Hello, and welcome to WP Carey's fourth quarter and full year 2025 earnings conference call. My name is Diego, and I will be your operator today. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. Please note that today's event is being recorded. After today's prepared remarks, we will be taking questions via the phone line. Instructions on how to do so will be given at the appropriate time. I will now turn today's program over to Peter Sands, Head of Investor Relations. Mr. Sands, please go ahead.

Hello, everyone, and thank you for joining us today for our 2025 fourth quarter earnings call. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that some of the statements made on this call are not historic facts and may be deemed forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from W.P. Carey's expectations are provided in our SEC filings. An online replay of this conference call will be made available in the Investor Relations section of our website at wpcarey.com, where it will be archived for approximately one year and where you can also find copies of our investor presentations and other related materials. And with that, let me hand the call over to W.P. Carey's Chief Executive Officer, Jason

Thanks, Peter. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. 2025 was a standout year for WP Carey, reflecting successful execution across our business, producing strong performance for the year, and laying the foundation for attractive, sustainable growth that supports long-term value creation. The 5.7% AFO growth we generated for the year was among the best in the net lease industry, reflecting our record investment activity, sector-leading rent growth, and strong portfolio performance. The dividends we paid, combined with the appreciation of our stock price, provided our shareholders with a total return of 25% for the year, placing us in the top tier of publicly traded REITs. Looking ahead, we're confident the momentum we established in 2025 will carry into this year. Our deal flow remains strong. We have access to multiple forms of of accretive capital, we expect incrementally higher contractual rent growth compared to last year and stable credit quality within our portfolio. Our competitive advantage on investment threats should also continue to differentiate us. Our average yields and IRRs are among the highest of the public net lease rates, reflecting both the strength of our rent bumps and the long duration of our leases. But combined with our lower average cost of debt, aided by access to Euro-denominated financing, we believe we're exceptionally well-positioned to drive industry-leading AFFO growth in 2026 and beyond. On this call, I'll briefly recap 2025 and expand on how we're positioned to continue delivering attractive growth. I'm joined by Tony Sanzone, our CFO, who will review the key details behind our results, balance sheet, and guidance, and Brooks Gordon, our head of asset management, to take your questions. Starting with our investment activity, We finished the year at the top end of our guidance range, closing record annual investment volume totaling $2.1 billion, representing substantial growth over our initial guidance and demonstrating our ability to source and close a high volume of transactions in a competitive market. Throughout 2025, we put capital to work at attractive spreads relative to the pricing we achieved on our asset sales, as well as to our overall cost of capital. Our investments carried a weighted average initial cash cap rate of 7.6% for the year, translating into an average yield just above 9% over long-term leases averaging 17 years. In contrast, the occupied assets we sold traded at cap rates averaging 6%, generating an average spread of about 150 basis points and creating significant value as we recycled capital from non-core asset sales to higher-yielding net lease investments. We allocated the most capital to warehouse and industrial, which accounted for 68% of our full-year investment volume, and found additional compelling opportunities in retail, which represented 22%. Geographically, 26% of our 2025 investment volume was in Europe, and 74% was in North America, the vast majority of which was in the U.S. Importantly, we finished the year with continued strong momentum, completing $625 million of investments during the fourth quarter. Among them was our $322 million investment in a portfolio of high-quality, lifetime fitness facilities, which significantly expanded our relationship with that tenant, making it our third largest by ABR. One of the compelling aspects of our business model that continued to stand out in 2025 was our industry-leading rent growth. Even with inflation remaining below the peak levels of recent years, we generated among the best internal growth in the net lease sector, driving a meaningful share of our overall AFFO growth, independent of our transaction activity. We expect this to continue in 2026, supported by the strength of our fixed rent escalations. Turning to our sources of capital, as mentioned, our 2025 investment activity was supported by disciplined capital raising, funding new transactions primarily with sales of non-core operating assets. This approach enabled us to both accretively recycle capital and further simplify our portfolio mix, effectively exiting the operating self-storage business. During the year, we also successfully refinanced our Euro-denominated term loan, locking in an attractive all-in rate below 3%, further demonstrating the advantages of having access to euro-denominated debt and multiple forms of capital. And mid-year, we achieved execution on our five-year U.S. bond issuance, giving us additional funding flexibility. Furthermore, during the second half of the year, we utilized our ATM program to sell forward equity, getting ahead of our 2026 needs. And so, looking ahead to 2026, we remain very well positioned to sustain a high level of investment activity and deliver attractive AFFO growth. Following the strong fourth quarter, we've already closed approximately $312 million of new investments year-to-date, and we currently have a sizable investment pipeline with several hundred million dollars of transactions at various stages of completion. In addition, our year-to-date investment volume includes roughly $50 million of completed capital projects, with another $290 million underway and scheduled to deliver over the next 12 to 18 months. We remain just as active, if not more active, than other net lease REITs in build-a-suits, expansions, and redevelopment projects. These are capabilities we've built over many years and view as a meaningful competitive strength, now further supported by our recently launched Cary Tenant Solutions platform. Historically, we've generally maintained a pipeline around $200 million of such projects, which typically deliver above market yields, extend lease terms, and enhance the strategic importance of the assets involved, creating highly attractive proprietary deal flow that leverages and strengthens our tenant relationships. We see significant opportunity to lean further into these capabilities with our carry tenant solutions platform positioning us to do even more going forward alongside other initiatives such as our expansion in U.S. retail. With all these factors in mind, we're confident in our ability to continue generating higher investment volumes than we have historically, as we demonstrated in 2025. At the same time, we're mindful that it's still early in the year, so we're starting with an initial investment volume guidance range of $1.25 to $1.75 billion. As we move through the year and gain more visibility to the second half, we expect to refine and potentially raise that range, as we did in 2025. We also foresee cap rates being incrementally lower this year. Based on our current pipeline, we're anticipating going in cash cap rates in the mid to low 7% range compared to 2025's weighted average of 7.6%. The momentum we're generating on the investment side of the business is supported by our strong funding position, having already accounted for the vast majority of our anticipated 2026 equity needs. The more than $400 million of forward equity we sold in 2025 remains available for settlement, with an active ATM program in place, enabling us to issue additional forward equity as needed. We also anticipate generating close to $300 million of retained cash flow this year, providing an additional source of equity capital. And importantly, with the option to pursue additional accretive disposition opportunities, potentially taking us over the top end of our initial disposition guidance range, should we choose to do so, enabling us to continue driving AFFO growth. Accordingly, we have ample flexibility to fund additional investments above the top end of our initial acquisition guidance range, regardless of equity capital market conditions. Let me pause there and hand the call over to Tony to discuss our results, balance sheet, and guidance in more detail.

Thanks, Jason, and good afternoon, everyone. Our fourth quarter and full year results demonstrate a strong, consistent pace of investment activity throughout 2025 at attractive spreads, coupled with sector-leading internal rent growth from our portfolio. I'll walk through the details of those results, starting with AFFO. AFFO per share for the fourth quarter was $1.27, representing a 5% increase over the prior year fourth quarter. For the full year, AFFO totaled $4.97 per share, representing 5.7% year-over-year growth and coming in just above the midpoint of our guidance range. As Jason mentioned, the record investment volume we completed came in just above the top end of our guidance range, at an average spread of just over 150 basis points to our dispositions, which will continue to benefit our earnings in 2026 as the full year impact flows through our results. During the fourth quarter, we continued to fund our investment activity accretively through opportunistic dispositions, selling 44 properties for gross proceeds totaling $507 million, bringing full-year disposition volume to $1.5 billion, the vast majority of which was sales of non-core assets. Our 2025 dispositions included sales of 63 self-storage operating properties for gross proceeds totaling approximately $785 million, leaving us with 11 such properties at year end, which we're currently in the process of selling and hope to complete in the first half of the year. Turning to our portfolio growth, contractual same-store rent growth remained strong, averaging 2.4% both for the fourth quarter and the full year on a year-over-year basis. CPI-linked rent escalations average 2.6% for the year, which comprise about half of our ABR, while fixed increases, which make up the other half, average 2.1% for the year. We continue to see fixed increases in new investments trend higher than the averages in our existing portfolio, which will support sustained higher levels of internal growth, even as CPI is moderating. About three-quarters of our 2025 investment volume had leases with fixed rent escalations averaging 2.5%. For 2026, we anticipate the contractual same-store rent growth will trend slightly higher than it did in 2025, although still averaging in the mid-2% range for the full year. Comprehensive same-store rent growth for the quarter was 70 basis points, which moderated from the first half of the year as anticipated, driven by the impact of a prior-year fourth-quarter rent recovery, as well as higher vacancy over the back half of 2025. On a full-year basis, comprehensive same-store averaged 2.8% in line with our contractual same-store growth after taking into account the impacts of releasing, rent collections, vacancies, and lease restructurings. Our portfolio continued to perform well throughout 2025 with minimal rent disruption. As previously announced, rent loss from tenant credit events totaled $6.4 million for 2025, or about 40 basis points of rent, which was well within our conservative assumption of around $10 million earlier in the fourth quarter. We continued reducing our Helvig exposure in 2025 through a combination of releasing activities and asset sales, bringing it down to 1.1% of total ABR by year-end. And we're currently engaged in active transactions that will further reduce our exposure by mid-year. Looking ahead to 2026, we're taking a similar approach to last year, initially assuming a conservative estimate for rent loss from tenant credit, totaling $10 to $15 million, or 60 to 90 basis points of expected rent. Importantly, we've not seen any material changes in credit throughout the portfolio since our last earnings call. As was the case in 2025, we hope to be able to reduce our rent loss estimate as the year progresses, which could provide some upside to our initial AFFO guidance. Portfolio occupancy at the end of the year increased to 98%, up 100 basis points from the end of the third quarter, as we completed vacant asset sales and entered into new leases during the fourth quarter, as we had anticipated. During 2026, we expect portfolio occupancy to remain over 98% through a combination of releasing and dispositions. Fourth quarter releasing activity resulted in the recapture of 100% of prior rent on 1.3% of ABR and added almost eight years of weighted average lease term. We saw similar positive results for the full year, with about 100% recapture on 5.3% of total portfolio ABR, adding 5.7 years of weighted average lease term. Other lease-related income for the fourth quarter was $8.1 million, bringing the total for the year to $24.6 million in line with our expectations. While the timing of these payments can vary from quarter to quarter and even from year to year, they demonstrate our proactive approach to managing our portfolio, often identifying opportunities to maximize the outcome for assets that may be better suited for releasing, redevelopment, or disposition. Turning now to our guidance. For 2026, we currently expect to generate AFFO of between $5.13 and $5.23 per share, implying a healthy 4.2% year-over-year growth at the midpoint, and which is based on investment volume of between $1.25 and $1.75 billion. Currently, we're assuming 2026 dispositions total between $250 and $750 million. This includes ordinary course net lease dispositions, notably certain of our vacant assets and a subset of our Helwig portfolio, as well as the expected sale of our remaining operating self-storage assets. And as Jason discussed, we've identified additional opportunistic and non-core asset sales we could execute at attractive cap rates, giving us a great deal of optionality and funding investments accretively. As the year progresses and we have a greater visibility, we'll be able to refine that range. G&A is expected to total between $103 to $106 million for 2026, which includes additional investments in data and technology initiatives with a focus on expanding AI further into our business processes and portfolio monitoring. We have a highly scalable operating platform and remain keenly focused on driving further long-term efficiencies. For modeling purposes, just a reminder that our G&A expense runs highest in the first quarter, mainly due to the timing of payroll taxes. We currently expect first quarter G&A to total about $28 million with the balance of the year, expected to trend lower and more evenly. Non-reimbursed property expenses are expected to total between $56 million and $60 million for 2026, including approximately $6 million of expected demolition costs associated with the planned redevelopment work. I'll note these incremental costs are expected to mostly occur in the first half of the year and will be more than offset by an associated termination payment, which will be recognized in other lease-related income, since we proactively terminated the in-place lease at these facilities to commence the development work. Excluding demolition costs, we expect non-reimbursed property expenses to decline as we continue reducing vacancy and the related carrying costs. Including the termination payment related to this redevelopment, other lease-related income is expected to total in the low to mid $30 million range for 2026, with about $20 million of that total expected to be recognized in the first half of the year. Tax expense on an AFFO basis, the vast majority of which comprises foreign taxes on our European assets, is anticipated to fall between $45 and $49 million for 2026, with the increase over last year mainly reflecting growth in our European portfolio. As we've now exited the vast majority of our operating assets, we expect operating NOI to total only about $10 million in 2026, which contemplates the sale of our remaining self-souraged properties by the end of the first quarter. Investment management fees are expected to decline to about $5 million this year, down from $9 million in 2025, as NLOP continues to execute asset sales. Non-operating income for 2026 is currently estimated to total between $7 million and $11 million, declining from about $17 million in 2025. For 2026, we assume a flat dividend from our equity stake and lineage of about $11 million, as well as lower estimated FX derivative hedging impacts, assuming the euro remains around its current level for the full year. Given the effectiveness of our hedging strategy, movements in the foreign currency rates are not expected to result in any meaningful impact on our 2026 AFFO. Considering all these factors, we see encouraging momentum heading into the year. The midpoint of our initial AFFO guidance range implies meaningful year-over-year growth of 4.2%, driven primarily by accretive external growth and continued strong internal growth. And importantly, we're delivering this growth outlook even while initiating guidance with a conservative stance towards both investment volume and credit-related rent loss. Moving to our balance sheet. In 2025, we demonstrated we have a variety of capital sources to fund our investment activity accretively, and we expect to continue to optimize our funding approach in the coming year, allowing us to execute on a strong pipeline of activity while generating attractive spreads. We sold 6.3 million shares of forward equity through our ATM program at a weighted average price of $67.53 for gross proceeds totaling $423 million. All of this forward equity remains outstanding, positioning us well to fund our investment activity throughout the year. Our strong investment-grade balance sheet and diversified asset base also gives us the unique opportunity to access attractive debt capital across a variety of markets. We have two bonds maturing in 2026, a 500 million euro bond in April and a 350 million dollar U.S. bond in October. Our initial guidance assumes we refinance these bonds with issuances in the same currencies, although we continue to have a wide range of options available to us. Our weighted average interest rate on debt was 3.2% for 2025, which we believe is among the lowest in the net lease sector. Despite having to refinance our upcoming bond maturities, our weighted average interest rate for 2026 is expected to remain in the low to mid 3% range. Net debt to adjusted EBITDA was 5.6 times, inclusive of unsettled forward equity at the end of the year, well within our target range. Excluding the impact of unsettled equity forwards, net debt to adjusted EBITDA was 5.9 times. We expect to continue to manage the balance sheet, maintaining leverage within our target range of mid to high five times. We ended the year with liquidity totaling $2.2 billion, including the availability of our credit facility, cash on hand or held for 1031 exchanges, and unsettled forward equity. In December, we increased our quarterly dividend by 4.5% year-over-year to $0.92 per share. Based on our current stock price, that equates to an attractive annualized dividend yield over 5%, which remains well-supported with a full-year payout ratio of approximately 73%. We expect our dividend to continue to grow in line with our AFFO growth while maintaining a conservative payout ratio. And with that, I'll hand the call

back to Jason. Thanks, Tony. 2025 was a successful year that demonstrated the strength of our business model, the quality of our portfolio, and the dedication of our team. We executed on our objectives across the company, delivering attractive external and internal growth, maintaining disciplined capital allocation, and continuing to strengthen and incrementally optimize our portfolio composition. We've entered 2026 well prepared to build on that progress. Our investment momentum remains strong, and our initial acquisition guidance for the year is effectively fully funded with the flexibility to execute additional investments without needing to access the equity capital markets. Through the combination of our internal growth, the spreads we're achieving on new investments, and a well-supported dividend, we're confident that we can again deliver attractive double-digit total returns this year before factoring in any expansion to our multiple. That includes our prepared remarks, so I'll pass the call back

to the operator for questions. At this time, we will take questions. If you would like to ask a question, please press the number one, the star key, then the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, please press the star, then the number two. And your first question comes from Jana Gallen with Bank of America. Please state your question.

Thank you. Hi, and congratulations on a very successful 2025. Jason, I wanted to follow up on the strategy of the expansion in U.S. retail. It looks like Lifetime Fitness was part of this goal. I'm kind of curious what other categories within retail you're targeting and whether these will be kind of in the form of more larger sale leaseback opportunities.

Yeah, sure. Yeah, we're making good progress in retail. It accounted for about 22% of our deal volume last year. And of course, about two thirds of that was the Lifetime deal. Looking forward to this year, a good chunk of our pipeline is retail. It's probably about half and half right now. Overall, net lease retail is the biggest part of the net lease market, especially in the U.S. And we think it could become a bigger part of our deal volume on an annual basis. I'd like to build it to maybe 25% to 30% of our annual deal volume. That would include both the U.S. and Europe. When you think about what we're targeting, we've done deals recently with Dollar General and Lifetime, some other fitness. We've done some family entertainment, some grocery, some sea stores in Europe. We're looking across the sector and we'll be somewhat opportunistic. And, you know, the things that we typically look for in, you know, generally what we do in net lease, we're focused on tenant credit and lease term and structure, you know, master lease versus individual leases, coverage, things like that are all important and that won't change.

Thank you. And then maybe also on the carry tenant solutions platform, you know, maybe just near term, how much above 200 million should we think about that growing?

Yeah, sure. So we've historically, as I mentioned, done about 200 million per year or had active projects, maybe in that range at any given point. And we do think that this can become a larger component of the business. Last year, we started a number of new projects. I think year to date, we completed about 50 million of those. And there is another 280 million in construction that we'll deliver over the next 12 to 18 months. Some of those new deals were done in conjunction with some recent investments where we agreed to either build a suit or an expansion as part of that. And there's other things that we're doing related to our existing portfolio. I mean, namely, there are some expansions and redevelopments. It includes, I think, two redevelopments that Tony had referenced earlier, as well as an expansion for one of our top tenants. So it's becoming more of an emphasis for us, and it's hard to predict exactly how big of a component it could be. You know, but I do think we can increase it.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from Greg McGinnis with Scotiabank. Please do your question.

Hey, Jason. I appreciate the commentary on the retail side. Also hoping you can kind of dig in a bit more on the industrial, you know, types of assets that you're finding or looking for cap rates and then kind of U.S. versus Europe. And if you comment on whether or not, you know, realty income is becoming more of a competitive company that you're seeing more on deals in Europe as well, that'd be appreciated.

Yeah, sure. I mean, industrial is still, you know, really the core part of our business. You know, we want to keep on adding retail, but, you know, industrials is significant. It's probably made up two-thirds to maybe even three-quarters of our deal volume over the last number of years. And in terms of, you know, what type of industrial, It's really a mix between both manufacturing and logistics, and we do provide some disclosure on those two components. I think in the past, we've also layered in some food production and processing, which we've always liked. Those tend to be non-discretionary spend-type products. The tenants tend to have very meaningful investment in these facilities. We also tend to get long lease terms and, in many cases, higher yields as well. So that's, you know, certainly a component as well. You know, in terms of cap rates, I mentioned earlier, I think that there's maybe some expectation they could tighten a little bit this year. Last year, our average for the year was 7.6%. You know, we'll continue to target deals in the sevens this year, but I do think they could come in some. So maybe that ends up somewhere in the low to mid 7% range on average for us versus the mid 7% last year. Maybe that's 25 basis points of tightening. But it's early in the year. It's kind of hard to predict what will happen over the next 10 months or so. So in terms of realty income, I mean, we see them from time to time, I would say, more in Europe than we have in the U.S., but they've focused a lot of their investing in the U.K., which has not been a country in which we've allocated a lot of capital. We're still doing more of our deals in continental Europe, and we're doing more of our deals, at least lately, in industrial. real. So, you know, we see them from time to time, but Europe's a big market and there's not a lot of competition there generally. So I wouldn't say it's all that impactful. Okay. I don't know

if I missed anything else there. Yeah, no, thank you. I appreciate that. And just on the potential cap rate tightening, is that just kind of an assumption based on maybe cost to borrow lowering or increased competition? Is it anything that you're seeing today or is it just some conservatism that we're building in there?

Yeah, you know, it's really a combination of all of that. I think that to the extent rates come down and stay stable, I mean, they've really been range-bound in this kind of low force for probably the better part of six months now. I think a lot of that maybe has flowed through to cap rates, but probably not all of that. Incremental competition, yeah, maybe there's some of that, but we haven't seen a lot of it. We hear about, you know, new entrants, but we haven't seen it, And we haven't seen it, you know, be all that impactful yet. But I think ultimately that could, you know, be a little bit of a catalyst, you know, towards that as well. So, yeah, and I think overall cost of capital, you know, across the sector is probably getting a little stronger, too. But, you know, we haven't seen a lot of it. I would say our year to date deals are still within our target range, maybe at the low end. But I would probably attribute most of that being that the bulk of what we've done year to date have been in Europe. And, you know, we can borrow, call it 100 basis points in euros inside of where we can borrow in dollars. So even if those cap rates are a little bit lower than what we've done historically, I think our spreads are still wider than where we've been. So it's shaping up. It's a good market. You know, we think that we're going to be quite active this year. And I think our spreads are probably going to be similar to what we did last year.

OK, great. Thank you.

You're welcome.

Thank you. And your next question comes from John Kim. with BMO Capital Markets. Please say your question.

Thank you. I wanted to ask about carry tenant solutions, which I think is just your branding for Build-A-Suit. Just wanted to make sure that was the case. But how do you protect yourself from development risks associated with these types of projects? And I think in the past you talked about a 25 to 50 basis point premium on Build-A-Suit versus acquisitions. Is that still the

right range to think about. Yeah, sure. Yeah, maybe it's helpful just to kind of spend a minute or so high level on carry tenant solutions. I mean, we've been quite active on what we call capital investment projects for some time. It's been in our disclosure and our sub for many years at this point in time, and it includes build the suits, expansions and redevelopments. We're good at these types of investments. We have a lot of experience on the team. And I've mentioned that I'd like to see us do more. And I think there's, you know, real potential for that. So, you know, part of our effort around this is to formalize it, you know, brand it, be a bit more holistic in our outreach to our tenants and more proactive in our approach overall. And, you know, I think that we can see some increased activity. I mentioned earlier that we historically have seen about $200 million of in-process capital projects. I think that can get bigger and become a more meaningful component of our annual deal volume. And look, it's also something that investors ask us about. I think there's been some more, you know, some other REITs that have made it more high profile and we've been asked about what our capabilities are. So, you know, that's kind of the thought process behind our recent launch of carry tenant solutions, you know, what we're calling it. You know, in terms of development risk, most of what we're doing here are build the suits and expansions. There are, you know, occasionally really high quality, very attractive redevelopment, and it's a real high bar for us to do that type of work. So it's going to be predominantly build-to-suits and expansions, and you can see that in our supplemental. That's what the disclosure is as well. So the development risk, typically you have very strong and large general contractors that provide fixed-price contracts. In many cases, on build-to-suits, we'll have guaranteed rent start dates built into the structures. So even if there's delays, We still get our rent. We'll also have a construction rent kind of built into the budget as well. So we effectively either earn or accrue interest, something for our cost of capital during the construction period. So like I said, we've done this for a really long time. We box the risks. We have a great team in place that one of the benefits of being as large as we are and having the scale is we can build out a dedicated in-house project management team. They have lots of experience, a lot of connections to local partners, and, you know, it's a real competitive advantage for us. I think you also asked about cap rate spread. Yeah, I would say on a build-a-suit, which is more of a market deal, it's probably in the, you know, 25 to 50 basis point premium. premium. And a lot of that will depend on the length of the build period and maybe the specifics of the deal with, you know, basis, you know, relative, you know, the construction costs relative to kind of a market, you know, market basis or where that puts you relative to market rents. I think on the other end of the spectrum are these expansions that we do for our tenants where, you know, this is truly proprietary deal flow to captive deal. You know, the tenant can either fund these expansions themselves on property that we own, or they can, you know, choose to maybe do something outside of what is likely a really, you know, critical core facility for them, or they can do a deal with us. And so we have, you know, some price and power, of course, you know, we're very mindful of our tenant relationships, and we want to make sure that, you know, there is, you know, kind of fairness in how we price it, but we'll typically see on those, you know, anywhere from 100 to, you know, 200 or 300 basis points of spread, depending on the specific project. And it's not just the premium that we benefit from in many cases on these expansions and kind of follow on deals that we do for tenants. We're also increasing the criticality of the real estate. We're lengthening lease terms. And when those are on master leases with other properties, there's a drag along effect with other properties as well. And also just deepening the tenant relationship through these type of transactions. And so, you know, all those are reasons why we want to lean into this more, you know, especially because we're quite good at it.

Great. Thank you. And then my second question is on your leverage. You talked about operating at a mid to high five times leverage. Is that where you think you get the premium multiple for your stock? I'm just wondering how you balance AFL growth versus having a cleaner balance sheet with more firepower.

Yeah, sure. I mean, look, there's no real changes to our leverage targets. It will continue to operate in the mid to high fives. We're very comfortable with that. But I think you're right. There is a certainly impact on equity multiple based on leverage. And I think over time, you know, I can see us drifting to the lower end of that range. I wouldn't say there's a specific timeline in that. And that should help the equity multiple. But right now, we're very comfortable within that, you know, mid to high fives range.

Great. Thank you. Thank you.

And your next question comes from Jason Wayne with Barclays.

please say your question.

Good afternoon. Just on the 60 million in dispositions year to date, I'm just wondering the cap rate there, and can you give some color on the cap rates that you're

assuming dispositions for the full year? Yeah, maybe I'll start, and if Brooks has any color he can add. For the full year, you know, our disposition guide is quite wide. As you know, So it includes, you know, a, sorry, another call come in. It includes kind of a, you know, a normal course dispositions, you know, example would be, you know, some held eggs, but it also includes a meaningful number of assets that we've talked about how we can sell opportunistically at very attractive pricing. These are what I would characterize as non-core, and we've referred to, you know, call it several hundred million dollars at those deals. So the average disposition cap rate for the year is very much going to depend on the mix of assets we choose to sell. And there are certainly scenarios that could put us in and around the execution we saw in 2025, especially if we factor in some vacant sales. So we'll dial that in as we execute and as the year continues. In terms of the $60 million, I mean, it's a small amount. It really probably depends on the exact assets we've disclosed. We tend not to go into that level of detail. I don't know, Brooks, if you have any commentary on Broadly, you know, if that's any indication for the rest of the year.

No, I think you've largely hit it. You know, we have closed a few transactions. The largest so far in Q1 was a warehouse property, formerly leased to the tenant Joanne, which vacated. We sold that at an extremely attractive price relative to the prior in-place rent.

I can share a specific cap rate, but highly accretive.

Got it. And then, yeah, just on the non-core deals that you've identified to go above the high end of the guidance range, can you just go into, you know, what's still available there?

What's still available there? Yeah, sure. I mean, it's a mixture, you know, of assets and, you know, maybe I'll just kind of rattle off a couple. These are just examples, of course. I mean, we do have a final property in Japan and, you know, given where rates are over there, those tend to sell tight. We have an operating student housing asset, a net lease hotel. And really, there's a number of assets that are lease to tenants who regularly approach us about repurchasing properties. Those tend to be at very aggressive pricing. I think that we can answer the phone on some of those if we feel a need to do it. And, of course, Brooks has mentioned the Joanne's deal, which, you know, is very attractive as a sub-six cap rate, you know, based on prior rent for a vacant asset. So, you know, good transaction there. But I think maybe the important note is we have lots of flexibility here. We mentioned earlier that we feel that we've pre-funded our equity needs for the year and to the extent, you know, we need to. If our deal volumes are higher than our initial guidance would suggest, you know, we can lean into some of these accretive asset sales. We can also consider equity as well. We've certainly had a nice run over the last 12 months, and equity is a lot more interesting, too. But there's a lot of flexibility. There's no immediate needs, though, based on our current deal volume guidance. It's fully funded.

Thank you. And your next question comes from Smades Rose with Citi. Please take your question.

I wanted to ask a little bit more about your acquisitions outlook for the year. I understand, you know, you said that you were coming into the year from a conservative standpoint. But just going back and looking at some of your commentary on your third quarter call, you know, you talked about having the infrastructure in place to support a similar pace of activity you were seeing in the back half of 25 and not seeing anything that would disrupt the pace of activity that you were seeing from a broader kind of macro perspective. And it seems like this is, you know, more than conservative. It seems like a very marked slowdown from what you're seeing, and especially in light of what you've already talked about in a year to date. So can you just kind of help me understand a little bit more, you know, conservative versus like is there something disruptive that's happening that's slowing down the overall pace and just trying to get a better sort of handle on that?

Yeah, no, there's nothing that we're seeing in the market right now that suggests there could be a slowdown. It's strong, it's constructive, stable interest rates. And look, we're confident in our ability to continue generating high deal volumes. And maybe we're back to what we did in 2025. I mean, if you look back to last year, maybe at the beginning of last year, we took a measured approach to how we view guidance. And that led to a series of increases throughout the year. And I think that's our preference going forward. So you can think about our initial guidance as a starting point, and our expectation is that as we progress through the year and get more visibility into the back half of the year, we'll refine that range and hopefully raise it as we did in 2025. But, you know, it's worth noting, and Tony mentioned this earlier, that even at the current midpoint of, you know, what I think could be characterized as conservative deal volume guidance, you know, we believe we can achieve AFO growth of over 4%. And that should be, you know, very attractive, you know, relative to, you know, many, you know, of our net lease peers. You know, I think also just look at, you know, where we've started the year. We're off to a good start, you know, a little over 300 million close already mentioned earlier that we have about 200 million dollars of capital projects that were delivered this year. And then a sizable near term pipeline, you know, that I would characterize as several hundred million dollars. So we're probably ahead of pace of our initial guidance. But again, you know, we don't have visibility into the back half of the year to necessarily extrapolate this initial pace out for the full year. So, you know, as we get more into the year, we'll continue to review it and hopefully be in a position to raise it.

Okay. And, you know, you talked a little bit more about, you know, you're leaning into more retail, lifetime fitness to your number three tenant. I'm just wondering if you could talk a little bit more about the profile of that tenant. I don't know if you can give kind of coverage levels. And I'm just asking because it seems like the fitness world, I don't know, can be subject to maybe a certain amount of kind of fickleness on the part of consumers and things come and go. I realize this is a popular asset class amongst the large, you know, net lease companies. But I'm just sort of wondering if you could talk a little bit about your comfort level of moving them to such a large position within the portfolio.

Yeah, sure. I think, first of all, this is not a new tenant for us. We've done deals with them in the past and had, and because of that, had good access to management during underwriting, both on the credit itself, but also into the specific assets. And we like Lifetime as a credit. They're one of, if not the strongest of the U.S. fitness operators. They're publicly traded, have a $6 to $7 billion equity market cap, have had a nice run since their IPO, and they've been bringing leverage down as well. So it's a good credit. We bought 10 facilities. These are all well-located and affluent, kind of highly desirable markets near dense retail. Very difficult to replicate these locations. I think our basis is very attractive, well below replacement costs. Low in place rents, and that's both for these locations, but also relative to the rents that Lifetime pays on other properties throughout the country. And we also have strong site-level coverage. I can't get into the details on the specifics for it, but it's quite strong in our understanding. It's better than the median within their portfolio. I think the other part about this deal is the seller is a group we know well and have transacted with before on other portfolio deals, and they were exiting a fund and looking to make distributions to their investors by year. And so that drove a quick close, and we think that dynamic contributed to the better-than-market economics. But overall, I think fitness is something that we've done some deals over the last couple of years, but clearly this is the largest one and we do like Lifetime. And look, I don't live in the suburbs. I live in the city. But if I did and I live near Lifetime Fitness, I'd be a member. I have a number of kids and these are a great model and it's a very unique model relative to many of the other fitness operators out there. These are more like country clubs with outdoor pools and water slides and restaurants and obviously, you know, very, you know, large and modern fitness facilities and workout rooms, etc.

Okay. Thank you. I appreciate that. Yep. You're welcome.

Your next question comes from Anthony Paolone with J.P. Morgan. Please see your question.

Thanks. Yeah, just first one on credit loss, the $10 to $15 million. If I go back to last year at this time, I think the number you gave incorporated a couple situations that maybe you wanted some room for, like true value perhaps, and maybe another one. So I'm just wondering if any of the $10 million to $15 million spoken for at this point, or if that's just kind of the number you're giving yourself cushion on.

Yeah, I think we're setting the range. Or Tony, go ahead. Sorry.

Go ahead, Tony.

Yeah, we're setting the range there really to capture a wide variety of scenarios there. I think there's nothing really specific in the portfolio at the moment. You know, we set this range last year and this year. Our objective is really early in the year taking a broad view so that we have no concerns around any AFO impact from rent disruption. And I think that, you know, again, similar to what Jason said on the investment side, our guidance is set at a level where we can achieve over 4% growth even with a range of rent loss at this level. So, again, nothing specific. It's probably the only uncertainty out there is in the macro environment. And it's something that, you know, we feel comfortable with at this stage of the game. But I think our goal here is to continue, you know, managing the portfolio, seeing the same limited level of disruption that we're seeing now and hopefully be able to reduce that and see some upside to our guidance.

Okay, thanks. And then second question is just on the balance sheet. You have two and a quarter percent euro bonds coming up. Where do those get refinanced today? and just any other details on how you're thinking about, you know, debt refinancing over the course

of the year. Yeah, sure. Maybe I'll start here. I don't know if there's anything to add, Tony. But yeah, the 26 maturities are very manageable. It's two bonds. It's one in each market, a euro bond, and then later in the year, U.S. dollar bond. I think the balance sheet's in great shape. We have access to, you know, multiple forms of debt and lots of flexibility right now, given our liquidity. So, you know, I think our guidance assumes that we replace each bond coming due with unsecured debt, probably in the same currency. I think that's what we will do. But, you know, we have lots of flexibility in terms of where things are pricing. You know, the 10-year euro bond is probably somewhere, you know, in the low, you know, 4% range in U.S. is maybe 100 basis points inside of that. You know, obviously, we'll think about, you know, which tenors we want to do and, you know, to the extent it's a little bit less than 10 years in Europe, which is maybe more than NERM. We'll pick up some basis points and get inside of 4% is my guess.

Okay. Thank you. Your next question comes from Jim Kammer with Evercore ISI. Please state your question.

Thank you. Good afternoon. Perhaps just an extension of that last topic. You obviously have done a very nice job, has benefited the company having a lot of Euro debt exposure. But could you remind me, where do you stand in terms of capacity in terms of, you know, about two-thirds of your overall debt. Can you do a lot more there, or how do you think about that going forward in terms of the overall debt composition?

Yeah, Tony, do you want to take that? Sure. Yeah, I'd say we still have room in our capital structure to issue incremental euro-denominated debt. You know, as Jason mentioned, we have a euro bond that's maturing this year as well, and a big part of our pipeline is denominated in euros. So, you know, we'll still have room beyond that. I'd say it still continues to create an effective hedge for us, both on the foreign currency side, and, you know, it's really we're benefiting from a lower cost borrowing there. So I think you'll continue to see us access those markets when the time makes sense for us. But overall, we do see that there's really no bright line at the moment. We have some room for additional capital there.

Okay, thank you. And then a different question. Obviously, you're not going all in on retail investing assets, But thinking about protecting your above-sector average escalator, weighted average escalator, can you get industrial-like escalators on C-stores in Europe or fitness centers in the U.S., et cetera? I'm just curious how that blend is incorporated into your numbers.

Yeah, certainly. I mean, in Europe, I would say that retail like industrial typically has inflation based increases. So so I think that we'll continue to get that whether we're doing industrial or retail. I think in the US, you're right. You know, we've always talked about this, that the bump structures in retail deals tend to be a little bit lower. I think that, you know, it's probably if we're doing industrial deals in the two and a half to three percent range, I would say that the retail deals are probably 50 to 100 basis points below that. But it depends on the deal. I mean, I think that that sale lease backs a lot of times you can, you know, kind of play with the different economics. And there's always tradeoffs between going in cap rates and what the bump structure is, which is why we're always quick to remind people that it's not just the going in cap rate. that matters. The cap rate plus the bump structure is important. And when we're investing in the mid-sevens, based on a going-in cap rate with bumps that are in the mid to high twos on average, that puts us to average yields in the nines, which I think is quite attractive. And there'll be a mix of retail in there, but we don't think it's going to be overall impactful.

Appreciate the comments. Thank you.

Thank you. And your next question comes from Michael Goldsmith. With UBS, please state your question.

Good afternoon. Thanks a lot for taking my questions. You talked about cap rates compressing this year to the mid to low 7% range versus 7.6% in 2025. So are there specific areas where you're not seeing that compression? And does that help drive your acquisition strategy? You're just trying to understand what the implications of this, of the cap rate compression is for your acquisition strategy.

Yeah, I mean, it's a good question, Michael. And, you know, we tend to target, you know, a diverse set of opportunities. The cap rate ranges tend to be quite wide depending on lots of factors. You know, certainly the bumps that I just mentioned on the prior question are a factor in that as well. Um, you know, I, I, I would say that the more commodity driven net lease is going to have the most compression. And I think that's going to be, you know, investment grade retail is an area that we've seen that, and it's not something that we target. I would say mostly for that reason, um, is that the, the, the, the cap rates and the bump structures are, are being driven down, you know, more and more there. Um, I think on the other side of that sale leasebacks, which is maybe our specialty and where a large part of our deal volume is generated from, we're able to maintain, I would say, cap rates that are closer to what we've done historically. I think there could be a little bit of compression there, but I think we'll have more pricing power around there, and I think you'll continue to see us have a bigger emphasis on sale-lease backs as a means to source new transactions.

Thanks for that, Jason. And then just as a follow-up, I guess I did a roughly 150 basic points spread between dispositions and acquisitions. Is that expected to be – is that sustainable this year? And just, you know, given what you're disposing, is that the right range to think about this? And then does that still make sense in a more competitive net lease environment?

Yeah, I mean, sure. I mentioned earlier that our dispo range is quite wide, and where we shake out on cap rates is going to depend on what that mix is of what we actually sell. And it's a combination of our normal course dispositions, which this year probably includes some Heldigs, among others. It's going to be some of these kind of accretive non-core assets that I listed off earlier. And we can probably factor in some vacant assets there as well, like the Joann's asset that I mentioned. So when you put all that together, we're probably in and around where we were last year. But again, it's really going to depend on the mix. I think where we started last year with spreads, we talked about that we think we can achieve at least 100 basis points, and then we dialed that up through the year. That's probably a reasonable starting point for this year. I think that cap rates could come down, but our equity price has gotten better to the extent we choose to fund deals with incremental deals above our investment volume with new equity. And I think there's also a number of assets we can lean into with very attractive pricing if we choose to fund incremental deals through asset sales. But we feel pretty comfortable we could be in the same or similar ballpark to where we were last year. And that certainly gives us a green light to keep on investing and driving earnings growth. Thank you very much. Good luck

in 2026. Yeah, thank you. Thank you. And before we take the next question, just a reminder to the audience if you'd like to ask a question press star then the number one on your telephone keypad if you would like to withdraw your question press the star then the number two our next question comes from ryan caviola with green street advisors please state your question

definitely everyone uh there were four vacant warehouse sales in the fourth quarter and it sounds like there's a fifth after the quarter end could you just walk us through the decision on re-tenanting versus disposing of those properties? Were re-tenanting opportunities not there, or is the choice to sell just opportunistic? Thanks.

Brooks, do you want to take that? Sure. Yeah, we look at vacancy just like we would any new investment. You know, we want to understand what are the forward-looking risk-adjusted returns that we can underwrite to. Where those returns are sufficient and attractive on a risk-adjusted basis, we will aggressively lease properties up But when available disposition opportunities, you know, make those forward-looking returns insufficient, we won't hesitate to sell and do so quite quickly. So that's really the exercise we pursue. And so something like a Joanne where an owner-occupier needed to own it and could pay a large premium, you know, that's a very easy decision for us on a sale. But, you know, elsewhere, we won't hesitate to release properties, you know, where we see a direct path to leasing velocity and an ability to underwrite those forward-looking returns.

Thanks. Appreciate that. And then it was outshined by the lifetime purchase, but there was the healthcare acquisition with New Era for $140 million during the quarter. And I also noticed there's an expansion on the capital commitments with the same tenant. I just wanted to see if you could share color on the relationship there and if health care is a venue you view as attractive going into 2026.

Yeah, sure. Yeah, I mean, we're always looking to expand our opportunity set in health care as an area we've been tracking for a while. And we do have some in-house expertise as well. It's a competitive space, but we do think that there's probably opportunity to add some deal volume there over time. And it's a diverse sector, lots of segments. I think broadly, it continues to outperform. The real estate outperforms, and that's probably supported by long-term dynamics of a growing and aging population. So, you know, I think that what we target in healthcare, we still want to make sure it fits within our existing net lease framework. It's going to be single tenant. It's going to be long term leases, typically absolute net. We're going to focus on strong site level coverage. And of course, we're going to want to partner with, you know, reputable operators and credit worthy tenants. So, yeah. So, you know, example of what we're targeting is what we recently closed. And those are in the inpatient rehab facility space. I think to be clear, we're not looking at acute care hospitals just when I talk about health care more generally. But on the new era deals, there's one of us we did earlier in the year called Earnest Health as well, which is a large IRF operator at the same time. These were all kind of somewhat recently developed. They're well-located, attractive basis, as I mentioned earlier, strong site-level coverage, and they're good operators. So I think that the IRF model is one that we like, and I think we could do hopefully more of those. And you're right, one of them did come with an expansion. One of the properties is performing quite well with a lot of demand, and so that's an easy thing to do if you have the land to expand these properties and get the kind of the operating leverage with additional rooms.

Got it. Appreciate the commentary.

Thank you. And at this time, I'm not showing any further questions. I'll now have a call back to Mr. Sands.

Great. Thank you, everyone, for your interest in WP Carey. If anyone has additional questions, please call Investor Relations directly on 212-492-1110. And that concludes today's call. You may now disconnect.