub markets with continued out performance from poor urban markets in the Northeast and Midwest and more supply impacted through the Sun Belt and Southwest. However we saw improvements in fundamentals across many markets with over 75% of our top 25 markets seeing revenue growth accelerate from the third quarter to the fourth quarter of 2025. As trends in our markets have been quite positive over the last four or five months, I am optimistic that we are inflecting and see a path to return to more historical levels of revenue and net operating income growth. In 2026, only 19% of our same stores are projected to face an impact of new supply, the lowest percentage since we began articulating this metric back in 2017. The magnitude of the impact of this competitive supply continues to lessen as more of the deliveries in that three-year rolling impact are from two or three years ago and those stores are beginning to reach their first level of occupancy stabilization. Our highest quality portfolio and best-in-class operating platform, along with a seasoned management team, with senior leadership having multiple decades of experience across cycles, against the backdrop of declining impact of new supply and more constructive operating fundamentals, has us well positioned to take on any challenges and maximize all opportunities through 2026. Now, I'd like to turn it over to Tim Martin for insight on our thoughts on capital allocation and guidance for 2026.

Thanks, Chris. Good morning, everyone. Thanks for taking a few minutes out of your day and spending it with us. I'll provide a quick review of fourth quarter results, discuss our recent investment activity, and then jump in and provide some additional color on our 26 expectations and guidance. Same-store revenue growth accelerated from the third quarter to just shy of flat at negative of 0.1% for the quarter, reflecting the continued stabilization of trends that Chris touched on, and moving us to an improved starting point for 2026. Same-store expenses grew 2.9% during the fourth quarter, helped by some good news in real estate taxes and property insurance, offset by increases in marketing and R&M spend, which are mostly timing related as compared to spend in those areas last year. Same store then resulted in declining 1.1% for the fourth quarter. We reported FFO per share as adjusted of $0.64 for the quarter, and during the quarter, we announced a 1.9% increase in our quarterly dividend, up to an annualized $2.12 per share. On yesterday's close, that represents a 5.3% dividend yield. On the external growth front, it's been a challenging couple of years to find accretive on-balance sheet opportunities to deploy capital, especially on marketed transactions. We had success with structured transactions in late 24 and then early into 25 when we were able to accretively invest a combined $610 million on a pair of transactions. One was a recap and one was a JV buyout. Since then, we've seen very limited opportunities to invest on balance sheet given the disconnect in public and private market valuations, but we've been focused on other creative avenues for capital deployment. We recently announced a new joint venture with CBRE-IM with a $250 million mandate to invest in high growth markets. This allows us to expand our JV relationships and provides another avenue to continue to grow the portfolio with enhanced returns. We also closed on two on-balance sheet acquisitions for $49 million during the quarter. In the fourth quarter, we also executed on our existing share repurchase program as the relative value for our portfolio made it a very attractive investment option. When considering we own the highest quality portfolio of self-storage assets and combining that with the disconnected valuation reflected on our share price during the fourth quarter, repurchasing shares was compelling for us on a risk-adjusted basis compared to private market values for lower quality assets. Our board has recently expanded the share repurchase authorization, giving us approximately $475 million in capacity to repurchase shares based on current valuation levels. We generate approximately $100 million in free cash flow annually, so we could execute under the share repurchase program on a leverage neutral basis up to those levels. We're also looking at potentially selling some assets or contributing assets to a joint venture and using those proceeds to fund additional share repurchases should the public-private valuation gap persist further into 2026. Our balance sheet is in great shape with credit metrics very favorable to our existing investment grade credit ratings. Leverage end of the year at 4.8 times net debt to EBITDA. We do have a few things on the to-do list for 2026. We may look at opportunistically accessing the bond market in the first half of the year and use proceeds to repay amounts currently drawn on our revolver. And then in the back half of the year, we may look to go again and use the proceeds to repay our existing bonds that mature in September. Looking forward, details of our 26 earnings guidance and related assumptions were included in our release last night. Overall, our FFO per share expectation for 26 is a range of $2.52 to $2.60 per share. For same-store guidance, our 2026 same-store pool increased by 16 stores. The midpoint of our guidance range for same-store revenues assumes a generally similar macro environment to last year, a lessening impact from competing new supply in our markets, a continuation of steadily improving competitive pricing, and a narrowing of our year-over-year occupancy gap as the year progresses. On the impact of supply, embedded in our same-store expectations for 26 is the impact of new supply that will compete with approximately 19% of our same-store portfolio, as Chris touched on. For context, that 19% is down from 24% of stores impacted by supply last year and down from the peak of 50% of stores impacted back at the peak in 2019 we've been keenly focused on expense controls for several years in fact we've led the sector with the lowest expense growth over the last three year four year five year and six year periods so a bit of our growth overall in 2026 is in the context of us setting a really challenging comp for ourselves given our expense controls over the past several years. Areas that are pushing up our expectation for year-over-year growth include real estate taxes especially late in the year as some of the good news in late 2025 creates a tough comp for us late in 26. Personnel costs coming off again a multi-year period of very very low growth and of course the biggest impact is going to come from the winter related costs from the storms over recent weeks pretty impactful storms compared to really not much at all in early 2025 from weather events thanks again for joining us on the call this morning at this time jordan why don't we open up the call for some questions as a reminder if you'd like to ask a question press star 1 on your telephone keypad your first question comes from the line of michael goldsmith from UBS.

Your line is live.

Good morning. Thanks a lot for taking my question. Maybe first, can we just start with supply? It seems like supply is coming down, or at least new deliveries are, but, you know, I guess at the same time, the demand environment has remained kind of stable, but not particularly strong. So, how do you think about supply? How do you think about supply? Is it Is it just kind of new deliveries? Is it the cumulative buildup over the last several years that's influencing it? And then the numbers that you quote, you know, is that a reflection of expected deliveries this year, or is that kind of like a multi-year number?

Thanks, Michael. Good morning. So, the numbers that I quoted of the 19% of stores being impacted, what we have consistently disclosed over time is we look at supply and the impact of supply on our existing stores over a three-year rolling period. So for the 19% of our stores that are impacted by supply in 2026, those are stores that within their trade ring are going to compete against something that is delivered in 2024, 2025, or 2026, and as Chris touched on, the stores that were delivered in 2024 are going to be less impactful from a headwind perspective than stores in 26 because they will be, in the third year, they will be starting to approach higher levels of occupancy and tend to start pricing more competitively within the market, so it's not only the 19 percent, it's kind of the nature of the 19% is going to be a little bit less of a headwind, we believe, that certainly than when we were at the peak back in 2019. So it's a combination of those things, but all the numbers that we quote are on a three-year rolling basis.

All right. Thanks for that. And as a follow-up, the New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection filed a lawsuit over predatory practices in the New York market. So I just want to say, you know, you have a large presence there. I just wanted to get your take on it. You know, has that influenced the way that you operate? And then obviously, you know, this is the lawsuit against you guys, but just kind of, you know, how you're reacting to it.

Yeah, Michael, we're certainly aware of recent announcements. That specific one out of New York, there's been some similar events. Attempts at legislation in other states found not only for storage, but just in general, pricing and transparency. We continue to monitor those and make sure we're in compliance. We are always focused on providing our customers with the optimum experience, and we'll continue to be flexible in terms of focusing in on that and doing that.

Thank you very much. good luck in 2026.

Thanks.

Your next question comes from the line of Victor Fadiv from Scotiabank. Your line is live.

Thank you for taking my question. I have a question regarding your operating expenses outlook for this year and it's a bit higher versus for example your peers just trying to understand what are the key pieces impacting that difference. Probably With New York, I see that in 2005 had probably higher operating expenses growth. So can you provide some color on what's driving that?

Yes, as we touched on in the introductory remarks, you have a couple things going on. You have, again, having led the sector in expense controls and expense growth over the past several years, do believe we have created a pretty high bar for ourselves from the standpoint of a baseline from which to compare. I think then the individual drivers of where we're getting a little bit of pressure, again, I mentioned we're on real estate taxes. In particular, in the later part of 2026, we're going to have some tough comps because we had some good news here in the fourth quarter of 25. And then the big one that I mentioned is the weather-related. We're going to have pretty significant year-over-year growth in weather-related expenses in the first quarter as we have a significant portion of our self-storage portfolio in the northeast states. And frankly, the winter storms were impactful far beyond just the northeastern part of the So real estate taxes, weather-related costs are the big ones. And then even on a line like personnel, we've been able to manage personnel at flat to negative growth over a multi-year period of time. This year we're looking at more inflationary or maybe just a little bit north of inflationary type growth in that line item. So those are the areas that are driving the thought process behind our same-store expense guidance.

And then as a follow-up, if you think about these new to form, JV, CBRE, what is actually like your opportunity set and what should you think about what is achievable for benefit in six in terms of incremental investment there?

Yeah, so we're super excited to expand our JV relationship and now we have what we had disclosed with our new venture with CBRE Investment Management. We've been working together with them for several years on the operational side and have established a great working relationship through our third-party management platform. The venture that we announced is focused on investing across the spectrum of core, core-plus value-add opportunities, and ideally that will result in us being able to assemble a portfolio of geographically diversified assets in high growth markets. So, fairly broad mandate and, you know, the $250 million mandate is hopefully number one and then we're successful there and we can move on and create additional venture opportunities with CBRE and then, of course, continue to look at creating additional joint venture opportunities with others, including some longstanding relationships that we have.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Brad Heffern from RBC. Your line is live.

Yeah. Hey, Mark. Thanks, everybody. Can you talk about the assumption for move-in rates during the year? Are they just sort of steady during the year at the levels we see now? Do they decline as comps get more difficult? Maybe do they go up because of supply?

Yeah, so we don't guide to the specific components. We guide to an overall revenue growth range expectation. I think what we have seen is what Chris touched on a little bit, which is we have seen a more constructive environment for pricing to new customers. And so we flipped to positive, and it's a good place to start the year. And then as I touched on, you know, at least on the baseline of our expectations, we'd be in an environment where we're able to steadily close the occupancy gap. throughout the year, that would be at the baseline of our expectation. The reality is busy season is going to come and market conditions are going to be what they're going to be and our systems are designed to maximize revenue. And so could you get a little bit more rate and a little bit less occupancy, a little bit more occupancy, a little bit less rate, could you move towards the higher end of the range, the lower end of the range, all that we'll see. But overall, we just got to the overall number which you see in our release.

Okay, got it. And then sort of sticking with that, you said in the prepared comments, you see a path back to historical growth levels. If we see move-in rates stay flat around where they are now, call it 3%, you know, when should we see same-store revenue get to 3%? I know there's a huge number of moving pieces, but just wondering generally, you know, is it quarters, is it a year, is it two years, et cetera?

Yeah, I think if you operate under the assumptions that you just described, then you see that gradual upward trajectory throughout the first year, which in this instance would be 2026. And then you would see yourself returning to more historical levels as you get into the second half of 2027 on a quarterly basis. And then ultimately you would roll into that on an annual basis as you go out then another Thanks.

Your next question comes from the line of Todd Thomas from KeyBank. Your line is live.

Yeah. Hi. Thanks. Good morning. First, just on New York, you know, revenue growth improved from the third quarter, continued to outperform, as you mentioned, along with some of your other sort of core coastal infill markets. Are you assuming that momentum persists in 26? And what's driving the strength in New York City, in your view? Is it more the supply backdrop? Are you seeing better demand? Any sense regarding the outperformance?

I would think about New York broadly as continuing to be the MSA that we would expect to be among our top performing MSAs in 2026 as it was in 25. I think you have two things moving in our favor one is North Jersey and to a lesser extent Westchester County and Long Island are covering from the headwind of supplies so when Tim talked about that and I talked about that 19% you know a good a good market that is benefiting from that is that North Jersey, Westchester, and Long Island markets as part of the MSA, and then in the city itself, we continue to see very positive trends that we've experienced over the last several years. Good lengths of stay, again, folks using the product as an alternative to their living spaces, not as a market that's as reliant on buying and selling of existing homes, really good brand awareness in the boroughs.

Okay. And then, Tim, you know, you talked about buybacks and the buybacks completed in the quarter, you know, potential dispositions, some, you know, potentially seeding, you know, assets into the joint venture. You know, the stock price is higher by almost, you know, 15% relative to the price that you executed at in the fourth quarter, I guess, how actionable are buybacks today and, you know, how do buybacks stack up against, you know, some of the other opportunities that you discussed?

Yeah, I think we obviously have a share price, which is a little bit more favorable for us today than where we were repurchasing back in the fourth quarter. But who knows what tomorrow brings or next week brings or next month brings. I think the point trying to make is that we are, you know, we're not sitting around waiting for the day where we get back to having a green light to grow and our share price is such that we can get back to buying $400, $500, $600 million worth of assets and do so accretively. We haven't seen that environment now for a couple of years. And to the extent that we are in a continued, prolonged period of time where private market valuations are very disconnected from public market valuations, then what's actionable for us to continue to execute on our long-term strategic objectives would be to perhaps improve the overall quality of our portfolio by trimming some things that would have us improve the overall quality of the portfolio and turn around and redeploy that capital to buy back shares because implicit in that is an awfully good opportunity when you think about the implied cap rate, even at the levels we're trading today, while not as compelling from a share repurchase as where they were, still pretty compelling relative to opportunities to buy things on balance sheet. So we'll see. It would be great. It would be great for us if share repurchases were never attractive again and the share price continues to get back and we get back to where, you know, we believe we should be valued, which is at a premium to the value of our underlying assets. But to the extent we don't get back there and the disconnect remains, you know, we're going to keep working to execute on our strategic objectives, and that might be a path for us to do.

That's helpful. Thank you. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Ravi.

Hi there. I saw that as in 4Q, your fee income line item as far as your same store revenue was a bit elevated. Is this primarily from late fees or any other type of fees and what is your assumption for this particular line item as when considering your 26 guide?

Yes. Thanks for the question. And so that line, the other property income line in the same stores includes a variety of things. So it includes merchandise sales, which would include sales of locks and boxes and other items. It includes fees. It includes truck rental income, among some other things. And so we're always looking at ways to enhance growing our cash flows. And we look at every opportunity, and we've been able to, over time, be successful in finding ways to grow that line item, along with growing other revenue line items and controlling expense line items. And so what you're seeing there is the fruits of all of those efforts. Our 2026 expectations would be based on our expectation to continue to build upon what we, you know, what you see coming through the results in 25 and continue at those levels and perhaps find even additional opportunities as we go forward.

Got it. That's helpful. And I wanted to kind of think about AI here, but from a demand perspective, Some of the announcements that we've seen is some of the layoff activity seems to be coming in bulk and a little bit faster than what people might have initially anticipated. How do you think about these announcements and how it could reflect demand for self-storage and moving and displacement as part of your portfolio right now?

So I think the resiliency of our business, And I think it shines through when you think about the last few years, pressures on some of the demand drivers for our business, and yet the, in context, really solid results the sector has been able to put up. You know, I think just speaks to the fact that we are a solution to a need for our customers regardless of the pleasurable or unpleasurable circumstances that that create that need so now never want anyone to lose employment certainly want an economy that is humming on all cylinders where there are plenty of opportunities for jobs and opportunities for advancement, what's made this business work so well for so long. But the reality is in an instance of displacement, we are a solution to help solve some of the related problems that have come along with that.

Got it.

Thanks.

Your next question comes from the line of Michael Griffin from Evercore ISI. Your line is live.

Great, thanks. Maybe on the revenue side, to start, you know, appreciate kind of the commentary as we've, you know, been through about two months of the year so far. But as you think about the interplay of rate versus occupancy, you know, clearly move-in rates are improving, but, you know, your occupancy is still kind of below your historical levels even pre-COVID. You know, give me a sense, does it make sense to maybe push on one of those levers over the other? You know, I realize you're solving for revenue maximization at the end of the day, but in today's environment, does one feel more opportunistic or applicable to drive relative to the other?

I think in today's environment, given where we've been over the last several years, I think the opportunity is there, and it clearly has been over the last five months or so, to be able to focus on maximizing the value of that customer as opposed to focusing in on the volume of customers. I think that's been our focus. I think we obviously as an industry need to continue this momentum of having positive growth in rates in order to generate those more historic levels of overall revenue growth that we've experienced over time. So that's kind of where the mindset is. But as Tim, you know, as Tim articulated, those are decisions that are made on a daily, weekly basis, and we're constantly looking at that, you know, that interplay between volume and rate.

Thanks, Chris. That's certainly some helpful context. And, Tim, I know you touched in the prepared remarks on some, you know, debt market activity. Curious what's contemplated in the guide as it relates to interest expense, And if you were to go out and refi those 26 maturities, you know, what you'd think the interest rate on that would be.

Yeah. So, I mean, the guide has a range for a reason. And it's a little bit tricky because you're not only thinking about where we might execute from a, you know, if we were in the market today is not super relevant for the guidance because it comes down to when do we go, what tenor do we go with, and what does the world look like at that time. And so what I was mentioning was, you know, kind of at the plan today would be a consideration of going first half of the year, using those proceeds to pay down the line, which would then give us a lot of flexibility and capacity as we look at the back half of the year because if we found a compelling market to go again, that would be our preference and just term out the maturity. but by freeing up all of the capacity under the line when our when our bonds mature in September we would have capacity to use the line of credit if we didn't think that there was a good window for issuance at that time so the range contemplates a variety of things when we go how many times do we go what tenor do we go with and what does the world look like at that time great That's it for me.

Thanks for the time.

Have a good weekend.

Your next question comes from the line of Juan Sambria from BMO Capital Markets.

Good morning. Thanks for the time. Chris or Tim, maybe just hoping you guys could expand a little bit on dispositions. You mentioned maybe pruning some non-core assets or markets, presumably. So just curious on how you think about that if the eventuality were to come to pass. Would you want to sell out of kind of the current underperformers, whether it's certain Sundalls or Southwest markets? Just curious on how you're thinking about that, recognizing it's kind of a fluid discussion, I thought, exercise.

Yeah, it is. It is a very fluid discussion and exercise. I think it could end up presenting itself in a variety of ways. The reality is we like our portfolio. And so we don't have a long list of assets that we're anxious to get rid of. I think the reality is, you know, as I mentioned, if there's a persistent environment in which there's a disconnect in valuations, then the opportunity for us to execute our strategic plan and to create shareholder value may be to find opportunities to, you know, to trade assets and repurchase stock. I think the reason I, you know, I wasn't specifically saying dispositions or necessarily joint venture contributions, the joint venture concept is pretty attractive because we could maintain an ownership position in some of these assets that, frankly, we don't want to sell. And we could also get a little bit of additional economics through a joint venture structure, through management fees, that type of thing. So it is a fluid – it's a great word to say it's a fluid discussion. It's just the reality of where we are and just sitting on our hands and hoping for a better day is not what we're doing.

I just appreciate that. And just a quick follow-up on the ECRIs. I'm just kind of curious on the expectation built into 26 guidance and or the kind of recent history. Has there been any change in cadence and or the percent increases you're passing through and or customers' acceptance of those?

Yeah, not much of a change in the contribution that we're expecting going forward is very consistent with the contribution that we've been receiving. So nothing really from a modeling standpoint or an expectation standpoint that's, you know, it's going to have a meaningful impact from ECRIs one way or the other.

Great, thank you.

Thanks. Your next question comes from the line of Spencer Glyncher from Green Street. Your line is live.

Thank you. Yeah, sorry not to be a dead horse here, but maybe just a follow-up on the share buyback discussion. So I appreciate the rationale you shared regarding your view of the disadvantaged cost of equity. Given you did buy two assets in the quarter and while I realized that the purchase price is only 50 million, what is it you're looking for in acquisition opportunities that would sway you to invest versus that simultaneous desire to shrink the asset base and buyback shares?

Yeah, great question. The horse is not quite dead yet, but let's kick it a few more times. The two assets that we bought, it is a process, and so we had those under contract at a value that made sense to us. inherent in those two opportunities are there's growth embedded in those opportunities that when they come onto our platform, we get some nice growth out of those. So, we're still very excited about those two opportunities as the year progressed and the quarter progressed and the disconnect became even larger and more pronounced than the share buyback was something that we focused on. So, it is, you know, there are still, there have been a lot of assets that have traded this year that were very attractive to us and would have been very complimentary and attractive on our platform. Just the valuation didn't make a lot of sense for us at this time. So the world changes pretty quickly. I was going back to my notes from our year-end call a year ago, and we talked about, you know, selling shares on the ATM for an average of $51. So things change pretty quickly. And so, you know, next quarter or the quarter after, we could be talking about contributing some assets to a joint venture and repurchasing some more shares. We could be talking about buying a big portfolio and issuing shares under the ATM. We need to be prepared for any of those scenarios. Our investments team is working hard. Fortunately for us, we do have other options, as we touched upon earlier, with co-investment strategies and the like. And so we're still looking at both ends. We're certainly not closed for business. We're very involved in underwriting a lot of different opportunities. And to the extent that we found something, even on balance sheet that had a compelling enough return, that we believe created shareholder value, then that's where we're focused.

That's great insight. And then would you mind providing some color on the stabilized cap rates that you underwrite on those two assets?

Yeah. So they weren't stabilized cap rates. I mentioned last quarter that the assets that we had under contract that then we closed two of the three, going in were in the low fives and they were stabilizing into the six range in year two, two and a half.

Thank you very much.

Thanks, Spencer.

Your next question comes from the line of Brendan Lynch from Barclays. Your line is live. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question.

The commentary around 19% of markets facing new supply in 2026 was really helpful. If the pace of new starts doesn't accelerate, what percent of your portfolio do you think would be facing new deliveries in 2027?

You know, so to one point of clarification, it's not markets. It's not 19% of our markets. It's literally 19% of our assets. You can have assets within a market, some of which are competing with new supply and some are not. So just that is a point of clarification. You know, we just disclosed the 19% and now you're asking for what is it going to be next We're never good enough. But I think if you think about that three-year rolling period for this year, it's deliveries in 24, 25, 26. So next year, when we disclose this number, it'll shift to be deliveries in 25, 26, and 27. So you'll add 27 deliveries and you'll drop off 24 deliveries, I would think, across our markets and across our portfolio, that deliveries in 27 will be a little bit lower than deliveries were in 24. And so, my expectation as we sit here today is that that 19% would trend downward a little That's helpful commentary.

And then just on the CBRE joint venture, you mentioned that some value-added assets might be contributed as well. So my sense is that value-added assets were something that you wanted to kind of hold on a balance sheet for the upside that you get as you improve those assets relative to maybe some more stabilized assets being better candidates for joint ventures. Can you just walk us through the kind of the nuances of how you think about which assets are good candidates versus not with your JV partners?

Yeah, sorry, we're covering a lot of different things. I think we might have mixed two things together there. So the venture that we have with CBRE is focused on external opportunities, nothing that we would contribute. So the value-add opportunities that that venture is seeking are value-add opportunities that we can find that are maybe earlier stages on our third-party management platform or, you know, going out and trying to identify those opportunities. So, they are external opportunities that would be across the spectrum of value-add, core-plus. The concept of contributing assets is completely separate from that and is more, you know, is not as actionable here in the near term as the venture that we announced with CBRE. I see.

Very good.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Eric Lubchow from Wells Fargo. your line is live all right great thanks for uh squeezing me in so um maybe you could touch on on the new york msa a little more it had some nice acceleration in the quarter could you kind of just aggregate where that strength is coming from between you know the boroughs north jersey long island or anywhere else sure so really uh the acceleration was um was across the board in each of those contexts.

I think when you think about it by borough, Queens has been pretty consistent, Q2, Q3, Q4, in terms of its revenue growth, in terms of its occupancy stability, A little bit of supply, you know, one or two stores, I think, have opened there over the last year or two, but really not that impactful, seeing good growth and, you know, a little pressure three years in there to the queues. Brooklyn has been the leader through the year, putting up, you know, overall same-store revenue growth in and quarter out north of occupancies there also pretty steady so a good you know a good driver is good lengths of stay now continue to focus on the existing customer and then seeing some good move-in rate growth there as well and that's pretty much pretty nice acceleration there throughout the year that's somewhat going to be just a year-over-year comp occupancies there There have been pretty steady, growing a little bit in the back half of the year. And when looking at that, again, by area, saw some strength throughout getting better each quarter in that Bronx River area. South Bronx, Co-op City have stayed pretty consistent. And then I think, as I said, consistently in Staten Island supply, which is the same story for the rest of the NFL.

Yeah, no, thank you. Very comprehensive. I guess just one for Tam. I know you called out some tough comps and expenses this year. Maybe could you provide us a little more color on some of the expense growth you expect across some of the key line items like real estate taxes, personnel, anything else to call out that we should keep in mind for this year?

No, I called out the big ones. Those are the ones that were notable that I have discussed a couple times here.

Okay, thank you. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Eric Wolf from Citigroup. Your line is live.

Hey, thanks. You mentioned that your solution to the displacement can occur during periods of job losses. So I was just curious if, you know, when you see accelerated layoffs or job losses in a certain market, how long that increased demand tends to last. And along with that, you know, DC's definitely been one of your strong markets the last year, but I did notice that it decelerated a bit this quarter. So I was curious if that was just noise in the numbers, tough comps, or, you know, maybe the lower employment is catching up there a bit.

Yeah, great question. When you think about storage, we're a neighborhood, small trade ring business. And then when you think about displacement, oftentimes that can either be so broad in terms of where the employees displaced come from. So I'll use D.C. as that example. You have folks who work in the federal government in Bethesda at NIH, in Washington, D.C. proper at other agencies who live as far away as Culpeper, Virginia or Frederick, Maryland or West Virginia, parts of Prince George's County. So, when we have our general managers focus on demand and try to inquire from the customer as we always do, what's going on in your life, it's just so dispersed that you just never really see an impact on any particular store there. So, the DC overall performance is comps. You know, we just had been on a run there for many, many quarters, and we just saw a little bit of that tough comp in Q4. But otherwise, you know, it will continue to be a market we expect in 26 to be a leader, the DC, you know, the DMV, and, you know, very good market for us. We also saw, you know, the ebb and flow of supply there, again, just given the broad nature of that MSA. But I think when you think about layoffs, then that might be within a plant or a business where the majority of the workers tend to be concentrated in a fairly tight geographic area, you would have a more correlated demand to the self-storage opportunities in that area. but in terms of like some historic trend it I don't have anything off the top of my mind that would be super insightful that was very helpful and I guess you know you talk about this a lot

today so don't need to get too much more into it but I guess you know one of the things that I'm trying to figure out is you talked about things improving throughout last year they've stayed, you know, very strong recently, improving some more. Is there some kind of common reason as to why? I mean, is it demand that's gotten better? Is it, you know, lower supply impact in the markets that are accelerating the most, just easier comps? Like, what is actually driving that improvement, and, like, is what gives you the confidence to know that you've actually reached an inflection in whatever's going to drive it going forward?

I think it is all of the above. I think you've really touched on all of the drivers. So what we've seen over the last four or five months, demand, and throughout all of 25, frankly, we now have a new but fairly consistent demand profile for the business throughout the 12 months. And that's that baseline of what we've seen in, you know, kind of 24, but really in 25 is the baseline that we're expecting here in 26. So if that's your baseline, but the impact of vacant space, new supply continues to ramp down very helpfully, well, then, you know, you're just in a better position than from, as Tim alluded to, from a pricing perspective. because those new stores that had opened in 24 are reaching a better level of physical occupancy and typically you know the savvy operators in our space then start to focus in on getting rate so that's helpful for the sub market in in which we operate we still see a pretty healthy consumer for our product and so that that's helpful so I think it's kind of all of the above that is embedded in sort of that range that Tim talked about and and that's been consistent now as I said for four months and so you know we're feeling pretty optimistic as we go into 2026 obviously we have a range and you know we're comfortable within that. I think the one item that we do not have factored in, and this is more recent news, but when you think about is there an opportunity here for those pent-up homeowners, homebuyers, animal spirits to be unleashed as the 30-year fixed rate dropped yesterday below 6% for the first time in three years, you know, you sit here and realize that today more homeowners have a mortgage rate above 6% than a rate below 3% for the first time in five years. So we're not counting on it. It's not in guidance at all, but certainly, you know, The kind of news over the last few days here on that front could be very helpful and would just be pure upside.

That's really helpful. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Samir Knal from Bank of America. Your line is live.

Good afternoon, everybody. I guess, Chris, I just wanted you to expand on you talked a little bit about the transaction market, maybe talk about pricing. And the reason I'm asking is, you know, there was a big portfolio that traded in New York, right? And I'm not sure how – this is the Carlisle Storage Mart one. Not sure how that – how should we think about that portfolio compared to your portfolio in New York? If that was complementary to your portfolio, do we think about that disconnect, right, between sort of private market valuation and kind of where your stock trades today?

Yeah, thanks for the question. So, the portfolio that you're referencing, we were a manager of some of those assets. So, we're a very good partner, and therefore, we don't talk about transactions that we weren't involved in. And you can certainly get more take on pricing, et cetera, from the buyer. New York is a great market. We continue to look for good opportunities there. In that particular instance, there just wasn't a transaction that made sense for CubeSmart, but it made sense for another operator there, and I'm sure they'd be happy to give you insight as to how they thought about what that pricing was, whatever in their mind they think.

That's it for me.

Thank you.

Your final question comes from the line of Mike Mueller from JPMorgan. Your line is live.

Hey, sorry to drag it out.

Most stuff's been answered, but just a quick one, are you likely to only sell assets if you see an opportunity with the stock being cheap or there's something to buy or there are likely some assets you're just going to cycle out of no matter what?

Yeah, I think the last part of that cycle out of assets, no matter what, was what I was trying to cover before. That list is very, very short for us. We like our existing portfolio, so the focus for us, and frankly, the difficulty on executing on the concept that I'm putting out there is the timing piece, right? You can't sell something in a week, and by the time you would sell it or contribute something something to a venture, public market valuations change awfully quickly. And so the objective for us would be to, again, further the strategic objective, improve the overall quality of the on-balance portfolio, and doing so accretively, which would combine dispositions or contributions of assets to raise the capital and repurchase shares. So the execution of that is a challenge, given the timing. And back to Spencer's question earlier, you know, we did, we bought some properties and repurchase share in the same quarter. We didn't do them in the same week. But, you know, things change, and sometimes they change pretty quickly. So it comes down to if there's a prolonged period where there's a disconnect, and there has been, the execution of that, we believe, would make a lot of sense.

Got it. Thanks, Mike.

That concludes the question and answer session. I'd now like to turn the call back over to Chris Maher for closing remarks.

Thank you everyone for your insightful questions. We've enjoyed the dialogue here this morning. We certainly are looking forward to the upcoming seasonal busy season for our industry. We've been off to a very solid start here in January and February, notwithstanding the unappetizing weather that we've seen here on the East Coast. But spring is sprung, and sun is coming, and the busy season for storage will be here before you know it, and we look forward to continuing our dialogue after we report first quarter earnings. Thank you very much. Have a great day.

This concludes today's meeting. You may not disconnect.